Search

ROBOASTRA EUROPAEA GARCÍA GÓMEZ, 1985 (FIGS 3D, 4D, 6C, 7E) Material examined: Torre, Marbella, Spain, July 1995, 1 specimen, 10 m depth, 30 mm, collected by J.L. González (MNCN 15.05 /46612). Torre, Marbella, Spain, September 1995, 1 specimen, 10 m depth, 18 mm, collected by M. T. Barrea (CASIZ 166049). Torre, Marbella, Spain, August 1996, 2 specimens, 10.7 m depth, 15 & 19 mm, collected by K.L. Schick (CASIZ 166053). La Herradura, Granada, Spain, February 1993, 1 specimen, 12 m depth, 14 mm, collected by A. Barrajón and M. Zarauz (MNCN 15.05 /29203). Arrecife La Cañonera, Strait of Gibraltar, Spain, June 2002, 1 specimen, 17 m depth, 50 mm, collected by Alma Sánchez (MNCN 15.05 /46650). Funchal, Madeira, June 1999, 1 specimen, 100 m depth, 35 mm (MMF 31021). Ponta do Baleeira, Sagres, Portugal, July 2002, 1 specimen, 20 m depth, 14 mm, collected by M. Pola (MNCN 15.05 /46613). Ponta do Baleeira, Sagres, Portugal, July 2002, 1 specimen, 20 m depth, 10 mm, collected by M.A. Malaquias (MNCN 15.05 / 46613). Specimens were collected on rocks and were measured following preservation. Distribution: This species is known mainly from the Strait of Gibraltar and southern Iberian Peninsula (García Gómez, 1985, 2002; Cervera et al., 1988; García Gómez et al., 1989, 1991; Moreno & Templado, 1998; Schick, 1998; Megina, 2000; Ocaña et al., 2000; Sánchez-Tocino, Ocaña & García 2000; Grande et al., 2002; Megina & Cervera, 2003). One misidentified specimen of Plocamopherus from Madeira deposited at the Natural History Museum (London) (1863.9.19.3), supposedly collected by Rev. R. Lowe, was correctly identified as belonging to Roboastra, very probably R. europaea. This hypothesis has been strongly supported by the recent collection of one specimen (also photographed) of this species at Funchal harbour. This species has been also recorded in southwestern Portugal (Calado et al., in press) and Catalonian coasts (north-eastern Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean Sea) (Schick, pers. comm.). Poddubetskaia & Petit de Voice (2003) provide an illustration of R. europaea from Dakar (Senegal). This is the southernmost record of this species in the Atlantic. External and internal morphology: Described in detail and figured by Pola et al. (2003). Regarding the colour pattern, this species can exhibit two colour varieties (Fig. 6C 1, C 2). The radular formula of two 15- mm-long specimens (preserved) is 23 ¥ 4.1.1.1.4; that of the 30-mm-long specimen (preserved) is 25 ¥ 4.1.1.1.4 (Fig. 7E). The reproductive system is triaulic (Figs 3D, 4D). The hermaphroditic duct widens into a S-shaped ampulla that has thick walls. The bursa copulatrix is rounded and the seminal receptacle is elongate; both are similar in size. The seminal receptacle has a short duct that connects to the vagina, near the bursa. The deferent duct, which lacks a morphologically well-differentiated prostate, is long and coiled, ending in a dilated penial atrium. The vaginal gland is large with muscular walls, convex on one side and concave on the other. The penis is located within the distal end of this muscular portion and is armed with at least three different kinds of hooked and chitinous spines arranged in helicoidal rows. Anatomical descriptions are based on the illustrations by Pola et al. (2003). Remarks: Roboastra europaea was described by García Gómez (1985) as the first species of the genus in the Atlantic Ocean, from the Strait of Gibraltar. Pola et al. (2003) redescribed the species and updated its geographical range to south-western Portugal (Calado et al., in press) and the Catalonian coast (north-eastern Spain). The anatomy of this species and the reproductive system of the specimen examined (MNCN 15.05/ 46650) are very similar to those descriptions and no substantive differences have been found, except with regard to identification of the uterine duct, which was not reported before. The uterine duct is long and convoluted, going from the middle of the vagina to the oviduct. García Gómez (1985) mentioned the presence of a fertilization duct, but did not draw it. More recently, R. europaea was included in studies relating to molecular phylogeny (Grande et al., 2002) and feeding ecology (Megina & Cervera, 2003)., Published as part of Pola, M., Cervera, J. L & Gosliner, T. M., 2005, Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands, pp. 167-189 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2) on pages 179-180, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634644, {"references":["Garcia Gomez JC. 1985. A new species of Roboastra (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) from the Gibraltar Strait (Southern Spain). Journal of Molluscan Studies 51: 169 - 176.","Garcia Gomez JC. 2002. Paradigmas de una fauna insolita. Los moluscos opistobranquios del estrecho de Gibraltar. Instituto de Estudios Campogibraltarenos, Serie Ciencias, 20.","Cervera JL, Templado J, Garcia Gomez JC, Ballesteros M, Ortea JA, Garcia FJ, Ros J, Luque AA. 1988. Catalogo actualizado y comentado de los Opistobranquios (Mollusca, Gastropoda) de la Peninsula Iberica, Baleares y Canarias, con algunas referencias a Ceuta y la Isla de Alboran. Iberus, Suplemento 1: 1 - 84.","Garcia Gomez JC, Cervera JL, Garcia FJ, Lopez CM. 1989. Resultados de la campana internacional de biologia marina ' Ceuta 86 ': moluscos opistobranquios. Bollettino Malacologico 25: 223 - 232.","Garcia Gomez JC, Cervera JL, Garcia FJ, Ortea JA, Garcia SF, Medina C, Burnay LP. 1991. Resultados de la campana internacional de biologia marina ' Algarve 88 ': moluscos opistobranquios. Bollettino Malacologico 27: 125 - 138.","Moreno D, Templado J. 1998. Nuevas aportaciones al conocimiento de los opistobranquios del sureste espanol. II. Iberus 16 (2): 39 - 58.","Schick KL. 1998. Atlas submarino de la Costa del Sol. Marbella: Edicion propia.","Megina C. 2000. Dieta y especializacion trofica en moluscos nudibranquios. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Cadiz.","Ocana A, Sanchez-Tocino LL, Lopez-Gonzalez S, Viciana JF. 2000. Guia Submarina de invertebrados no artropodos. 2 nd ed. Granada: Ed. Comares.","Sanchez-Tocino L, Ocana A, Garcia FJ. 2000. Contribucion al conocimiento de los moluscos opistobranquios de la costa de Granada (sureste de la Peninsula Iberica). Iberus 18 (1): 1 - 14.","Grande C, Templado J, Cervera JL, Zardoya R. 2002. The complete mitochondrial genome of the nudibranch Roboastra europaea (Mollusca: Gastropoda) supports the monophyly of opisthobranchs. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19 (10): 1672 - 1685.","Megina C, Cervera JL. 2003. Diet, prey selection and cannibalism in the hunter opisthobranch Roboastra europaea. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the UK 83: 489 - 495.","Poddubetskaia M, Petit de Voice P. 2003. Roboastra europaea from Senegal. Message dated May 3 in Sea Slug Forum. http: // www. seaslugforum. net / find. cfm? id = 9652","Pola M, Cervera JL, Gosliner TM. 2003. The genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) in the Atlantic Ocean. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 54 (22): 381 - 392."]}

