Search

Background: In the field of anesthesia for bariatric surgery, a wide variety of recommendations exist, but a general consensus on the perioperative management of such patients is missing. We outline the perioperative experiences that we gained in the first two years after introducing a bariatric program., Methods: The perioperative approach was established together with all relevant disciplines. Pertinent topics for the anesthesiologists were; successful airway management, indications for more invasive monitoring, and the planning of the postoperative period and deposition. This retrospective analysis was approved by the local ethics committee. Data are mean [SD]., Results: 182 bariatric surgical procedures were performed (147 gastric bypass procedures (GBP; 146 (99.3%) performed laparascopically). GBP patients were 43 [10] years old, 78% female, BMI 45 [7] kg/m(2), 73% ASA physical status of 2. 42 patients (28.6%) presented with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. 117 GBP (79.6%) patients were intubated conventionally by direct laryngoscopy (one converted to fiber-optic intubation, one aspiration of gastric contents). 32 patients (21.8%) required an arterial line, 10 patients (6.8%) a central venous line. Induction lasted 25 [16] min, the procedure itself 138 [42] min. No blood products were required. Two patients (1.4%) presented with hypothermia (<35 °C) at the end of their case. The emergence period lasted 17 [9] min. Postoperatively, 32 patients (21.8%) were transferred to the ICU (one ventilated). The other patients spent 4.1 [0.7] h in the post anesthesia care unit. 15 patients (10.2%) required take backs for surgical revision (two laparotomies)., Conclusions: The physiology and anatomy of bariatric patients demand a tailored approach from both the anesthesiologist and the perioperative team. The interaction of a multi-disciplinary team is key to achieving good outcomes and a low rate of complications., Trial Registration: DRKS00005437 (date of registration 16(th) December 2013).

Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a chronic disease with increasing prevalence in western society. Obesity represents a well established risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus type 2. Several studies on surgical procedures for the treatment of obesity have shown a postoperative reduction of obesity-related co-morbidities. Thus, diabetes mellitus type 2 was shown to resolve or improve in more than 75% of morbidly obese patients (BMI >35) after bariatric surgery. These insights paved the way for the advent of metabolic surgery - a novel field with the goal to improve glucose metabolism in patients with a BMI of less than 35. Encouraging results from mostly observational studies have sparked the interest in the surgical management of diabetes mellitus type 2.

The rapid increase of morbid obesity has become an important task in the Western world in recent years. Since conservative treatments have failed to prove sufficient efficacy, surgery has turned out to be the most powerful option in treating morbid obesity. In this paper, the different surgical techniques with their advantages and drawbacks are presented. In general, there are restrictive, malabsorptive and combinations of both procedures available. The adjustable gastric banding (Figure 1) represents a purely restrictive operation. It is useful for patients with a relatively low body mass index (BMI) and a good understanding and control of their eating habits. By contrast, the duodenal switch (Figure 2) stands for a mainly malabsorptive procedure that might be indicated in patients with a very high BMI. The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (Figure 3) is the most widely used bariatric procedure worldwide. It combines restriction and malabsorption. Today, almost two thirds of all bariatric procedures are performed laparoscopically, which has further enhanced the use of surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity. In conclusion, the treatment of morbid obesity represents a significant challenge in the Western world, and bariatric surgery plays a paramount role in the fight against overweight.

Background: Morbidly obese patients show high somatic and psychiatric co-morbidity. Bariatric surgery is accepted as the obesity treatment with the greatest long-term success. There is growing evidence that follow-up studies should address somatic as well as psychosocial conditions of patients undergoing bariatric surgery and non-operatively treated patients. This study investigates the physical and psychosocial outcomes of patients with and without bariatric surgery., Methods: A sample of 131 morbidly obese patients applying for bariatric surgery underwent somatic and psychological assessment (T0). A first follow-up study (T1) was conducted 2 years after T0 in 119 patients. The present second follow-up (T2) was carried out 4 1/2 years after T0 and 3.2 years after potential bariatric surgery. Psychological/psychosocial measures were collected in the 93 patients, 63 of whom were treated surgically, via the Psychosocial Stress and Symptom Questionnaire (PSSQ) and a telephone interview covering BMI, employability, medication, doctor consultations, eating behavior, and physical/psychological well-being., Results: Patients with and without bariatric surgery showed a BMI reduction, which was significantly greater in those who underwent surgery (P<.001). The average percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) between T0 and T2 was 11.5% in patients with no bariatric surgery, 36.0% in patients with laparoscopic gastric banding, and 52.8% in patients with laparoscopic gastric bypass (%EWL between T0 and T2 in patients of all groups significant, P<.001). Patients with and without surgical treatment showed significant improvement with regard to depressive symptoms and binge-eating behavior. Three-quarters of the surgically-treated and two-thirds of the non-treated patients rated their physical, psychological, and psychosocial well-being as "good" at T2., Conclusion: After 3 to 4 years, all of the patients have adapted well to their weight and body appearance, regardless of whether they have undergone surgery. Weight loss is, however, greater for operated patients, which strongly decreases the risk of developing obesity-related co-morbidities.

Bariatric surgery is currently considered the best treatment option for morbid obesity. With the rapid development of laparoscopic techniques, a significant increase in the number bariatric procedures in recent years can be observed. Various surgical techniques to treat morbid obesity have been described, but only few prospective studies compare the different procedures, leading to a lack of evidence for their use. However, from the available literature some general recommendations can be given: (a) preoperative workup in an interdisciplinary team is mandatory, (b) primary bariatric procedures should be performed laparoscopically, and (c) the combination of restrictive and malabsorptive techniques is more efficient than a purely restrictive method, which is also true for the treatment of comorbid diabetes and arterial hypertension. In this paper, we present recent developments in bariatric surgery, with special emphasis on the available evidence for the best treatment of morbidly obese patients.