Search

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR707 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ signaling domain and a CD28 co-stimulatory domain. ACTR707 is in clinical development in combination with rituximab (NCT03189836) or trastuzumab (NCT03680560). Here we present clinical findings from the dose escalation phase of Study ATTCK-20-03, an ongoing, multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR707+rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The primary objectives of this first-in-human study are to evaluate the safety of the combination of ACTR707 and rituximab and to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Other objectives include evaluating antitumor activity and ACTR T-cell persistence. Subjects must have CD20+ NHL that is R/R after prior treatments, which must include anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR707. Additional doses of rituximab are administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study includes a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR707 with fixed dose of rituximab at 375 mg/m2 q3w) and an expansion phase at the RP2D. Results: Six subjects received ACTR707 at Dose Level 1 (DL1; 23-38×106 ACTR+ T cells), 3 subjects at DL2 (30-50×106 ACTR+ T cells), and 5 subjects at DL3 (45-55×106 ACTR+ T cells). The majority of the subjects were diagnosed with DLBCL (93%) and had refractory disease (71%), defined as progressive disease as the best response to any prior treatment or relapse In DL1 through DL3, as of 27 May 2019, there were no dose-limiting toxicities, AEs of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), serious or severe neurologic AEs, or AEs leading to deaths on treatment. TEAEs reported in >2 subjects, regardless of causality or grade, included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, cough, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. SAEs considered possibly related to ACTR707 were febrile neutropenia (n=2) and cytopenia (n=1). ACTR707 expansion generally reached peak levels within 1 to 2 weeks after administration. All subjects with complete response (CR) up to 1 year had detectable ACTR at the last timepoint evaluated. Higher ACTR707 CD8:CD4 T-cell ratios were associated with clinical responses. Clinical activity was reported across DL1 through DL3, with an overall response rate of 64% including durable complete responses (CRs), with one subject in CR for 387+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: Data available from DL1 through DL3 of ACTR707+rituximab suggest that clinical responses can be achieved without severe T cell-mediated toxicities (eg, CRS and neurotoxicity) that have been reported with other autologous T-cell products. Dose escalation continues at a target dose of 80×106 ACTR+ T cells; enrollment in DL4 (n=6) was recently completed. Updated data, including identified correlates of clinical outcomes, will be presented for DL1 through DL4. Disclosures Flinn: TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Cohen:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Hutchison: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Akard:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Bachanova:Celgene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Background: Autologous T cells engineered to express a universal ACTR chimeric receptor kill tumors through interactions with tumor-targeting antibodies [Kudo, Cancer Res 2014]. ACTR707 was identified through rigorous preclinical screening of more than 100 different ACTR variants. It is composed of the extracellular domain of CD16, the cytoplasmic signaling domain of CD3ζ, and the costimulatory domain of CD28. Study ATTCK-20-03 (NCT03189836) is the first clinical trial of ACTR707. ACTR707 in combination with rituximab is being studied in subjects with relapsed or refractory CD20+ B-cell lymphoma previously treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy. Herein we report data from the first dose level of ACTR707, where 6 subjects have been enrolled and treated.Methods: ATTCK-20-03 is a first-in-human, multicenter phase 1 dose escalation study of ACTR707 in combination with rituximab. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of ACTR707 in combination with rituximab, and secondary objectives include evaluation of antitumor activity, assessment of T-cell expansion and persistence, cytokine levels, and rituximab pharmacokinetics. Eligible subjects must have histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma of DLBCL, MCL, PMBCL, Gr3b FL, or transformed FL subtype and have received prior anti-CD20 mAb therapy in combination with chemotherapy. Subjects received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2) for 3 days, followed by rituximab (375 mg/m2) and a single infusion of ACTR707. Additional doses of rituximab are administered, one dose every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression. The study is separated into two sequential phases, a dose escalation and a safety expansion phase. During dose escalation, ACTR707 will be tested at increasing doses in combination with rituximab. Results: Six subjects received ACTR707 in combination with rituximab at the first dose level: 5 diagnosed with DLBCL (83%) and 1 with Gr3b FL (17%). Median age was 61 years (range: 57-76), 83% were male, 50% were treated with ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy, and 67% had no response to or progression within 6 months of immediate prior therapy. ACTR707 was successfully manufactured for all subjects. ACTR+ T cells demonstrated expansion and were detectable at D28 post-ACTR707 infusion for all subjects tested. There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed in the 4 subjects evaluable for DLTs (2 subjects were not DLT-evaluable due to early disease progression). There were no serious adverse events of cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or autoimmune events and no deaths on study. Grade 3 or higher AEs included neutropenia (n=2), febrile neutropenia (n=2), and thrombocytopenia (n=1). Antitumor activity was assessed in all 6 subjects. Three subjects experienced disease progression and 3 subjects demonstrated investigator-reported complete responses at the first disease response assessment (D42). Responses are ongoing at the time of the data cut-off. Conclusions: In the first dose level studied in subjects with relapsed or refractory aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma, ACTR707 in combination with rituximab induced complete responses in 3 out of 6 treated subjects, with no serious events of cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity. ACTR+ T-cells were detectable in all subjects and ACTR+ T-cells persisted in the presence of continued rituximab administration. These results support the continued dose escalation of ACTR707 in combination with rituximab. Citation Format: Veronika Bachanova, Jonathon Cohen, Luke Akard, Samantha Jaglowski, Jessica Sachs, Ann Ranger, Patricia Harris, Kathleen McGinness, Greg Motz, Ian Flinn. Safety and preliminary efficacy of ACTR707, autologous T lymphocytes expressing an antibody-coupled T-cell receptor, in combination with rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A003.

Background: B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has recently emerged as a promising candidate antigen for therapeutic targeting in multiple myeloma (MM), with several targeted agents in clinical studies including antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific T cell engagers as well as CAR T cells. The Antibody-Coupled T cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is a universal, engineered autologous T cell therapy developed to mediate anti-tumor activity in combination with tumor-targeting antibodies. The ACTR construct is composed of the ectodomain of CD16 fused to intracellular co-stimulatory and CD3ζ signaling domains (Kudo et al., Cancer Res. 2014), which allow ACTR T cells to exert antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, a function otherwise physiologically limited to CD16-expressing natural killer cells and macrophages. ACTR087 expresses a 4-1BB-containing receptor and has been evaluated in combination with rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ B cell lymphoma as previously reported (Akard et al., Blood 2017). SEA-BCMA is a novel, humanized non-fucosylated anti-BCMA IgG1 antibody that has been demonstrated pre-clinically to bind to ACTR087 T cells to mediate ACTR T cell activation, cytotoxicity, cytokine release, and proliferation in the presence of BCMA-expressing MM cell lines. These functional activities were demonstrated to be BCMA-specific and SEA-BCMA dose-dependent (Cheema et al., AACR 2017). Here we present preliminary findings from the first 2 single-subject cohorts of the ATTCK-17-01 study (NCT03266692), an ongoing Phase 1 study of ACTR087 in combination with the first-in-human administration of SEA-BCMA. Methods: ATTCK-17-01 is a multicenter, Phase 1, dose-escalation study of ACTR087 in combination with SEA-BCMA. The primary objectives are to characterize the safety and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose of ACTR087 in combination with SEA-BCMA in subjects with R/R MM. The secondary objectives include evaluation of anti-myeloma activity, ACTR T cell persistence, cytokines, and SEA-BCMA pharmacokinetics (PK); exploratory objectives include the anti-myeloma activity of SEA-BCMA alone. Subjects must have measurable disease and must have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including treatment with a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for HSCT-eligible subjects. BCMA expression on MM cells was not a condition of eligibility. Dose escalation of the 2 investigational agents, ACTR087 and SEA-BCMA, is determined according to adaptive design principles. After study enrollment and leukapheresis, subjects receive SEA-BCMA by IV infusion once every 3 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation. After the third dose of SEA-BCMA and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2, each daily for 3 days), subjects receive a single dose of ACTR087. Results: Two subjects enrolled and received ACTR087 at the first dose level in combination with the first 2 dose levels of SEA-BCMA. First-in-human dosing of SEA-BCMA was well tolerated, with no reported SEA-BCMA-related adverse events (AEs) or dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Following ACTR087 infusion, ACTR+ T cells were detectable in the peripheral blood and demonstrated expansion post-infusion. No DLTs were observed with the combination of ACTR087 and SEA-BCMA in the first 2 cohorts. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs experienced by at least 1 subject, regardless of causality assessment, include cytopenias, increased ALT, and bone pain. Conclusions: ACTR087 in combination with SEA-BCMA was well tolerated in the first 2 subjects treated, with no DLTs or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. These results support the continued dose escalation of ACTR087 in combination with SEA-BCMA. Enrollment in Cohort 3 is ongoing. Updated data, including SEA-BCMA PK, biomarkers, and preliminary Cohort 3 data, will be presented. Disclosures Holmes: Unum: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy. Hari:Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Exter:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Cheema:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Sienczylo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. O'Meara:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sussman:Seattle Genetics: Employment. Akard:Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.

In mice, graft-versus-host reactions, associated with powerful graft-versus-tumor effects, can be achieved without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by delayed administration of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) to established mixed chimeras. However, GVHD sometimes occurs after DLI in established mixed chimeric patients. In contrast to mice, in which T cell recovery from the thymus occurs prior to DLI administration, human T cell reconstitution following T cell–depleted hematopoietic cell transplantation is slow, resulting in lymphopenia at the time of DLI. We demonstrate in this study that T cell lymphopenia is an independent risk factor for GVHD following DLI in the absence of known inflammatory stimuli. DLI-induced GVHD was prevented in lymphopenic recipients by prior administration of a small number of nonalloreactive polyclonal T cells, insufficient to prevent lymphopenia-associated expansion of subsequently administered T cells, through a regulatory T cell–independent mechanism. GVHD was not inhibited by T cells with irrelevant specificity. Moreover, administration of antibiotics reduced the severity of GVHD in lymphopenic hosts. Accumulation of DLI-derived effector T cells and host hematopoietic cell elimination were markedly diminished by regulatory T cell–depleted, nonalloreactive T cells. Finally, thymectomized mixed chimeras showed increased GVHD following delayed DLI. Collectively, our data demonstrate that in the absence of known conditioning-induced inflammatory stimuli, T cell lymphopenia is a risk factor for GVHD in mixed chimeras receiving delayed DLI. Our data suggest that the predisposition to GVHD can at least in part be explained by the presence of occult inflammatory stimuli due to the absence of T cells to control microbial infections.

Mixed hematopoietic chimerism can be induced in mice receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) after nonmyeloablative host conditioning with depletion T cells with of anti-T cell monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), low-dose (3 Gy) total-body irradiation (TBI), and local thymic irradiation (7 Gy). These mice are specifically tolerant to donor and host antigens. When nontolerant donor T cells are given to chimeras several months after BMT, full donor-type chimerism develops, but graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) does not occur. The induction of such lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions without GVHD could provide an approach to separating graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) from GVHD in patients with hematologic malignancies. To make the nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen described above more cytoreductive for such malignancies, we have now modified it by replacing TBI with cyclophosphamide (CP). Treatment with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs on day -5, 200 mg/kg CP on day -1, and 7 Gy thymic irradiation on day 0 was only slightly myelosuppressive and allowed fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched (with or without multiple minor antigen disparities) allogeneic bone marrow to engraft and establish long-term mixed chimerism in 40 to 82% of recipients in three different strain combinations. The administration of nontolerant donor spleen cells at 5 weeks or at 5, 8, and 11 weeks posttransplant was capable of eliminating host hematopoietic cells, leading to full or nearly full donor chimerism in six of six and two of four chimeric animals in two different strain combinations. No clinical evidence of GVHD was observed in any recipients of these donor leukocyte infusions (DLI). These studies demonstrate that induction of mixed chimerism with nonmyeloablative conditioning followed at appropriate times by DLI might allow lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions, and hence GVL effects, to eliminate chronic hematologic malignancies without causing clinically significant GVHD. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1999;5(3):133-43.

