Search

Cellulosic material is considered to be excellent for food packaging due to its low cost, easy degradability, and high recyclability rates. However, its application is still limited due to its porous structure and high hydrophilicity, which provide high permeabilities to grease, gas and water vapor. One solution to fix these issues and to bring new functionalities that can also extend food shelf life is to coat the paper substrate with biopolymers containing nanoparticles and/or components with antioxidant and/or antimicrobial activities. In this regard, the aim of this study was to review some aspects of the current knowledge critically and didactically on applications of biopolymer-based coatings incorporated with active components and/or nanoparticles on paper/paperboard materials usually applied as primary cellulosic active packaging. Studies have shown that this combination can positively improve the physical, mechanical, and barrier properties of cellulosic packaging, along with the enhancement of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. A better understanding of these aspects enables the use of other active compounds to develop more functionality to the packaging itself as well as to apply it to food packaging in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paper has been used to engineer many types of bio-diagnostics. A major issue to most paper-based bio-diagnostics is the biomolecule instability causing the short shelf-life of the diagnostics. Commercial papers contain various polymeric additives. Polyamidoamine-epichlorohydrin (PAE), a polyelectrolyte typically used as wet-strength agent, is commonly used in filter papers and paper towels, which are often used as substrate in bioactive paper. However, the effect of cellulose or polymeric additives on antibody bioactivity is unknown. This limits paper optimization for diagnostic applications. In this study, model papers were made with and without PAE addition. IgM Anti-A blood typing antibody was physisorbed and dried on paper, aged for up to 9 weeks at different relative humidity (RH) conditions and the antibody activity was measured. The antibody bioactivity was represented as blood typing efficiency measured by image analysis. The surface chemical composition was measured using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Antibody bioactivity loss was promoted by elevated RH, corresponding to increased paper water content. PAE significantly reduces the paper water content under ambient environment. Antibody bioactivity is higher on paper made with PAE under the high humidity conditions (57.6%–84.3% RH). However, under conditions of humidity saturation (100%RH), PAE shows little effect on reducing paper water content nor on protecting antibody bioactivity. These results demonstrate the water content of paper to be associated with antibody bioactivity loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The reaction kinetics of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) adsorbed on paper was quantified by image analysis using a colorimetric technique under conditions of excess enzyme. A classical reaction kinetics approach integrated with image processing technique was used to analyse the coloured product formation from the enzyme substrate reaction against time. The order of reaction and rate constant of enzyme activities on paper surface were calculated. ALP was either physisorbed directly on paper or adsorbed on paper treated with a monolayer of a high molecular weight cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), an anionic polyacrylic acid (PAA) or a high molecular weight polyethylene oxide (PEO). The reaction rate of enzymatic paper follows a first order reaction with respect to the concentration of enzyme–substrate complex. ALP immobilized on paper has a reaction rate 2 to 3 orders of magnitude lower than the free ALP enzyme in buffer solution. This might be due to a critical loss of enzyme flexibility upon adsorption. No increase in reaction rate was achieved by immobilizing ALP on paper treated with a high molecular weight cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) or a highly charged anionic polyacrylic acid oligomer (PAA), which suggests the enzyme orientation was not significantly affected. However, the reaction rate for ALP on PEO treated paper was lower than that on CPAM or PAA treated papers. That is probably due to some PEO-enzyme interaction affecting the tertiary structure of the ALP enzyme. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Research into paper-based sensors or functional materials that can perform analytical functions with active recognition capabilities is rapidly expanding, and significant research effort has been made into the design and fabrication of bioactive paper at the biosensor level to detect potential health hazards. A key step in the fabrication of bioactive paper is the design of the experimental and operational procedures for the immobilization of biomolecules such as antibodies, enzymes, phages, cells, proteins, synthetic polymers and DNA aptamers on a suitably prepared paper membrane. The immobilization methods are concisely categorized into physical absorption, bioactive ink entrapment, bioaffinity attachment and covalent chemical bonding immobilization. Each method has individual immobilization characteristics. Although every biomolecule-paper combination has to be optimized before use, the bioactive ink entrapment method is the most commonly used approach owing to its general applicability and biocompatibility. Currently, there are four common applications of bioactive paper: (1) paper-based bioassay or paper-based analytical devices for sample conditioning; (2) counterfeiting and countertempering in the packaging and construction industries; (3) pathogen detection for food and water quality monitoring; and (4) deactivation of pathogenic bacteria using antimicrobial paper. This article reviews and compares the different biomolecule immobilization techniques and discusses current trends. Current, emerging and future applications of bioactive paper are also discussed. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]