Search

Background and Aim: Although endoscopic recognition of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus is difficult, experience in recognition of early neoplastic lesions is supposed to increase the detection of early neoplastic lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the significance of dysplasia in random biopsies in Barrett's esophagus, in the absence of reported visible lesions as well as the difference in final outcome of pathology., Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients with Barrett's esophagus with suspicion of dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma who were referred to our center between February 2008 and April 2016. We analyzed all endoscopy reports, pathology reports, and referral letters from 19 different hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the presence or absence of visible lesions reported upon referral., Results: In total, 170 patients diagnosed with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma were referred to our tertiary center. Ninety-one of these referred patients were referred with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in random biopsies, without a reported lesion during endoscopy in the referral center. During endoscopic work-up at our center, a visible lesion was detected in 44 of these 91 patients (48.4%). After endoscopic work-up and treatment, adenocarcinoma was found in an additional 21 patients. Two of these patients were initially referred with low-grade dysplasia, and 19 patients were initially referred with high-grade dysplasia. The final pathology was upstaged in 35.8% of the patients., Conclusions: The presence of any grade of dysplasia in random biopsies during surveillance in referral centers is a marker for more severe final pathology. Training in recognition of early neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus imaging is recommended for endoscopists performing Barrett's surveillance.

Background: There is a large Barrett's esophagus patient population undergoing endoscopic surveillance. Methods to stratify patients into higher and lower risk groups may enable more varied surveillance intervals for patients with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus that could optimize use of endoscopy resources., Objective: We aimed to assess whether risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma differed in patients with multiple endoscopic biopsies negative for dysplasia., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among individuals from the population-based Northern Ireland Barrett's register with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (with intestinal metaplasia) between 1993 and 2010, who had at least one endoscopic biopsy conducted at least 12 months after diagnosis. We used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between number of successive endoscopies showing non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma alone, and combined with high-grade dysplasia, at the next endoscopy., Results: We identified 1761 individuals who met our eligibility criteria. Subsequent risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma was lower at the next endoscopy following two endoscopies showing non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (IRR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.66) than following one endoscopy showing non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Similar findings were apparent for risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia (IRR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.79)., Conclusion: The lower risk of malignant progression in individuals with persistent non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus over two consecutive endoscopic biopsies but not for longer term persistence does not support hypotheses of persistence being an indicator of less biologically aggressive lesions. Instead, the initial difference may be attributable to post-endoscopy cancers and support the necessity of adhering to robust quality standards for endoscopic procedures.

Background: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Europe and the United States rapidly increased from the latter half of the 1970s and exceeded that of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the latter half of the 1990s, currently accounting for approximately 60% of all esophageal carcinomas. Recently, its incidence has also increased in Japan, raising concerns that it will follow a course similar to that in Europe and the United States., Summary: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan was about 2% until the 1990s, but in recent years, it has risen to 6.5-7.1%. Causes include the increase in the incidence of obesity due to changes in eating habits with resultant increases in the incidence of hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis, a decrease in the rate of Helicobacter pylori infection, and the increased interest of physicians in the gastroesophageal junction. The number of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients in Japan rapidly increased from the 1990s, which accordingly increased the number of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma patients from the latter half of the 1990s. Tabulation and analysis of 1,794 reported cases of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan showed that superficial cancers accounted for 77.6%, and that the concomitant rates of hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis were high at 87 and 70% respectively. Key Message: The future trend in the incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan will depend on the increase in the incidence of reflux esophagitis, which is essential for the development of Barrett's esophagus and Barrett's esophageal carcinoma. The obesity rate is lower in Japan than that in Europe and the United States, and the incidence and severity of reflux esophagitis are low. We expect that the incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan will not rise as high as in Europe and the United States, and will remain below 10%., (© 2018 Japanese Gastroenterological Association Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Endoscopic techniques such as high-definition and optical-chromoendoscopy have had enormous impact on endoscopy practice. Since these techniques allow assessment of most subtle morphological mucosal abnormalities, further improvements in endoscopic practice lay in increasing the detection efficacy of endoscopists. Several new developments could assist in this. First, web based training tools could improve the skills of the endoscopist for enhancing the detection and classification of lesions. Secondly, incorporation of computer aided detection will be the next step to raise endoscopic quality of the captured data. These systems will aid the endoscopist in interpreting the increasing amount of visual information in endoscopic images providing real-time objective second reading. In addition, developments in the field of molecular imaging open opportunities to add functional imaging data, visualizing biological parameters, of the gastrointestinal tract to white-light morphology imaging. For the successful implementation of abovementioned techniques, a true multi-disciplinary approach is of vital importance., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a metaplastic condition that occurs secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease. BE is also a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, which, although still rare in Japan, is one of the most rapidly increasing cancers in Western countries. However, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease has increased significantly over the past few decades in Japan, possibly leading to an incremental rise in BE and the associated inherent risk of adenocarcinoma. Given the poor prognosis of advanced-stage Barrett's adenocarcinoma, endoscopic surveillance is recommended for subjects with BE to detect early neoplasias including dysplasia. However, endoscopic identification of dysplastic lesions is still not sufficiently reliable or subjective, making targeted therapy extremely difficult. Over the past few years, improvements in image resolution, image processing software, and optical filter technology have enabled identification of dysplasia and early cancer in BE patients. We retrieved as many studies on advanced endoscopic technologies in BE as possible from MEDLINE and PubMed. The present review focuses on the emergent clinically available technologies to provide an overview of the technologies, their practical applicability, current status, and future challenges., (© 2014 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2014 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an accepted treatment for the eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (DBE) and residual Barrett's esophagus after endoscopic resection of intramucosal adenocarcinoma. Circumferential balloon-based and focal catheter-based RFA devices are currently used (the Halo360 and Halo90). However, a new smaller focal ablation device (the Halo60) has been developed, which may be of benefit in patients with short tongues of Barrett's neoplasia, small residual islands, difficult anatomy, or strictures. We report the first use of this device in 17 patients with either DBE or residual Barrett's esophagus after endoscopic resection of intramucosal adenocarcinoma., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Barrett's esophagus is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, one of the most rapidly increasing cancers in the United States. Given the poor prognosis of late-stage adenocarcinoma, endoscopic surveillance is recommended for subjects with Barrett's esophagus to detect early neoplasia. Current guidelines recommend "random" four-quadrant biopsies taken every 1-2 cm throughout the Barrett's segment. However, this only samples a minority of epithelium and has been shown to miss areas of endoscopically- inapparent neoplasia (high grade dysplasia or cancer). Recent efforts have focused on developing novel diagnostic imaging technologies to detect the subtle epithelial changes associated with dysplasia and neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Some of these modalities serve as "red flag" technologies designed to detect areas of abnormality within large surface areas. Other technologies serve to characterize areas of visible abnormality, offering a higher spatial resolution to confirm/exclude the presence of neoplasia. This review summarizes several available and evolving imaging technologies used in the endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's associated neoplasia.

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a highly fatal cancer, has risen in incidence in Western societies, but it is unclear whether this is due to increasing incidence of its pre-cursor condition, Barrett's oesophagus (BO) or whether the proportion of BO patients undergoing malignant progression has increased in the face of unchanged BO incidence. Data from population-based studies of BO incidence is limited, with equivocal results to date difficult to distinguish from changes in endoscopic practices. The aim of this study was to assess population trends in Barrett's oesophagus (BO) diagnoses in relation to endoscopy and biopsy rates over a 13 year period. The Northern Ireland Barrett's oesophagus Register (NIBR) is a population-based register of all 9,329 adults diagnosed with columnar epithelium of the oesophagus in Northern Ireland between 1993 and 2005, of whom 58.3% were male. European age-standardised annual BO incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 of the population, per 100 endoscopies and per 100 endoscopies including an oesophageal biopsy. Average annual BO incidence rates rose by 159% during the study period, increasing from 23.9/100,000 during 1993-1997 to 62.0/100,000 during 2002-2005. This elevation far exceeded corresponding increases in rates of endoscopies and oesophageal biopsies being conducted. BO incidence increased most markedly in individuals aged < 60 years, and most notably amongst males aged < 40 years. This study points towards a true increase in the incidence of BO which would appear to be most marked in young males. These findings have significant implications for future rates of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and surveillance programmes.

