Search

Proteolysis is a key event in several biological processes; proteolysis must be tightly controlled because its improper activation leads to dramatic consequences. Deregulation of proteolytic activity characterizes many pathological conditions, including cancer. The plasminogen activation (PA) system plays a key role in cancer; it includes the serine-protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). uPA binds to a specific cellular receptor (uPAR), which concentrates proteolytic activity at the cell surface, thus supporting cell migration. However, a large body of evidence clearly showed uPAR involvement in the biology of cancer cell independently of the proteolytic activity of its ligand. In this review we will first describe this multifunctional molecule and then we will discuss how uPAR can sustain most of cancer hallmarks, which represent the biological capabilities acquired during the multistep cancer development. Finally, we will illustrate the main data available in the literature on uPAR as a cancer biomarker and a molecular target in anti-cancer therapy.

The urokinase (uPA) receptor (uPAR) plays a key role in cell migration. We previously showed that uPAR-negative HEK-293 cells efficiently migrate toward serum but, after uPAR ectopic expression, migrate only in a uPAR-dependent manner. In fact, migration of uPAR-transfected HEK-293 (uPAR-293) cells is impaired by anti-uPAR antibodies, without recovery of the uPAR-independent migration mechanisms formerly active. Prostate carcinoma PC3 cells, which express high endogenous uPAR levels, migrated only through a uPAR-dependent mechanism, in fact, the silencing of uPAR expression inhibited their migration. We hypothesize a crucial role of the uPAR glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) tail, which promotes uPAR partitioning to lipid rafts, in uPAR-controlled cell migration. Here, we show that removal of the uPAR GPI-tail, or lipid rafts disruption by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin impairs migration of PC3 cells, incapable of uPAR-independent migration, whereas it restores uPAR-independent migration in uPAR-293 cells. We then show that, in PC3 cells, both uPAR signaling partners, &beta, 1 integrins and receptors for formylated peptides (FPRs), partly associate with lipid rafts. Inhibition of their interaction with uPAR impairs this association and impairs cell migration. Interestingly, blocking uPAR association with FPRs also impairs &beta, 1 integrin partitioning to lipid rafts, whereas blocking its association with &beta, 1 integrins has no effect on FPRs partitioning. On these bases, we propose that uPAR controls cell migration by connecting &beta, 1 integrins and FPRs and, through its GPI tail, by driving them into lipid rafts, thus promoting pro-migratory signals. uPAR-mediated partitioning of integrins to lipid rafts is strictly dependent on uPAR association with FPRs.

Besides focusing urokinase (uPA) proteolytic activity on the cell membrane, the uPA receptor (uPAR) is able to bind vitronectin, via a direct binding site. Furthermore, uPAR interacts with other cell surface receptors, such as integrins, receptor tyrosine kinases, and chemotaxis receptors, triggering cell-signaling pathways that promote tumor progression. The ability of uPAR to coordinate binding and degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell signaling makes it an attractive therapeutic target in cancer. We used structure-based virtual screening (SB-VS) to search for small molecules targeting the uPAR-binding site for vitronectin. Forty-one compounds were identified and tested on uPAR-negative HEK-293 epithelial cells transfected with uPAR (uPAR-293 cells), using the parental cell line transfected with the empty vector (V-293 cells) as a control. Compounds 6 and 37 selectively inhibited uPAR-293 cell adhesion to vitronectin and the resulting changes in cell morphology and signal transduction, without exerting any effect on V-293 cells. Compounds 6 and 37 inhibited uPAR-293 cell binding to vitronectin with IC50 values of 3.6 and 1.2 μmol/L, respectively. Compounds 6 and 37 targeted S88 and R91, key residues for uPAR binding to vitronectin but also for uPAR interaction with the fMLF family of chemotaxis receptors (fMLF-Rs). As a consequence, compounds 6 and 37 impaired uPAR-293 cell migration toward fetal calf serum (FCS), uPA, and fMLF, likely by inhibiting the interaction between uPAR and FPR1, the high affinity fMLF-R. Both compounds blocked in vitro ECM invasion of several cancer cell types, thus representing new promising leads for pharmaceuticals in cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(8); 1402–16. ©2013 AACR.