ROBOASTRA TIGRIS FARMER, 1978 (FIGS 3C, 4C, 6B, 7C, D) Material examined: Bahía de Los Angeles, Baja California, Gulf of California, Mexico, October 1975, 3 specimens, 12–21 m depth, 20–35 mm preserved length, collected by M. Michel & D. Mulliner. (LACM: 140747). Bahía de Los Angeles, Baja California, Gulf of California, Mexico, October 1984, 1 specimen, 7– 10 m depth, 30 mm preserved, collected by R. Van Syoc & A.J. Ferreira (CASIZ: 057321). Bahía de Los Angeles, Baja California, Gulf of California, Mexico, January 1985, 1 specimen, 1–7 m depth, 40 mm preserved, collected by R. Van Syoc et al. (CASIZ: 057613). Isla San Esteban, Sonora, Gulf of California, Mexico, April 1985, 1 specimen, 12 m depth, 40 mm preserved, collected by L. Dunne (CASIZ 072629). Baja California Sur, Gulf of California, Mexico, September 1965, 1 specimen, 30 m depth, collected by D. Wobber (CASIZ: 68357). Distribution: Roboastra tigris has been reported from offshore islands in the central and southern Gulf of California (Islas San Pedro, Monserrate and San Diego, Guaymas, and islands in the region of Bahía de Los Angeles and La Paz) (Farmer, 1978). External morphology (Fig. 6B): Body elongate and limaciform with a long and pointed posterior end of the foot. The preserved animals are 20–40 mm in length. The body surface is lightly wrinkled with most of the wrinkles following the longitudinal stripes on the notum and both sides of the body. The predominant body colour is a greenish, yellow-ochre, or brown, with five longitudinal dark navy blue stripes outlined by light green. There is a band surrounding the notal edge. Another midline extends from the anterior part, near the edge of the notum, to the middle gills and continues behind these gills. Two other lines start from the rhinophore sheaths and run parallel until they join in the postbranchial region. The line that results from the two joined lines continues to the posterior end of the foot. The eyespots are bluish in colour and well defined. They join with the rhinophores to form two shorter lines that continue for a little way behind the eyespots. The sides may have an interrupted stripe. The sole of the foot is blue-black and the foot margin is blue. The head is rounded with a pair of conical, completely retractile perfoliate rhinophores with approximately 35 tightly packed lamellae. The oral tentacles are strongly developed and dorsolaterally grooved along a part of their length and they also are blueblack. There are five nonretractile tripinnate gills; the three anteriormost gills are more highly developed. The gills form a semicircle surrounding the anal papilla, which is elevated and is blue-black. The pinna of the gills is dark blue, while the inner side of the rachis is yellow. The rhinophores and their sheaths are blue-black with light green central axes. The oral area is cobalt blue. The genital pore opens on the right side, midway between the gills and the rhinophores. Internal morphology: All specimens were dissected. The anterior digestive tract begins with a long, thickwalled, muscular oral tube, which continues into the buccal mass. The buccal mass is elongate and tubular, with a pair of slender elongate pouches opening into the digestive system at the junction of the oral tube and the buccal mass. The salivary glands are small and short, entering on the buccal mass and flanking the oesophagus. The labial cuticle and the labial armature are absent. There is a well-developed blood gland that is granular in texture. The radular formula of one 40-mm-long specimen (preserved) is 28 ¥ 4.1.1.1.4; that of the 30-mm-long specimen (preserved) is 30 ¥ 4–3.1.1.1.3–4. The rachidian tooth (Fig. 7C) is broad, thin and very arched at its base with two welldifferentiated lateral cusps and a small one in the middle. The inner lateral tooth (Fig. 7C) is very curved, with two very well developed cusps. The inner cusp is simple and larger than the outer one, which is very slender. The remaining lateral radular teeth (3- 4) are quadrangular, lack cusps or denticulation and become smaller near the margin (Fig. 7D). The reproductive system is triaulic. Figure 3C shows that of the 40-mm-long specimen (preserved) (CASIZ: 072629). The whole genital mass is very small, filling a third of the second body cavity. The hermaphroditic duct widens into a small S-shaped ampulla. The ampulla narrows into a large and wide postampullary duct, which bifurcates into the vas deferens and oviduct. The short oviduct enters the female gland mass. The deferent duct, which lacks a morphologically well-differentiated prostate, is long and coiled, ending in a dilated and darkly pigmented penial sac. The deferent duct has a uniform width, but it is slightly wider and thicker in the prostatic part. The distal part of the vas deferens enters the wide penial bulb. The penis is located within the distal end of this muscular portion, and it is armed with at least three different kinds of hooked and chitinous spines arranged in helicoidal rows (Fig. 4C). The bursa copulatrix and seminal receptacle are very small. The former is rounded and the latter is elongate; both are similar in size. The seminal receptacle has a short duct that connects to the vagina after making two loops near the bursa. The vagina is long and straight. Nearly halfway along its length, it branches into the uterine duct, which is long and convoluted and joins with the oviduct. There is a large, thick-walled, inverted L-shaped vaginal gland, which joins the distal part of the vagina; both open into the genital atrium. The reproductive system in this species is very small in the context of the total size of the specimens, and when compared with that of the other species. Remarks: Roboastra