The past decade has led to marked improvements in our understanding regarding the pathogenesis and risk of progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE), enhanced imaging technology to improve dysplasia detection, and the development and refinement of endoscopic techniques, such as mucosal ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR), to eradicate BE. However, many questions remain including identifying which, if any, candidates are most appropriate for screening for BE; how to improve current surveillance protocols; predicting which patients with BE will develop neoplastic progression; identifying the most appropriate candidates for endoscopic eradication therapy; developing algorithms for appropriate management posteradication; and understanding the potential role of chemoprophylaxis. This article describes potential future advances regarding screening, surveillance, risk stratification, endoscopic eradication therapies, and chemoprevention and provides a potential future management strategy for patients with BE., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The key to prevention and early treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma is the detection and eradication of neoplasia found in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The approach to the management in BE has rapidly evolved based on the paradigm shift towards endoscopic therapy, on improved detection of neoplasia with increased appreciation for subtle lesions and enhanced endoscopic imaging modalities, and on a new set of endoscopic therapeutic modalities. This review briefly outlines the evolution of the current approach to neoplasia in BE, the appreciation for improved techniques and technologies to detect neoplasia, and the specific modalities currently used in the endoscopic treatment of Barrett's neoplasia. The goals of endoscopic therapy of Barrett's neoplasia are to preserve the esophagus while ablating or removing the entire Barrett's segment. The therapeutic modalities highlighted are endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection), photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and cryotherapy. Endoscopic resection is a tool to accurately provide a histological diagnosis of lesions in addition to treat neoplasia. In addition, to treating the known neoplasia, it is also important to treat the remainder of the at-risk Barrett's epithelium to address synchronous and metachronous lesions. This treatment of the entire Barrett's epithelium may be achieved with one or more modalities. With multiple endoscopic tools available, it is important to appreciate how to optimally address neoplasia in BE.

There have been many developments in endoscopy-based imaging for the detection of Barrett's syndrome, dysplasia, and neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. This article reviews the studies on and compares the efficacy of several important endoscopic imaging modalities. Some of these technologies have already achieved regulatory approval, commercial availability, and establishment of clinical utility and practical application. The future of imaging for Barrett's syndrome likely rests with the development of molecular targeting with dysplasiatargeted probes that have been conjugated to dyes or nanoparticles.

Endoscopic therapies for the treatment of complicated Barret's esophagus should be embraced by the surgical community. While esophagectomy remains the standard of care for early esophageal neoplasia in many centers, endoscopic techniques are being increasingly utilizid. As refinements in both endoscopic and surgical approaches continue to evolve, accurate and contempary assessments of outcomes are critical in assuring that each is applied in appropriate circumstances.

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is a rare cancer; however, it is the most rapidly increasing cancer in the western world. Barrett's oesophagus is the only recognised precursor and is associated with the majority of cases of adenocarcinoma. The role of screening and surveillance in patients with Barrett's oesophagus remains controversial. There is insufficient evidence to show that screening improves survival and is cost-effective. Indirect evidence suggests that patients diagnosed with cancer while undergoing surveillance endoscopy are diagnosed at an earlier stage and have an improved survival. The problems with current surveillance techniques include lack of data on natural history of Barrett's oesophagus, test invasiveness, costs, lack of standardisation and validation of biopsy and treatment protocols, and endoscopy intervals. The use of novel endoscopic techniques and biomarkers combined with better identification of high-risk groups could make screening and surveillance a cost-effective practice in the future.

The current surveillance strategies for patients with a Barrett's oesophagus are hampered by the poor endoscopic visibility of early neoplastic lesions, the sampling error of random biopsies, the subjectivity of the histological evaluation, and the low incidence of carcinoma. New endoscopic techniques are available for a more reliable evaluation of a Barrett's oesophagus: high-resolution endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, fluorescence endoscopy and optical coherence tomography. The use of molecular markers will probably lead to a better risk stratification of patients. Detection of aneuploid cell populations and assessment of an increase of the number of cells in the S- and G2-phase are possible with DNA flow cytometry; flow cytometric abnormalities may be a more reliable predictor of carcinoma than histological assessment. A combined approach with the new endoscopic techniques and molecular markers may lead to a more efficient and cost-effective surveillance programme.