Search

Background: Predicting mortality in stroke patients using information available before endovascular treatment (EVT) is an essential component for supporting clinical decision-making. Although the mortality rate of acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) after EVT has reached 40%, few studies have focused on predicting mortality in these individuals. Thus, we aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based mortality prediction tool based on preoperative information for ABAO patients receiving EVT., Methods: The derivation cohort comprised patients from southern provinces of China in the BASILAR registry. The model (POSITIVE: Predicting mOrtality of baSilar artery occlusion patIents Treated wIth EVT) was trained and optimized using a fivefold cross-validation method in which hyperparameters were selected and fine-tuned. This model was retrospectively tested in patients from the northern provinces of China from the BASILAR registry. A prospective test of POSITIVE was performed on consecutive patients from two hospitals between January 2020 and June 2022., Results: Extreme gradient boosting was employed to construct the POSITIVE model, which achieved the best predictive performance among the eight machine learning algorithms and showed excellent discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.80 to 0.87) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P>0.05) in the development cohort. AUC yielded by the POSITIVE model for the retrospective test was 0.79 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.85), higher than that obtained by traditional models. Prospective comparisons showed that the POSITIVE model achieved the highest AUC (0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90) among all prediction models., Conclusion: We developed a machine learning algorithm and retrospective and prospective testing with multicentric cohorts, which exhibited a solid predictive performance and may act as a convenient reference to guide decision-making for ABAO patients. The POSITIVE model is presented online for user-friendly access., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: The BASILAR registry, a nationwide prospective nonrandomized study conducted in China, enrolled consecutive patients with acute basilar artery occlusion receiving endovascular treatment or conventional-treatment from January 2014 to May 2019. This article aimed to report the results of clinical follow-up at one year among these patients., Methods: The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale at one year, assessed as a common odds ratio using ordinal logistic regression analysis adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors. Secondary outcomes included the modified Rankin Scale-based outcome group at one year (0-1, 0-2, or 0-3) and all-cause death., Results: Of the 829 patients enrolled in the original BASILAR registry, one-year data were available for 785 patients (94.7%). The distribution of outcomes on the modified Rankin Scale favored endovascular treatment over conventional-treatment (adjusted common odds ratio, 4.50 [95% CI, 2.81-7.29]; P <0.001). The cumulative one-year mortality rate was 54.6% in the endovascular treatment group versus 83.5% in the conventional-treatment group (adjusted odds ratio, 4.36 [95% CI, 2.69-7.29]; P <0.001)., Conclusions: The beneficial effect of endovascular treatment on functional outcome at one year in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion is similar to that reported at 90 days in the original study., Registration: URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR1800014759.

Importance: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been reported to be safe and effective in improving clinical outcomes among patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO). The benefits associated with EVT remain uncertain for patients with ABAO with severe symptoms (ie, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≥ 21)., Objectives: To assess the outcomes associated with EVT and identify factors associated with outcomes among patients with ABAO and severe symptoms., Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, nationwide cohort study was conducted using data from January 2014 to May 2019 in China from the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study Registry (BASILAR). Included patients had ABAO and underwent EVT or standard medical treatment (SMT) alone in routine clinical practice. Patients were dichotomized into severe symptoms (ie, NIHSS score ≥ 21) and minor to moderate symptoms (NIHSS score < 21) groups. Patients were followed up for 90 days. Data were analyzed from December 2020 through June 2021., Exposures: EVT with SMT vs SMT alone., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was improvement in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, defined as a decrease by 1 grade in mRS score. Secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome (ie, mRS score, 0-3) and mortality., Results: Among 542 patients with ABAO and severe symptoms (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-74] years; 147 [27.1%] women), 431 patients (79.5%) received EVT and 111 patients (20.5%) received SMT. Compared with SMT, EVT was associated with increased odds of improved mRS score (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 3.44 [95% CI, 2.05-5.78]; P < .001), with increased odds of a favorable functional outcome (ie, mRS score, 0-3; adjusted OR, 4.52 [95% CI, 1.64-12.43]; P = .004) and decreased odds of mortality (adjusted OR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.15-0.50]; P < .001). Among patients receiving EVT, baseline NIHSS score was associated with decreased odds of a favorable functional outcome (adjusted OR per 1-point increase in score, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85-0.95]; P < .001) and increased odds of mortality (adjusted OR per 1-point increase in score, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.07-1.19]; P < .001), while posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS) was associated with increased odds of a favorable functional outcome (adjusted OR per 1-point increase in score, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.41-2.07]; P < .001) and decreased odds of mortality (adjusted OR per 1-point increase in score, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.85]; P < .001). Different occlusion sites, compared with distal basilar artery, were associated with decreased odds of favorable functional outcome (eg, middle basilar artery: adjusted OR vs distal basilar artery, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.17-0.80]; P = .01)., Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that EVT was associated with increased odds of functional favorable outcomes among patients with ABAO and severe symptoms. Baseline NIHSS score, pc-ASPECTS, and occlusion site were independent factors associated with clinical outcomes.

Background and Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the impact of baseline posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS) on the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy (EVT) for patients with acute basilar artery occlusion., Methods: The BASILAR was a nationwide prospective registry of consecutive patients with a symptomatic and radiologically confirmed acute basilar artery occlusion within 24 hours of symptom onset. We estimated the effect of standard medical therapy alone (SMT group) versus SMT plus EVT (EVT group) for patients with documented pc-ASPECTS on noncontrast CT, both as a categorical (0-4 versus 5-7 versus 8-10) and as a continuous variable. The primary outcomes included favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) at 90 days and mortality within 90 days., Results: In total, 823 cases were included: 468 with pc-ASPECTS 8 to 10 (SMT: 71; EVT: 397), 317 with pc-ASPECTS 5 to 7 (SMT: 85; EVT: 232), and 38 with pc-ASPECTS 0 to 4 (SMT: 13; EVT: 25). EVT was associated with higher rate of favorable outcomes (adjusted relative risk with 95% CI, 4.35 [1.30-14.48] and 3.20 [1.68-6.09]; respectively) and lower mortality (60.8% versus 77.6%, P =0.005 and 35.0% versus 66.2%, P< 0.001; respectively) than SMT in the pc-ASPECTS 5 to 7 and 8 to 10 subgroups. Continuous benefit curves also showed the superior efficacy and safety of EVT over SMT in patients with pc-ASPECTS ≥5. Furthermore, the prognostic effect of onset to puncture time on favorable outcome with EVT was not significant after adjustment for pc-ASPECTS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.94-1.02])., Conclusions: Patients of basilar artery occlusion with pc-ASPECTS ≥5 could benefit from EVT. The baseline pc-ASPECTS appears more important for decision making and predicting prognosis than time to EVT. Registration: URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique identifier: ChiCTR1800014759.

Objective To analyze the prognosis and risk factors of acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBO) after endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods This study used the patient data from the EVT for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study (BASILAR), a national multicenter clinical registry study for endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion from January 2014 to May 2019. All patients received intravascular treatment and underwent a 90 d follow-up. According to the presence of vertebral artery and basilar artery occlusion, they were divided into vertebral basilar artery occlusion (VBO) group and acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) group. Their baseline indicators were analyzed to explore the differences in prognosis and influencing factors between the 2 groups. Results A total of 647 eligible patients were included in this study, with a median age of 64 (56, 74) years, and 74.7% of them (483) were males. Among them, 560 patients had simple basilar artery occlusion and the other 87 had basilar artery occlusion combined with severe stenosis or occlusion of the vertebral artery. There were no significant differences in the 90-day good prognosis rate (defined as mRS score of 0~3) (P=0.090) and mortality rate (P=0.890) between the VBO group and the BAO group. For the patients in the VBO group, lower NIHSS score (OR=0.898, 95% CI: 0.845~0.954, P < 0.001), higher pc-ASPECTS score (OR=1.690, 95%CI: 1.117~2.557, P=0.010), and shorter puncture to recanalization time (OR=0.990, 95%CI: 0.980~1.000, P=0.047) were independent risk factors for 90-day good prognosis. Similarly, higher NIHSS score (OR=1.094, 95%CI: 1.033~1.159, P=0.002), lower pc-ASPECTS score (OR=0.622, 95%CI: 0.438~0.882, P=0.008) and longer puncture to recanalization time (OR=1.010, 95%CI: 1.001~1.019, P=0.040) were also predictive factors for 90-day mortality in these patients. Conclusion EVT is safe and effective for acute VBO, with a good short-term prognosis. NIHSS score, pc-ASPECTS score, and puncture to recanalization time are independent predictors for 90-day good prognosis in VBO patients, and are also predictors of 90-day mortality rate.

