1. Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability
- Author
-
Richard B. Ivry, Srikantan S. Nagarajan, Benjamin Parrell, and John F. Houde
- Subjects
Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology ,Linguistics and Language ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cerebellar Ataxia ,Clinical Sciences ,Audiology ,Biology ,Speech Acoustics ,Language and Linguistics ,Feedback ,Speech and Hearing ,Feedback, Sensory ,Phonetics ,Clinical Research ,Vowel ,Cerebellar Degeneration ,medicine ,Humans ,Speech ,Auditory feedback ,Sensory ,Cerebellar ataxia ,Neurosciences ,Linguistics ,Formant ,Speech Perception ,Biomedical Imaging ,Cognitive Sciences ,Special Issue: Selected Papers From the 2020 Conference on Motor Speech—Basic Science and Clinical Innovation ,medicine.symptom ,psychological phenomena and processes - Abstract
Purpose Individuals with cerebellar ataxia (CA) caused by cerebellar degeneration exhibit larger reactive compensatory responses to unexpected auditory feedback perturbations than neurobiologically typical speakers, suggesting they may rely more on feedback control during speech. We test this hypothesis by examining variability in unaltered speech. Previous studies of typical speakers have demonstrated a reduction in formant variability (centering) observed during the initial phase of vowel production from vowel onset to vowel midpoint. Centering is hypothesized to reflect feedback-based corrections for self-produced variability and thus may provide a behavioral assay of feedback control in unperturbed speech in the same manner as the compensatory response does for feedback perturbations. Method To comprehensively compare centering in individuals with CA and controls, we examine centering in two vowels (/i/ and /ɛ/) under two contexts (isolated words and connected speech). As a control, we examine speech produced both with and without noise to mask auditory feedback. Results Individuals with CA do not show increased centering compared to age-matched controls, regardless of vowel, context, or masking. Contrary to previous results in neurobiologically typical speakers, centering was not affected by the presence of masking noise in either group. Conclusions The similar magnitude of centering seen with and without masking noise questions whether centering is driven by auditory feedback. However, if centering is at least partially driven by auditory/somatosensory feedback, these results indicate that the larger compensatory response to altered auditory feedback observed in individuals with CA may not reflect typical motor control processes during normal, unaltered speech production.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF