Search

Objective: To perform a systematic review to assess the incidence of transient (<6 months) and persistent (>6 months) stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) after transurethral surgeries for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. We included studies comparing monopolar (M)/bipolar (B) transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) vs ablation vs enucleation procedures. Incidence of incontinence was assessed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method and reported as odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-values. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 Evidence Synthesis: Twenty-eight studies were included. Incidence of transient SUI was 4.6%, 6.0%, 3.0%, and 2.4% after ablation, enucleation, M-TURP, and B-TURP, respectively. Incidence of persistent SUI was 1.1% after ablation, 1.7% after enucleation and M-TURP, and 1.0% after B-TURP. Incidence of transient UUI was 2.0%, 7.3%, 4.4%, and 2.8% after ablation, enucleation, M-TURP, and B-TURP, respectively. Incidence of persistent UUI was 2.2% after M-TURP. The incidence of transient MUI was 5.1%, 0.8%, 5.4%, and 0.9% after ablation, enucleation, M-TURP, and B-TURP, respectively. Incidence of persistent MUI was 3.1% after ablation and 4.8% after M-TURP. Incidence of transient and persistent SUI and UUI did not differ after TURP vs enucleation. Incidence of transient (OR 3.32, 95% CI 0.41–26.65, p = 0.26) and persistent SUI (OR 4.79, 95% CI 0.52–43.89, p = 0.17) was not significantly higher after ablation. Incidence of transient UUI was not significantly higher after ablation (OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.04–166.01, p = 0.65), whereas persistent UUI did not differ. Incidence of transient MUI was significantly higher after enucleation (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.51–7.05, p = 0.003). Incidence of transient and persistent MUI did not differ after TURP vs ablation. Conclusions: Ablation, enucleation, and TURP have an impact on all forms of incontinence, but this is transient in most cases with no difference between the groups, except for MUI, which was higher after enucleation vs M-TURP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate is gaining popularity due to its short learning curve and low postoperative morbidity. The aim of Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate is the complete endoscopic enucleation of the adenoma. We report an unusual case of bladder outlet obstruction developed 6 weeks after Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate. Case description: A 74-year-old man complained of severe voiding phase symptoms lasting 2 weeks, starting 6 weeks after Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate. He underwent a transrectal ultrasound, which showed a wide prostatic fossa. A cystoscopy revealed that the prostatic fossa was filled with whitish tissue arising from two tiny residual adenomas. The obstructing tissue was resected with the aid of Thulium laser and the histopathology report showed necrotic prostatic glands. Conclusion: Partially enucleated and left inside adenoma may become necrotic and cause bladder outlet obstruction several weeks after Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate. Transrectal ultrasound control at the end of enucleation may help reduce this complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate whether 2 similar en bloc thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) techniques can influence surgical complications and outcomes.Material: Within 2 institutional databases 164 men who underwent 2 different en bloc ThuLEP techniques were compared using propensity scores. With the first technique prostatic lobes were all enucleated en bloc, whereas, with the second the median lobe was enucleated first and the lateral lobes were enucleated en bloc thereafter. All patients were evaluated at baseline and 6 months after surgery with PSA, Qmax, and self-administrated IPSS. Operative data and 30-day postoperative complications were gathered.Results: Surgical time and 24-hour blood loss were similar between 2 groups (55 vs 55 minutes, P .97288; -0.9 vs -1.3 g/dL, P .112 respectively). Median hospital stay after surgery was 3 days in both groups (P .3251). IPSS and Qmax improved equally in both groups (median 3 vs 3, P .941; 19.17 vs 20.63 mL/s, P .8232 respectively). Early complications were mild to moderate (Clavien I 12.2% vs 12.2%; Clavien II 3.6% vs 4.84%; Clavien IIIb 1.2% vs 2.4%).Conclusion: Our results show that en bloc ThuLEP approaches appear feasible, have similar complications and outcomes and can be considered surgeon-independent techniques. En bloc ThuLEP may be proposed even for laser-naïve urologists as an alternative to the original 3-lobe technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]