tigris was described by Farmer (1978). It is easily distinguishable by its colour pattern and large size. Farmer suggested that its size might be linked to its feeding mechanism and explained the role of the coelomic cavity. Roboastra tigris feeds on other polycerids, such as Tambja abdere Farmer (1978) and T. eliora (Marcus & Marcus, 1967). It was named R. tigris for its stripes and carnivorous appetite. Carté & Faulkner (1983, 1986) and Faulkner & Ghiselin (1983) studied the defensive metabolites of R. tigris. This species, and its prey T. abdere and T. eliora, contain tambjamines A- D. These have been traced to a food source, the bryozoan Sessibugula translucens and are implicated in the chemical defence mechanism of the Tambja species. The radula of R. tigris is very similar to that of R. leonis sp. nov., but in fully mature specimens the reproductive system is smaller than in R. leonis. The bursa copulatrix and the seminal receptacle are both similar in size while in R. leonis they are unequal in size. These differences were consistent in all specimens of each species examined here., Published as part of Pola, M., Cervera, J. L & Gosliner, T. M., 2005, Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands, pp. 167-189 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2) on pages 178-179, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634644, {"references":["Farmer WM. 1978. Tambja and Roboastra (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia) from the Gulf of Calilfornia and the Galapagos Islands. Veliger 20 (4): 375 - 385.","Marcus E, Marcus E. 1967. American opisthobranch mollusks. Studies in Tropical Oceanography Miami 6: 1 - 256.","Carte B, Faulkner J. 1983. Defensive metabolites from three nembrothid Nudibranchs. Journal of Organic Chemistry 48 (14): 2314 - 2318.","Carte B, Faulkner J. 1986. Role of secondary metabolites in feeding associations between a predatory nudibranch, two grazing nudibranch, and a bryozoan. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12 (3): 795 - 804.","Faulkner J, Ghiselin M. 1983. Chemical defense and evolutionary ecology of dorid nudibranchs and some other opisthobranch gastropods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 13: 295 - 301."]}

ROBOASTRA LEONIS SP. NOV. (FIGS 3F, 4F, 6E, 7H, 9, 10) Roboastra sp., Farmer, 1978: 384, fig. 20. Roboastra sp., Debelius, 1998: 181. Type material: Holotype: Isla San Cristóbal, León Dormido, Kicker Rock, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador, May 1994, 1 specimen, 80 mm, collected by T. M. Gosliner aboard Mistral II, max. depth 26 m (MECCD 4023). Paratypes: same data as for holotype, 60 and 70 mm (CASIZ 097548). Other material: Isla Isabela, Punta Vicente Roca. Galápagos Islands, Ecuador, May 1994, 5 specimens, 25, 35, 45, 53 and 80 mm, collected by T. M. Gosliner aboard Mistral II, max. depth 23 and 31 m (CASIZ 097577). Isla Darwin, NE side, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador, May 1994, 1 specimen, 25 mm, collected by T. M. Gosliner aboard Mistral II, max. depth 18 m (CASIZ 097554). The specimens were measured while preserved. Etymology: Holotype found in the locality of León Dormido. It is also named leonis for its aggressive predatory habits. Distribution: Currently reported from the Galápagos Islands, but Farmer (1978) included an illustration of a similar animal from La Paz (Gulf of California). Debelius (1998) reported it as endemic to the Galápagos Islands. External morphology (Fig. 6E): Body elongate and limaciform with a long and pointed posterior end of the foot. The preserved animals are 25–80 mm in length. The body surface is strongly wrinkled with numerous stripes of yellow ochre, green and bluishblack on the notum and both sides of the body. Some of the stripes are lighter in shade and can be continuous or discontinuous. The foot is linear and the edge of the foot is blue-black. The head is rounded with a pair of conical, completely retractile, perfoliate rhinophores with approximately 40 tightly packed lamellae. The base of the rhinophores is blue-black with a similar core; the leaves are bright orange and tipped in blueblack. The eyespots are brilliant blue. The oral tentacles are strongly developed and dorsolaterally grooved along part of their length and they are also blue-black. There are five nonretractile tripinnate gills; the three anteriormost gills are more highly developed. The gills form a semicircle surrounding the anal papilla, which is elevated and is blue-black in colour. The gills are blue-black distally and white proximally and the inner side of the rachis of each has a yellow line. The dark blue genital pore opens on the right side, midway between the gills and the rhinophores. Internal morphology: Four specimens were dissected. The general arrangement of the internal organs is shown in Figure 9. The anterior digestive tract begins with a long, thick-walled muscular oral tube, which continues into the buccal mass. At their junction, a pair of slender elongate pouches opens into the digestive system (Fig. 10A, B). The salivary glands are short and thick, opening on to the buccal mass and flanking the oesophagus. The labial cuticle is weak and lacks any armature. There is a well-developed blood gland, which is granular in texture. The radular formula of two 35-mm-long specimens (preserved) is 26 ¥ 4.1.1.1.4; that of the 60-mm-long specimen (preserved) is 32 ¥ 4.1.1.1.4 (Fig. 7G). The rachidian tooth is broad, thin and very arched at its base, with two well-differentiated lateral cusps and a small one in the middle. The inner lateral tooth is very curved, having two very well developed cusps. The inner cusp is simple and larger than the outer one, which is very slender. The remaining lateral radular teeth are quadrangular, lack cusps or denticulation and become smaller near the margin. The reproductive system is triaulic. That of one 45- mm-long specimen (preserved) (CASIZ 097577) is shown in Figure 3F. The genital mass is small compared with the total size of the specimens, but larger than in R. tigris. The hermaphroditic duct widens into a large S-shaped ampulla, which has thick walls. The ampulla narrows into the postampullary duct, which bifurcates into the vas deferens and oviduct. The short oviduct enters the female gland mass. The deferent duct, which lacks a morphologically well-differentiated prostate, is long and coiled, ending in a dilated and darkly pigmented penial atrium. The duct has a uniform width, but is slightly narrower and thinner in the prostatic part. The penis is located within the distal end of this muscular portion and is armed with at least three different kinds of hooked and chitinous spines arranged in helicoidal rows. The types of spines and their arrangement on the penis are shown in Figure 4F. The bursa copulatrix and the seminal receptacle are well developed. The former is rounded and large, while the latter is elongate and smaller in size. The seminal receptacle has a short duct that connects to the vagina, near the bursa. The vagina is long and straight, opening into the genital atrium. The vaginal gland is very well developed, elongate, flattened, with muscular walls and joins the vagina at the distal part. Remarks: Roboastra leonis is clearly distinguishable from other members of the genus. The external coloration is consistently different, while the number of lines on the notum and both sides of the body is higher than in the other species. Roboastra luteolineata (Baba, 1936) also has many lines on its body, but the pigmentation of the gills, the rhinophores and most of the lines is different. There are also differences in the radular morphology of the two species. In R. leonis the rachidian tooth is highly arched at its base, with two well-developed lateral cusps and a small one in the middle. In R. luteolineata it is rectangular, with a slightly curved upper edge and three denticles (the central one is longer). Furthermore, the inner lateral tooth of R. leonis has a simple inner cusp while in R. luteolineata it is bifid. R. tigris Farmer, 1978, which is biogeographically the closest species to R. leonis, has a similar radular morphology, but its predominant body colour is greenish, yellow-ochre, or brown, with a few longitudinal dark navy blue stripes outlined in light green. These differences do not just involve coloration. In R. leonis there are consistently more lines covering the body than in R. tigris. Reproductive differences noted in the discussion of R. tigris were consistent in the numerous mature specimens examined here. Roboastra leonis is the first species of the genus to have been found in the Galápagos Islands. It has been reported feeding on Tambja mullineri Farmer, 1978 (Gosliner, unpublished data). Farmer (1978) provided a drawing of an animal similar to R. leonis from La Paz, but the specimen was devoured by one of its R. tigris companions in transit from the field to the laboratory. The external description of that species suggests that R. leonis is also present in the Gulf of California; a photograph appears in Hickman & Finet (1999) and Debelius (1998)., Published as part of Pola, M., Cervera, J. L & Gosliner, T. M., 2005, Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands, pp. 167-189 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2) on pages 181-183, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634644, {"references":["Farmer WM. 1978. Tambja and Roboastra (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia) from the Gulf of Calilfornia and the Galapagos Islands. Veliger 20 (4): 375 - 385.","Debelius H. 1998. Nudibranquios y caracolas de mar del Indopacifico. Alicante: Eds. M & G Difusion.","Baba K. 1936. Opisthobranchia of the Ryukyu (Okinawa) Islands. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Kyushu Imperial University 5 (1): 1 - 49.","Hickman CP, Finet Y. 1999. Field guide to marine molluscs of Galapagos. An illustrated guidebook to the common intertidal and shallow-water snails, bivalves and chitons of the Galapagos Islands. Lexington, Va: Sugar Spring Press."]}

Pola, M., Cervera, J. L, Gosliner, T. M. (2005): Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2): 167-189, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x

ROBOASTRA CABOVERDENSIS POLA ET AL., 2003 (FIGS 3E, 4E, G- I, 6D, 7F, G) Material examined: Holotype: 15 miles NW Santo Antao Island, Cape Verde Archipelago, July 2002, 1 specimen, 38 m depth (CASIZ 166047). Other material: Tarrafal, Cape Verde Archipelago, December 1998, 1 specimen, 25 mm, P.Wirtz (MMF 35083). Banco Joao Valente, Boavista Island, Cape Verde Archipelago, August 2002, 2 specimens, 20 m depth, 26/ 30 mm (70 mm in life), M.A. Malaquias (MNCN. 15.05/46614). Banco Joao Valente, Boavista Island, Cape Verde, August 2002, 2 specimens, 30 m depth, 31/ 37 mm (70 mm in life), M.A. Malaquias (CASIZ 166052). Boavista Island, August 2002, 3 specimens, 13/15/ 18 mm, C. Grande (MNCN. 15.05/46617). Sao Vicente, Cape Verde, October 2002, 1 specimen, 20 mm, G. Calado (CASIZ 166050). Specimens were collected on rocks and were measured preserved. Distribution: This species is known only from the Cape Verde Archipelago. External and internal morphology: Described in detail and figured by Pola et al. (2003) and not repeated here. A specimen from Tarrafal, Cape Verde Archipelago, is illustrated (Fig. 6D) to confirm the identity of the material examined. The radular formula of two specimens of 70 mm (in life) is 33 ¥ 3– 4.1.1.1.3–4 (Fig. 7F). The rachidian tooth is broad, clearly curved at the base, having three well-differentiated cusps. The inner lateral tooth is hooked with two well-developed elongate cusps. The inner one is very long, with sharp and curved edges on the inner side and a prominent projection on the outer one. The outer lateral teeth (3–4) are smaller and quadrangular without prongs, and decrease in size from the inner to the outer side of the radula. The reproductive system is shown in Figure 3E. The hermaphroditic duct has an S-shaped ampulla that continues into the spermoviduct. The vas deferens is long and coiled, with a uniform width. It is slightly narrower in the prostatic part. It ends in a dilated penial section. The penis is armed with at least three different kinds of spines arranged in helicoidal rows. Types of spines and their arrangement on the penis are shown in Figure 4G- I and E, respectively. The bursa copulatrix is rounded and the seminal receptacle is elongate; both are similar in size. The seminal receptacle joins the vagina near the bursa via a short duct. The vagina is short and straight, opening into the genital atrium, near the vaginal gland. This gland is very well developed, flattened, with muscular walls. Remarks: This species is the second to be described from the Atlantic Ocean. Roboastra caboverdensis is very similar to R. europaea (García