1. Lessons learnt from multiple private land conservation programs in Canada to inform species at risk conservation.
- Author
-
Reiter, Dana, Pittman, Jeremy, Ayambire, Raphael Anammasiya, Brown, H. Carolyn P., Colla, Sheila R., Loewen, Theresa M., McCune, Jenny L., Olive, Andrea, and Parrott, Lael
- Subjects
- *
NATURE reserves , *WILDLIFE conservation , *ENDANGERED species , *AGRICULTURAL conservation , *FARMS - Abstract
Action at local scales is needed to reduce documented declines in global biodiversity. Agricultural land constitutes 6.8% of the surface area of Canada, including more than 20 million hectares of grazing pasture alone, providing habitat to many species at risk of extinction. In Canada, where a voluntary stewardship approach is the main strategy for species at risk conservation on privately owned and managed lands, the challenge is to create conservation programs that maximize participation. We reviewed research on voluntary conservation programs on agricultural lands from five Canadian provinces to understand which approaches were most effective in maximizing participation. The objective of this paper is to contribute to policy development for conservation on private lands in Canada. We highlight common themes from all five regions. Key findings include the value of establishing a local delivery agent for the program, and the importance of designing the program to be in alignment with existing agricultural operations. Private landowners may build trust with local program managers, and are more open to making subtle adjustments to their land management rather than major changes. We conclude with eight recommendations to support the development of high impact species at risk stewardship programs on agricultural lands in Canada. Key Messages: The use of a local program delivery agency that engages in meaningful, long‐term stakeholder engagement and collaboration builds trust and encourages participation.Land managers appreciate flexible and collaborative program design that aligns with current agricultural land management.Stable, long‐term organizational funding and strong financial incentives for land managers are key. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF