Search

Study Design: A randomized trial of 100 patients with low back pain who were potential surgical candidates., Objectives: To determine whether an interactive videodisc with a booklet is superior to a booklet alone for informing patients about back surgery., Summary of Background Data: Substantial geographic variation has been observed in lumbar spine surgery. Informed patient preferences should play an important role in decisions about surgery. However, little is known about optimal strategies for informing patients., Methods: Subjects were randomized to receive an interactive videodisc (with a booklet) or a booklet alone. A knowledge test administered at baseline and follow-up was used to measure improvement in knowledge about treatment options for lumbar spine problems. Patients' reactions to the videodisc and booklet and preferences for treatment were also assessed., Results: The patients' knowledge improved after exposure to either intervention. Multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline score, age, education, gender, and diagnosis showed a significant advantage for the videodisc with booklet over the booklet alone. The videodisc-booklet group showed significantly greater gains in knowledge among subjects with the worst baseline knowledge scores. A larger proportion of subjects in the videodisc-booklet group rated the materials easy to understand (93% vs.- 72%,P = 0.04), containing the right amount of information (93% vs.- 80%,P = 0.3), and adequate to assist in choice of treatment (75% vs.- 51%,P = 0.2). Those who viewed the videodisc expressed a somewhat lower preference for surgery than those who received the booklet alone (23% vs.- 42%,P = 0.4)., Conclusions: Both the booklet alone and the combination of videodisc and booklet improved knowledge. The combination produced greater knowledge gains than the booklet alone for the subgroup with the least knowledge at baseline. Patients preferred the combination and had a slightly lower preference for surgery if they had viewed the video presentation. For some patients, the video may enhance involvement in clinical decisions.

Objective: To describe and compare trends in hospital admission rates for mechanical neck and back problems between 1982 and 1992 in Ontario and the United States., Design: A descriptive analysis of hospital admissions, with data for Ontario extracted from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database and data for the US extracted from the National Hospital Discharge Survey., Setting: All acute care hospitals in Ontario and a probability sample of acute care hospitals in the US., Patients: Adults aged 20 years or more who were admitted to an acute care hospital for mechanical neck or back problems in 1982, 1987 or 1992. Mechanical neck and back problems were defined using an algorithm developed by the study team., Outcome Measure: Hospital admission rate per 100,000 adults., Results: Between 1982 and 1992 the hospital admission rate for medically treated cases decreased by 52% in Ontario and by 75% in the US. Over the same period the admission rate for surgically treated cases increased by 14% and by 35% respectively. By 1992 the admission rate for medically treated cases in the US was 23% higher than that in Ontario, whereas the rate for surgically treated cases was 164% higher., Conclusions: The hospital-based medical or surgical treatment of mechanical neck and back problems provides an example of discretionary care. The higher admission rates for surgery in the US may reflect a larger supply of surgical specialists and imaging units. Further work is needed to confirm these findings for other types of discretionary care and to compare the appropriateness of care and clinical outcomes for discretionary care in these 2 jurisdictions.

For several years, interest in clinical practice patterns has increased due to concerns about the costs and quality of health care. Our objectives were to examine recent trends and geographic variations in low back pain hospitalization. We analyzed data from a Washington State automated database for 1987-1992. Low back surgery rates in Washington changed little during the study years. In contrast, nonsurgical hospitalization rates fell from 15.5 to 5.1 per 10,000. The proportion of operations involving fusion decreased from 15.8% in 1987 to 11.7% in 1990, and then remained stable. During 1990, important county-to-county variations were observed in surgery rates, nonsurgical hospitalization rates, the proportion of operations involving fusion, and the percentage of surgical patients undergoing reoperation within 3 years. Wide county variations suggest that there may be overutilization or underutilization of low back pain treatments in some geographic areas. A more consistent approach to the management of back problems may benefit patients.

Study Design: A cohort study was undertaken using medical claims of Medicare beneficiaries., Objectives: Factors associated with reoperation after lumbar spine surgery were identified., Summary of Background Data: Repeat spine surgery is one outcome measure of surgical success, but little is known about clinical or demographic factors associated with repeat surgery., Methods: Medicare beneficiaries who had surgery in 1985 were included in follow-up through 1989. Time between the first operation and a lumbar spine reoperation, death, or end of follow-up period was recorded. Survival analysis (time-to-event) techniques were used to test the association of baseline characteristics with reoperation., Results: Higher reoperation rates were associated (P < 0.05) with previous back surgery, younger age, recent hospitalization, white race, and diagnosis of herniated disc (compared with other diagnoses). Fusion alone or combined with other procedures did not lower the reoperation rate., Conclusion: Reoperation rates are affected not only by technical factors, but also by demographic and clinical characteristics that are often omitted from reports of surgical case series.