Search

Objectives: To determine the association of adequate empirical combination therapy (AECT) with 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with septic shock due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (BSI)., Methods: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study analysed data from 14 public hospitals in Italy, including all consecutive adult patients admitted during 2021-2022 with septic shock due to P. aeruginosa BSI. We compared the outcomes of patients receiving AECT to those on adequate empirical monotherapy (AEMT) using Cox regression analyses., Results: Of the 98 patients who received adequate empirical antibiotic treatment for septic shock due to P. aeruginosa BSI, 24 underwent AECT and 74 were given AEMT. AECT was associated with a lower 30-day all-cause mortality (25%, six out of 24) compared to AEMT (56.8%, 42 out of 74; P = 0.007). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated AECT as the only factor significantly associated with improved survival (aHR 0.30; 95% CI 0.12-0.71; P = 0.006). By contrast, the use of monotherapy or combination therapy in the definitive regimen did not influence mortality (aHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.25-2.14; P = 0.568)., Conclusions: AECT may be associated with reduced mortality compared to monotherapy in septic shock patients due to P. aeruginosa BSI. However, the administration of definitive adequate monotherapy or combination therapy yields similar outcomes, suggesting that once susceptibility is documented, switching to a single active in vitro drug is safe and feasible. Further studies are recommended to validate these findings., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of mortality in elderly. Objective of the study is to identify factors predictive of mortality in old and oldest old patients., Methods: This is a single centre retrospective observational study, including all patients admitted to Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli university hospital and diagnosed with BSI. Patients were stratified into three groups according to age: adult (A), younger than 65; old (O), aged between 65 and 80; oldest old (OO), older than 80. Primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were duration of antimicrobial therapy (DOT) and length of hospital stay (LOS)., Results: Of the 1034 patients included in the study, 346 were in group A, 447 in group O and 241 in group OO. The rate of 30-day mortality raised from 6.9% (24/346) in group A to 10.8% (84/447) in group O and 33.2% (80/241) in group OO (p<0.01), while DOT and LOS significantly decreased moving from adults to oldest old (p<0.01). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterococcus spp were both independently correlated to an increased 30-day mortality risk selectively in patients older than 80 (MRSA: HR 2.37, p=0.03; Enterococcus spp: HR 2.44, p=0.01)., Conclusions: BSIs have a high impact on survival in old and oldest old patients. BSIs by gram-positive pathogens, in particular MRSA and Enterococcus spp, should be a wake-up call for physicians, who should focus efforts on adequate and prompt antibiotic and support treatment., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To evaluate whether PCT levels could be used to distinguish among different bacterial and fungal etiologies in patients with documented bloodstream infection (BSI)., Patients and Methods: Monocentric retrospective cohort study on patients admitted to the Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli Hospital between December 2012 and November 2015 with BSI. Those who had undergone PCT determination within 48 hours of when the first positive blood culture was sampled were included in the study., Results: Four hundred and one patients were included in the study. Both the 24h and 48h PCT values were significantly higher in patients with Gram-negative (GN) BSI than in those with Gram-positive (GP) or candida BSI (p at ANOVA = 0.003). A PCT value of > 1 ng/ml was found in 31.5% of patients with GN BSI. Less than 7% of people with candida BSI had PCT level of > 1 ng/ml. At multivariable regression analysis, GN BSI, septic shock, and plasma creatinine were significantly correlated with PCT values., Conclusions: PCT may be of value in distinguishing GN BSI from GP, and fungal BSI and PCT values of > 1 ng/ml could be used to prevent unnecessary antifungal treatment.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs are implemented to optimize the use of antibiotics and control the spread of antibiotic resistance. Many antimicrobial stewardship interventions have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics, the duration of antimicrobial therapy, and mortality. We evaluated the benefits of a combination of rapid diagnostic tests and an active re-evaluation of antibiotic therapy 72 h after the onset of bloodstream infection (BSI). All patients with BSI from November 2015 to November 2016 in a 1100-bed university hospital in Rome, where an Infectious Disease Consultancy Unit (Unità di Consulenza Infettivologica, UDCI) is available, were re-evaluated at the bedside 72 h after starting antimicrobial therapy and compared to two pre-intervention periods: the UDCI was called by the ward physician for patients with BSI and the UDCI was called directly by the microbiologist immediately after a pathogen was isolated from blood cultures. Recommendations for antibiotic de-escalation or discontinuation significantly increased (54%) from the two pre-intervention periods (32% and 27.2%, p < 0.0001). Appropriate escalation also significantly increased (22.5%) from the pre-intervention periods (8.1% and 8.2%, p < 0.0001). The total duration of antibiotic therapy decreased with intervention (from 21.9 days [standard deviation, SD 15.4] in period 1 to 19.3 days [SD 13.3] in period 2 to 17.7 days in period 3 [SD 11.5]; p = 0.002) and the length of stay was significantly shorter (from 29.7 days [SD 29.3] in period 1 to 26.8 days [SD 24.7] in period 2 to 24.2 days in period 3 [SD 20.7]; p = 0.04) than in the two pre-intervention periods. Mortality was similar among the study periods (31 patients died in period 1 (15.7%), 39 (16.7%) in period 2, and 48 (15.3%) in period 3; p = 0.90). Rapid diagnostic tests and 72 h re-evaluation of empirical therapy for BSI significantly correlated with an improved rate of optimal antibiotic therapy and decreased duration of antibiotic therapy and length of stay.