Search

Eight novel Schiff bases derived from benzil dihydrazone (BDH) or benzil monohydrazone (BMH) and four fused‐ring carbonyl compounds (3‐formylindole, FI; 3‐acetylindole, AI; 3‐formyl‐1‐methylindole, MFI; 1‐formylnaphthalene, FN) were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ESI–QTOF–MS, 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, as well as single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. They are (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane (BDHFI), C32H24N6, (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[1‐(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)ethylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane (BDHAI), C34H28N6, (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[(1‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane (BMHMFI) acetonitrile hemisolvate, C34H28N6·0.5CH3CN, (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[(naphthalen‐1‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane (BDHFN), C36H26N4, (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone (BMHFI), C23H17N3O, (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[1‐(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)ethylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone (BMHAI), C24H19N3O, (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[(1‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone (BMHMFI), C24H19N3O, and (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[(naphthalen‐1‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone (BMHFN) C25H18N2O. Moreover, the in vitro cytotoxicity of the eight title compounds was evaluated against two tumour cell lines (A549 human lung cancer and 4T1 mouse breast cancer) and two normal cell lines (MRC‐5 normal lung cells and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts) by MTT assay. The results indicate that four (BDHMFI, BDHFN, BMHMFI and BMHFN) are inactive and the other four (BDHFI, BDHAI, BMHFI and BMHAI) show severe toxicities against human A549 and mouse 4T1 cells, similar to the standard cisplatin. All the compounds exhibited weaker cytotoxicity against normal cells than cancer cells. The Swiss Target Prediction web server was applied for the prediction of protein targets. After analyzing the differences in frequency hits between these active and inactive Schiff bases, 18 probable targets were selected for reverse docking with the Surflex‐dock function in SYBYL‐X 2.0 software. Three target proteins, i.e. human ether‐á‐go‐go‐related (hERG) potassium channel, the inhibitor of apoptosis protein 3 and serine/threonine‐protein kinase PIM1, were chosen as the targets. Finally, the ligand‐based structure–activity relationships were analyzed based on the putative protein target (hERG) docking results, which will be used to design and synthesize novel hERG ion channel inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A series of mono- and di-Schiff-bases based on Benzil Dihydrazone ( BDH ) were designed and synthesized to be set as the model compounds to explain which one should be the advanced product and which parameters will determine the end-product. As the first step of a series of investigations, this article presents the syntheses and characterization of five new Schiff-bases plus one preliminary reported Schiff-base, all derived from BDH . The compounds were characterized by single crystal (or conventional powder) X-ray diffractometry, elemental analysis, m.p., 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, IR and UV–Vis. Structural features of the five new Schiff-bases are similar. For instance, all molecules are nonsymmetrical/symmetrical double helix with the torsion angle of two “half-parts” about 72–97°. The Ph-C N–N C-Ph moiety all exists in planar and anti form, indicating significant conjugation. The crystal structures appear to be stabilized by π-stacking between the aromatic rings, as well as by intermolecular hydrogen bonds and C–H … π stacking interactions. DFT calculations have been performed to explain the trend of the experimentally measured reaction yields. In the case of the studied systems by us, the type of Schiff-bases exhibits a clear dependence on the molar ratio of reactants if the products have similar stabilities. Otherwise the importance of reaction conditions will be weakened and the most stable product will be favored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A series of mono- and di-Schiff bases formed between benzil dihydrazone {BDH; systematic name: (1 Z)-[(2 E)-2-hydrazinylidene-1,2-diphenylethylidene]hydrazine} and three isomeric chlorobenzaldehydes were designed and synthesized to be used as model compounds to help to explain the reaction mechanisms for the formation of Schiff bases. These compounds are 1-(2-chlorobenzylidene)-2-{2-[2-(2-chlorobenzylidene)hydrazin-1-ylidene]-1,2-diphenylethylidene}hydrazine (BDHOCB), and the 3-chloro (BDHMCB) and 4-chloro (BDHPCB) analogues, all having the formula C28H20Cl2N4. Surprisingly, only di-Schiff bases were obtained; our attempts to push the reaction in favour of the mono-Schiff bases all failed. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to explain the trend in the experimental results. In the case of the systems studied, the type of Schiff base produced exhibits a clear dependence on the HOMO-LUMO energy gaps (Δ EHOMO-LUMO), i.e. the product is mainly governed by its stability. The compounds were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffractometry, elemental analysis, melting point, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy. The structural features of the three new Schiff bases are similar. For instance, they have the same chemical formula, all the molecules have a symmetrical double helix structure, with each Ph-C=N-N=C-Ph arm exhibiting an anti conformation, and their supramolecular interactions include intermolecular π-π and weak C-H...π stacking interactions. The crystal systems are different, however, viz. triclinic (space group P) for BDHPCB, monoclinic (space group P21/ n) for BDHOCB and orthorhombic (space group Pnna) for BDHMCB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]