1. A novel barcoded nanopore sequencing workflow of high-quality, full-length bacterial 16S amplicons for taxonomic annotation of bacterial isolates and complex microbial communities.
- Author
-
Dommann J, Kerbl-Knapp J, Albertos Torres D, Egli A, Keiser J, and Schneeberger PHH
- Subjects
- Workflow, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization methods, DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic methods, DNA, Bacterial genetics, Humans, Nanopore Sequencing methods, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics, Bacteria genetics, Bacteria classification, Bacteria isolation & purification, Microbiota genetics
- Abstract
Due to recent improvements, Nanopore sequencing has become a promising method for experiments relying on amplicon sequencing. We describe a flexible workflow to generate and annotate high-quality, full-length 16S rDNA amplicons. We evaluated it for two applications, namely, (i) identification of bacterial isolates and (ii) species-level profiling of microbial communities. We assessed the identification of single bacterial isolates by sequencing, using a set of barcoded full-length 16S rRNA gene primer pairs (pair A), on 47 isolates encompassing multiple genera and compared those results with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based identification. Species-level community profiling was tested with two sets of barcoded full-length 16S primer pairs (A and B) and compared to the results obtained with shotgun Illumina sequencing using 27 stool samples. We developed a Nextflow pipeline to retain high-quality reads and taxonomically annotate them. We found high agreement between our workflow and MALDI-TOF data for isolate identification (positive predictive value = 0.90, Cramér's V = 0.857, and Theil's U = 0.316). For species-level community profiling, we found strong correlations ( r
s > 0.6) of alpha diversity indices between the two primer sets and Illumina sequencing. At the community level, we found significant but small differences when comparing sequencing techniques. Finally, we found a moderate to strong correlation when comparing the relative abundances of individual species (average rs = 0.6 and 0.533 for primers A and B). Despite identified shortcomings, the proposed workflow enabled accurate identification of single bacterial isolates and prominent features in microbial communities, making it a worthwhile alternative to MALDI-TOF MS and Illumina sequencing.IMPORTANCEA quick, robust, simple, and cost-effective method to identify bacterial isolates and communities in each sample is indispensable in the fields of microbiology and infection biology. Recent technological advances in Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing make this technique an attractive option considering the adaptability, portability, and cost-effectiveness of the platform, even with small sequencing batches. Here, we validated a flexible workflow to identify bacterial isolates and characterize bacterial communities using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing platform combined with the most recent v14 chemistry kits. For bacterial isolates, we compared our nanopore-based approach to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based identification. For species-level profiling of complex bacterial communities, we compared our nanopore-based approach to Illumina shotgun sequencing. For reproducibility purposes, we wrapped the code used to process the sequencing data into a ready-to-use and self-contained Nextflow pipeline., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF