Search

Purpose: Blood culture (BC) is the gold standard for diagnosing blood stream infections (BSI) but is limited by long turnaround times (TAT) and low detection rate. The T2 Magnetic Resonance method (T2MR) offers a rapid, culture-independent alternative. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the T2Bacteria assay to BCs in a real-world setting., Methods: Retrospective comparative study consisting of T2Bacteria samples and BCs sampled within 72 h from the T2Bacteria sample. The primary outcome was detections by BC and T2Bacteria, respectively. The secondary outcome was difference in TAT., Results: In total, 640 episodes were included, consisting of 640 T2Bacteria samples and 2,117 BCs. A median of three BCs was collected for each T2Bacteria sample. Overall positivity was 101 (15.8%) by either method. In 29 (28.7%) episodes, both T2Bacteria and BC were concordantly positive. In discordant episodes, 46/101 (45.5%) episodes were T2Bacteria positive/BC negative and 26/101 (25.7%) were T2Bacteria negative/BC positive (McNemar χ 2 , p < 0,05). In T2Bacteria positive/BC negative episodes, eight had growth of the same microorganism in a non-BC culture. Median (IQR) TAT for BC was 35 h and 30 min (25 h 50 min - 45 h 24 min), compared to 21 h and 3 min (17 h 6 min - 27 h 30 m) for T2Bacteria (p < 0.001), with longer delays for samplings occurring outside work hours., Conclusions: The study highlights a high discordance between T2Bacteria and BC and suggests complementary roles of the methods in BSI diagnostics. Furthermore, it is crucial to improve TAT by reducing preanalytical delays., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

There is an utmost need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria causing bloodstream infections (BSI). The dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Seoul) is a commercial method that can be performed directly from positive blood cultures. The present study aims to evaluate the performance of the dRAST on prospective clinical blood culture samples. A sample prescreening algorithm based on clinical routine was used to choose relevant clinical positive blood culture samples for testing on the dRAST. Rapid identification via short-term culture followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was used during the test run, and dRAST results were compared to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) disk diffusion as the reference method. The performance of the dRAST was also evaluated on selected multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates in simulated blood cultures. Using the sample pre-screening algorithm, 242 clinical blood culture samples were selected and tested on the dRAST, of which 200 (82.6%) gave valid AST tests results comprising 76 Gram-positive and 124 Gram-negative samples. AST measurements from the dRAST and disk diffusion from clinical samples had an overall agreement rate of 95.5%. When using simulated blood culture samples of 31 selected MDR isolates, the agreement between dRAST and disk diffusion was 87.2%. While the agreement rates were high, it was noted that the dRAST was not reliable for AST of certain antibiotic-bacteria combinations. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that dRAST delivers rapid AST results from blood cultures and using a prescreening algorithm for sample selection is important in implementation of modern AST methods such as dRAST. IMPORTANCE There is an utmost need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria causing bloodstream infections (BSI). The dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Seoul) is a rapid AST method that can be performed directly from positive blood cultures. The dRAST gives results in 6 h compared to conventional AST methods that needs 18-20 h of incubation. The present study aims to evaluate the performance of the dRAST in a clinical setting with the use of a sample selection algorithm to reduce incompatible sample numbers. The study found that while the agreement rates between dRAST and reference AST methods were high, it was noted that the dRAST was not reliable for AST of certain antibiotic-bacteria combinations. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that dRAST delivers rapid AST results from blood cultures and using a prescreening algorithm for sample selection is important in implementation of modern AST methods such as dRAST.

The performance of blood cultures (BCs) relies on optimal sampling. Sepsis guidelines do not specify which sampling protocol to use but recommend two sets of BC bottles, each set containing one aerobic and one anaerobic bottle. For the single-site sampling (SSS) protocol, only one venipuncture is performed for all four bottles. The predominating multisite sampling (MSS) protocol implies that BC bottles are collected from two separate venipuncture sites. The aim of this study was to compare SSS and MSS. Primary outcomes were number of BC sets collected, sample volume, and diagnostic performance. This was a retrospective clinical study comparing BC results in an emergency department before and after changing the sampling protocol to SSS from MSS. All BC samples were incubated in the BacT/Alert BC system. The analysis included 5,248 patients before and 5,364 patients after the implementation of SSS. There was a significantly higher proportion of positive BCs sampled with SSS compared with MSS, 1,049/5,364 (19.56%) and 932/5,248 (17.76%), respectively ( P =  0.018). This difference was due to a higher proportion of solitary BC sets (two BC bottles) in MSS. Analyzing only patients with the recommended four BC bottles, there was no difference in positivity. SSS had a higher proportion of BC bottles with the recommended sample volumes of 8-12 ml than MSS ( P <  0.001). Changing the sampling protocol to SSS from MSS resulted in higher positivity rates, higher sample volume and fewer solitary BC sets. These advantages of SSS should be considered in future sepsis guidelines.

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing remain a crucial step for early efficient therapy of bloodstream infections. Traditional methods require turnaround times of at least 2 days, while rapid procedures are often associated with extended hands-on time. The Accelerate Pheno™ System provides microbial identification results within 90 min and susceptibility data in approximately 7 h directly from positive blood cultures with only few minutes of hands-on time. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the performance of the Accelerate Pheno™ System in identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria directly from clinical blood culture samples. We analyzed 108 and 67 blood culture bottles using the Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit with software version v1.0 and the FDA-cleared version v1.2, respectively. Reliable identification was achieved for Enterobacteriaceae, staphylococci, and enterococci, with 76/80 (95%), 42/46 (91%), and 10/11 (91%) correct identifications. Limitations were observed in the identification of streptococci, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes, and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrobial susceptibility results for Enterobacteriaceae, for amikacin, ertapenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam ranged between 86 and 100% categorical agreement. Using v1.2, results for ceftazidime showed 100% concordance with the reference method. For staphylococci, the overall performance reached 92% using v1.2. Qualitative tests for detection of methicillin or macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance caused major and very major errors for isolates. Overall, the present data show that the Accelerate Pheno™ system can, in combination with Gram stain, be used as a rapid complementation to standard microbial diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

There are several approaches available for purifying microorganisms prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis. In the present study, rapid BACpro® II (Nittobo Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a new application, has been compared with Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, USA) and an in-house method. Samples were also tested with two modules, standard and Sepsityper®, identified in the Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. The bottles having monomicrobial growth were included in the study according to Gram staining results. In total, two hundred blood culture bottles were included but there was no growth in one of the subcultures so 199 blood culture bottles were studied prospectively. With the standard MALDI-TOF MS analysis, rapid BACpro® II could successfully identify microorganisms in 174/199 (87.4%) of the bottles where Sepsityper® kit and in-house method were successful in 136/199 (68.3%) and 114/199 (57.3%), respectively. When the MALDI-TOF MS data were analysed by Sepsityper® module, the identification rates were increased to 94.4%, 82.1% and 69.8% (p < 0.001), respectively. In the Sepsityper® module, 72/73 (98.6%) of Gram-negative and 97/106 (91.5%) of Gram-positive microorganisms were detected by rapid BACpro® II method. The present study shows that rapid BACpro® II is a reliable preparation procedure and has higher rates of identification compared with Sepsityper® kit and in-house method. The use of the Sepsityper® module in blood cultures increases the chance of identification for all three methods studied.

The usefulness of pneumococcal urinary antigen tests (UATs) in severe pneumococcal infection relies heavily on the performance in bacteremic patients. Fluorescence technology and automatic reading of test results may improve UAT performance. We evaluated the automatically read Sofia S. pneumoniae FIA for diagnosing pneumococcal bloodstream infection (BSI) in hospitalized adult patients. First, the Sofia FIA was evaluated on 97 patients with pneumococcal ( n  = 47) and nonpneumococcal ( n  = 50) BSI and compared with results by the visually read BinaxNOW S. pneumoniae immunochromatographic test (ICT) and ImmuView S. pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila ICT. In four cases (4.1%), the Sofia FIA showed invalid test results, three of which showed invalid results by the ImmuView ICT previously. Based on 93 valid cases, the Sofia FIA showed similar sensitivity (for both comparisons: 68% versus 62%; P = 0.45) and specificity (for both comparisons: 91% versus 93%; P = 1.00) as the visually read UATs. Second, the Sofia FIA was prospectively evaluated on 82 consecutive nonfrozen urine samples, detecting pneumococcal antigen in 10 of 14 (sensitivity, 71%) pneumococcal BSI patients, similarly to the visually and automatically read BinaxNOW ICT (both 12 of 14; sensitivity, 86%; P = 0.50). Of five nonpneumococcal BSI cases, the Sofia FIA showed an invalid test result in one case, but no positive UAT results were obtained. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the Sofia FIA were similar to the performance rates of other UATs in patients with BSI, but invalid test results are of concern for the usefulness in pneumococcal BSI., (Copyright © 2019 Olofsson et al.)

