Search

The effects of the putrescine analogue 1-aminooxy-3-aminopropane on fungal polyamine metabolism were evaluated using Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as an experimental model. The compound inhibited ornithine decarboxylase, spermidine synthase, and S -adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase in mycelial extracts. Addition of 1-aminooxy-3-aminopropane at 1 mM to the culture medium did not reduce mycelial growth and caused a 29% decrease in free spermidine and a two-fold increase in free spermine. When added 4.5 h before the determination of ornithine decarboxylase, 1-aminooxy-3-aminopropane reduced in vivo activity of this enzyme by 40-50%. When added 48 h before the determination, 1-aminooxy-3-aminopropane at 0.01 and 0.1 mM caused a slight increase of in vivo ornithine decarboxylase activity, while it had no effect at 1 mM. Comparison of the action of 1-aminooxy-3-aminopropane with that of other inhibitors of polyamine biosynthesis suggested that its effects on in vivo ornithine decarboxylase activity resulted from a balance between direct inhibition of enzyme activity and indirect stimulation of enzyme synthesis and/or activity mediated by the decrease in spermidine levels, which in turn was due to inhibition of spermidine synthase and S -adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase. The potential of 1-aminooxy-3-aminopropane as a tool for studies on fungal polyamine metabolism and for the control of plant diseases of fungal origin is discussed.

1. Berenil, administered to rats in vivo, promoted a decrease in liver SAMDC activity, but an increase in ODC and SAT activity. 2. Its effect on ODC was completely prevented by cycloheximide, that on SAT only partially. 3. Berenil had no effect on ODC activity in adrenalectomized rats. Adrenergic antagonists counteracted the effect of Berenil on ODC activity. 4. Polyamine content was increased. The maximum modification was observed for putrescine and N1-acetylspermidine.

Two transfected cell lines, one carrying a mammalian ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) that is suppressed by polyamines and one carrying a trypanosomal ODC that is not, were used to ask whether ODC suppression is necessary for the antiproliferative activities of two polyamine analogs, N1,N8-bis(ethyl)spermidine (BES) and N1,N14-bis(ethyl)homospermine (BE444). Both analogs accumulated within cells and suppressed S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, as well as polyamine-sensitive mouse ODC activity. Neither drug was able to suppress the activity of the polyamine-refractory trypanosome ODC. But, whereas BE444 was able to inhibit growth of both cell lines, BES could inhibit only growth of cells carrying the polyamine-sensitive ODC, under conditions that cause prolonged depletion of endogenous polyamines. We conclude from these studies that the antiproliferative activity of BES, a less potent drug, requires the suppression of ODC. The efficacy of BE444 is enhanced by its ability to suppress ODC. However, it can function without ODC suppression, whereas BES cannot.