Search

Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is routinely performed with a 24F, 26F, or a 28F scope. Proponents of the larger scopes propose that a bigger sheath size allows for superior flow and visibility leading to a more efficient operation and better hemostasis. Those utilizing the smaller scopes suggest that the smaller sheath is less traumatic, resulting in lower stricture rates and temporary incontinence. We sought to compare outcomes of ambulatory HoLEP using the 24F and 28F laser scope. Materials and Methods: From May 2022 to March 2023, we randomized patients undergoing HoLEP (<200 cm3 in size) 1:1 to either a 24F or 28F scope. The primary outcome was differences in surgical duration between groups (minutes). Secondary outcomes included surgeon scope evaluation and postoperative patient results. Results: There was no difference in patient characteristics in those randomized to 28F (n = 76) vs 24F (n = 76) (p > 0.05) scopes. Procedural duration and efficiencies were not different between groups (all p > 0.05). The 28F scope was associated with improved surgeon-graded irrigation flow and visibility (p < 0.001). Patients treated with the 28F scope were more likely to achieve effective same-day trial of void (SDTOV) (28F 94.3% vs 24F 82.1%, p = 0.048) and have a shorter length of stay (LOS) (28F 7.0 vs 24F 11.9 hours, p = 0.014), however, rates of same-day discharge (SDD) were not statistically different (28F 87.8% vs 24F 78.4%, p = 0.126). There was no difference between the cohorts in rates of 90-day emergency room presentations, re-admissions, complications, or functional ouctomes (p > 0.05). Conclusions: We identified no clear advantage of scope size with regard to intraoperative or postoperative outcomes at 3-month follow-up due to scope size. However, if SDD is part of your postoperative pathway, the 28F scope may shorten LOS and increase rates of effective SDTOV. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05308017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has evidenced-based advantages in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) relative to other interventions. Unfortunately, the adoption of HoLEP has remained relatively low in Medicare and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program populations. HoLEPs role as an inpatient surgical intervention is changing as advancements in the technique and systems have demonstrated the feasibility of same-day discharge. Thus, our objective was to evaluate national HoLEP trends in ambulatory surgery settings from 2016 to 2019. Materials and Methods: The Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample (NASS) is the largest national all-payer database of ambulatory surgical encounters, managed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the 2016 and 2019 NASS was performed. Rates of BPH surgeries were calculated and stratified by age, census region, and primary payer to compare across time points for trends. Chi-squared tests and two-sample t-tests were completed for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results: The total number of ambulatory BPH surgeries fell 20% between 2016 (n = 124,538) and 2019 (n = 100,593). In 2016, HoLEP lagged behind photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) with 4.7% of surgeries but rose to the second most common procedure in 2019 with 8.3% of total surgeries. TURP was the most common intervention (62.6% in 2016, 90.7% in 2019). Simple prostatectomy was the most expensive intervention. By U.S. census region, more HoLEPs were carried out in the South (43.1% in 2016, 37.5% in 2019) and Midwest (26.8% in 2016, 31.7% in 2019). Conclusions: Overall, HoLEP uptake is increasing. HoLEP has replaced greenlight PVP as the second most frequently used intervention. The rate of ambulatory HoLEPs has nearly doubled despite a general decrease in the number of surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare perioperative outcomes between Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), open simple prostatectomy (OSP), and robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP) for large prostates (> 80 cc). A retrospective study of 340 patients who underwent HoLEP (n = 209), OSP (n = 66), or RSP (n = 65) at a large academic medical center between January 2013 – September 2021 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), operative time, catheter duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, and 30-day ED visits and readmissions were compared between the three groups. Univariate analyses consisted of ANOVA with Tukey's corrections and Chi-square tests. Linear and multivariate logistic regression was also performed. All tests were two-sided and a p-value <0.05 was pre-determined to be statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SAS v9.4. HoLEP was found to have the shortest: operative time (1.4 vs 2.7 vs 3.8h), LOS (0.65 vs 4.2 vs 2.6d), and catheter duration (0.38 vs 9.9 vs 11.2d) compared to OSP and RSP, respectively (all P <.0001). HoLEP also had the lowest EBL (66 vs 795 vs 326 mL, P <.0001). HoLEP and RSP had a lower risk of blood transfusion compared to OSP (P <.0001). These associations remained significant on multivariable analyses. HoLEP is a minimally invasive treatment option for large prostates that was found to have shorter operative time, LOS, and catheter duration as well as lower EBL compared to OSP and RSP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To improve surgeon-patient communication of postoperative expectations, a multidisciplinary team created and evaluated a holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) expectations handout. Although an effective benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery, it is crucial that patients understand the HoLEP recovery. A quality assessment previously performed at our center revealed 11% of patients were not aware of potential ejaculate volume changes. Methods: Patients presenting for consultation prior to HoLEP were assessed with post-procedure patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires before (n=50) and after (n=50) the implementation of a surgeon-patient expectations handout. Patient demographics and perioperative course were examined in the context of responses. Comparisons were made with a Chi-squared test (p<0.05). Results: We observed a response rate of 96% (pre-handout: 46/50 vs. post-handout: 50/50). Overall, 89/96 (93%) patients felt they had a reasonable understanding of HoLEP expectations, with no difference between cohorts (45/46 vs. 48/50, p=0.71). There was no difference in reporting an understanding of post-HoLEP hematuria (p=0.12) or urinary incontinence (UI) (p=0.99). The implementation of the handout improved understanding of retrograde ejaculation (pre-handout: 41/46 vs. post-handout: 50/50, p=0.022) and dysuria (pre-handout: 35/46 vs. post-handout: 46/50, p=0.048). Fiftyfive patients experienced any dysuria postoperatively, with 89% reporting less than or equal to what they expected. Close to 30% (28/94) of respondents offering ways to improve communication suggested an educational website. Conclusions: The implementation of a surgeon-patient handout during HoLEP consultation improved understanding of postoperative retrograde ejaculation and dysuria at our center. We identified areas for future technology-aided improvements in post-HoLEP communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a size-independent treatment option for the management of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Although advancements in laser technology have led to clinical improvements in the enucleation portion of HoLEP, the morcellation aspect of HoLEP is often the rate-limiting step. We sought to compare efficiency and surgeon satisfaction in four commercial morcellators. Methods: This was an ex vivo study comparing four commercial morcellators: the Wolf Piranha™, the Lumenis VersaCut™, the JenaSurgical MultiCut Solo™, and the Hawk™ Morcellator. Four surgeons with significant experience performing HoLEPs participated. Surgeons tested each device to morcellate two different prostate models (1) morcellating as much microwave-cooked chicken breast in 10 minutes and (2) timed morcellation of bull testicles. Surgeons completed subjective surveys after each morcellator trial. Objective outcomes included the following: morcellation efficiency (g/min morcellated) and aspiration power (time to aspirate 1 L of saline). Means of continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (2019). Results: Comparing subjective outcomes, the Piranha™ was chosen as the safest morcellator (p = 0.0058). The least safe morcellator was thought to be the MultiCut by 75% of surgeons (p = 0.046). The Piranha™ was chosen as the most effective morcellator by 75% of surgeons (p = 0.046). Comparing objective parameters between the morcellators, the Piranha™ had the fastest aspiration time (43.50 ± 10.34 seconds, p = 0.0116). There were no significant differences in morcellation efficiency when using chicken breast (p = 0.3096). However, when comparing the morcellation efficiency using bull testicles, the Piranha™ had the highest efficiency at 39.68 ± 3.57 g/min (p = 0.0268). Conclusion: In this ex vivo study comparing four different commercially available morcellators, the Piranha™ had the highest aspiration power. No significant differences were found in morcellation efficiency using microwave-cooked chicken breast. The Piranha™ was felt to be the safest and most effective morcellator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate perceived barriers to successful same-day discharge (SDD) after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) from the perspective of surgical and nursing staff members.Methods: A 17-question survey was administered to intraoperative and postoperative surgical staff in June 2021 after a six-month period of implementing a SDD HoLEP pathway with same-day catheter removal. McNemar's and Stuart-Maxwell tests were performed for statistical analysis.Results: Surveys were completed by 30 respondents. The majority of respondents had less than 5 years of surgical experience (63%). Almost all respondents (96%) felt that HoLEP patients could be discharged safely on day of surgery. Overall, 60% felt that HoLEP had a lower risk of post-operative bleeding compared to other transurethral surgeries. There was a significant decrease in number of respondents that felt apprehensive when comparing initiation of SDD HoLEP pathway to 6-months post-implementation (43% vs 7%, P = .003). The most common factors causing apprehension both