Background: Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) reflects a true acute hyperglycemic state during acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO). We aimed to investigate the association between SHR and short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with ABAO receiving endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: We selected patients treated with EVT from the BASILAR study, a nationwide prospective registry. A total 250 patients with documented glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) values at admission were included. SHR was calculated as the ratio of glucose/HbA1C. All 250 patients completed 90 days of follow-up and 234 patients (93.6%) completed 1 year of follow-up. The primary outcome was the favorable outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 3 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included mortality at 90 days and 1 year, and intracranial hemorrhage. Results: Among the 250 patients included, patients with higher tertiles of SHR were associated with decreased odds of a favorable functional outcome at 90 days (adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12–0.56; P = 0.001 and adjusted OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18–0.80; P = 0.01; respectively) and 1 year (adjusted OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16–0.73; P = 0.006 and adjusted OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18–0.82; P = 0.01; respectively) after adjusting for confounding covariates. The mortality was comparable across tertiles of SHR groups at 90 days and 1 year. Conclusions: Our study showed that SHR was associated with a decreased probability of favorable functional outcome both at 90 days and 1 year after EVT in patients with ABAO. The relationship was more pronounced in non-diabetes patients. Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800014759 (November 12, 2013). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is associated with the highest mortality in patients with large vessel occlusion. This study aimed to identify modifiable risk factors of early mortality in patients with BAO. Methods and Results: This was a cohort study of consecutive patients with BAO admitted to 47 stroke centers in China between January 2014 and May 2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 7 days after hospitalization. Of 829 patients, 164 died (0–3 days: 115; 4–7 days: 49) within 7 days after hospitalization. Among pre- and periprocedural variables, higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, adjusted OR, 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04–1.09; p < 0.001), lower admission posterior circulation-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS, adjusted OR, 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–0.98; p = 0.02), lower Basilar Artery on Computed Tomography Angiography score (BATMAN, adjusted OR, 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76–0.93; p = 0.001), and recanalization failure (adjusted OR, 2.99, 95% CI: 2.04–4.38; p < 0.001) were independently associated with a higher risk of early mortality. Herniation (adjusted OR, 2.84, 95% CI: 1.52–5.30; p = 0.001) is an independent postprocedural predictor of early mortality. In patients dying ≤3 days, higher NIHSS (p < 0.001), lower pc-ASPECTS (p = 0.01), lower BATMAN (p = 0.004), recanalization failure (p < 0.001), herniation (p = 0.001), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (p = 0.046), and absence of pneumonia (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of early mortality. Higher NIHSS (p = 0.01), recanalization failure (p < 0.001), and pneumonia (p = 0.03) were independently associated with early mortality between 4 and 7 days. Conclusions: Recanalization failure, herniation, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and pneumonia are potentially modifiable risk factors for early mortality in basilar artery occlusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A link between body temperature and stroke outcomes has been established but not for acute basilar artery occlusion. We aimed to determine the association between body temperature and clinical outcomes in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion and temperature management range. Methods: We included patients from the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study (BASILAR) database with records of both admission body temperature (ABT) and peak body temperature (PBT). ABT was defined as the body temperature first measured at the hospital visit, PBT was defined as the highest temperature within 24 h of treatment, and minus body temperature (MBT) was defined as PBT-ABT. The primary clinical outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–3 at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included 3-month mortality, in-hospital mortality, and symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage. Results: A total of 664 patients were enrolled in the study; 74.7% were men, with a median age of 65 (interquartile range, 57.25–74) years. In all patients, multivariate analysis indicated that PBT and MBT were independent predictors of favorable functional outcome [odds ratio (OR), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.43–0.77); OR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52–0.88), respectively], and higher ABT, PBT, and MBT were associated with an increased 3-month mortality [OR, 1.47 (95% CI, 1.03–2.10), OR, 1.58 (95% CI, 1.28–1.96), OR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.11–1.65), respectively]. Proportional odds models demonstrated that when ABT, PBT, MBT were in the range of <37.5, <38.9, and −0.6–2.7°C, respectively, the benefit of the endovascular treatment is clearly greater than that of standard medical treatment in terms of favorable functional outcome. Conclusions: Body temperature is an independent predictor of clinical outcome in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion. It is necessary to control the patient body temperature within the appropriate range in clinical settings. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800014759. Registered 03 February 2018. Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) is known to have a poor outcome with a high rate of morbidity and mortality despite endovascular treatment (EVT), highlighting the necessities of exploring factors to limit the efficacy of EVT in these patients. Cerebellar infarctions in ABAO might progress to malignant cerebellar edema (MCE), a life-threatening complication after reperfusion, posing a secondary injury to the brainstem by mass effects. Therefore, the present research aimed to explore the impacts of MCE on a long-term outcome and investigate the prognostic factors for MCE among ABAO after EVT. Methods: In the national BASILAR registry, a total of 329 ABO patients with cerebellar infarctions treated by EVT met the inclusion criteria. The presence of MCE defined by the Jauss scale ≥4 points, was evaluated on the computed tomography performed 72 h after EVT. The adjusted odds ratio and 95% CI were obtained by logistic regression models. A favorable outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0–3. Results: MCE was statistically associated with the decreased incidence of a favorable outcome [adjusted odds ratio, 0.35(95% CI, 0.18-0.68), P=0.002]. The baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, collateral circulation, neutrophil count at admission, and recanalization status were predictors for MCE and a favorable functional status at 90 days (all P<0.05). Among all inflammatory factors, the neutrophil count achieved the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for MCE. Adding the neutrophil count status into the baseline model obviously enhanced its prediction ability for MCE and favorable outcome by increasing the area under curve and achieving both net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement (all P<0.05). Mediation analysis indicated that MCE mediated the association between the increased neutrophil count and worse functional outcome (P=0.026). Discussion: MCE acted essential roles in worsening prognosis for ABAO after EVT. A high neutrophil count at admission was linked to MCE and a poor outcome among ABAO patients, which could be further incorporated into the clinical decision-making system and guide immunomodulation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between the hyperdense basilar artery sign (HBAS) on non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and clinical outcomes in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: Eligible patients who underwent EVT due to acute BAO between January 2014 and May 2019 were divided into two groups based on HBAS. HBAS was assessed by two neuroradiologists using five grades on nonenhanced CT. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome (defined as a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] of 0–3) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization and mortality within 90 days. Results: Among 829 patients with BAO as assessed with CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography, 643 patients were treated with EVT. Of these, 51.32% (330/643) had HBAS. Patients with HBAS were older and had more severe neurological deficits and a higher frequency of atrial fibrillation than those without HBAS. There was no significant difference in favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.354, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.906–2.024; p = 0.14), successful recanalization (aOR: 0.926, 95% CI: 0.616-−1.393; p = 0.71), and mortality (aOR: 1.193, 95% CI: 0.839–1.695; p = 0.33) between patients with or without HBAS. Subgroup analysis showed that the HBAS predicted a favorable outcome in patients aged <60 years (aOR: 2.574, 95% CI: 1.234–5.368; p = 0.01) and patients with vertebral artery-V4 segment occlusion (aOR: 3.738, 95% CI: 1.212–11.530; p = 0.02). In patients with HBAS, the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, posterior circulation–Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS), and stent retriever were associated with successful recanalization. Conclusions: Our study did not find a significant association between HBAS and favorable outcomes and successful recanalization in patients with BAO who underwent EVT. Moreover, large prospective studies are warranted to further investigate this relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: It is unknown the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) for progressive stroke in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of EVT with standard medical therapy (SMT) in a population of BAO patients with progressive stroke. Methods: The EVT for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study (BASILAR) is a national prospective registry of consecutive patients with acute BAO within 24 h of symptom onset. According to the applied therapy, all patients were divided into SMT and EVT groups. Subsequently, the EVT group was divided into early (≤6 h) and late groups (>6 h) according to the time window. The efficacy outcome was favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 3) at 90 days. The safety outcomes included mortality within 90 days and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) after EVT. Results: The EVT cohort presented more frequently with a favorable functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 5.