Search

The bacteremia level as well as the administration of antibiotics before blood collection may significantly affect the recovery of bacterial pathogens from pediatric blood cultures in BacT/Alert Virtuo or Bactec FX BC systems, which remain the common techniques to diagnose bacteremia in pediatric patients. We simulated pediatric blood cultures with low or intermediate bacteremia level to evaluate BacT/Alert PF Plus and Bactec Peds Plus blood culture bottles for resin-based inactivation of 16 antibiotic-bacterium combinations. Overall, 105/192 (54.7%) of BacT/Alert PF Plus bottles and 69/192 (36.0%) of Bactec Peds Plus bottles allowed organisms to grow when exposed to antibiotics. In particular, both BacT/Alert PF Plus and Bactec Peds Plus bottles proved to be effective with piperacillin/tazobactam and Pseudomonas aeruginosa or with oxacillin and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (100% growth), whereas no effectiveness was apparent with ceftriaxone and Escherichia coli , Streptococcus agalactiae , or Streptococcus pneumoniae or with cefepime and E. coli (0% growth). In some relevant instances ( e.g. , with vancomycin and methicillin-resistant S. aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae ), BacT/Alert PF Plus bottles were superior to Bactec Peds Plus bottles. Together, these findings underscore the potentiality of resin-containing bottles to enhance diagnosis of bacteremia in pediatric patients on antimicrobial therapy. This is particularly true with one of the evaluated BC systems and with simulated intermediate bacteremia level only., Competing Interests: The authors declare that bioMérieux provided reagents and funding for this study, participated in the study design, and critically reviewed the manuscript before submission., (Copyright © 2021 Giordano, Liotti, Menchinelli, De Angelis, D’Inzeo, Morandotti, Sanguinetti, Spanu and Posteraro.)

Background: Timely detection of antimicrobial (cephalosporin/carbapenem) resistance (AMR) determinants is crucial to the clinical management of bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB)., Objectives: To review and meta-analyse the evidence for using commercially available molecular tests for the direct detection of AMR determinants in GNB-positive blood cultures (PBCs)., Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of Knowledge., Study Eligibility Criteria: Clinical studies evaluating the performance of two major commercial systems, namely the Verigene® and FilmArray® systems, for rapid testing of GNB-PBCs, in comparison with the phenotypic or genotypic methods performed on GNB-PBC isolates., Methods: Literature search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria and, for meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity of both systems, bivariate random-effects model., Results: Twenty studies were identified (3310 isolates) from 2006 to 2019. Nine studies were conducted in East Asia. In 15 studies using phenotypic comparators (1930 isolates), 1014 (52.5%) isolates were Escherichia coli, and 287 (14.9%) of all the isolates displayed AMR phenotypes. In five studies using genotypic comparators (1380 isolates), 585 (42.4%) were E. coli, and 100 (7.2%) of all the isolates displayed AMR genotypes. Pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for detection of AMR determinants by the Verigene (i.e. CTX-M, IMP, KPC, NDM, OXA and VIM) and/or FilmArray (i.e. KPC) systems were 85.3% (95% CI 79.9%-89.4%) and 99.1% (95% CI 98.2%-99.5%), respectively, across the 15 studies, and 95.5% (95% CI 89.2%-98.2%) and 99.7% (95% CI 99.1%-99.9%), respectively, across the five studies., Conclusions: Our findings show that the Verigene and FilmArray systems may be a valid adjunct to the conventional microbiology (phenotypic or genotypic) methods used to identify AMR in GNBs. The FilmArray system detects only one AMR genotype, namely KPC, limiting its use. Both Verigene and FilmArray systems can miss important cephalosporin/carbapenem resistance phenotypes in a minority of cases. However, the sensitivity and specificity of both systems render them valuable clinical tools in timely identification of resistant isolates. Further studies will establish the prominence of such rapid diagnostics as standard of care in individuals with bloodstream infections., (Copyright © 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) still relies on blood culture (BC), but low turnaround times may hinder the early initiation of an appropriate antimicrobial therapy, thus increasing the risk of infection-related death. We describe a direct and rapid multiplex PCR-based assay capable of detecting and identifying 16 bacterial and four Candida species, as well as three antibiotic-resistance determinants, in uncultured samples. Using whole-blood samples spiked with microorganisms at low densities, we found that the MicrobScan assay had a mean limit of detection of 15.1 ± 3.3 CFU of bacteria/ Candida per ml of blood. When applied to positive BC samples, the assay allowed the sensitive and specific detection of BSI pathogens, including bla KPC -, mecA -, or vanA / vanB -positive bacteria. We evaluated the assay using prospectively collected blood samples from patients with suspected BSI. The sensitivity and specificity were 86.4 and 97.0%, respectively, among patients with positive BCs for the microorganisms targeted by the assay or patients fulfilling the criteria for infection. The mean times to positive or negative assay results were 5.3 ± 0.2 and 5.1 ± 0.1 h, respectively. Fifteen of 20 patients with MicrobScan assay-positive/BC-negative samples were receiving antimicrobial therapy. In conclusion, the MicrobScan assay is well suited to complement current diagnostic methods for BSIs., (Copyright © 2019 Liotti, Posteraro, Mannu, Carta, Pantaleo, De Angelis, Menchinelli, Spanu, Fiori, Turrini and Sanguinetti.)

The proportion of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among the ESKAPE and Escherichia coli (ESKAPEEc) pathogens causing bloodstream infection (BSI) increased worldwide. We described longitudinal trends in ESKAPEEc BSI and AMR over 9 years (2007-2015) at a large teaching hospital in Italy. Of 9720 unique BSI episodes, 6002 (61.7%) were caused by ESKAPEEc pathogens. The majority of these episodes (4374; 72.9%) were hospital-onset infections. The most frequent pathogen was E. coli (32.8%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (20.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.1%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.6%). There was a significant increase of hospital-onset K. pneumoniae (from 2.3 to 5.0 per 10,000 patient-days; P = 0.001) and community-onset E. coli (from 3.3 to 9. 1 per 10,000 emergency admissions; P = 0.04) BSIs. Among hospital-onset BSIs, increases of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli (from 25.4 to 35.2%, P = 0.006), carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (from 4.2 to 51.6%, P < 0.001), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (from 33.9 to 44.4%, P < 0.001) BSIs were observed between the 2007-2009 and 2010-2012 study periods. In contrast, a decrease of BSIs caused by P. aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime (from 45.5 to 28.2%, P < 0.001), ciprofloxacin (from 46 to 36.3%, P = 0.05), and meropenem (from 55 to 39.9%, P = 0.03) was observed through all 9 years of the study period. Among community-onset BSIs, increases of BSIs caused by ESBL-producing E. coli (from 28.6 to 42.2%, P = 0.002) and carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (from 0 to 17.6%) were observed between the 2007-2009 and 2010-2012 study periods. Our findings show increased rates of BSI and relative AMR for specific pathogen-health care setting combinations, and call for continued active surveillance and infection control policies.

Objectives: To evaluate the magnetic resonance-based T2Bacteria Panel assay for direct detection of ESKAPEc (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) pathogens in blood samples of patients with suspected bloodstream infection (BSI)., Patients and Methods: Adult patients admitted to the Emergency Medicine Department, Infectious Diseases Unit and ICU of a large tertiary-care hospital were included if they had a blood culture (BC) ordered concomitantly with a whole-blood sample for T2Bacteria testing. Results were compared with those of BC and other clinically relevant information., Results: A total of 140 samples from 129 BSI patients were studied. Single bacteria were detected in 15.7% (22/140) and 12.1% (17/140), and multiple bacteria in 2.9% (4/140) and 1.4% (2/140), of samples tested by T2Bacteria and BC, respectively. With respect to the six target (ESKAPEc) species, overall sensitivity and specificity of T2Bacteria across all detection channels in comparison with BC were 83.3% and 97.6%, respectively; these values increased to 89.5% and 98.4%, respectively, when a true-infection criterion (i.e. the same microorganism detected only by T2Bacteria was cultured from another sample type reflecting the source of infection) was used as the comparator. There were 808 T2Bacteria detection results across 112 samples, with concordant negative results, yielding a negative predictive value of 99.8%. The mean time to negative result was 6.1 ± 1.5 h, whereas the mean time to detection/species identification was 5.5 ± 1.4 h., Conclusions: The T2Bacteria Panel assay has the potential to provide accurate and timely diagnosis of ESKAPEc bacteraemia, which might support the direct therapeutic management of BSI patients.