Gómez, 1985), but some external and internal features permit us to distinguish it from its congeneric Atlantic species. The two species differ in their colour pattern. The arrangement of the yellow lines differs in both species; it is denser in R. europaea. The base of the rachidian radular tooth is more curved in R. caboverdensis than in R. europaea. The upper cusp of the inner lateral tooth is simple in R. caboverdensis and bifid in R. europaea (see Fig. 7E). R. caboverdensis has been reported feeding on other polycerids, such as Tambja fantasmalis (Malaquias, pers. comm.). This species has been misidentified as T. ambja simplex in http://www. medslug.de and a picture of it is also shown in Wirtz & Debelius (2003) identified as Roboastra sp. nov., Published as part of Pola, M., Cervera, J. L & Gosliner, T. M., 2005, Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands, pp. 167-189 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2) on page 180, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634644, {"references":["Pola M, Cervera JL, Gosliner TM. 2003. The genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) in the Atlantic Ocean. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 54 (22): 381 - 392.","Garcia Gomez JC. 1985. A new species of Roboastra (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) from the Gibraltar Strait (Southern Spain). Journal of Molluscan Studies 51: 169 - 176.","Wirtz P, Debelius H. 2003. Mediterranean and Atlantic invertebrate guide. From Spain to Turkey. From Norway to the Equator. Hackenheim, Germany: Conch Books."]}

ROBOASTRA LUTEOLINEATA (BABA, 1936) (FIGS 3B, 4B, 6A, 7A, B, 8B) Nembrotha luteolineata Baba, 1936: 26–27, pl. 3, fig. 7; text-fig. 14. Material examined: North coast, near Madang, Papua New Guinea, June 1992, 1 specimen, 24 m depth, 40 mm preserved, collected by T. M. Gosliner (CASIZ: 086319). Ryukyu Island, Okinawa, Japan, March 1997, 1 specimen previously identified as Tambja affinis, 115 mm in life (70 mm preserved), 55 m depth, collected by R. F. Bolland from a bottom of mixed rock and coral rubble (CASIZ: 115739). South Mulron Island, Western Australia, August 1995, 1 specimen previously identified as Tambja affinis, 45 mm preserved, collected by C.W. Bryce (WAM: S23322). Distribution: Originally described from Japan (Baba, 1936), this species has been also reported from New Zealand, Australia (Lord Howe Is., Heron Is.), Solomon Is., Kerama Is. (Okinawa, Japan), Thailand, Indonesia (Bali) and South Africa (Durban) (Hamatani & Baba, 1976; Gosliner, 1987; Coleman, 1989; Debelius 1998; Ono, 1999, 2004; Suzuki, 2000; Armstrong & Armstrong, 2001; Coleman, 2001; Johnson, 2001; Takamasa, 2003; Nakano, 2004). External morphology (Fig. 6A): Body elongate and limaciform with a long and pointed posterior end of the foot. The preserved animals are 35–70 mm in length. The body surface is smooth or lightly wrinkled with numerous (6–8) yellow longitudinal stripes on either side of the body. A wide yellow submarginal band follows the inner notal edge. There are two stripes on the back, which pass posterior to the base of the gills. The stripes in the lateral parts of the back each arise from the outer corner of the rhinophores. In some specimens all these lines can also be green or orange or, more typically, a mix of bright yellow and green. There are two milky green markings between the rhinophores. The ground colour is dark green or deep blue-black. The foot is linear and the edge of the foot is dark green or blue-black. The head is slightly expanded with a pair of conical, completely retractile perfoliate rhinophores with approximately 45 tightly packed lamellae. The oral tentacles are strongly developed and dorsolaterally grooved along a part of their length and they are also blue-black. There are five nonretractile tripinnate gills, with the three anteriormost being more highly developed. The gills form a semicircle surrounding the anal papilla, which is elevated and is also blue-black. The gills are dark, the same colour as the body, but the outer and inner sides of the rachis are green. The sheaths of the rhinophores, rhinophores, oral tentacles and pinnae of the gills are black. The genital pore opens on the right side, midway between the gills and the rhinophores. Internal morphology: The anterior digestive tract begins with a long and muscular oral tube, that continues into the buccal mass. At the junction of the oral tube and the buccal mass a pair of large, thick, elongated pouches open into the digestive system. There are two small and elongated salivary glands on the buccal bulb, flanking the oesophagus. Green and small-developed blood gland, granular in texture, located above the intestinal loop. The buccal mass is shorter than the length of the oral tube. The labial cuticle is smooth. The radular formula of the 40-mmlong specimen (preserved) is 35 ¥ 3.1.1.1.3; that of the 115-mm-long specimen (in life) is 40 ¥ 4.1.1.1.4. The rachidian tooth is rectangular, with a slightly curved upper edge and three denticles; the central one is longer (Fig. 7A). The inner lateral tooth typically has a strongly curved bifid inner cusp. The upper denticle of this inner cusp is slender and well developed, while the outer cusp is strong and well developed (Fig. 7B). The outer lateral teeth are plate-like and become smaller near the margin (Fig. 7A). The hermaphroditic reproductive system is triaulic (Fig. 3B). The genital mass fills the second quarter of the body cavity. The ampulla is large, folded thrice upon itself, with soft and thin walls. From its distal portion emerges the postampullary duct, which divides into the prostate and the oviduct. The prostate is wide, long and convoluted, distally narrowing and expanding again into the long muscular ejaculatory portion. The vas deferens is highly coiled. The distal portion of the deferent duct opens into a long, wide common atrium with the vaginal duct. The penis is located within the distal end of this muscular portion and it is armed with at least three different kinds of hooked and chitinous spines arranged in helicoidal rows (Fig. 4B). The vaginal duct is thin, elongate and enters the large, spherical bursa copulatrix. Another duct connects the vagina to the smaller and pyriform seminal receptacle after making two loops. Distally to the bursa copulatrix, a short and coiled uterine duct leaves the vagina and enters the female gland mass. The vaginal gland is well developed, elongate and joins with the vagina before opening into the genital atrium. Remarks: Roboastra luteolineata was described by Baba (1936) as Nembrotha luteolineata, based on a 30- mm-long specimen collected in Ishigakishima, Japan, and another specimen, 70 mm long, collected in the same locality. Baba (1936) gave two radular formulae (35 ¥ 3.1.1.1.3 and 40 ¥ 3.1.1.1.3) while Hamatani & Baba (1976) gave one: 36 ¥ 4.1.1.1.4. These results, together with the description of the external morphology, are almost entirely consistent with our description. The specimens studied here have five tripinnate gills instead of three (Baba, 1936). Hamatani & Baba (1976) described five bipinnate gills, but we can see that they are tripinnate. The reproductive system of this species has not been previously described. Roboastra luteolineata has been identified in a number of popular books on Australian nudibranchs (Willan & Coleman, 1984; Coleman, 1989; Debelius, 1998) as Tambja affinis (Eliot, 1904). However, that species, originally described from East Africa, was described as having a single median yellow stripe. Moreover, apart from other features, such as the milky green marking between the rhinophores, the radular teeth of R. luteolineata and T. affinis are very distinct. R. luteolineata feeds on other polycerids, such as Tambja verconis (Basedow & Hedley, 1905) (Armstrong & Armstrong, 2001), rather than the arborescent bryozoan Bugula dentata, on which Tambja verconis feeds (Rudman, 1998b). Ono (1999, 2004) included photographs of R. luteolineata feeding on another species of Tambja / Nembrotha in Japan., Published as part of Pola, M., Cervera, J. L & Gosliner, T. M., 2005, Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands, pp. 167-189 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2) on pages 174-177, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634644, {"references":["Baba K. 1936. Opisthobranchia of the Ryukyu (Okinawa) Islands. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Kyushu Imperial University 5 (1): 1 - 49.","Hamatani I, Baba K. 1976. Taxonomical comparison between the nudibranch species Roboastra gracilis and R. luteolineata from Yoron Islands of the Amami Islands, Southern Japan. Venus 35 (3): 135 - 137.","Gosliner TM. 1987. Nudibranchs of Southern Africa: a guide to opisthobranch molluscs of Southern Africa. Monterey, CA: Sea Challengers.","Coleman N. 1989. Nudibranchs of the South Pacific, 1. Springwood, Qld: Sea Australia Resource Centre.","Debelius H. 1998. Nudibranquios y caracolas de mar del Indopacifico. Alicante: Eds. M & G Difusion.","Ono A. 1999. Opisthobranchs of Kerama Islands. Tokyo: TBS-Britannica.","Ono A. 2004. Opisthobranchs of Ryukyu Islands. Tokyo: Rutles Inc.","Suzuki K. 2000. Opisthobranchs of Izu Peninsula. Tokyo: TSB-Britannica.","Armstrong R, Armstrong D. 2001. Roboastra luteolineata vs Tambja verconis. Messages dated October 25, 26, in Sea Slug Forum. http: // www. seaslugforum. net / find. cfm? id = 5558","Coleman N. 2001. 1001 nudibranchs. Catalogue of Indo- Pacific sea slugs. Springwood, Qld: Neville Coleman's Underwater Geographic Pty Ltd.","Takamasa T. 2003. Opisthobranchs of Bali and Indonesia. Tokyo: Hankyu Communications.","Nakano R. 2004. Opisthobranchs of Japan Islands. Tokyo: Rutles, Inc.","Burn R. 1967. Notes on an overlooked nudibranch genus, Roboastra Bergh, 1877, and two allied genera (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Australian Zoology 14: 212 - 222.","Eliot C. 1904. On some nudibranchs from East Africa and Zanzibar. Part 5. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2: 83 - 105.","Rudman WB. 1998 b. Tambja verconis (Basedow & Hedley, 1905). Message dated December 13 in Sea Slug Forum. http: // www. seaslugforum. net / tambverc. htm"]}

ROBOASTRA GRACILIS (BERGH, 1877) (FIGS 1, 2, 3A, 4A) Nembrotha gracilis Bergh, 1877: 458, pl. 56, figs 11- 17. Nembrotha rubropapulosa Bergh, 1905: 198, pl. 5, fig. 14, pl. 18, figs 19-22. Material examined: Cebu Island: White Beach (Moalboal area), Philippines, April 1996, 1 specimen, 0– 21 m depth, collected by T. M. Gosliner (CASIZ: 106591). Marshall Islands: Enewetak North, Pacific Ocean, February 1982, 1 specimen, 1 m depth, collected by S. Johnson under dead coral (CASIZ: 120670). Koror Municipality: Ngederrak Lagoon, Palau, September 1996, 2 specimens, collected by Clay Carlson (CASIZ: 109707). North coast, near Madang, Barracuda Point, Papua New Guinea, November 1990, 2 specimens, 6 m depth, collected by T. M. Gosliner (CASIZ: 075839). North coast, near Madang, Christiansen Research Institute’s Clam Tanks, Papua New Guinea, November 1991, 1 specimen. collected by T. M. Gosliner (CASIZ: 086900). North coast, near Madang, outer barrier reef between Pig Island and Rasch Pass, Papua New Guinea, June 1992, 1 specimen, collected by T. M. Gosliner (CASIZ: 086496). Luzon, Batangas Province, Maricaban Island, Philippines, 1 specimen, collected by M. Miller (CASIZ: 103732). Molokini Island, Hawaii, April 1990, 1 specimen, 6 m depth, collected by P. Fiene under rubble. Identified as ‘ Roboastra n. sp., aff. gracilis’ (CASIZ: 087131). Maui, Hawaii, April 1990, 1 specimen, 10 m depth, collected by P. Fiene. Identified as ‘ Roboastra sp. like the one in Scott Johnson’s book’ (CASIZ: 088547). Oahu Island R. cf. gracilis and Makua, Hawaii, June 1980, 1 specimen, 5 m depth, collected by S. Johnson and identified as ‘-light background’ (CASIZ: 116819). Kimberley, Ashmore Reef, Western Australia, July 1994, 1 specimen, 5–15 m depth, collected by C.W. Bryce (WAM: S23267). North of Cartier Island, Western Australia, September 1988, 1 specimen, collected by C.W. Bryce & F.E. Wells (WAM: S23236). Off Fremantle, Hall Bank, Western Australia, December 1981, 1 specimen, collected by S.M. Slack-Smith & C.M. Bryce (WAM: S23233). Distribution: Tropical Indo-Pacific: South Africa, Red Sea (Saudi Arabia), Malaysia, Indonesia (SE Sulawesi, Bali), Palau, Philippines (the type locality), Papua New Guinea, Solomon Is., Japan, Australia, Western Australia, New South Wales, N. Queensland, Pacific Ocean (Marshall Is.), Fiji and many other records (Baba, 1936; Burn, 1967; Hamatani & Baba, 1976; Baba, 1977; Coleman, 1989, 2001; Ono, 1999, 2004; Suzuki, 2000; Takamasa, 2003; Nakano, 2004). External morphology: Small, measuring 10–30 mm in length. Body elongate and limaciform with a long and pointed posterior end of