Search

Background: Immunotherapies have shown clinical activity in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, for which outcomes remain poor despite standard of care treatment with gemcitabine and cisplatin. We aimed to evaluate gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab with or without tremelimumab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer., Methods: This open-label, single-centre, phase 2 study was conducted at Seoul National University Hospital. Eligible patients were treatment-naïve adults aged 18 years or older with histologically proven unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer, at least one measurable lesion based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, life expectancy of 12 weeks or longer, and adequate healthy organ and bone marrow function. Initially, all patients received one 3-week cycle of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2 ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 and 8 followed by gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab (1120 mg) and tremelimumab (75 mg) on day 1 of each cycle, starting with the second cycle (chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group). Following protocol amendment, patients were recruited to receive gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab, starting on day 1 of the first cycle (chemotherapy plus durvalumab group) or gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab and tremelimumab also from day 1 of the first cycle (chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group) in parallel and allocated using a random block method. Assessors and patients were not masked to the treatment group. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, assessed in the efficacy population (ie, patients who were treated at least until the first tumour response assessment). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03046862 (active)., Findings: Between March 2, 2017, and Feb 13, 2020, 128 patients were enrolled (32 in the chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group, 49 in the chemotherapy plus durvalumab group, and 47 in the chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group). Four patients (two in the chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group and two in the chemotherapy plus durvalumab group) were excluded and 124 were evaluable for tumour response. The median duration of follow-up was 48·2 months (IQR 41·5-49·4) for the chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group, 26·6 months (19·0-27·9) for the chemotherapy plus durvalumab group, and 24·2 months (20·7-31·7) for the chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group. 82 (66%) of 124 patients achieved an objective response (15 [50%] of 30 in the chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group, 34 [72%] of 47 in the chemotherapy plus durvalumab group, and 33 [70%] of 47 in the chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab group). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (67 [53%] of 126), anaemia (50 [40%]), and decreased platelet count (24 [19%]), with no unexpected safety events. No adverse events leading to discontinuation or death occurred., Interpretation: Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus immunotherapy showed promising efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with biliary tract cancer. Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab are being evaluated in the phase 3, TOPAZ-1 study (NCT03875235) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer., Funding: AstraZeneca; National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. 2021R1A2C2007430)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests D-YO received research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Array, Eli Lilly, Servier, BeiGene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Handok and has been a consultant or adviser for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Genentech, Merck Serono, Bayer, Taiho, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Halozyme, Zymeworks, Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGene, Basilea, and Turning Point. YL, VG, PM, WL, SW, QZ, and MCR are or were employees and shareholders of AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Up to 20% of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) have alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) genes, including homologous recombination (HR) genes. Therefore, the DDR pathway could be a promising target for new drug development in BTC. We aim to investigate the anti-tumor effects using poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and WEE1 inhibitors in BTC., Materials and Methods: We used 10 BTC cell lines to evaluate an anti-tumor effect of olaparib (a PARP inhibitor) and AZD1775 (a WEE1 inhibitor) in in vitro. Additionally, we established SNU869 xenograft model for in vivo experiments., Results: In this study, we observed a modest anti-proliferative effect of olaparib. DNA double-strand break (DSB) and apoptosis were increased by olaparib in BTC cells. However, olaparib-induced DNA DSB was repaired through the HR pathway, and G2 arrest was induced to secure the time for repair. As AZD1775 typically regulates the G2/M checkpoint, we combined olaparib with AZD1775 to abrogate G2 arrest. We observed that AZD1775 downregulated p-CDK1, a G2/M cell cycle checkpoint protein, and induced early mitotic entry. AZD1775 also decreased CtIP and RAD51 expression and disrupted HR repair. In xenograft model, olaparib plus AZD1775 treatment reduced tumor growth more potently than did monotherapy with either drug., Conclusion: This is the first study to suggest that olaparib combined with AZD1775 can induce synergistic anti-tumor effects against BTC. Combination therapy that blocks dual PARP and WEE1 has the potential to be further clinically developed for BTC patients.