Background Boys with X-linked ectodermal dysplasia and immunodeficiency caused by mutations of nuclear factor-κB essential modulator have defects in innate and adaptive immunity, and some have colitis. Objective We sought to determine whether curing the immune defect in such patients by means of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation abolishes the susceptibility to colitis. Methods A boy with X-linked hypohydrotic ectodermal dysplasia with immunodeficiency underwent allogeneic transplantation from a matched unaffected sibling identified by means of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Toll-like receptor (TLR) function was assessed by measuring TLR agonist–induced cytokine production in whole blood tested in vitro . B-cell proliferation was measured by means of tritiated thymidine incorporation. Natural killer cell function was examined in PBMCs by means of K562 target cell lysis. Colitis severity was assessed clinically based on corticosteroid requirement and histology of large intestinal biopsy specimens. Results Defects in cytokine production in response to TLR agonists, CD40-mediated proliferation, and natural killer cell cytotoxicity were all corrected after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite successful hematopoietic and immune reconstitution, the patient continued to have flares of colitis, often associated with bacterial infection. Conclusions Our findings strongly suggest that nuclear factor-κB essential modulator deficiency intrinsic to the intestinal epithelium is sufficient to predispose to colitis, despite robust correction of immune defects.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) may lead to lymphohematopoietic graft-versus-host (GVH) reactions without graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of DLI is greater in mixed chimeras than in full chimeras following fully MHC-mismatched bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Some studies showed, following MHC-mismatched BMT, that only CD8+ T cells are involved in GVL effects of DLI against MHC class I+ class II− tumors, but others showed that the GVL effect of DLI is dependent on both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Previously, we have observed that GVL against EL4 is mediated by CD8+ T cells but not CD4+ T cells following DLI in freshly irradiated mice treated with cytokines to reduce GVHD mortality in fully MHC-mismatched BMT. The exact contribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to the GVL effects of DLI in established mixed chimeras is not known. We hypothesized that lethal conditioning leads to the production of many proinflammatory cytokines which may help to generate a CD4 cell-independent, CD8 cell-mediated anti-tumor effect. However, in delayed DLI recipients, CD4+ helper T cells might be needed to induce CD8+ anti-tumor effector cells. We evaluated the role of T-cell subsets in GVL effects of DLI following fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched BMT in freshly irradiated mice and mixed chimeric delayed DLI recipients. While GVL effects of delayed DLI given to established mixed chimeras were dependent on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells did not contribute to GVL effects in freshly irradiated mice. Consistent with this, MHC class II expression on host antigen-presenting cells (APCs) was needed to optimize GVL effects of DLI in established mixed chimeras. To address whether cross-presentation of tumor antigens (Ag) via class I would permit GVL responses in full chimeras, we generated full chimeras in which donor and recipient shared a class I locus. However, there were no GVL effects of delayed DLI in full chimeras, providing no evidence that cross-presentation of tumor Ag through class I molecules shared by donor and the tumor led to anti-tumor effects in this model. We conclude that following delayed DLI to established mixed chimeras, the GVL response requires extensive MHC disparity, MHC class II expression on host APCs and the presence of CD4+ T cells. In contrast, the requirement for CD4+ T cells can be bypassed in freshly irradiated recipients, but this occurs at the expense of a greater risk of GVHD. Administration of delayed DLI to mixed chimeras permits achievement of optimal GVL effects because large numbers of GVH-reactive T cells can be administered without inducing GVHD.