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.06–14.61, p = 0.01) and with a decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.54, p < 0.001). What's more, EVT still safe (P = 0.584, P = 0.492, respectively) and effective (P = 0.05) in patients with progressive stroke when the treatment time window exceeds 6 h. Conclusions: EVT was more effective and safer than SMT for progressive stroke in patients with BAO. Besides, EVT remains safe and effective in patients with progressive stroke when the treatment time window exceeds 6 h. Predictors of desirable outcome in progressive stroke patients undergoing EVT included lower baseline NIHSS score, higher baseline pc-ASPECTs, successful recanalization and shorter puncture to recanalization time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eight randomized controlled trials have consistently shown that endovascular treatment plus best medical treatment improves outcome after acute anterior proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion strokes. Whether intravenous thrombolysis prior to endovascular treatment in patients with anterior circulation, large vessel occlusion is of any additional benefits remains unclear. Objective: This study compares the safety and efficacy of direct endovascular treatment versus intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator bridging with endovascular treatment (bridging therapy) in acute stroke patients with intracranial internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery-M1 occlusion within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Methods and design: The DEVT study is a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with blinded outcome assessment. This trial uses a five-look group-sequential non-inferiority design. Up to 194 patients in each interim analysis will be consecutively randomized to direct endovascular treatment or bridging therapy group in 1:1 ratio over three years from about 30 hospitals in China. Outcomes: The primary end-point is the proportion of independent neurological function defined as modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days. The primary safety measure is symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 48 h and mortality at 90 days. Trial registry number: ChiCTR-IOR-17013568 (www.chictr.org.cn). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravenous thrombolysis is recommended before endovascular treatment, but its value has been questioned in patients who are admitted directly to centres capable of endovascular treatment. Existing randomised controlled trials have indicated non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone or have been statistically inconclusive. We formed the Improving Reperfusion Strategies in Acute Ischaemic Stroke collaboration to assess non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone versus intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to establish non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone versus intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. We searched PubMed and MEDLINE with the terms "stroke", "endovascular treatment", "intravenous thrombolysis", and synonyms for articles published from database inception to March 9, 2023. We included randomised controlled trials on the topic of interest, without language restrictions. Authors of the identified trials agreed to take part, and individual participant data were provided by the principal investigators of the respective trials and collated centrally by the collaborators. Our primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone was assessed using a lower boundary of 0·82 for the 95% CI around the adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) for shift towards improved outcome (analogous to 5% absolute difference in functional independence) with ordinal regression. We used mixed-effects models for all analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023411986. We identified 1081 studies, and six studies (n=2313; 1153 participants randomly assigned to receive endovascular treatment alone and 1160 randomly assigned to receive intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment) were eligible for analysis. The risk of bias of the included studies was low to moderate. Variability between studies was small, and mainly related to the choice and dose of the thrombolytic drug and country of execution. The median mRS score at 90 days was 3 (IQR 1–5) for participants who received endovascular treatment alone and 2 (1–4) for participants who received intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment (acOR 0·89, 95% CI 0·76–1·04). Any intracranial haemorrhage (0·82, 0·68–0·99) occurred less frequently with endovascular treatment alone than with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and mortality rates did not differ significantly. We did not establish non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment in patients presenting directly at endovascular treatment centres. Further research could focus on cost-effectiveness analysis and on individualised decisions when patient characteristics, medication shortages, or delays are expected to offset a potential benefit of administering intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment. Stryker and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]