Search

To examine patients' perception of performance and satisfaction with the activities in their set goals before and after very early supported discharge (VESD) with continued rehabilitation. A descriptive cohort study with data extracted from a randomized controlled trial. Sixty-nine patient allocated to the intervention group were eligible. Before discharge, the patients were asked to set rehabilitation goals, and they were asked to rate the performance and satisfaction of their set goals. At discharge from the rehabilitation, the patients were asked to re-evaluate their experience and satisfaction with the goal performance. One hundred and forty goals were registered. At 81.5% of the set goals, the patients estimated that they performed the task better at discharge than at enrolment and at 86.5% of the set goals the patients were more satisfied with the performance at discharge than at enrolment. Patients with mild to moderate stroke, undergoing a VESD after stroke, reported high performance level for their set goals and were satisfied with their performance execution. Further research is needed to investigate whether the goal should be set preferably at home or at hospital before discharge. Many of the patients can formulate achievable goals with their rehabilitation after stroke. Patients ongoing rehabilitation after stroke are satisfied with their performance of the set goals. As part of patient-centered care, stroke patients should be given the opportunity to formulate their own goals with their rehabilitation. Short hospital times and fast planning of goal-meetings, seems to influence patient goal setting in early discharge rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dependency in personal activities of daily living (ADL) is a common short-term and long-term consequence of stroke and requires targeted rehabilitation. As the duration of hospital stay has become shorter in recent decades, early identification of patients who require rehabilitation has become vital. To our knowledge, no study has investigated whether ADL dependency in the very early stages after admission to the stroke unit can explain ADL dependency 3 and 12 months later. This knowledge would facilitate planning for very early discharge and patient-centered rehabilitation. Objective: This study evaluated whether ADL dependency within 2 days after stroke could explain ADL dependency at 3 and 12 months after stroke. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study included patients with stroke who were treated at a stroke unit in the Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden) between May 2011 and March 2016. The primary independent variable was ADL dependency at 36–48 h after admission to the stroke unit, which was assessed using a Barthel Index (BI) score of ≤90. The dependent variables were self-reported personal ADL dependency at 3 and 12 months after stroke. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Of 366 eligible patients (58% male; median age 71 years), a majority (76%) had mild stroke and 60% were ADL dependent 36–48 h after stroke. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that patients who were dependent within the first 2 days after stroke had higher odds for being dependent 3 months as well as 12 months after stroke. Conclusion: The results indicated that dependency in personal ADL during the first 2 days can explain dependency at 3- and 12-month post-stroke. Therefore, early ADL assessments post-stroke can be used for understanding rehabilitation needs after stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stroke is the disease with the highest costs for hospital care and also after discharge. Early supported discharge (ESD) has shown to be efficient and safe and the best results with well-organised discharge teams and patients with less severe strokes. The aim is to investigate if very early supported discharge (VESD) for stroke patients in need for on-going individualised rehabilitation at home is useful for the patient and cost effective.Methods/design: A randomized controlled trial comparing VESD with ordinary discharge.Inclusion Criteria: confirmed stroke, >18 years of age, living within 30 min from the stroke unit, on day 2 0-16 points on the National institute of health stroke scale (NIHSS) and 50-100 points on the Barthel Index (BI), with BI 100 then the patient can be included if the Montreal Cognitive Assessment is < 26. Exclusion criteria are: NIHSS >16, BI < 50, life expectancy < 1 year, inability to speak or to communicate in Swedish. The inclusion occurs on day 4 and in block randomization of 20 and with blinded assessor.Primary Outcome: levels of anxiety and depression.Secondary Outcomes: independence, security, level of function, quality of health, needs of support in activities of daily living and caregiver burden. Power calculation is based on the level of anxiety and with a power of 80%, p-value 0.05 (2 sided test) 44 persons per group are needed. Data is gathered on co-morbidity, re-entry to hospital, mortality and a health economic analysis. Interviews will be accomplished with a strategic sample of 15 patients in the intervention group before discharge, within two weeks after homecoming and 3 months later. Interviews are also planned with 15 relatives in the intervention group 3 months after discharge.Discussion: The ESD studies in the Cochrane review present hospital stays of a length that no longer exist in Sweden. There is not yet, to our knowledge, any study of early supported discharge with present length of hospital stay. Thus it is not clear if home rehabilitation nowadays without risks, is cost effective, or with the same patient usefulness as earlier studies.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01622205. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]