Phosphoprotein enriched in diabetes/phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes-15 kD (PED/PEA-15) is an anti-apoptotic protein whose expression is increased in several human cancers. In addition to apoptosis, PED/PEA-15 is involved in the regulation of other major cellular functions, including cell adhesion, migration, proliferation and glucose metabolism. To further understand the functions of this protein, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screening using PED/PEA-15 as a bait and identified the 67 kD high-affinity laminin receptor (67LR) as an interacting partner. 67 kD laminin receptor is a non-integrin cell-surface receptor for the extracellular matrix (ECM), derived from the dimerization of a 37 kD cytosolic precursor (37LRP). The 67LR is highly expressed in human cancers and widely recognized as a molecular marker of metastatic aggressiveness. The molecular interaction of PED/PEA-15 with 67LR was confirmed by pull-down experiments with recombinant His-tagged 37LRP on lysates of PED/PEA-15 transfected HEK-293 cells. Further, overexpressed or endogenous PED/PEA-15 was co-immunoprecipitated with 67LR in PED/PEA-15-transfected HEK-293 cells and in U-373 glioblastoma cells, respectively. PED/PEA-15 overexpression significantly increased 67LR-mediated HEK-293 cell adhesion and migration to laminin that, in turn, determined PED/PEA-15 phosphorylation both in Ser-104 and Ser-116, thus enabling cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis. PED/PEA-15 ability to induce cell responses to ECM-derived signals through interaction with 67LR may be of crucial importance for tumour cell survival in a poor microenvironment, thus favouring the metastatic spread and colonization.

PED (phosphoprotein enriched in diabetes) is a death-effector domain (DED) family member with a broad anti-apoptotic action. PED inhibits the assembly of the death-inducing signalling complex (DISC) of death receptors following stimulation. Recently, we reported that the expression of PED is increased in breast cancer cells and determines the refractoriness of these cells to anticancer therapy. In the present study, we focused on the role of PED in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a tumour frequently characterized by evasion of apoptosis and drug resistance. Immunohistochemical analysis of a tissue microarray, containing 160 lung cancer samples, indicated that PED was strongly expressed in different lung tumour types. Western blotting performed with specimens from NSCLC-affected patients showed that PED was strongly up-regulated (>6 fold) in the areas of tumour compared to adjacent normal tissue. Furthermore, PED expression levels in NSCLC cell lines correlated with their resistance to tumour necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced cell death. The involvement of PED in the refractoriness to TRAIL-induced cell death was investigated by silencing PED expression in TRAIL-resistant NSCLC cells with small interfering (si) RNAs: transfection with PED siRNA, but not with cFLIP siRNA, sensitized cells to TRAIL-induced cell death. In conclusion, PED is specifically overexpressed in lung tumour tissue and contributes to TRAIL resistance.

The clinical relevance of the urokinase receptor (uPAR) as a prognostic marker in ovarian cancer is well documented. We had shown that the uPAR sequence corresponding to 84-95 residues, linking D1 and D2 domains (uPAR(84-95)), drives cell migration and angiogenesis in a protease-independent manner. This study was aimed at defining the contribution of uPAR(84-95) sequence to invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Now, we provide evidence that the ability of uPAR-expressing ovarian cancer cells to cross extra-cellular matrix and mesothelial monolayers is prevented by specific inhibitors of the uPAR(84-95) sequence. To specifically investigate uPAR(84-95) function, uPAR-negative CHO-K1 cells were stably transfected with cDNAs coding for uPAR D2 and D3 regions exposing (uPARD2D3) or lacking (uPAR Delta D2D3) the 84-95 sequence. CHO-K1/D2D3 cells were able to cross matrigel, mesothelial and endothelial monolayers more efficiently than CHO-K1/Delta D2D3 cells, which behave as CHO-K1 control cells. When orthotopically implanted in nude mice, tumor nodules generated by CHO-K1/D2D3 cells spreading to peritoneal cavity were more numerous as compared to CHO-K1/Delta D2D3 cells. Ovarian tumor size and intra-tumoral microvessel density were significantly reduced in the absence of uPAR(84-95). Our results indicate that cell associated uPAR promotes growth and abdominal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells mainly through its uPAR84-95 sequence.