the foot. The foot is linear and blue-grey. The ground colour of the body is blueblack with yellow-orange longitudinal lines, which can be continuous or discontinuous (Fig. 1A, B). If the lines are discontinuous they give the appearance of yellow-orange spots. The longitudinal lines or spots are arranged in the following pattern: 2 stripes in the median part of the back between the head and the front of the gills, 2 in the lateral parts of the back between the rhinophores and the rear of the gills, 1 around the margin of the mantle and 3–4 on the sides of the body. Usually the yellow lines are narrower than the blue-black background. All these lines consist of a series of glandular pits, which give them a corrugated aspect (Fig. 1C). The oral tentacles are smooth, very well developed and dorsolaterally grooved. The perfoliate rhinophores are very large, with 15–25 packed lamellae. There are from three to six very large and nonretractile unipinnate gills. The gills form a semicircle surrounding the anal papilla, which is not elevated. These proportionally large rhinophores and gills are a very characteristic feature of this species. The genital pore opens on the right side, slightly closer to the rhinophores than to the gills. The oral tentacles, the rhinophores and the gills can be deep blue, blue-grey or purple depending on the specimens. Internal morphology: The anterior digestive tract begins with a long and muscular oral tube that continues into the buccal mass. At the junction of the oral tube and the buccal mass a pair of thick elongated pouches opens into the digestive system. These pouches are arranged similarly in all Roboastra spp. (Fig. 10A). There are two small, short salivary glands on the buccal bulb, flanking the oesophagus. The buccal mass is shorter in length than the oral tube. The labial cuticle is smooth and very weak. The radular formula of the two 15-mm-long specimens (preserved) is 30 ¥ 3–2.1.1.1.2–3; that of the 4-mm and 6-mm-long specimens (preserved) is 25 ¥ 2.1.1.1.2. The rachidian tooth is rectangular, with a slightly arched upper edge and three denticles. These denticles, while are usually the same size, can be highly asymmetrical (Fig. 2A, B). The inner lateral tooth has typically a strongly curved ga bifid inner cusp. The upper denticle of this inner cusp is strong and little developed; the outer cusp is slender and well developed (Fig. 2C). The proximal outer lateral teeth become smaller near the margin. The inner outer lateral teeth are longer and larger than the remaining outer lateral teeth (Fig. 2A, B). The reproductive system is triaulic (Fig. 3A). The genital mass fills the whole of the second quarter of the body cavity. The hermaphroditic duct widens into a large S-shaped ampulla. The ampulla narrows into a long thin postampullary duct that connects with the oviduct and the prostate. The short oviduct enters the massive female gland mass. The deferent duct lacks a morphologically well-differentiated prostate but it has soft glandular walls that skirt around the seminal receptacle. The distal muscular vas deferens is much narrower and shorter than the prostatic part. It terminates in a dilated penial section. The penis is armed with at least three different kinds of hooked, chitinous spines arranged in helicoidal rows (Fig. 4A). The vaginal duct is long, normally straight and connects to the large, round bursa copulatrix. The seminal receptacle, smaller and more elongate than the bursa copulatrix, has a short duct that connects to the vagina near the bursa after making two loops. A slender uterine duct leaves the vagina and joins the oviduct. The vagina shares a common aperture within the genital atrium with the vaginal gland, which is very well developed, elongate, flattened, with muscular walls. - Remarks: Bergh (1877) described Roboastra gracilis (as Nembrotha gracilis) based on specimens collected from the Philippines. His types were two specimens preserved in alcohol; there are neither notes on, nor sketches of, the living animals. Baba (1949) depicted another specimen from Japan and said that N. gracilis may have either two or three marginal plates. Burn (1967) discovered two new specimens from northern New South Wales (Australia) and redescribed the species under the name Roboastra gracilis justified by radular and genital differences. He included a drawing of the living animal made from a colour transparency and drawings of the half row of radula and the reproductive system. Hamatani & Baba (1976) made a taxonomic comparison between R. gracilis and R. luteolineata using 16 specimens of the former, collected from Japan. In these notes they included a drawing of one specimen and two drawings of the left half row of the radula. No comment was made about the reproductive system. Later Baba (1977) described R. gracilis as being collected from Seto, Japan. He described in further detail both the colour and radula of this small animal; however, again there was no description of the reproductive system. Although Burn’s and Baba’s descriptions of R. gracilis are not very detailed, they are consistent with our specimens. This species has very characteristic features: extremely long rhinophores and gills (the latter simply pinnate), which are unique within the genus, while the body surface is covered with glandular pits. In recent years, many pictures have appeared in different field books and web pages devoted to sea slugs and marine invertebrates. It has been reported that when the animals are disturbed, the yellow-orange spots along the body open, releasing an acidic yellow fluid (Fig. 1C). Once the chemical has been released, they close the spots again. Presumably, this is a defence mechanism but it appears to be quite noxious to other sea slugs (Warren, 2000). At the moment there are no feeding records for this species. However, as a typical Roboastra, it most likely feeds on other polycerids. In our studies we found specimens in CASIZ that have different colours (but the same pattern of coloration) and other differences in their external anatomy (Fig. 1D). They were collected from Hawaii and are 6 mm in length (preserved). Their ground colour is transparent white with lines or spots of brilliant yellow. The end of the oral tentacles, the tips of the rhinophores and gills and the end of the foot are purple. They have 3–4 simply pinnate gills, although these are shorter than in larger specimens from other areas within the Indo-Pacific. Initially, we thought that they might be a different species, but study of their internal anatomy revealed that they are R. gracilis. They are similar in colour to the specimens illustrated by Bertsch & Johnson (1982) and Suzuki (2000). Roboastra rubropapulosa was the second species of the genus described by Bergh (1905). It too has an Indo-Pacific distribution. In his report on the Siboga material, Bergh (1905: 198) described a brightly coloured papillate species (Fig. 5A) as N. rubropapulosa. This differed from his R. gracilis only in that there was one elongate marginal plate on each side of the radular rows. Burn (1967) stated that the number of plates is not a characteristic which can be used to separate the species from its congeners because the division between the marginal plates can be very difficult to see. Thus N. rubropapulosa cannot be effectively separated from R. gracilis and is presently considered to be a synonym of the latter. Nevertheless, photographs have appeared in a number of publications (e.g. Gosliner, Behrens & Willians, 1996) and in web pages (www.medslug.de; www.diveoz.au.com), where the animal is misidentified as R. rubropapulosa (Fig. 5B). Moreover, we have studied some of the specimens deposited at CASIZ (075236, 082920, 082922, 106531) and we have been able to confirm that they represent juvenile specimens of Nembrotha sp., perhaps N. kubaryana, because they have a radula typical of this genus (Fig. 5C)., Published as part of Pola, M., Cervera, J. L & Gosliner, T. M., 2005, Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands, pp. 167-189 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2) on pages 168-173, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634644, {"references":["Bergh LSR. 1877. Malacologische Untersuchungen. In: Semper C, ed. Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen. Zweiter Theil, Wissenschaftliche Resultate 2 (11): 429 - 494.","Bergh LSR. 1905. Die Opisthobranchita der Siboga- Expedition. Siboga Expedition Monographs 50: 1 - 248.","Baba K. 1936. Opisthobranchia of the Ryukyu (Okinawa) Islands. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Kyushu Imperial University 5 (1): 1 - 49.","Burn R. 1967. Notes on an overlooked nudibranch genus, Roboastra Bergh, 1877, and two allied genera (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Australian Zoology 14: 212 - 222.","Hamatani I, Baba K. 1976. Taxonomical comparison between the nudibranch species Roboastra gracilis and R. luteolineata from Yoron Islands of the Amami Islands, Southern Japan. Venus 35 (3): 135 - 137.","Baba K. 1977. Notes on Roboastra gracilis (Bergh, 1877) (Nudibranchia: Doridoidea: Polyceridae) obtained from Seto, Kii, Middle Japan. Veliger 19 (3): 290 - 292.","Coleman N. 1989. Nudibranchs of the South Pacific, 1. Springwood, Qld: Sea Australia Resource Centre.","Coleman N. 2001. 1001 nudibranchs. Catalogue of Indo- Pacific sea slugs. Springwood, Qld: Neville Coleman's Underwater Geographic Pty Ltd.","Ono A. 1999. Opisthobranchs of Kerama Islands. Tokyo: TBS-Britannica.","Ono A. 2004. Opisthobranchs of Ryukyu Islands. Tokyo: Rutles Inc.","Suzuki K. 2000. Opisthobranchs of Izu Peninsula. Tokyo: TSB-Britannica.","Takamasa T. 2003. Opisthobranchs of Bali and Indonesia. Tokyo: Hankyu Communications.","Nakano R. 2004. Opisthobranchs of Japan Islands. Tokyo: Rutles, Inc.","Pola M, Cervera JL, Gosliner TM. 2003. The genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) in the Atlantic Ocean. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 54 (22): 381 - 392.","Baba K. 1949. Opisthobranchia of Sagami Bay. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.","Warren L. 2000. Roboastra gracilis from SE Sulawesi. Message dated July 18 in Sea Slug Forum. http: // www. seaslugforum. net / find. cfm? id = 2722","Bertsch H, Johnson S. 1982. Three new species of dorid nudibranchs (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) from the Hawaiian Islands. Veliger 24 (3): 208 - 218.","Gosliner TM, Behrens D, Willians G. 1996. Coral reef animals of the Indo-Pacific. Monterey, CA: Sea Challengers."]}

ROBOASTRA ARIKA BURN, 1967 (FIG. 8A) Remarks: Burn (1967) described a new species, R. arika, from Lowe Howe Island, more than 600 km from the east coast of Australia. The description was based on a single preserved specimen, 12 mm long, deposited in the Australian Museum. However, it appears that the holotype has been lost (Rudman, pers. comm.). The only available information about this species stems from the original description. Comparison of the drawing of the half row of radula (Fig. 8A) from Burn (1967) with that of the radula (Fig. 8B) of R. luteolineata from Baba (1936) reveals that they appear to be very similar. Since we do not have any more information, and as we are not sure that both are the same species, we nominate R. arika as a taxon dubium. It is important to emphasize that, in the last few years, pictures of a nudibranch incorrectly identified as R. arika have appeared in a number of popular books (Gosliner et al., 1996; Debelius, 1998; Coleman, 2001) and web pages (www.seaslug forum.net, www.medslug.de, www.aqualife.com, etc.). These pictures are from an unknown species of Tambja, which is currently being described., Published as part of Pola, M., Cervera, J. L & Gosliner, T. M., 2005, Review of the systematics of the genus Roboastra Bergh, 1877 (Nudibranchia, Polyceridae, Nembrothinae) with the description of a new species from the Galápagos Islands, pp. 167-189 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2) on page 178, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00167.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634644, {"references":["Burn R. 1967. Notes on an overlooked nudibranch genus, Roboastra Bergh, 1877, and two allied genera (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Australian Zoology 14: 212 - 222.","Baba K. 1936. Opisthobranchia of the Ryukyu (Okinawa) Islands. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Kyushu Imperial University 5 (1): 1 - 49.","Gosliner TM, Behrens D, Willians G. 1996. Coral reef animals of the Indo-Pacific. Monterey, CA: Sea Challengers.","Debelius H. 1998. Nudibranquios y caracolas de mar del Indopacifico. Alicante: Eds. M & G Difusion.","Coleman N. 2001. 1001 nudibranchs. Catalogue of Indo- Pacific sea slugs. Springwood, Qld: Neville Coleman's Underwater Geographic Pty Ltd."]}