Search

Lipoprotein(a) has long been regarded as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, its routine use in clinical practice has been hampered by difficulties inherent in the measurement of this complex lipoprotein. The major challenges relate to its size heterogeneity and related issues including (1) use of appropriate calibrators (2) standardization of calibration protocols (3) traceability and (4) reporting units. In the UK, results from the current EQA schemes for lipoprotein(a) suggest that there is considerable work required to standardize lipoprotein(a) measurement. This is becoming increasingly pertinent with the increasing recognition of lipoprotein(a) as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in international guidelines and the emergence of novel antisense therapies to effectively reduce lipoprotein(a). This article raises awareness of the importance of measurement of lipoprotein(a) for the assessment of cardiovascular disease risk and gives guidance to clinical laboratories regarding choice of appropriate assays.

Serum total testosterone (tT)9 includes both free testosterone (fT) (0.5%–3% of total and believed to be the biologically active form) and sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG)- and albumin-bound forms (1). Guidelines for diagnosing and treating male hypogonadism that emphasize measurement of tT (2) may not address the major variations in SHBG and consequent testosterone bioavailability (testosterone bioavailability [BT] either calculated or assayed directly) that are associated with age, obesity, anticonvulsant therapy, and thyroid and liver disease. For these reasons, recent Endocrine Society of Australia guidelines (3) acknowledge the value of measuring SHBG as well as BT, but nevertheless state that, “There is no evidence that free or bioavailable testosterone levels, which are usually not directly measured but calculated…are a better measure of androgen status than total testosterone level. Moreover, reference intervals for these [BT levels] are even less well defined than those for measured testosterone concentrations. Therefore, they [BT levels] are not recommended for clinical decision-making.” Although commercially available direct fT assays are not always robust, calculated fT (c-fT) values from a mass-action …

The physical association of hepatitis C virus (HCV) particles with lipoproteins in plasma results in distribution of HCV in a broad range of buoyant densities. This association is thought to increase virion infectivity by mediating cell entry via lipoprotein receptors. We sought to determine if factors that affect triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) metabolism alter the density and dynamics of HCV particles in the plasma of patients with chronic HCV infection.Fasting patients (n = 10) consumed a high-fat milkshake; plasma was collected and fractionated by density gradients. HCV- RNA was measured in the very-low-density fraction (VLDF, d1.025 g/mL) before and at 7 serial time points postprandially.The amount of HCV RNA in the VLDF (HCV(VLDF)) increased a mean of 26-fold, peaking 180 minutes after the meal (P.01). Quantification of HCV RNA throughout the density gradient fractions revealed that HCV(VLDF) rapidly disappeared, rather than migrating into the adjacent density fraction. Immuno-affinity separation of the VLDF, using antibodies that recognize apolipoprotein B-100 and not apolipoprotein B-48, showed that HCV(VLDF) is composed of chylomicron- and VLDL-associated HCV particles; peaking 120 and 180 minutes after the meal, respectively. Plasma from fasting HCV-infected patients mixed with uninfected plasma increased the quantity of HCV(VLDF), compared with that mixed with phosphate-buffered saline, showing extracellular assembly of HCV(VLDF).Dietary triglyceride alters the density and dynamics of HCV in plasma. The rapid clearance rate of HCV(VLDF) indicates that association with TRL is important for HCV infectivity. HCV particles, such as exchangeable apolipoproteins, appear to reassociate with TRLs in the vascular compartment.

Background: We measured plasma PCSK9 concentrations in healthy men with a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) loss-of-function variant (p.R46L), in statin-treated patients with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and carrying a PCSK9 gain-of-function mutation (p.D374Y), and in statin-treated patients with FH due to different genetic causes. Methods: PCSK9 was measured with a previously described ELISA. Results: In 81 healthy middle-aged Caucasian men, the PCSK9 concentration was significantly associated with the concentrations of total cholesterol (r = 0.42; P < 0.0001), LDL cholesterol (r = 0.34; P = 0.01), and triglycerides (r = 0.25; P = 0.02). In p.R46L carriers, mean (SD) concentrations of PCSK9 were 15% lower than in RR individuals [65.5 μg/L (21.6 μg/L) vs 77.5 μg/L (18.2 μg/L); P = 0.03]. In patients with the p.D374Y variant (n = 7), the mean PCSK9 concentration was significantly lower than in the combined group of patients with an LDLR (low density lipoprotein receptor) mutation (n = 25), an APOB [apolipoprotein B (including Ag(x) antigen)] variant encoding p.R3527Q (n = 6), or no detectable mutation (n = 14) [96.4 μg/L (42.5 μg/L) vs 151.6 μg/L (69.6 μg/L); P = 0.02]. Two of the 14 patients with no mutation had PCSK9 concentrations below the mean for p.D374Y carriers; sequencing of the PCSK9 gene and promoter revealed no mutations. Among 409 FH patients, we identified 6 carriers of the promoter variant −287G>A (1.5%), a frequency similar to that (1.0%) previously reported for 2772 healthy men in the UK. In neither group was the −287G>A variant associated with differences in lipid traits. Conclusions: The loss-of-function p.R46L variant is associated with the expected lower concentrations of circulating PCSK9; the gain-of-function p.D374Y mutation is also associated with lower concentrations, presumably because of the higher affinity of this variant for the LDL receptor and its more rapid clearance. In treated FH patients, a low plasma PCSK9 concentration does not appear to be a useful screening tool for identifying novel PCSK9 mutations.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common single gene disorder, which predisposes to coronary artery disease. In a previous study, we have shown that in patients with definite FH around 20% had no identifiable gene defect after screening the entire exon coding area of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and testing for the common Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) R3500Q mutation. In this study, we have extended the screen to additional families and have included the non-coding intron splice regions of the gene. In families with definite FH (tendon xanthoma present, n=68) the improved genetic screening protocol increased the detection rate of mutations to 87%. This high detection rate greatly enhances the potential value of this test as part of a clinical screening program for FH. In contrast, the use of a limited screen in patients with possible FH (n=130) resulted in a detection rate of 26%, but this is still of significant benefit in diagnosis of this genetic condition. We have also shown that 14% of LDLR defects are due to splice site mutations and that the most frequent splice mutation in our series (c.1845+11 c>g) is expressed at the RNA level. In addition, DNA samples from the patients in whom no LDLR or ApoB gene mutations were found, were sequenced for the NARC-1 gene. No mutations were identified which suggests that the role of NARC-1 in causing FH is minor. In a small proportion of families (