The receptor (uPAR) of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is crucial in cell migration since it concentrates uPA proteolytic activity at the cell surface, binds vitronectin and associates to integrins. uPAR cross-talk with receptors for the formylated peptide fMLF (fMLF-Rs) has been reported; however, cell-surface uPAR association to fMLF-Rs on the cell membrane has never been explored in detail. We now show that uPAR co-localizes at the cell-surface and co-immunoprecipitates with the high-affinity fMLF-R, FPR1, in uPAR-transfected HEK-293 (uPAR-293) cells. uPAR/β1 integrin and FPR1/β1 integrin co-localization was also observed. Serum or the WKYMVm peptide (W Pep), a FPR1 ligand, strongly increased all observed co-localizations in uPAR-293 cells, including FPR1/β1 integrin co-localization. By contrast, a low FPR1/β1 integrin co-localization was observed in uPAR-negative vector-transfected HEK-293 (V-293) cells, that was not increased by serum or W Pep stimulations. The role of uPAR interactions in cell migration was then explored. Both uPAR-293 and V-293 control cells efficiently migrated toward serum or purified EGF. However, cell treatments impairing uPAR interactions with fMLF-Rs or integrins, or inhibiting specific cell-signaling mediators abrogated uPAR-293 cell migration, without exerting any effect on V-293 control cells. Accordingly, uPAR depletion by a uPAR-targeting siRNA or uPAR blocking with an anti-uPAR polyclonal antibody in cells constitutively expressing high uPAR levels totally impaired their migration toward serum. Altogether, these results suggest that both uPAR-positive and uPAR-negative cells are able to migrate toward serum; however, uPAR expression renders cell migration totally and irreversibly uPAR-dependent, since it is completely inhibited by uPAR blocking. We propose that uPAR takes control of cell migration by recruiting fMLF-Rs and β1 integrins, thus promoting their co-localization at the cell-surface and driving pro-migratory signaling pathways.

Cell division cycle 25 (Cdc25) proteins are highly conserved dual specificity phosphatases that regulate cyclin-dependent kinases and represent attractive drug targets for anticancer therapies. To discover more potent and diverse inhibitors of Cdc25 biological activity, virtual screening was performed by docking 2.1 million compounds into the Cdc25B active site. An initial subset of top-ranked compounds was selected and assayed, and 15 were found to have enzyme inhibition activity at micromolar concentration. Among these, four structurally diverse inhibitors with a different inhibition profile were found to inhibit human MCF-7, PC-3, and K562 cancer cell proliferation and significantly affect the cell cycle progression. A subsequent hierarchical similarity search with the most active reversible Cdc25B inhibitor found led to the identification of an additional set of 19 ligands, three of which were confirmed as Cdc25B inhibitors with IC(50) values of 7.9, 4.2, and 9.9 μM, respectively.

The receptor (CXCR4) for the stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF1) and the urokinase-receptor (uPAR) are up-regulated in various tumors. We show that CXCR4-transfected cells migrate toward SDF1 on collagen (CG) and do not on vitronectin (VN). Co-expression of cell-surface uPAR, which is a VN receptor, impairs SDF1-induced migration on CG and allows migration on VN. Blocking fMLP receptors (fMLP-R), alpha-v integrins or the uPAR region capable to interact with fMLP-Rs, impairs migration of uPAR/CXCR4-transfected cells on VN and restores their migration on CG. uPAR co-expression also reduces the adherence of CXCR4-expressing cells to various components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and influences the partitioning of beta1 and alpha-v integrins to membrane lipid-rafts, affecting ECM-dependent signaling. uPAR interference in CXCR4 activity has been confirmed in cells from prostate carcinoma. Our results demonstrate that uPAR expression regulates the adhesive and migratory ability of CXCR4-expressing cells through a mechanism involving fMLP receptors and alpha-v integrins.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by excessive fibrosis throughout the body. There are two major subsets of SSc, diffuse cutaneous Systemic sclerosis (dSSc) and limited cutaneous Systemic sclerosis (ISSc). Fibroblasts play a key role in SSc. The expression and function of the urokinase (uPA)-mediated plasminogen activation (PA) system, a well-characterized system of serine-proteases involved in several pathological processes, has been investigated in SSc fibroblasts. The expression of the components of the PA system, including uPA, its type-1 and type-2 inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2) and its receptor (uPAR), was examined by Western blot in fibroblasts from patients affected by limited and diffuse forms of SSc. uPA and PAI-1 secretion increased only in fibroblasts from ISSc lesions compared to normal fibroblasts. PAI-2 levels were decreased in fibroblasts from both SSc forms. Interestingly, fibroblasts from areas not adjacent to the lesions (not-affected) of the diffuse form showed reduced levels of PAI-1 and increased uPAR expression. Adhesion experiments showed reduced adherence to VN of fibroblasts from ISSc lesions and from non-affected areas of the diffuse form, as compared to normal controls. These results suggest a role for uPA and PAI-1 in the ISSc form, likely related to the activation of latent forms of cytokines and to the accumulation of ECM components, whereas a role for uPAR can be hypothesized in the evolvement of the diffuse form, based on its up-regulation in the non-affected areas.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a GPI-anchored cell-surface receptor involved in many physiological and pathological events that include cell migration and tissue invasion. uPAR traditional role was considered the focusing of uPA proteolytic activity on the cell surface; however, different uPAR activities have been demonstrated in the last years. In fact, cell surface uPAR functionally interacts with integrins, fMLP-receptors (fMLP-Rs) and growth factor receptors, thus regulating cell adhesion, migration and proliferation. uPAR also exists in a soluble form (suPAR) that has been detected in human body fluids. Both cell surface and suPAR can be proteolytically cleaved, thus generating truncated forms lacking the N-terminal domain and exposing the specific sequence able to interact with the fMLP-Rs. The cleaved form of suPAR binds and activates the fMLP-Rs and regulates the activity of MCP-1, RANTES and SDF1 receptors. Here, we review the role that shedding and cleavage could play in regulating uPAR structural/functional interaction with other cell-surface receptors and in uPAR-mediated biological and pathological processes.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a cell-surface receptor involved in cell adhesion and migration. uPAR binds urokinase (uPA) and vitronectin (VN) and interacts with integrins and chemotaxis receptors. Soluble forms of uPAR (suPAR) have been detected in human plasma and urine. A cleaved form of suPAR (c-suPAR), lacking the N-terminal domain and exposing the sequence SRSRY (aa 88–92), stimulates cell migration by activating fMLP receptors. We recently demonstrated uPAR involvement in G-CSF-induced CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization. We also demonstrated that c-suPAR could induce mobilization of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in mice. Since HSC mobilization and homing to bone marrow (BM) are mirror image processes which utilize the same mediators and similar signaling pathways, we investigated whether uPAR and its ligands could play a role in regulating CD34+ HSC interactions with the BM stroma, thus also contributing to HSC homing and engraftment to the BM. We found expression of uPA and VN in cultures of human BM stroma cells. Interestingly, stroma cells also produced suPAR and high amounts of c-suPAR, exposing the chemotactic SRSRY sequence. The role of the different soluble forms of uPAR produced by stroma cells in regulating HSC interactions with the BM microenvironment was analyzed by long term cultures (LTC) of BM and G-CSF mobilized CD34+ HSCs, in the presence of suPAR or the uPAR-derived uPAR84–95 peptide, corresponding to the active site of c-suPAR. Both suPAR and the uPAR84–95 peptide increased the number of adherent and released clonogenic progenitors from LTC of BM and G-CSF mobilized HSCs. To elucidate the mechanism of suPAR and c-suPAR effects on CD34+ HSC interactions with the stromal microenvironment, in vitro adhesion and proliferation assays were performed on CD34+ KG1 cells. suPAR treatment determined a significant increase in CD34+ KG1 cell adhesion whereas c-suPAR increased cell proliferation. Taken together, our results indicate that BM stroma produces soluble forms of uPAR that regulate CD34+ HSC interactions with BM microenvironment, their local proliferation and trafficking from and to BM.

Cleaved forms of soluble urokinase receptor (c-suPAR) have been detected in body fluids from patients affected by various tumors. We recently reported increased c-suPAR levels in sera of healthy donors during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–induced mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). In vitro, c-suPAR or its derived chemotactic peptide (uPAR84-95) stimulated migration of human CD34+ HSCs and inactivated CXCR4, the chemokine receptor primarily responsible for HSC retention in bone marrow. These results suggested that c-suPAR could potentially contribute to regulate HSC trafficking from and to bone marrow. Therefore, we investigated uPAR84-95 effects on mobilization of mouse CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSC/HPC). We first showed that uPAR84-95 stimulated in vitro dose-dependent migration of mouse CD34+ M1 leukemia cells and inactivated murine CXCR4. uPAR84-95 capability to induce mouse HSC/HPC release from bone marrow and migration into the circulation was then investigated in vivo. uPAR84-95 i.p. administration induced rapid leukocytosis, which was associated with an increase in peripheral blood CD34+ HSCs/HPCs. In vitro colony assays confirmed that uPAR84-95 mobilized hematopoietic progenitors, showing an absolute increase in circulating colony-forming cells. uPAR84-95 mobilizing activity was comparable to that of G-CSF; however, neither synergistic nor additive effect was observed in combining the two molecules. These findings show for the first time in vivo biological effects of c-suPAR. Its capability to mobilize HSCs suggests potential clinical applications in HSC transplantation. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(22): 10885-90)

Angiogenesis is a multistep complex phenomenon critical for several inflammatory and neoplastic disorders. Basophils, normally confined to peripheral blood, can infiltrate the sites of chronic inflammation. In an attempt to obtain insights into the mechanism(s) underlying human basophil chemotaxis and its role in inflammation, we have characterized the expression and function of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their receptors in these cells. Basophils express mRNA for three isoforms of VEGF-A (121, 165, and 189) and two isoforms of VEGF-B (167 and 186). Peripheral blood and basophils in nasal polyps contain VEGF-A localized in secretory granules. The concentration of VEGF-A in basophils was 144.4 ± 10.8 pg/106 cells. Immunologic activation of basophils induced the release of VEGF-A. VEGF-A (10–500 ng/ml) induced basophil chemotaxis. Supernatants of activated basophils induced an angiogenic response in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane that was inhibited by an anti-VEGF-A Ab. The tyrosine kinase VEGFR-2 (VEGFR-2/KDR) mRNA was expressed in basophils. These cells also expressed mRNA for the soluble form of VEGFR-1 and neuropilin (NRP)1 and NRP2. Flow cytometric analysis indicated that basophils express epitopes recognized by mAbs against the extracellular domains of VEGFR-2, NRP1, and NRP2. Our data suggest that basophils could play a role in angiogenesis and inflammation through the expression of several forms of VEGF and their receptors.