pre- and post-implementation included: degree of hematuria (43% vs 40%, P = .56), risk of failure of trial of void (40% vs 30%, P = .26), and risk of readmission or unplanned emergency department (ED) visit (33% vs 30%, P = .48). There was a significant decrease in the number of respondents who were apprehensive about lack of experience with SDD after HoLEP comparing pre- and post-implementation (20% vs 0%, P = .01).Conclusion: While staff report initial apprehension regarding implementation of a SDD HoLEP pathway, adequate support to intraoperative and postoperative teams helps build experience that alleviates these concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To perform a global survey to identify contemporary practice patterns of transurethral therapies for benign prostatic hypertrophy. Methods: A REDCap survey was distributed to the ~ 3500 members of the Endourological Society. Surgeons completed demographic information and then selected the BPH therapies they perform 10 cases/year. There were four categories of BPH therapies: ablation, enucleation, resection/vaporization, and MIST (minimally invasive surgical technique). Within each category, there were subcategories to account for different energy modalities. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. Results: A total of 175 surgeons responded to our survey. Prostate resection/vaporization remained the most commonly utilized technique (51.9%, n = 147/283) followed by enucleation (22.6%, n = 64/283). Bipolar TURP (bTURP) was the most common modality for prostate resection (69.4%, n = 102/147). Holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) was the most common modality for enucleation (46.9%, n = 30/64). Urolift® was performed more often than Rezūm™ (55.9% vs. 44.1%, n = 19/34 vs. 15/34, respectively). Among surgeons performing ablation, country of practice was a significantly associated with length of stay (LOS), p < 0.0001. For surgeons performing enucleation, academic institution and completion of a fellowship were associated with postoperative day (POD) 1 catheter removal (p = 0.0240 and p = 0.020, respectively). Conclusions: In this contemporary, global survey of the Endourology Society, resection/vaporization techniques were the most commonly performed. Rates of MISTs remained relatively low at 12.1%. Academic institution and fellowship status were associated with shorter catheterization times and LOS for certain surgical categories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a highly effective and durable minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Historically, alternative treatments for large glands (≥175 cc) are associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) and postoperative catheterization. However, advances in laser technology combined with surgical technique optimization have early evidence supporting same-day discharge. We look to examine contemporary same-day discharge outcomes for large glands. Materials and Methods: With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval we queried our electronic medical record and retrospective clinical registry to examine perioperative outcomes of large gland (≥175 cc) prostates that underwent HoLEP with consideration for same-day discharge. Results: From December 10, 2019 to September 29, 2020 we identified 55 patients with a preoperative prostate size ≥175 cc (39 CT, 12 MRI, 4 transrectal ultrasound), of which 45 were scheduled for same-day discharge and 10 for admission. Mean preoperative prostate size was 229.9 cc (range 175–535 cc) and 36 (65.5%) were in urinary retention. Mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 8.58 ng/mL, American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUASS) 22.3, and Qmax 8.8 mL/second. At 3 months postoperative follow-up mean AUASS was 6.7, PSA 0.87 ng/mL and Qmax 20.4 mL/second. All comer same-day discharge rate was 70% (38/55). Of patients planned for same-day discharge 38/45 (84%) were effective. Average LOS for all patients was 11.8 hours with catheterization of 21.2 hours. When compared with 2010 published large gland outcomes, our current LOS represents a 220% reduction. Looking specifically at patients planned for same-day discharge, average LOS and catheter duration was 8.8 and 17.0 hours, whereas LOS and catheter duration for patients planned for admission was 25.7 and 39.4 hours, respectively. Conclusions: We report the first outcomes of preoperatively planned same-day discharge for HoLEP in large glands (≥175 cc). A combination of technologic advances and optimization of technique have allowed for a safe adoption of same-day discharge, providing additional advantages over alternative large gland treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia has been well studied. As comfort with the procedure has improved, the number of concurrent surgeries performed with HoLEP has increased. Technology and technique optimization have safely transitioned HoLEP toward same-day catheter removal and discharge. We aim to assess the success and safety of transitioning toward a same-day care pathway for patients undergoing concurrent surgeries with HoLEP. Materials and Methods: With institutional review board approvals, we queried the electronic medical record and retrospective clinical registry to examine