Search

Barrett's oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with very poor prognosis. The main risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus are a history of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux symptoms and obesity. Men, smokers and those with a family history are also at increased risk. Progression from Barrett's oesophagus to cancer occurs via an intermediate stage, known as dysplasia. However, dysplasia and early cancer usually develop without any clinical signs, often in individuals whose symptoms are well controlled by acid suppressant medications; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is recommended to allow for early diagnosis and timely clinical intervention. Individuals with Barrett's oesophagus need to be fully informed about the implications of this diagnosis and the benefits and risks of monitoring strategies. Pharmacological treatments are recommended for control of symptoms, but not for chemoprevention. Dysplasia and stage 1 oesophageal adenocarcinoma have excellent prognoses, since they can be cured with endoscopic or surgical therapies. Endoscopic resection is the most accurate staging technique for early Barrett's-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic ablation is effective and indicated to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus in patients with dysplasia. Future research should focus on improved accuracy for dysplasia detection via new technologies and providing more robust evidence to support pathways for follow-up and treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MdP participated in the BEST3 screening trial and received consultant fees from Medtronic. JNP was chair of the trial Steering committee of the AspECT trial. NJT participated in the AspECT trial., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The aims of this study were to compare neoplasia detection rates for nontargeted biopsies (Seattle protocol) versus acetic acid-targeted biopsies (Portsmouth protocol) during Barrett's surveillance and to explore feasibility, patient/clinician experience, acceptance, and barriers/enablers to study participation and implementation of the acetic acid technique., Methods: This was a mixed-methods feasibility study including a pilot multicenter, randomized, crossover trial with qualitative interviews. Patients under Barrett's surveillance with no history of neoplasia were included. Patients underwent two endoscopies, one with each protocol, 8 weeks apart. Outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, neoplasia yield, and number of biopsies., Results: 200 patients were recruited from 6 centers, and 174 (87.0 %) underwent both procedures. Neoplasia prevalence was 4.7 % (9/192). High grade dysplasia and cancer were detected with both protocols. Five low grade dysplasias were detected (two with acetic acid, four with nontargeted biopsies; one lesion was detected with both techniques). A total of 2139 biopsies were taken in the nontargeted arm and 226 in the acetic acid arm. Both patients and clinicians found the acetic acid technique acceptable. Based on these data, a noninferiority, tandem, crossover trial would require an estimated 2828 patients., Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of performing a crossover endoscopy trial in Barrett's surveillance. Low neoplasia yield makes this design necessary and qualitative results demonstrated patient and clinician acceptance. The reduced numbers of biopsies suggest that the acetic acid technique could result in cost savings, providing the lack of missed pathology can be proven in a fully powered definitive trial., Competing Interests: None, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Barrett's oesophagus is an established risk factor for developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma. However, Barrett's neoplasia can be subtle and difficult to identify. Acetic acid chromoendoscopy (AAC) is a simple technique that has been demonstrated to highlight neoplastic areas but lesion recognition with AAC remains a challenge, thereby hampering its widespread use., Objective: To develop and validate a simple classification system to identify Barrett's neoplasia using AAC., Design: The study was conducted in four phases: phase 1-development of component descriptive criteria; phase 2-development of a classification system; phase 3-validation of the classification system by endoscopists; and phase 4-validation of the classification system by non-endoscopists., Results: Phases 1 and 2 led to the development of a simplified AAC classification system based on two criteria: focal loss of acetowhitening and surface patterns of Barrett's mucosa. In phase 3, the application of PREDICT (Portsmouth acetic acid classification) by endoscopists improved the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) from 79.3% and 80.2% to 98.1% and 97.4%, respectively (p<0.001). In phase 4, the application of PREDICT by non-endoscopists improved the sensitivity and NPV from 69.6% and 75.5% to 95.9% and 96.0%, respectively (p<0.001)., Conclusion: We developed and validated a classification system known as PREDICT for the diagnosis of Barrett's neoplasia using AAC. The improvement seen in the sensitivity and NPV for detection of Barrett's neoplasia in phase 3 demonstrates the clinical value of PREDICT and the similar improvement seen among non-endoscopists demonstrates the potential for generalisation of PREDICT once proven in real time., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

The current standard of treating early Barrett's neoplasia is resection of visible lesions using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by ablative therapy to the Barrett's segment. There is increasing evidence to support the use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) where en-bloc resection and lower recurrence rates may be achieved. However, ESD is associated with deep submucosal dissection when compared to EMR. This may increase the risk of complications including stricture formation with subsequent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of RFA following EMR and ESD as well as when RFA was used without prior endoscopic resection. The primary outcome measure was complication rates. Clearance of dysplasia (CRD) and clearance of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM) were secondary outcomes. A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 91 patients referred for RFA from a single academic tertiary center was performed. The choice of endoscopic resection method was tailored according to the lesion type and morphology. Focal and circumferential ablation was performed after initial follow up endoscopy postresection. Patients proceeded straight to RFA in the absence of any visible lesions. In this study, the ESD group had a higher proportion of cancers compared to the EMR cohort (74.1% vs. 30.2%, P < 0.01) prior to RFA. All complications post RFA occurred in the groups with previous endoscopic resection. There was no significant difference in the total complication rate (7.4% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.78) and stricture formation rate (3.7% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.38) between the ESD and EMR groups. CRD was achieved in 96.3% in the ESD group, 88.4% in the EMR group, and all patients in the RFA alone group. CRIM rates were similar in the EMR and ESD groups (81.4% vs. 85.2%) but higher in the RFA alone group (90.5%). In conclusion, RFA following ESD is very effective and not associated with an increased risk of complications compared to EMR. This supports the application of RFA in the treatment algorithm of patients undergoing ESD for Barrett's neoplasia.

Background and Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective technique to resect early Barrett's neoplasia and has advantages over conventional EMR in that it enables en-bloc resection and accurate histopathologic analysis of cancer resection margins. However, its long learning curve and higher adverse event rate have tempered its uptake in the West. We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of ESD when used to resect complex Barrett's neoplasia. The primary endpoint was the en-bloc and R0 resection rate., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 143 ESDs for Barrett's neoplasia performed in 3 tertiary referral centers from 2008 to 2016., Results: The mean lesion size was 31.1 mm (range, 5-90) and median follow-up time 21.6 months (interquartile range, 11.0-32.6). In total, 24.5% of lesions (35/143) were scarred after previous endoscopic resection, surgery, or radiotherapy. The en-bloc resection rate was 90.8% and R0 resection rate 79% in this series. The overall adverse event rate was 3.5% (1.4% bleeding, 0% perforation, and 2.1% stricture formation). The expanded curative resection rate was 65.8%, reflecting the R0 resection rate and proportion of cases with more advanced disease. Submucosal cancer was identified as a significant factor affecting the R0 resection rate., Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility and safety of ESD in the West for resection of complex Barrett's neoplasia including large, nodular, or scarred lesions. This is a safe and effective technique with a low adverse event rate when performed by an experienced operator. The en-bloc resection rate reached a plateau once 30 procedures had been performed., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and study aims  Acetic acid chromoendoscopy (AAC) enhances the ability to correctly identify Barrett's neoplasia, and is increasingly used by both expert and nonexpert endoscopists. Despite its increasing use, there is no validated training strategy to achieve competence. The aims of our study were to develop a validated training tool in AAC-assisted lesion recognition, to assess endoscopists' baseline knowledge of AAC-assisted lesion recognition, and to evaluate the efficacy and impact of this training tool. Methods  A validated assessment of 40 images and 20 videos was developed. A total of 13 endoscopists with experience of Barrett's endoscopy but no formal training in AAC were recruited to the study. Participants underwent: baseline assessment 1, online training, assessment 2, interactive seminar, assessment 3. Results  Baseline assessment demonstrated a sensitivity of 83 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 83 %. The online training intervention significantly improved sensitivity to 95 % and NPV to 94 % ( P  < 0.01). Further improvement was seen after a 1-day interactive seminar including live cases, with sensitivity increasing to 98 % and NPV to 97 %. Conclusions  The data demonstrate the need for training in AAC-assisted lesion recognition as baseline performance, even by Barrett's experts, was poor. The online training and testing tool for AAC for Barrett's neoplasia was successfully developed and validated. The training intervention improved performance of endoscopists to meet ASGE PIVI standards. The training tool increases the endoscopist's degree of confidence in the use of AAC. The training tool also leads to shift in attitudes of endoscopists from Seattle protocol towards AAC-guided biopsy protocol for Barrett's surveillance., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Barrett's oesophagus is of significant importance due to its premalignant potential. Acetic acid chromoendoscopy is a simple technique that can be used with any endoscope system. It has been utilised for the identification of Barrett's intestinal metaplasia; and more importantly, for the localisation of early neoplasia within Barrett's, which is often focal, subtle and very easy to miss by random quadrantic biopsies alone. Acetic acid is routinely utilised in specialised centres and its use is expanding. This article examines the evidence base behind acetic acid chromoendoscopy and looks at where further research needs to be directed., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Currently, various advanced endoscopic techniques are available with varying success rates. These technologies are manufacturer dependent, which has financial implications in the current era of austerity. Acetic acid is a commonly available dye that has been used in the detection of neoplasia within Barrett's esophagus. It has been shown to be effective in detecting neoplasia in high-risk subgroups, but its efficacy in a low-prevalence surveillance population remains unproven., Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of acetic acid chromoendoscopy in a Barrett's esophagus surveillance population. We aimed to compare the neoplasia yield of acetic acid chromoendoscopy (AAC) with the neoplasia yield from standardized random biopsy (SBP) protocol-guided biopsies in the routine surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Tertiary referral hospital in the United Kingdom., Patients: Patients 18 years of age and older with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus undergoing surveillance gastroscopy., Interventions: AAC versus standardized random biopsy protocol (SBP) for Barrett's esophagus surveillance., Main Outcome Measurements: Neoplasia detection in 2 groups., Results: The overall neoplasia detection rates for all grades of neoplasia were 13 of 655 (2%) in the SBP-guided biopsy cohort and 41 of 327 (12.5%) in the AAC cohort (P = .0001). On per-patient analysis, a 6.5-fold gain in neoplasia detection was seen in the AAC cohort compared with the SBP cohort (0.13 vs 0.02, P = .000). In the SBP cohort, a total of 13 of 655 (2%) neoplasias were detected, of which 3 of 655 patients (0.5%) had low-grade dysplasia, 7 of 655 (1%) had high-grade dysplasia, and 3 of 655 (0.5%) were found to have superficial cancer (T1a/T1b). In the AAC cohort, a total of 41 of 327 neoplasias (12.5%) were found, of which 9 of 327 patients (2.7%) had low-grade dysplasia, 18 of 327 (5.5%) had high-grade dysplasia, and 14 of 327 (4.2%) were found to have superficial cancer. The number of biopsies required to detect 1 neoplasia was 15 times lower in the AAC cohort (40 biopsies) than in the SBP cohort (604 biopsies). On per-biopsy analysis, a 14.7-fold increase in neoplasia detection was seen in the AAC cohort per biopsy compared with the SBP cohort (0.025 vs 0.0017; P = .000)., Limitations: Not a randomized, controlled study., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that acetic acid detects more neoplasias than conventional protocol-guided mapping biopsies and requires 15 times fewer biopsies per neoplasia detected., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Study Aims: Acetic acid reacts with Barrett's mucosa to produce acetowhitening which disappears with time. The clinical significance of this is unknown. We aimed to quantify the acetowhitening time, developing an objective tool for diagnosis of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus., Patients and Methods: Prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center, enrolling patients undergoing surveillance of Barrett's metaplasia or referred with suspected neoplasia. Acetic acid 2.5 % was applied to the mucosa via a spray catheter. Acetowhitening was observed and time to disappearance recorded. Targeted biopsies of any neoplasia and quadrantic 2-cm biopsies of residual Barrett's area were then taken. Histological findings were investigated in relation to duration of acetowhitening., Results: 132 patients were examined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was produced for identifying high risk neoplasia according to acetowhitening duration. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (0.89 - 0.97). Using a threshold of 142 seconds yielded a sensitivity for neoplasia of 98 % (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 89 % - 100 %) and specificity of 84 % (74 % - 91 %). The ROC curve for mucosal neoplasia (high grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma) versus deep invasive cancer showed an AUC of 0.786 (0.61 - 0.96); a cutoff of 20 seconds yielded a sensitivity and specificity for invasive cancer of 67 % (35 % - 90 %) and 85 % (69 % - 95 %), respectively., Conclusion: The time to disappearance of acetowhitening can serve as a simple but very sensitive tool for the diagnosis of high risk neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. It can be used to distinguish mucosal neoplasia from deep invasive cancer., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background & Aims: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasingly common among patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to provide consensus recommendations based on the medical literature that clinicians could use to manage patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or early-stage EA., Methods: We performed an international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage EA. We used a Delphi process to develop consensus statements. The results of literature searches were screened using a unique, interactive, Web-based data-sifting platform; we used 11,904 papers to inform the choice of statements selected. An a priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement., Results: Eighty-one of the 91 statements achieved consensus despite generally low quality of evidence, including 8 clinical statements: (1) specimens from endoscopic resection are better than biopsies for staging lesions, (2) it is important to carefully map the size of the dysplastic areas, (3) patients that receive ablative or surgical therapy require endoscopic follow-up, (4) high-resolution endoscopy is necessary for accurate diagnosis, (5) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surveillance, (6) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surgery, (7) the combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the most effective therapy, and (8) after endoscopic removal of lesions from patients with HGD, all areas of BE should be ablated., Conclusions: We developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence-based consensus statements for the management of patients with BE and early-stage EA. This approach identified important clinical features of the diseases and areas for future studies., (Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To examine the efficacy and potential cost implications of acetic acid (AA) chromoendoscopy in the assessment of Barrett's neoplasia. Our prospective database of patients referred between 2005 and 2010 with suspected early neoplasia was reviewed. High-resolution Fujinon gastroscopes and EPX-4400 processor were used. Inspection of Barrett's neoplasia was carried out using white light followed by AA. Neoplastic areas were noted, and targeted biopsy was carried out. This was followed by quadrantic biopsies of the remaining Barrett's neoplasia. The cost of protocol-guided biopsies was compared with AA-guided biopsy protocols. Two hundred sixty-three procedures on 197 patients were examined. High-risk neoplasia was found during 143 procedures. In 96% of cases it was identified with AA. The cost of histological evaluation by Cleveland protocol would be £139,416.30. The cost by AA-targeted biopsy followed by random biopsies in one pot would be £25,032.50. For AA-targeted biopsies alone the cost would be £9,541.8 but results in a 4% miss rate. AA localizes neoplastic lesions in the majority of patients and could potentially represent a significant cost saving in patients with suspected neoplasia., (© 2011 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Endoscopic methods to recognise and treat early gastrointestinal malignancies have increased in recent years. This has resulted in more lesions being diagnosed at an early stage and a shift away from invasive surgery towards endoscopic resection. However, it is necessary for the endoscopist to understand the key principles behind advanced endoscopic diagnosis and the new therapeutic options available. This chapter will review the advances in endoscopic techniques and methods which are changing the way we diagnose and treat these cancers. It will examine the general principles behind advanced endoscopy and then examine their application in Barrett's neoplasia, gastric cancer and the dysplasia associated lesions or masses associated with ulcerative colitis. It will focus on the best techniques for each of the above pathology.

Background & Aims: Diagnosis of Barrett's neoplasia requires collection of large numbers of random biopsy samples; the process is time consuming and can miss early-stage cancers. We evaluated the role of acetic acid chromoendoscopy in identifying Barrett's neoplasia., Methods: Data were collected from patients with Barrett's esophagus examined at a tertiary referral center, between July 2005 and November 2008 using Fujinon gastroscopes and EPX 4400 processor (n = 190). All procedures were performed by a single experienced endoscopist. Patients were examined with white light gastroscopy and visible abnormalities were identified. Acetic acid (2.5%) dye spray was used to identify potentially neoplastic areas and biopsy samples were collected from these, followed by quadrantic biopsies at 2 cm intervals of the remaining Barrett's mucosa. The chromoendoscopic diagnosis was compared with the ultimate histological diagnosis to evaluate the sensitivity of acetic acid chromoendoscopy., Results: Acetic acid chromoendoscopy had a sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 80% for the detection of neoplasia. There was a correlation between lesions predicted to be neoplasias by acetic acid and those diagnosed by histological analysis (r = 0.98). There was a significant improvement in the detection of neoplasia using acetic acid compared with white light endoscopy (P = .001)., Conclusions: Analysis of this large series showed that acetic acid-assisted evaluation of Barrett's esophagus detects neoplasia better than white light endoscopy, with sensitivity and specificity equal to that of histological analysis., (Copyright © 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)