Search

Background: Infections following shoulder surgery, particularly periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), are challenging to treat. Cutibacterium acnes is the causative pathogen in 39% to 76% of these cases. This study explores the efficacy of bacteriophage therapy as an alternative to conventional antibiotics for treating such infections., Methods: Nine phages with lytic activity were isolated from the skin of humans using C. acnes ATCC 6919 as the indicator host. These phages were tested individually or in combination to assess host range and antibiofilm activity against clinical strains of C. acnes associated with PJIs. The phage cocktail was optimized for broad-spectrum activity and tested in vitro against biofilms formed on titanium discs to mimic the prosthetic environment., Results: The isolated phages displayed lytic activity against a range of C. acnes clinical isolates. The phage cocktail significantly reduced the bacterial load of C. acnes strains 183, 184, and GG2A, as compared with untreated controls ( p < 0.05). Individual phages, particularly CaJIE7 and CaJIE3, also demonstrated significant reductions in bacterial load with respect to specific strains. Moreover, phages notably disrupted the biofilm structure and reduced biofilm biomass, confirming the potential of phage therapy in targeting biofilm-associated infections., Conclusions: Our preclinical findings support the potential of phage therapy as a viable adjunct to traditional antibiotics for treating C. acnes infections in orthopedic device-related infections. The ability of phages to disrupt biofilms may be particularly beneficial for managing infections associated with prosthetic implants.

Given the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance, scientists are urgently seeking adjunct antimicrobial strategies, such as phage therapy (PT). However, despite promising results for the treatment of musculoskeletal infections in our center, crucial knowledge gaps remain. Therefore, a prospective observational study (PHAGEFORCE) and a multidisciplinary approach was set up to achieve and optimize standardized treatment guidelines. At our center, PT is strictly controlled and monitored by a multidisciplinary taskforce. Each phage treatment follows the same pathway to ensure standardization and data quality. Within the PHAGEFORCE framework, we established a testing platform to gain insight in the safety and efficacy of PT, biodistribution, phage kinetics and the molecular interaction between phages and bacteria. The draining fluid is collected to determine the phage titer and bacterial load. In addition, all bacterial isolates are fully characterized by genome sequencing to monitor the emergence of phage resistance. We hereby present a standardized bench-to-bedside protocol to gain more insight in the kinetics and dynamics of PT for musculoskeletal infections., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Bessems, Chen, Uyttebroek, Devolder, Lood, Verwimp, De Munter, Debaveye, Depypere, Spriet, Van Gerven, Dupont, Wagemans, van Noort, Lavigne, Metsemakers and Onsea.)

Importance: As antimicrobial resistance becomes more prevalent, the application of (bacterio)phage therapy as an alternative treatment for difficult-to-treat infections is (re)gaining popularity. Over the past decade, numerous promising case reports and series have been published demonstrating the therapeutic potential of phage therapy. However, important questions remain regarding the optimal treatment protocol and, unlike for medicinal products, there are currently no predefined quality standards for the stability of phage preparations. Phage titers can be influenced by several factors which could lead to reduced titers after preparation and storage and, ultimately, subtherapeutic applications. Determining the stability of different phages in different recipients according to the route of administration is therefore one of the first important steps in establishing a standardized protocol for phage therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Bacteriophage (phage) therapy has shown promise in treating fracture-related infection (FRI); however, questions remain regarding phage efficacy against biofilms, phage-antibiotic interaction, administration routes and dosing, and the development of phage resistance. The goal of this study was to develop a dual antibiotic-phage delivery system containing hydrogel and alginate microbeads loaded with a phage cocktail plus meropenem and evaluate efficacy against muti-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Two phages (FJK.R9-30 and MK.R3-15) displayed enhanced antibiotic activity against P. aeruginosa biofilms when tested in combination with meropenem. The antimicrobial activity of both antibiotic and phage was retained for eight days at 37 °C in dual phage and antibiotic loaded hydrogel with microbeads (PA-HM). In a mouse FRI model, phages were recovered from all tissues within all treatment groups receiving dual PA-HM. Moreover, animals that received the dual PA-HM either with or without systemic antibiotics had less incidence of phage resistance and less serum neutralization compared to phages in saline. The dual PA-HM could reduce bacterial load in soft tissue when combined with systemic antibiotics, although the infection was not eradicated. The use of alginate microbeads and injectable hydrogel for controlled release of phages and antibiotics, leads to the reduced development of phage resistance and lower exposure to the adaptive immune system, which highlights the translational potential of the dual PA-HM. However, further optimization of phage therapy and its delivery system is necessary to achieve higher bacterial killing activity in vivo in the future., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bacteriophage therapy has a long history in the treatment of musculoskeletal and skin/soft tissue infections, particularly in the former Soviet Union. Due to the global rise in antimicrobial resistance, phage application has experienced a resurgence of interest and expanded to many countries., Objectives: This narrative review aims to provide clinical microbiologists, infectious disease specialists and surgeons a brief history of bacteriophage therapy for human musculoskeletal and soft tissue infections, as well as data on current practices and ongoing clinical studies., Sources: A search of PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify relevant studies. Search terms were 'bacteriophage therapy', 'musculoskeletal infection' and 'soft tissue infection'. The bibliography of all retrieved articles was checked for additional relevant references., Content: Past and current data on the use of bacteriophage therapy for human musculoskeletal, skin and soft tissue infections are evaluated. Moreover, we present the clinical trials registered in public databases. Based on current clinical experience and data, several scenarios of bacteriophage application for human therapy are examined. Finally, we discuss legislative hurdles in the regulatory approval process and present future perspectives for bacteriophage therapy., Implications: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most important global public health challenges. Several different alternatives to conventional antibiotics are under development; bacteriophage therapy is one of them. Currently, therapeutic use of phages is restrained by regulatory hurdles and largely limited to sporadic authorization in compassionate use or under temporary approval as new drugs in Europe and the US. Although bacteriophage therapy seems to be safe and clinical results of phage treatment are promising, future data from high-quality (randomized controlled) trials could provide a better understanding of the reasonable minimal criteria required for expansion of bacteriophage therapy., (Copyright © 2023 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Bacteroides fragilis is a commensal gut bacterium that is associated with a number of blood and tissue infections. It has not yet been recognized as one of the drug-resistant human pathogens, but cases of the refractory infections, caused by strains that are not susceptible to the common antibiotic regimes established for B. fragilis, have been more frequently reported. Bacteriophages (phages) were found to be a successful antibacterial alternative to antibiotic therapy in many cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. We have characterized the bacteriophage GEC&#95;vB&#95;Bfr&#95;UZM3 (UZM3), which was used for the treatment of a patient with a chronic osteomyelitis caused by a B. fragilis mixed infection. Studied biological and morphological properties of UZM3 showed that it seems to represent a strictly lytic phage belonging to a siphovirus morphotype. It is characterized by high stability at body temperature and in pH environments for about 6 h. Whole genome sequencing analysis of the phage UZM3 showed that it does not harbor any known virulence genes and can be considered as a potential therapeutic phage to be used against B. fragilis infections.

