Search

Objectives: To assess the microbiological characteristics of Escherichia coli causing healthcare-associated bacteraemia of urinary origin (HCA-BUO) in Spain (ITUBRAS-2 project), with particular focus on ESBL producers and isolates belonging to ST131 high-risk clone (HiRC). Clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with ST131 infection were investigated., Methods: A total of 222 E. coli blood isolates were prospectively collected from patients with HCA-BUO from 12 tertiary-care hospitals in Spain (2017-19). Antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL/carbapenemase production were determined. ST131 subtyping was performed. A subset of 115 isolates were selected for WGS to determine population structure, resistome and virulome. Clinical charts were reviewed., Results: ESBL-producing E. coli prevalence was 30.6% (68/222). ST131 represented 29.7% (66/222) of E. coli isolates and accounted for the majority of ESBL producers (46/68, 67.6%). The C2/H30-Rx subclone accounted for most ST131 isolates (44/66) and was associated with CTX-M-15 (37/44) and OXA-1 enzymes (27/44). Cluster C1-M27 was identified in 4/10 isolates belonging to subclade C1/H30-R1 and associated with CTX-M-27. Additionally, ST131 isolates showed a high content of other acquired resistance genes, and clade C/ST131 isolates carried characteristic QRDR mutations. They were categorized as uropathogenic E. coli and had higher aggregate virulence scores. ST131 infection was associated with more complex patients, prior use of cephalosporins and inadequate empirical treatment but was not associated with worse clinical outcomes., Conclusions: ST131 HiRC is the main driver of ESBL-producing E. coli causing HCA-BUO in Spain, mainly associated with the expansion of subclade CTX-M-15-C2/H30-Rx and the emergence of CTX-M-27-C1/H30-R1 (Cluster C1-M27)., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To determine the incidence of cardiac device-related infection (CDRI) among patients with cardiac device (CD) during late-onset bloodstream infection (BSI) and to identify the risk factors associated with CDRI., Methods: Patients with a CD (cardiac implantable electronic devices -CIED- and/or prosthetic heart valve -PHV-) and late-onset-BSI (>1 year after the CD implantation/last manipulation) were selected from the PROBAC project, a prospective, observational cohort study including adult patients with bacteraemia consecutively admitted to 26 Spanish hospitals from October 2016 to March 2017. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression were performed to identify the risk factors associated with CDRI., Results: 317 BSI from patients carrying a CD were registered, 187 (56.2%) were late-onset-BSI. A total of 40 (21.4%) CDRI were identified during late-onset-BSI. The CDRI cumulative incidence in Gram-positive-BSI was 41.8% (38/91), with S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and viridans streptococci showing the greatest percentages: 40% (12/30), 42% (11/26) and 75% (6/8), respectively. Independent predictors of CDRI were an unknown source of infection (OR: 2.88 [CI 95%:1.18-7.06], p = 0.02), Gram-positive-aetiology (23.1 [5.23-102.1], p < 0.001) and persistent bacteraemia (4.81 [1.21-19], p = 0.03). In an exploratory analysis, S. aureus (3.99 [1.37-11.65], p = 0.011), Enterococcus spp. (5.21 [1.76-15.4], p = 0.003) and viridans streptococci (28.7 [4.71-173.5], p < 0.001) aetiology were also found to be risk factors for CDRI., Conclusions: CDRI during late-onset-BSI is a frequent phenomenon. Risk of CDRI differs among species, happening in almost half of the Gram-positive-BSI. An unknown source of the primary infection, Gram-positive-aetiology -especially S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and viridans streptococci-, and persistent bacteraemia were identified as risk factors for CDRI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest L.B-P. has accepted conference invitations from Astellas, Pfizer and MSD. E.C. has accepted grants, speaking engagements and conference invitations from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer and MSD. L.E.L-C. has served as scientific advisor for Novartis, speaker for MSD, Pfizer, Angelini, and ViiV, and has served as trainer for MSD and ViiV. All other authors: none to declare., (Copyright © 2022 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Infection remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with neutropenia, and the beneficial effects of oral prophylaxis remain controversial., Methods: From 1993 to December 1999, the authors analyzed the clinical and microbiologic outcomes of 144 episodes of febrile neutropenia among adult patients with acute leukemia., Results: Forty-three consecutive episodes occurred among patients who were on ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during 1993-1996 (ciprofloxacin group), and 101 subsequent episodes occurred among patients who were not exposed to ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (control group). There were no differences in clinical presentation, antibiotic treatment received for the episode, or a worse outcome between groups. The rate of bacteremia was similar (12 of 43 patients [28%] vs. 26 of 101 patients [26%], respectively). There was a trend toward a higher rate of Gram positive bacteremia in the control group (12 of 101 patients [12%] vs. 2 of 43 patients [5%]) and a higher rate of Gram negative bacteremia in the ciprofloxacin group (11 of 43 patients [26%] vs. 15 of 101 patients [15%]). Resistance to fluoroquinolones was greater in Escherichia coli blood isolates from patients in the ciprofloxacin group (7 of 8 patients vs. 2 of 9 patients; P = 0.02)., Conclusions: The current results suggest that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis for patients with febrile neutropenia may be abandoned safely in areas with a high prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant enterobacteria., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society)

To assess the most relevant features of hospital-acquired pneumococcal bacteremia, all cases of pneumococcal bacteremia at a single teaching hospital that occurred during 1988-2000 were prospectively studied. During this period, 374 cases of pneumococcal bacteremia were documented; 39 (10%) of these episodes were hospital acquired. Twenty-nine (74%) cases occurred during the period of December through May. Eleven (28%) of 39 patients had received antimicrobial agents in the month before the onset of bacteremia. All patients had underlying diseases that predisposed them to pneumococcal infection. The most common origin of infection was the respiratory tract, followed by the intra-abdominal region. Fifteen strains were fully susceptible to penicillin, and 20 were intermediately resistant. Only 25 strains were susceptible to erythromycin; all strains that were resistant to erythromycin were penicillin nonsusceptible. Eighteen (46%) of 39 patients died; the mortality rate related to infection was 39%.

The rate of macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae is increasing, but some investigators have questioned its clinical relevance. We conducted a matched case-control study of patients with bacteremic pneumococcal infection at 4 hospitals to determine whether development of breakthrough bacteremia during macrolide treatment was related to macrolide susceptibility of the pneumococcal isolate. Case patients (n=86) were patients who had pneumococcal bacteremia and an isolate that was either resistant or intermediately resistant to erythromycin. Controls (n=141) were patients matched for age, sex, location, and year that bacteremia developed who had an erythromycin-susceptible pneumococcus isolated. Excluding patients with meningitis, 18 (24%) of 76 case patients and none of 136 matched controls were taking a macrolide when blood was obtained for culture (P=.00000012). Moreover, 5 (24%) of 21 case patients with the low-level-resistant M phenotype and none of 40 controls were taking a macrolide (P=.00157). These data show that development of breakthrough bacteremia during macrolide or azalide therapy is more likely to occur among patients infected with an erythromycin-resistant pneumococcus, and they also indicate that in vitro macrolide resistance resulting from both the efflux and methylase mechanisms is clinically relevant.