Basophils circulate in the blood and are able to migrate into tissues at sites of inflammation. Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) binds a specific high affinity surface receptor (uPAR). The uPA-uPAR system is crucial for cell adhesion and migration, and tissue repair. We have investigated the presence and function of the uPA-uPAR system in human basophils. The expression of uPAR was found at both mRNA and protein levels. The receptor was expressed on the cell surface of basophils, in the intact and cleaved forms. Basophils did not express uPA at either the protein or mRNA level. uPA (10−12–10−9 M) and its uPAR-binding N-terminal fragment (ATF) were potent chemoattractants for basophils, but did not induce histamine or cytokine release. Inactivation of uPA enzymatic activity by di-isopropyl fluorophosphate did not affect its chemotactic activity. A polyclonal Ab against uPAR inhibited uPA-dependent basophil chemotaxis. The uPAR-derived peptide 84–95 (uPAR84–95) induced basophil chemotaxis. Basophils expressed mRNA for the formyl peptide receptors formyl peptide receptor (FPR), FPR-like 1 (FPRL1), and FPRL2. The FPR antagonist cyclosporin H prevented chemotaxis induced by FMLP, but not that induced by uPA and uPAR84–95. Incubation of basophils with low and high concentrations of FMLP, which desensitize FPR and FPRL1, respectively, but not FPRL2, slightly reduced the chemotactic response to uPA and uPAR84–95. In contrast, desensitization with WKYMVm, which also binds FPRL2, markedly inhibited the response to both molecules. Thus, uPA is a potent chemoattractant for basophils that seems to act through exposure of the chemotactic uPAR epitope uPAR84–95, which is an endogenous ligand for FPRL2 and FPRL1.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its cellular receptor (uPAR) are involved in the proteolytic cascade required for tumor cell dissemination and metastasis, and are highly expressed in many human tumors. We have recently reported that uPA, independently of its enzymatic activity, is able to increase the expression of its own receptor in uPAR-transfected kidney cells at a posttranscriptional level. In fact, uPA, upon binding uPAR, modulates the activity and/or the level of a mRNA-stabilizing factor that binds the coding region of uPAR-mRNA. We now investigate the relevance of uPA-mediated posttranscriptional regulation of uPAR expression in non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), in which the up-regulation of uPAR expression is a prognostic marker. We show that uPA is able to increase uPAR expression, both at protein and mRNA levels, in primary cell cultures obtained from tumor and adjacent normal lung tissues of patients affected by NSCLC, thus suggesting that the enzyme can exert its effect in lung cells. We investigated the relationship among the levels of uPA, uPAR and uPAR-mRNA binding protein(s) in NSCLC. Lung tissue analysis of 35 NSCLC patients shows an increase of both uPA and uPAR in tumor tissues, as compared to adjacent normal tissues, in 27 patients (77%); 19 of these 27 patients also show a parallel increase of the level and/or binding activity of a cellular protein capable of binding the coding region of uPAR-mRNA. Therefore, in tumor tissues, a strong correlation is observed among these 3 parameters, uPA, uPAR and the level and/or the activity of a uPAR-mRNA binding protein. We then suggest that uPA regulates uPAR expression in NSCLC at a posttranscriptional level by increasing uPAR-stability through a cellular factor that binds the coding region of uPAR-mRNA.