According to the latest reports from WHO, the incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections is increasing worldwide, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality and a rising pressure on health-care systems. However, the development of new antibiotics is an expensive and time-consuming process, urging scientists to seek alternative antimicrobial strategies. Over the past few decades, the concept of therapeutic administration of bacteriophages (also known as phages) has gained popularity worldwide. Although conceptually promising, the widespread implementation of phage therapy in routine clinical practice is restricted by the scarcity of safety and efficacy data obtained according to the strict standards of the applicable clinical trial regulations. In this systematic review, we list clinical data published between Jan 1, 2000 and Aug 14, 2021 on the safety and efficacy of phage therapy for difficult-to-treat bacterial infections, and provide an overview of trials and case studies on the use of phage therapy in several medical disciplines., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Bacteriophage therapy has recently attracted increased interest, particularly in difficult-to-treat infections. Although it is not a novel concept, standardized treatment guidelines are currently lacking. We present the first steps towards the establishment of a "multidisciplinary phage task force" (MPTF) and a standardized treatment pathway, based on our experience of four patients with severe musculoskeletal infections. After review of their medical history and current clinical status, a multidisciplinary team found four patients with musculoskeletal infections eligible for bacteriophage therapy within the scope of Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki. Treatment protocols were set up in collaboration with phage scientists and specialists. Based on the isolated pathogens, phage cocktails were selected and applied intraoperatively. A draining system allowed postoperative administration for a maximum of 10 days, 3 times per day. All patients received concomitant antibiotics and their clinical status was followed daily during phage therapy. No severe side-effects related to the phage application protocol were noted. After a single course of phage therapy with concomitant antibiotics, no recurrence of infection with the causative strains occurred, with follow-up periods ranging from 8 to 16 months. This study presents the successful outcome of bacteriophage therapy using a standardized treatment pathway for patients with severe musculoskeletal infection. A multidisciplinary team approach in the form of an MPTF is paramount in this process., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Phage therapy (PT) continues to attract interest in the fight against fracture-related infection (FRI), particularly for recurring infections that have not been resolved using conventional therapeutic approaches. The journey PT has taken from early clinical application in the pre-antibiotic era to its recent reintroduction to western clinical practice has been accelerated by the increased prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens in the clinic. This review will present PT's potential as a precise, adaptable, and effective treatment modality, with a focus on patient and phage selection, as well as the various administration protocols currently applied to patients. The challenges for PT, for example the most optimal application technique and dosing, are also discussed and underscore the importance of personalized approaches and the urgent need for more robust clinical evidence. Future perspectives, including phage engineering and innovative delivery systems will be discussed, as they may broaden the applicability of PT to a point where it may become a standard rather than an option of last resort for orthopedic infection management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In times where only a few novel antibiotics are to be expected, antimicrobial resistance remains an expanding global health threat. In case of chronic infections caused by therapy-resistant pathogens, physicians have limited therapeutic options, which are often associated with detrimental consequences for the patient. This has resulted in a renewed interest in alternative strategies, such as bacteriophage (phage) therapy. However, there are still important hurdles that currently impede the more widespread implementation of phage therapy in clinical practice. First, the limited number of good-quality case series and clinical trials have failed to show the optimal application protocol in terms of route of administration, frequency of administration, treatment duration and phage titer. Second, there is limited information on the systemic effects of phage therapy. Finally, in the past, phage therapy has been applied intuitively in terms of the selection of phages and their combination as parts of phage cocktails. This has led to an enormous heterogeneity in previously published studies, resulting in a lack of reliable safety and efficacy data for phage therapy. We hereby present a study protocol that addresses these scientific hurdles using a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together the experience of clinical, pharmaceutical and molecular microbiology experts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common condition affecting 5–12% of the general population worldwide. In a limited number of cases, the disease is recalcitrant to medical and surgical interventions, causing a major impact on physical, social and emotional well-being and increasing pressure on healthcare systems. Biofilm formation and dysbiosis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa play a role in the pathogenesis of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis. In these cases, a promising treatment alternative is the application of bacteriophages, which are viruses that infect and lyse bacteria. In this review, we appraise the evidence for the use of bacteriophages in the treatment of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis. Additionally, (dis)advantages of bacteriophages and considerations for implementation of phage therapy in otorhinolaryngology practice will be discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]