perioperative characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent HoLEP performed by two endourologists at two centers between July 1, 2016, and June 1, 2021, in which ≥1 concurrent surgical procedure was performed. Results: There were 188 patients with an average age of 72.3 years, who underwent HoLEP with ≥1 concurrent surgical procedure within the study period. In total, 221 non-HoLEP procedures were performed with 30/188 (16.0%) undergoing ≥3 total procedures in a single operation. The four-most common concurrent procedures were cystolitholapaxy 86/221 (38.9%), ureteroscopy 57/221 (25.8%), transurethral resection of bladder tumor 14/221 (6.3%), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy 14/221 (6.3%). Postoperatively, 3 (1.6%) patients required transfusion. After transitioning to a same-day care path, the proportion of patients who had successful same-day catheter removal and same-day discharge increased (all p < 0.05). Median length of stay decreased (from 23 hours 11 minutes to 3 hours 49 minutes, p = 0.008). Our 90-day readmission rate for urology complication was 7.9%, and only 3.6% of patients undergoing concurrent stone surgery required an additional stone surgery within 90 days. The overall Clavien–Dindo ≥3b rate was 4.8% (9-3b, 0-4, 0-5). Conclusions: Advances in HoLEP technique and technology allow for safe same-day discharge for concurrent surgery performed at the time of HoLEP. Few patients were readmitted within 90 days and no patients experienced Clavien–Dindo ≥4 complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) accounts for approximately one-quarter of all surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) procedures performed in the U.S.1 Within five years of a patient's PUL procedure, approximately 1/7 patients will require surgical BPH retreatment.2 We aimed to highlight the evidence of surgical BPH retreatment modalities after PUL, with a focus on safety, short-term efficacy, durability, and relative costs. METHODS: A literature review was performed using PubMed, and an exhaustive review of miscellaneous online resources was completed. The search was limited to English, human studies. Citations of relevant studies were reviewed. RESULTS: No study has examined the efficacy, safety, or durability of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or repeat PUL in the post-PUL setting. Recently, groups have examined laser enucleation (n=81), water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) (n=5), robotic simple prostatectomy (SP) (n=2), and prostatic artery embolization (PAE) (n=1) in the post-PUL setting. Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) after PUL appears to be safe and has similar functional outcomes to HoLEP controls. Other treatment modalities examined appear safe but have limited efficacy evidence supporting their use. Photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and robotic waterjet treatment (RWT) have no safety or efficacy studies to support their use in the post-PUL setting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing numbers of patients expected to require surgical retreatment after PUL in North America, there is currently limited evidence and a lack of recommendations guiding the evaluation and management of these patients. HoLEP is associated with the strongest evidence to support its use in the post-PUL setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We aimed to compare holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) outcomes in patients with and without neurologic diseases (ND). Methods: A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing HoLEP from January 2021 to April 2022 was reviewed. The following NDs were included: diabetes-related neuropathy/neurogenic bladder, Parkinson’s disease, dementia, cerebrovascular accident, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, transient ischemic attack, brain/spinal tumors, myasthenia gravis, spinal cord injury, and other. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests, Chi-squared, and binomial tests (p<0.05). Results: A total of 118 ND patients were identified with 135 different neurologic diseases. ND patients were more likely to have indwelling catheters (57% vs. 39%, p=0.012) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) preoperatively (32% vs. 19%, p=0.002). Postoperatively, ND patients were more likely to fail initial trial of void (20% vs. 8.1%, p<0.001) and experience an episode of acute urinary retention (16% vs. 8.5%, p=0.024). Within 90 days postoperative, the overall complication rate was higher in the ND group (26% vs. 13%, p=0.001). Within the ND group, 30/118 (25%) had ≥1 UTI within 90 days preoperative, which decreased to 10/118 (8.7%) 90 days postoperative (p<0.001). At last followup (mean 6.7 months [ND] vs. 5.4 months [nonND], p=0.03), four patients (4.4%) in the ND group required persistent catheter/clean intermittent catheterization compared to none in the non-ND group (p=0.002). Conclusions: Patients with ND undergoing HoLEP are more likely to experience postoperative retention and higher complication rates compared to non-ND patients. While UTI rates are higher in this population, HoLEP significantly reduced three-month UTI and catheterization rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]