Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) has widespread routine use as a tool in proteomics for confirmation of primary structure determination and for characterization of purified proteins (Griffiths et al. 2001). Application of ESI-MS to detection and characterization of non-covalent complexes of biomolecules is not as well established, but there are now many examples of noncovalent interactions that have been studied in the gas phase, including those between protein subunits, proteins and nucleic acids, and enzymes and substrates (Veenstra 1999; Burkitt et al. 2003; Sanglier et al. 2003). The most obvious use of ESI-MS for study of these complexes is in determination of the stoichiometry of binding partners, and this has recently been extended to monitor subunit exchange between small heat shock proteins in real time (Sobott et al. 2002). The establishment of stoichiometry is a prelude to more detailed structural determination of biomolecules in complexes. The stability of the complex (dissociation constants), the types of noncovalent interactions (e.g., polar vs. nonpolar), and conformational changes in the binding partners upon complex formation are important when considering the mechanism of biological action of biomolecular complexes (e.g., protein–protein, protein–DNA). There is a suite of biophysical techniques that can be applied to study these properties. These range from monitoring of changes in fluorescence or surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for determination of dissociation constants and use of circular dichroism and NMR spectroscopy for following conformational changes, ultimately to determination of complete structures of complexes by NMR, X-ray crystallography, or cryo-electron microscopy. ESI-MS offers speed and sensitivity in monitoring components of equilibrium mixtures. Consequently, there are increasing numbers of reports of its use for determination of dissociation constants or relative binding affinities of non-covalent complexes (Jorgensen et al. 1998; Kapur et al. 2002; Bligh et al. 2003). Furthermore, there are ESI-MS studies where the stabilities of noncovalent complexes have been assessed by their resistance to dissociation in the mass spectrometer using CID (collision-induced dissociation) or thermal denaturation experiments (Gupta et al. 2001; de Brouwer et al. 2002; Benesch et al. 2003). Nevertheless, data obtained from ESI-MS studies need to be interpreted with caution. First, the ionization process itself might perturb equilibria (Wang and Agnes 1999). Second, there is a paucity of information about changes in the strength or specificity of noncovalent interactions that occur on transfer from the condensed to the gas phase during the ionization process. The stabilities of complexes between biological macromolecules involve contributions from ionic, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, and/or van der Waals interactions. Several ESI-MS studies support the proposal that electrostatic interactions are strengthened in vacuo, while hydrophobic interactions are unaffected or weakened through loss of water during desolvation and/or ionization (Loo 1997). For these reasons, it is important to study the behavior of noncovalent complexes that have been well characterized in solution to enable evaluation of data from ESI-MS experiments. Recently, as part of a study aimed at investigating the behavior of noncovalent complexes on transferal from solution to the gas phase, we used ESI-MS to study the well-characterized Tus-Ter (protein–DNA) complex that terminates DNA replication in Escherichia coli (Kapur et al. 2002). We showed that relative binding affinities of mutant Tus proteins for double-stranded TerB DNA were the same in the gas phase as in solution, and conversely, that the relative affinities of wild-type Tus for various double-stranded DNA sequences were unchanged on transferal to the gas phase. Both the X-ray structure (Kamada et al. 1996) and SPR studies of the ionic strength dependence of dissociation of the Tus-TerB complex (Neylon et al. 2000) show there are substantial polar and electrostatic contacts between the binding partners. Consistent with this, ESI mass spectra showed that dissociation of the complex required high concentrations of ammonium acetate, in the range of 1–2 M (Kapur et al. 2002). For the present work, we used ESI-MS to investigate the predominantly hydrophobic interactions between two protein subunits of E. coli DNA polymerase III: the θ subunit, and the N-terminal domain (residues 2–186) of the ɛ subunit (ɛ186). DNA polymerase III is a multisubunit enzyme that is the major replicative polymerase of E. coli (Kelman and O’Donnell 1995; McHenry 2003). Three of the 10 subunits, α, ɛ, and θ, comprise the catalytic core: the large α-subunit contains the polymerase active site, and ɛ contributes the proofreading 3′→5′ exonuclease activity, while the precise function of θ is not known (Studwell-Vaughan and O’Donnell 1993; Kunkel and Bebenek 2000). The ɛ subunit consists of two domains (Perrino et al. 1999; Taft-Benz and Schaaper 1999; Hamdan et al. 2000). The N-terminal domain (ɛ186) contains the exonuclease active site and forms a stable 1:1 complex with θ (Perrino et al. 1999; Hamdan et al. 2002a). The complex forms readily and essentially quantitatively on mixing of the two subunits, and is sufficiently stable that it can be isolated by ion-exchange chromatography (Hamdan et al. 2002a). It is stable for extended periods at 25°C in aqueous solution under conditions required for NMR studies (Pintacuda et al. 2004). Although there is no high-resolution structure yet available for the ɛ186–θ complex, we have reported the crystal structure of ɛ186 (Hamdan et al. 2002b) and the solution structure of θ (Keniry et al. 2000). NMR chemical shift mapping experiments in the latter study suggested that a series of small hydrophobic residues on the external face of the first helix of θ (residues 21–27, AAAGVAF) are involved in its association with ɛ186, and this has been confirmed in the more recent NMR structure of θ in the ɛ186–θ complex (M. Keniry, pers. comm.). Moreover, recent comparisons of NMR spectra of free ɛ186 and ɛ186–θ have identified hydrophobic residues in ɛ at the θ-binding interface, including Ile31, Val50, Val58, Ile68, Leu74, Ile154, Leu161, Leu165, and Leu166 (DeRose et al. 2003). It appears, therefore, that interaction between the two proteins is mediated largely via aliphatic side chains, and the forces that hold them together are largely hydrophobic in nature. In the present work, we aimed to use ESI-MS to supply “snapshots” of components of mixtures of ɛ186 and θ. The stability of the ɛ186–θ complex was studied under various solution and instrumental conditions. Its stability at high ionic strength is consistent with a dominant contribution of nonpolar interactions, in contrast with that of the Tus-Ter complexes, where interactions are primarily polar and electrostatic in nature and are disrupted at relatively low ionic strength (Kapur et al. 2002). In addition, ESI-MS experiments suggested that the ɛ subunit protects ɛ186 from aggregation in organic solvent/water mixtures. This is consistent with earlier experiments in which θ was shown to stabilize ɛ186 against thermal inactivation (Hamdan et al. 2002a).