Search

Parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) face higher levels of caregiver strain compared to parents of children with other disabilities. This study examined child clinical features that predict high levels of caregiver strain for 374 parents of children with ASD. Caregiver strain was measured using the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ) objective, subjective internalized, and subjective externalized subscales. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable fit for the original CGSQ three-factor solution. The strongest child predictors across CGSQ subscales were: disruptive behavior for objective strain, autism severity and disruptive behavior for subjective internalized strain, and oppositional behavior and hyperactivity for subjective externalized strain. Individualized interventions that attend to specific elements of parental strain may reduce strain and improve family wellbeing.

ObjectiveWe explored patterns of concomitant psychiatric disorders in a large sample of treatment-seeking children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).MethodsParticipants were 658 children with ASD (age 3-17 years; mean = 7.2 years) in one of six federally-funded multisite randomized clinical trials (RCT) between 1999 and 2014. All children were referred for hyperactivity or irritability. Study designs varied, but all used the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory or Early Childhood Inventory to assess Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Oppositional-Defiant Disorder (ODD), Conduct Disorder (CD), Anxiety Disorders, and Mood Disorders. In addition, several measures in common were used to assess demographic and clinical characteristics.ResultsOf the 658 children, 73% were Caucasian and 59% had an IQ >70. The rates of concomitant disorders across studies were: ADHD 81%, ODD 46%, CD 12%, any anxiety disorder 42%, and any mood disorder 8%. Two or more psychiatric disorders were identified in 66% of the sample. Of those who met criteria for ADHD, 50% also met criteria for ODD and 46% for any anxiety disorder. Associations between types of concomitant disorders and a number of demographic and clinical characteristics are presented.ConclusionIn this well-characterized sample of treatment-seeking children with ASD, rates of concomitant psychiatric disorders were high and the presence of two or more co-occurring disorders was common. Findings highlight the importance of improving diagnostic practice in ASD and understanding possible mechanisms of comorbidity.

Insomnia is common in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We recently developed and validated the 21-item Pediatric Autism Insomnia Rating Scale (PAIRS). This report explores the associations and agreements between actigraphy and PAIRS. Children with ASD, with and without sleep problems, were assessed with a battery of parent-rated and clinician measures (N = 134). In a subset (n = 70), a wrist-worn actigraph measured sleep for five consecutive nights. Parents completed logs for scoring sleep intervals. Spearman correlations evaluated associations with the PAIRS and actigraphy indices (sleep onset latency = SOL, wake after sleep onset = WASO, total sleep time = TST, sleep efficiency = SE%). Agreements on "poor sleepers" based on PAIRS total score (≥33) and conventional thresholds for TST and SE% were evaluated with Cohen's Kappa and McNemar's test. Actigraphy data were averaged over 4.64 ± 0.68 nights in 70 children (mean age = 7.3 ± 2.9, 74.3 % male). There were no significant correlations between PAIRS and any actigraphy indices. On TST, 48.6 % (n = 34) and on SE% 52.9 % (n = 37) were classified as "poor sleepers" compared to 32.9 % (n = 23) on PAIRS (kappa = 0.11 for TST and 0.27 for SE%). P-values on McNemar's Chi square test for PAIRS with TST and with SE% were 0.072 and 0.011, respectfully. These results suggest that actigraphy and PAIRS do not agree. Actigraphy TST captures movement and an estimate of specific sleep parameters. PAIRS is a broader measure that incorporates sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bedtime and sleep disturbances are ubiquitous in children with autism. The telehealth delivery of a behavior analytic parent training program was earlier reported to be efficacious in improving child sleep and parent sense of competency. Our aim in this brief report was to determine the durability of the telehealth delivered sleep parent training program (SPT) compared to the control condition in this randomized controlled trial. Telehealth delivery could be a means to expand access to such early treatment if efficacious. Parents of young children, ages 2–7 years, with autism and co-occurring sleep disturbances were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomized to either SPT or a comparison arm that included non-sleep related parent education except for one session Sleep Parent Education; SPE). Each participant was individually administered a 5 session program delivered over 10 weeks. Outcome measures were collected at weeks 5 and 10 and at post-treatment follow-up at 16 weeks. Follow-up week 16 data were available for 30 participants randomized to SPT and 24 participants randomized to SPE. Demographics for this follow-up cohort were similar to the full sample. At week 16 follow-up, there was a significant group difference between SPT and SPE the Modified Simonds & Parraga Sleep Questionnaire-Composite Sleep Index (MSPSQ – CSI) (p = 0.011) with an effect size of 0.68. Further, 8 of the 10 children in SPT who were negative responders at the week 10 endpoint were rated as positive responders at week 16 by the treatment masked