Identification of anaerobic bacteria causing blood stream infections (BSI) is challenging. This study describes the epidemiology of anaerobic BSI at a tertiary care hospital and the performance of a rapid method for identification of anaerobic bacteria from blood cultures over three years, between June 2015 and June 2018. Short-term culturing is a low-cost user-friendly method and may be used for rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by matrix-associated laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF). Short-term culturing is performed after Gram staining on all positive blood culture bottles (BCBs) before 10:30 a.m. in our laboratory. Successful short-term cultures were defined as growth and reliable MALDI-TOF result in maximum 8 h after culture positivity. Data pertaining to unique anaerobic episodes and short-term cultures was collected retrospectively from our laboratory information system. Overall, during the three-year period, 692 unique anaerobic episodes (including Propionibacterium spp) were isolated. A total of 17 anaerobic bacterial genera were isolated in our laboratory, with 5 GNB genera and 12 GPB genera. The most prevalent bacteria were Bacteroides spp. 266/692 (38%), Propionibacterium spp. 128/692 (18%), Clostridium spp. 103/692 (15%), Fusobacterium spp. 34/692 (5%), and Actinomyces spp. 34/692 (5%). We performed short-term cultures on 270/564 (48%) clinically relevant episodes (excluding Propionibacterium spp) on chocolate agar plates. Growth within 8 h from culture positivity was detected in 33/270 (12%) short-term cultures. There were 22/33 (67%) gram negative (GNB) and 11/33 (33%) gram positive bacteria (GPB). Only two genera were identified: Bacteroides spp 22/33 (67%) and Clostridium spp 11/33 (33%). Thus, short-term culturing can function as a low-cost add-on to already existing protocols involving MALDI-TOF, where both GNB and GPB can be identified., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Many strategies and technologies are available to improve blood culture (BC)-based diagnostics. The ideal approach to BCs varies between healthcare institutions. Institutions need to examine clinical needs and practices in order to optimize BC-based diagnostics for their site. Before laboratories consider offering rapid matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) or expensive rapid panel-based molecular BC diagnostics, they should optimize preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical processes and procedures surrounding BC systems. Several factors need to be considered, including local resistance rates, antibiotic prescribing patterns, patient- and provider-types, laboratory staffing, and personnel available to liaise with clinicians to optimize antibiotic use. While there is much excitement surrounding new high-technology diagnostics, cost-neutral benefits can be realized by optimizing existing strategies and using available tools in creative ways. Rapid BC diagnostics should be implemented in a manner that optimizes impact. Strategies to optimize these BC diagnostics in individual laboratories are presented here., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.)

We compared the newly approved BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture system to the BacT/Alert 3D system using 115 clinical bacterial and fungal isolates in 784 simulated blood culture bottles. The time to detection was reduced by roughly 20% in the Virtuo system (P< 0.0001) while the detection rate did not differ., (Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Eggerthella lenta is a Gram-positive anaerobic bacillus. Improved diagnostics and increased awareness of rare pathogens have revealed its potential to cause serious invasive infections. In this study, 18 clinical E. lenta isolates derived from positive blood cultures were included. Underlying problems of the patients were in the majority of cases related to the gastrointestinal tract. The performance of two MALDI-TOF MS systems, i.e. Bruker and Vitek MS, in identification of E. lenta was analyzed. In addition, the minimal inhibitory concentrations for clinically relevant antimicrobial agents were determined by routine procedures using E-test. 17 of the 18 E. lenta isolates investigated in this study were correctly identified to species level by the Bruker MS system, while the Vitek MS system identified all 18 isolates. Antimicrobial sensitivity towards the tested agents was in general good. However, high resistance rates were observed for penicillin G and piperacillin-tazobactam based on EUCAST breakpoints., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rapid identification of bacteria from blood cultures enables early initiation of appropriate antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the use of matrix-associated laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) MS after a short incubation on solid media for rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles. MALDI-TOF MS was performed after 2.5 and 5.5 h plate incubation of samples from positive blood cultures. Identification scores with values ≥ 1.7 were accepted as successful identification if the results were confirmed by conventional methods. Conventional methods included MALDI-TOF MS, Vitek 2, and diverse biochemical and agglutination tests after overnight culture. In total, 515 positive blood cultures with monomicrobial bacterial growth representing one blood culture per patient were included in the study. There were 229/515 (44.5%) and 286/515 (55.5%) blood culture bottles with Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and Gram-positive bacteria (GPB), respectively. MALDI-TOF MS following short-term culture could accurately identify 300/515 (58.3%) isolates at 2.5 h, GNB being identified in greater proportion (180/229; 78.6%) than GPB (120/286; 42.0%). In an additional 124/515 bottles (24.1%), identification was successful at 5.5 h, leading to accurate identification of bacteria from 424/515 (82.3%) blood cultures after short-term culture. Interestingly, 11/24 of the isolated anaerobic bacteria could be identified after 5.5 h. The present study demonstrates, in a large number of clinical samples, that MALDI-TOF MS following short-term culture on solid medium is a reliable and rapid method for identification of bacteria from blood culture bottles with monomicrobial bacterial growth.

The T2Bacteria panel is a direct-from-blood assay that delivers rapid results, targeting E. coli, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumanii, P. aeruginosa, and E. faecium (ESKAPE pathogens). In this study, T2Bacteria and T2Candida (targeting C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. glabrata/C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis) were evaluated in parallel with blood cultures in 101 consecutive surgical patients with suspected intra-abdominal infection admitted to the intensive care unit or high dependency unit. Fifteen patients had bacteremia, with T2Bacteria correctly identifying all on-panel (n = 8) pathogens. T2Bacteria was positive in 19 additional patients, 11 of whom had supportive cultures from other normally sterile sites (newly inserted drains, perioperative cultures or blood cultures) within seven days. Six of these eleven patients (55%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics at the sampling time. T2Candida identified the two cases of blood-culture-positive candidemia and was positive in seven additional patients, three of whom were confirmed to have intra-abdominal candidiasis. Of four patients with concurrent T2Bacteria and T2Candida positivity, only one patient had positive blood cultures (candidemia), while three out of four patients had supporting microbiological evidence of a mixed infection. T2Bacteria and T2Candida were fast and accurate in diagnosing on-panel bloodstream infections, and T2Bacteria was able to detect culture-negative intra-abdominal infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although there are several US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved/cleared molecular microbiology diagnostics for direct analysis of patient samples, all are single target or panel-based tests. There is no FDA-approved/cleared diagnostic for broad microbial detection. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS), commercialized as the IRIDICA system (Abbott) and formerly PLEX-ID, had been under development for over a decade and had become CE-marked and commercially available in Europe in 2014. Capable of detecting a large number of microorganisms, it was under review at the FDA when, in April 2017, Abbott discontinued it. This turn of events represents not only the loss of a potential diagnostic tool for infectious diseases but may be a harbinger of similar situations with other emerging and expensive microbial diagnostics, especially genomic tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The present study analyzed the performance of Bactec Mycosis IC/F, BacT/Alert FA, and BacT/Alert FN vials in detection and time to detection (TTD) of Candida spp. in 179 simultaneous blood cultures. The Mycosis IC/F, BacT/Alert FA, and BacT/Alert FN vials could detect Candida spp. in 144 (80.45%) of 179, 149 (83.24%) of 179, and 8 (4.47%) of 179 samples, respectively. With the presence of antifungal therapy, the numbers of positive vials were higher in BacT/Alert FA compared to Mycosis IC/F, 87/99 versus 73/99, respectively (P < 0.05). TTD (SD) for C. albicans was shorter in Mycosis IC/F than in BacT/Alert FA vials without antifungal therapy, 20.89 (9.33) versus 28.26 (9.77), respectively (P < 0.01). The detection of Candida spp., with concomitant bacteremia, was higher in Mycosis IC/F than in BacT/Alert FA vials, 28/30 and 19/30, respectively (P = 0.01). The present data show that the use of Bactec Mycosis IC/F together with BacT/Alert FA vials might improve the detection of Candida spp. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]