Search

Effort-based decision-making provides a framework to understand the mental computations estimating the amount of work ("effort") required to obtain a reward. The aim of the current review is to systematically synthesize the available literature on effort-based decision-making across the spectrum of eating and weight disorders. More specifically, the current review summarises the literature examining whether 1) individuals with eating disorders and overweight/obesity are willing to expend more effort for rewards compared to healthy controls, 2) if particular components of effort-based decision-making (i.e. risk, discounting) relate to specific binge eating conditions, and 3) how individual differences in effort and reward -processing measures relate to eating pathology and treatment measures. A total of 96 studies were included in our review, following PRISMA guidelines. The review suggests that individuals with binge eating behaviours 1) are more likely to expend greater effort for food rewards, but not monetary rewards, 2) demonstrate greater decision-making impairments under risk and uncertainty, 3) prefer sooner rather than delayed rewards for both food and money, and 4) demonstrate increased implicit 'wanting' for high fat sweet foods. Finally, individual differences in effort and reward -processing measures relating to eating pathology and treatment measures are also discussed. • Few studies examine effort-based decision-making frameworks in disordered eating populations. • There is a dearth of investigations specifically examining food-related stimuli across effort-based constructs. • Individuals with binge eating behaviours demonstrate greater decision-making impairments under risk and uncertainty. • Research assessing delay discounting has validated preferences for sooner rather than delayed rewards in binge-type disorders. • Incentive salience studies show increased 'liking' and 'wanting' for highly palatable foods in binge-type disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This is the first study to examine cannabis use changes across clinical ED groups. • A general decrease in regular cannabis use occurred between 2004 and 2014. • In 2014 a breakpoint occurred, whereafter regular cannabis use rates began to rise. • Relaxation of medical cannabis laws coincides with increasing cannabis use rates. • Comorbid psychiatric diagnoses did not increase the odds of regular cannabis use. Regular cannabis use (CU), defined as "weekly or more often", is associated with a number of negative mental health outcomes. In the last decade, Canada legalized first medical and then recreational CU. Despite higher prevalence in mental health populations, little research has documented changes in frequency of CU with progressive legalization of cannabis. This study examined rates of CU in a sample of 843 treatment-seeking patients with eating disorders (ED) in an outpatient setting between 2004 and 2020. Across ED diagnoses, segmented regression indicated a significant break-point in regular CU in 2014, commensurate with the relaxation of medical cannabis laws. Regular CU increased from 4.9 % to 23.7 % from 2014 to 2020; well above the stable 6 % found in the general population. No significant break-point was observed in either alcohol or illicit substance use over the same time period. Significant increases in regular CU were found in patients with anorexia nervosa and binge eating disorder, while regular use remained stable in patients with bulimia nervosa. Comorbid psychiatric diagnoses did not increase odds of regular CU. Findings suggest certain patient groups with mental illness may be at risk of engaging in high frequency use in the context of legislation implying medical benefits of cannabis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]