Olaparib, a potent PARP inhibitor, has been shown to have great anti-tumor effects in some tumor types. Although biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a good candidate for DNA damage response (DDR)-targeted agents, targeted DDR inhibitors, including olaparib, are currently rarely evaluated in BTC. In our project, a total of ten BTC cell lines were used to assess the efficacy of olaparib. Olaparib alone showed moderate anti-proliferative effects in BTC cells and increased p-ATR and PD-L1 expression levels. In combination with an ATR inhibitor (AZD6738, ceralasertib) showed synergistic anti-proliferative effects and increased DNA strand breaks in vitro. PD-L1 induced by olaparib was also downregulated by ceralasertib through p-STAT-3 and YAP reduction with or without human primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In SNU478-xenograft models, the combination treatment significantly suppressed tumor growth. PD-L1 and YAP were strongly downregulated, similar to in vitro conditions, and expression of CXCR2 and CXCR4 was further reduced. In the current ongoing clinical trial (NCT04298021), BTC patients treated with olaparib and ceralasertib combination have shown tumor response. In conclusion, co-targeting of PARP and ATR might be a potential therapeutic approach for patients with BTC., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the association between soluble TGF-β (sTGF-β) and soluble PD-L1 (sPDL1), the dynamics of sTGF-β during treatment and its prognostic role in biliary tract cancer (BTC)., Methods: The study population consisted of 90 BTC patients with first-line chemotherapy (cohort 1) and 35 BTC patients with second- or third-line chemotherapy (cohort 2). Plasma sTGF-β and sPDL1 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay., Results: In both groups, sTGF-β was positive correlated with sPDL1 for baseline and change values after treatment. sTGF-β was elevated at disease progression compared to baseline in cohort 1 (P < .001). Increased sTGF-β after treatment revealed worse DFS and OS (P = .024, P = .028, respectively) in cohort 1 and significantly shorter OS (P = .020) in cohort 2. In multivariable analysis, this prognostic value of increased sTGF-β for OS retained its significance in both cohorts (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.8, 95% CI, 1.1-3.0, P = .028, in cohort 1; HR = 4.7, 95% CI, 1.5-14.6, P = .007, in cohort 2)., Conclusions: In BTC, sTGF-β was positively correlated with sPDL1 for baseline and changes after chemotherapy, and increased as tumour burden. sTGF-β could be associated with survival; particularly, an elevated value after treatment suggests worse prognosis., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Currently, the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway represents a key target for new cancer drug development. Advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis because of the lack of efficacious treatment options. Although DNA repair pathway alterations have been reported in many patients with BTC, little is known regarding the effects of DDR-targeted agents against BTC., Materials and Methods: In this study, nine BTC cell lines were exposed to the WEE1 inhibitor (AZD1775). In vitro, MTT assay, colony-forming assay, cell cycle analysis, phospho-histone H3 staining assay, Transwell migration assay, and western blot were performed. Then, to enhance the antitumor effect of AZD1775, the combination treatment of WEE1 inhibitor and ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related (ATR) inhibitor (AZD6738) was conducted using MTT assay and comet assay. Finally, HuCCT-1 and SNU2670 xenograft models were established to confirm the anti-tumor effect of AZD1775 alone. Furthermore, the combination treatment was also evaluated in SNU2670 xenograft models., Results: AZD1775 blocked the phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDC25C in all cell lines, but significantly increased apoptosis and S phase arrest in sensitive cells. However, increased p-ATR and phosphorylated ataxia telangiectasia mutated levels were observed in less sensitive cells. In addition, in vitro and in vivo data illustrated that AZD1775 combined with AZD6738 exerted more potent anti-tumor effects than either drug alone. Although WEE1 inhibition has promising anti-tumor effects in some BTC cells, the addition of ATR inhibitors could enhance its efficacy., Conclusion: Taken together, this study supports further clinical development of DDR-targeted strategies as monotherapy or combination regimens for BTC.

Background: A phase Ib study of binimetinib and capecitabine for gemcitabine-pretreated biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients was conducted., Methods: Binimetinib and capecitabine were dosed twice daily on days 1-14, in 3-week cycles. In the dose-escalation (DE) part, three dose levels (DL) were tested (DL1: binimetinib/capecitabine, 15 mg/1000 mg/m 2 ; DL2: 30 mg/1000 mg/m 2 ; DL3: 30 mg/1250 mg/m 2 )., Results: In the DE part, nine patients were recruited and no dose-limiting toxicity was noted. Therefore, the recommended phase 2 dose was determined as DL3. In the expansion part, 25 patients were enrolled. In total, 34 patients, 25 (73.5%) and 9 patients (26.5%) were second-line and third-line settings, respectively. The 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 64.0%, and the median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 4.1 and 7.8 months. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 20.6% and 76.5%. In total, 68.4% of stable diseases were durable (> 12 weeks). Furthermore, patients with RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway mutations (38.5%) showed significantly better tumour response (p = 0.028), PFS (5.4 vs. 3.5 months, p = 0.010) and OS (10.8 vs. 5.9 months, p = 0.160) than wild type. Most of the adverse events were grade 1/2 and manageable., Conclusions: A combination of binimetinib and capecitabine shows acceptable tolerability and promising antitumor efficacy for gemcitabine-pretreated BTC, especially in patients with RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway mutations., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02773459).

Purpose: The DNA damage response (DDR) is a multi-complex network of signaling pathways involved in DNA damage repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and apoptosis. In the case of biliary tract cancer (BTC), the strategy of DDR targeting has not been evaluated, even though many patients have DNA repair pathway alterations. The purpose of this study was to test the DDR-targeting strategy in BTC using an ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor., Materials and Methods: A total of nine human BTC cell lines were used for evaluating anti-tumor effect of AZD6738 (ATR inhibitor) alone or combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents through MTT assay, colony-forming assays, cell cycle analyses, and comet assays. We established SNU478-mouse model for in vivo experiments to confirm our findings., Results: Among nine human BTC cell lines, SNU478 and SNU869 were the most sensitive to AZD6738, and showed low expression of both ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and p53. AZD6738 blocked p-Chk1 and p-glycoprotein and increased γH2AX, a marker of DNA damage, in sensitive cells. AZD6738 significantly increased apoptosis, G2/M arrest and p21, and decreased CDC2. Combinations of AZD6738 and cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents exerted synergistic effects in colony-forming assays, cell cycle analyses, and comet assays. In our mouse models, AZD6738 monotherapy decreased tumor growth and the combination with cisplatin showed more potent effects on growth inhibition, decreased Ki-67, and increased terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling than monotherapy with each drug., Conclusion: In BTC, DDR targeting strategy using ATR inhibitor demonstrated promising antitumor activity alone or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. This supports further clinical development of DDR targeting strategy in BTC.

Purpose: Jab1 is a coactivator of c-Jun that enhances the transcriptional function of c-Jun. Jab1 is frequently overexpressed in various cancers and is associatedwith poor prognosis of cancer patients. Thus, Jab1 could be a potential therapeutic target in cancer. However, the role of Jab1 in biliary tract cancer (BTC) has not been studied., Materials and Methods: We performed in vitro and in vivo experiments to evaluate the therapeutic potential ofJab1 inhibition in BTC., Results: Among 8 BTC cell lines, many showed higher Jab1 expression levels. In addition, Jab1 silencing by siRNA increased p27 expression levels. SNU478 and HuCCT-1 cells exhibited profound Jab1 knockdown and increased p27 expression by Jab1-specific siRNA transfection. Jab1 silencing induced anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects and resulted in G1 cell cycle arrest in SNU478 and HuCCT-1 cells. In addition, Jab1 silencing potentiated the anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects of cisplatin by increasing DNA damage. Interestingly,Jab1 knockdown increased PTEN protein half-life, resulting in increased PTEN expression. In the HuCCT-1 mouse xenograft model, stable knockdown of Jab1 by shRNA also showed anti-proliferative effects in vivo, with decreased Ki-67 expression and AKT phosphorylation and increased Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling and p27 expression., Conclusion: Jab1 knockdown demonstrated anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects in BTC cells by increasing DNA damage and stabilizing PTEN, resulting in G1 cell cycle arrest. In addition, Jab1 silencing potentiated the anti-proliferative effects of cisplatin. Our data suggest that Jab1 may be a potential therapeutic target in BTC that is worthy of further investigations.

There are currently no clinically validated therapeutic targets for biliary tract cancer (BTC). Despite promising results in other cancers, compounds targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, alone or in combination with Ras/Raf/MEK pathway inhibitors, have not been evaluated in BTC. Here, we examined the effects of a pan-PI3K inhibitor (BKM120) with or without a MEK inhibitor (MEK162), on eight human BTC cell lines carrying mutations in K-Ras and/or the PI3K catalytic subunit, PI3KCA. BKM120 inhibited the colony-forming ability and migration of BTC cells carrying wild-type (WT) PI3KCA and either mutant (MT) or WT K-Ras, but not of cells carrying mutations in both genes. In K-Ras-WT cells, BKM120 decreased the phosphorylation of Akt, its downstream effector kinase p70S6K, and the translational repressor 4E-BP1. Interestingly, BKM120 did not induce cell cycle arrest or suppress PI3K signaling via restoration of p-4E-BP1 in cells with PIK3CA and K-Ras double mutations. Notably, the resistance of dual K-Ras/PI3KCA-mutant cells to BKM120 was overcome by treatment with a combination of BKM120 and MEK162. Our findings thus support the clinical development of BKM120 monotherapy or BKM120/MEK162 combination therapy for the treatment of BTC., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Src, a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, is involved in a number of cancer-related signaling pathways and aberrantly activated in biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aimed to elucidate the potential role of Src as a therapeutic target in BTC. We tested bosutinib, an orally active c-Src/Abl kinase inhibitor, alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents using 9 human BTC cell lines: SNU-245, SNU-308, SNU-478, SNU-869, SNU-1079, SNU-1196, HuCCT1, TFK-1, and EGI-1. Of these, SNU-308 and SNU-478 were relatively sensitive to bosutinib. Bosutinib abrogated phosphorylation of Src and its downstream molecules, and significantly increased G1 cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Bosutinib significantly inhibited cell migration and invasion and decreased epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers. Bosutinib combined with gemcitabine or cisplatin showed synergistic antiproliferative and antimigratory effects. In addition, this combination further inhibited phosphorylation of Src and its downstream molecules and decreased epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker expression compared with bosutinib alone. We established a SNU-478 xenograft model for in vivo experiments, because SNU-478 was more tumorigenic than SNU-308. Bosutinib combined with gemcitabine or cisplatin showed significantly more potent antitumor effects than bosutinib alone. Bosutinib combined with gemcitabine further decreased Ki-67 expression and Src phosphorylation, and further increased TUNEL expression. Our data suggest that Src might be a potential therapeutic target in BTC. Bosutinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity alone or in combination with gemcitabine or cisplatin in BTC cells, which supports further clinical development in patients with advanced BTC. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(7); 1515-24. ©2016 AACR., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)