Search

Background: The diagnosis Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) has recently been included in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. To identify individuals who need help coping with grief, knowledge is needed about who is at risk of developing PGD. We, therefore, conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature on risk factors for prolonged grief symptoms (PGS)., Methods: Based on a literature search in PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL, we included the most frequently investigated risk factors in a meta-analysis. The effect size correlation was used as the standardized measure of the strength of the association between the risk factor and PGS., Results: Based on 120 studies of 61.580 participants published between 1989 and 2023, 19 risk factors were included in the meta-analysis. For the adjusted associations, the strongest associations with PGS were pre-loss grief symptoms (ESr = 0.39, 95%CI[0.24-0.53]) and depression (ESr = 0.30, 95%CI[0.13-0.44]). Small, but statistically significant associations were observed for unexpected death, violent/unnatural death, low educational level, low income, female gender, anxious attachment style, and death of a child or partner., Conclusions: An updated overview of risk factors for PGS is presented, including their predictive strength. The results offer knowledge that can aid prevention and early identification of people at risk of PGD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is a newly recognized mental disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. Several studies using exploratory factor analysis have found a unidimensional structure of the Prolonged Grief-13 (PG-13) measure of PGD. The recently published ICD-11 proposal proposes a distinction between two clusters of symptoms: Separation distress symptoms and associated cognitive, emotional and behavioral symptoms. The aim of the current study is to test competing factor structures of PGD in Danish samples of bereaved. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test competing models of PGD among two samples of in total 1093 adults that completed the questionnaires 6 months post loss of either a parent or a partner. Convergent and divergent validity was tested via the relationship to depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and general wellbeing using regression analysis. The Danish version of the PG 13 appeared to be both valid and reliable. A two-factor model reflecting the division of core- and associated symptoms of prolonged grief disorder provided the best description of the PG-13 among Danish bereaved adults and there was evidence of partial structural invariance of the latent structure of PGD across bereavement types. Convergent and divergent validity analysis supported the validity of the two-factor model of PGD. SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES: : A latent variable model differing between core- and associated symptomatology of grief is supported. The Danish translation of PG-13 is a valid measure of prolonged grief symptomatology., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest by any of the authors or in relation to funding., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is included in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR and includes a requirement of cultural deviance. This study examined endorsement rates and factors associated with endorsement of this criterion among Danish bereaved spouses (n = 425) and their adult children (n = 159) four years post-loss. In total, 7.5% (n = 44) participants endorsed this criterion. Both including and excluding the criterion, the prevalence rates for probable DSM-5-TR PGD were 1.4% (n = 8) and 1.7% (n = 10), respectively and for probable ICD-11 PGD were 1.4% (n = 8) and 2.2% (n = 13), respectively. Age and gender of the deceased, age of the bereaved, greater grief severity, and comorbid psychopathology were positively associated with endorsement of the criterion. Findings demonstrate low endorsement of the cultural deviation criterion, that its inclusion excludes several potential PGD cases, and unanticipated associations with several factors raise questions about the criterion's validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]