The urokinase-mediated plasminogen activation (PA) system has been shown to play a key role in cell migration and tissue invasion by regulating both cell-associated proteolysis and cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. The expression and activity of the components of this complex system are strictly regulated. The control of the expression occurs both at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. This review is focused on the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression of all components of the PA system.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is able to cleave its cell surface receptor (uPAR) anchored to the cell membrane through a glycophosphatidylinositol tail. The cleavage leads to the formation of cell surface truncated forms, devoid of the N-terminal domain 1 (D1) and unmasks or disrupts, depending on the cleavage site, a sequence in the D1-D2 linker region (residues 88-92), which in the soluble form is a potent chemoattractant for monocyte-like cells. To investigate the possible role(s) of the cleaved forms of cell surface glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR, uPAR-negative human embrional kidney 293 cells were transfected with the cDNA of intact uPAR (uPAR-293) or with cDNAs corresponding to the truncated forms of uPAR exposing (D2D3-293) or lacking (D2D3wc-293) the peptide 88-92 (P88-92). Cell adhesion assays and co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the removal of D1, independently of the presence of P88-92, abolished the lateral interaction of uPAR with integrins and its capability to regulate integrin adhesive functions. The expression of intact uPAR induced also a moderate increase in 293 cell proliferation, which was accompanied by the activation of ERK. Also this effect was abolished by D1 removal, independently of the presence of P88-92. The expression of intact and truncated uPARs regulated cell directional migration toward uPA, the specific uPAR ligand, and toward fMLP, a bacterial chemotactic peptide. In fact, the uPA-dependent cell migration required the expression of intact uPAR, including D1, whereas the fMLP-dependent cell migration required the expression of a P88-92 containing uPAR and was independent of the presence of D1. Together these observations indicate that uPA-mediated uPAR cleavage and D1 removal, occurring on the cell surface of several cell types, can play a fundamental role in the regulation of multiple uPAR functions.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPA-R can regulate integrin functions by associating with several types of beta-subunit. We have recently shown that normal thyroid TAD-2 cells express both a native and a cleaved form of uPA-R which lacks the binding domain for uPA. We found this cleaved form to be present in reduced amounts in papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma cells and completely absent in cells derived from an anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ARO). We now report that in normal thyroid cells the intact form of uPA-R strongly associates with beta-1 integrins, whereas its cleaved form does not. uPA-R expressed by ARO cells shows a stronger resistance to the cleavage mediated by uPA, plasmin and chymotrypsin than does uPA-R expressed by normal thyroid cells. This resistance to cleavage correlates with the higher level of glycosylation of uPA-R of ARO cells as compared to that of cleavable uPA-R of normal thyroid cells. These results suggest that uPA-R cleavage, which occurs in several cell types, represents a mechanism regulating the interactions of uPA-R with integrins and, possibly, the subsequent integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Moreover we hypothesize that glycosylation regulates uPA-R cleavage and, indirectly, its interaction with integrins.

The monocyte-like THP-1 cells express on their surface the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R). This receptor, chemically cross-linked to its possible ligands, migrates, in SDS PAGE, slower than the uPA-R expressed on the epithelial thyroid cell line TAD-2, cross-linked to the same ligands. The different migration corresponds to a difference in molecular weight of 15 kDa. Similar results were obtained with peripheral monocytes and primary cultures of thyroid cells. The molecular weight of the native receptor is about 50 kDa and appears to be identical in these two cell types. Such results suggest that, in monocytic cells, uPA-R associates to a 15 kDa molecule. This molecule is probably linked to the cell surface by a glyco-phospho-inositol anchor since, by phospholipase-C treatment, it is co-eluted with the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor from THP-1 cells.

We studied the relationship between differentiation, transformation, and uPA production in a system of rat thyroid cells in vitro . The fully differentiated FRTL 5 cells did not produce detectable amounts of uPA, even after stimulation with phorbol esters, potent inducers of uPA expression. All the other cell lines (i.e., FRT, cells which have lost the characteristics of the differentiated thyroid cells; 1–5G and FRA, transformed cells derived from rat thyroid tumors) produced uPA, the 1–5G line being the highest producer. Also the FRTL line became positive for uPA production after viral transformation (clone KM4). The lack of uPA expression in FRTL 5 cells was not due to the presence of inhibitors and these cells did not produce an inactive molecule, as shown by immunoprecipitation with anti-uPA antibody. However, in FRTL 5 cells Northern analysis showed the presence of a small amount of uPA-specific mRNA that increased appreciably after phorbol ester stimulation. In conclusion, in our system uPA expression was a property of undifferentiated and transformed cells; in fully differentiated cells uPA expression was switched off by a still unclear mechanism.