IE compared to 2 out of 12 in the SPE group (p = 0.008). Post-treatment follow-up data suggests SPT is durable over time compared to SPE, the active control group. Further, for some participants in SPT, a positive responsive emerged after the treatment endpoint. This brief report adds to the efficacy of SPT as a time-limited intervention for insomnia in young autistic children. • Significant improvements of Sleep Parent Training (SPT) was durable at week 16 follow-up compared Sleep Parent Education (SPE) control condition. • Positive response to SPT may emerge after the active 10 week treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Young children with autism spectrum disorder (autism) have bedtime and sleep disturbances at much higher frequency and persistency than their neurotypical counterparts. Hence, access to early, effective treatment is critical in view of the importance of sleep in early childhood. Telehealth delivery could be a means to expand access to such early treatment if efficacious. The aim of this randomized control trial (RCT) was to compare a manualized, telehealth delivered, behaviorally based sleep parent training (SPT) intervention for parents of young children with autism and sleep disturbances to a control condition, a telehealth delivered parent education program with one sleep focused session (SPE). We hypothesized that the SPT group would show more improvements on child measures of sleep outcome measures, and daytime behaviors and parent measures of stress and sense of competence. We further aimed to explore the overall feasibility of telehealth delivery of SPT and SPE. Parents of 77 young children, ages 2–7 years, with autism and co-occurring sleep disturbances were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomized to either SPT or a comparison arm that included non-sleep related parent education except for one session. Each participant was individually administered a 5 session program delivered over 10 weeks. Outcome measures, including child sleep measures, child daytime behavior and parent stress and sense of competency were collected at weeks 5 and 10 after the baseline time point. Feasibility indicators (treatment fidelity, parent adherence, and parent attendance), and safety measures were also collected. Of 77 randomized participants, data were available for 36 participants randomized to SPT and 38 participants randomized to SPE. The mean age was 3 years, 8 months. Results support the efficacy of this manualized SPT intervention for bedtime and sleep disturbances. Sleep outcome measures were significantly improved in the SPT group compared to SPE on the Modified Simonds & Parraga Sleep Questionnaire-Composite Sleep Index (MSPSQ – CSI) (p < 0.001) with a large effect size of 0.83 at week 10. Positive response to treatment, as determined from the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) at week 10 was observed in 56% of SPT participants compared to 32% in SPE (p = 0.037). There were no significant group differences in either the ABC-I as measure of daytime behaviors or in parental stress. There were group differences in favor of SPT over SPE on the PSOC, a measure of parent sense of competency. Feasibility and safety were further demonstrated with telehealth delivery. This RCT demonstrated the efficacy of a telehealth delivered parent training intervention for bedtime and sleep disturbances in young autistic children compared to an active control condition. Further, parents in SPT reported more confidence in their parenting role than those in the SPE group, but SPT did not result in overall decreases in parental stress. Telehealth delivery allowed for a much broader reach with enrolled participants from 24 states. This study supports a telehealth approach to a manualized behavioral parent mediated intervention for sleep disturbance in young autistic children and offers an alternative to in-person delivered approaches. This telehealth delivery has the potential to improve access for families who have a young autistic child with sleep disturbances. Given the small sample size, determining predictors and moderators of treatment response was not possible and should be examined in a larger trial. • Telehealth delivery of Sleep Parent Training (SPT) improved bedtime and sleep disturbances in a sample of young autistic children compared to an active control. • SPT did not result in decreased daytime behavior or parental stress, but did prove more effective in increasing parent sense of competency. • Feasibility of telehealth delivery of both treatment arms was demonstrated. • Telehealth SPT may be a viable intervention for some young autistic children to address sleep disturbances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anxiety is a common and impairing problem in children with autism spectrum disorder, but little is known about it in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. This article reports on the characteristics of anxiety symptoms in young children with autism spectrum disorder using a parent-completed rating scale. One hundred and eighty children (age 3–7 years) participated in a clinical trial of parent training for disruptive behaviors. Anxiety was measured as part of pre-treatment subject characterization with 16 items from the Early Childhood Inventory, a parent-completed scale on child psychiatric symptoms. Parents also completed other measures of behavioral problems. Sixty-seven percent of children were rated by their parents as having two or more clinically significant symptoms of anxiety. There were no differences in the Early Childhood Inventory anxiety severity scores of children with IQ < 70 and those with ⩾70. Higher levels of anxiety were associated with severity of oppositional defiant behavior and social disability. Anxiety symptoms are common in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. These findings are consistent with earlier work in school-age children with autism spectrum disorder. There were no differences in anxiety between children with IQ below 70 and those with IQ of 70 and above. Social withdrawal and oppositional behavior were associated with anxiety in young children with autism spectrum disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Many children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have feeding and mealtime problems. To address these, we conducted a pilot randomized trial of a new 11-session, individually delivered parent training program that integrated behavioral strategies and nutritional guidance (PT-F).Methods: Forty-two young children (age: 2 to 7-11 years) with ASD and feeding problems were assigned to 11 sessions of PT-F intervention over 20 weeks or a waitlist control. Outcomes included attendance, parent satisfaction, therapist fidelity, and preliminary assessments of child and parent outcomes.Results: Of the 21 PT-F families, attendance was high (85%) as was parent satisfaction (94% would recommend to others). Treatment fidelity was also high (97%-therapist integrity; 94%-parent adherence). Compared with waitlist, children whose parents participated in PT-F showed significantly greater reductions on the two parent-completed primary outcomes (Brief Autism Mealtime Behavior Inventory-Revised; Twald = -2.79; p = .003; About Your Child's Eating; Twald = -3.58; p = .001). On the independent evaluator-completed secondary eating outcome, the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, 48.8% of the participants in PT-F were rated as "responders" compared with 0% in waitlist (p = .006). General child disruptive behavior outcomes decreased more in PT-F but not significantly. Parent outcomes of caregiver stress showed nonsignificant trends favoring PT-F with moderate to small effect sizes.Conclusions: This trial provides evidence for feasibility, satisfaction, and fidelity of implementation of PT-F for feeding problems in young children with ASD. Feeding outcomes also appeared favorable and lends support for conducting a larger efficacy trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Sleep disturbances in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are common and may impair daytime functioning as well as add to parental burden. In this well characterized sample of young children with ASD and disruptive behaviors, we examine the association of age and IQ in sleep disturbances using the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire modified for ASD (CSHQ-ASD). We also test whether children with poor sleep have greater daytime behavioral problems than those with better sleep. Finally, we examine whether parental stress is higher in children with greater disruptive behaviors and sleep disturbances.Participants and Methods: One hundred and seventy-seven children with complete data out of 180 (mean age 4.7) with ASD participated in a randomized clinical trial. Parents completed the CSHQ-ASD and several other measures at study enrollment. The sample was divided into "poor sleepers" (upper quartile on the total score of the CSHQ-ASD) and "good sleepers" (lower quartile) for comparisons. Analyses were conducted to evaluate group differences on age, IQ, daytime disruptive behavior, social disability and parental stress.Results: The two groups of young children with ASD, good sleepers versus poor sleepers, were not different on age or cognitive level. Children in the poor sleeping group had significantly higher daytime behavioral problems including irritability, hyperactivity, social withdrawal and stereotypical behaviors. Parents in this group reported significantly higher levels of stress.Conclusions: The finding of no age difference between good and poor sleepers in young children with ASD and disruptive behaviors suggests that sleep problems are unlikely to resolve as might be expected in typically developing children. Likewise, the good and poor sleepers did not significantly differ in IQ. These findings add strong support for the need to screen for sleep disturbances in all children with ASD, regardless of age and cognitive level. Poor sleepers exhibited significantly greater daytime behavioral problems and parents of children in this group reported significantly higher levels of stress. Above and beyond the co-occurring disruptive behavior, poor sleep quality appears to pose substantial additive burden on child and parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Sleep disturbances in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are very common. Psychometrically sound instruments are essential to assess these disturbances. Children's Sleep Habit Questionnaire (CSHQ) is a widely used measure in ASD. The purpose of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the CSHQ in a sample of children with ASD.Participants and Methods: Parents/caregivers of 310 children (mean age: 4.7) with ASD completed the CSHQ at study enrollment. Correlations between intelligence quotient (IQ) scores and the original CSHQ scales were calculated. Item endorsement frequencies and percentages were also calculated. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, and internal consistency was assessed for the newly extracted components.Results: Correlations between IQ scores and CSHQ subscales and total scores ranged from .015 to .001 suggesting a weak, if any, association. Item endorsement frequencies were high for bedtime resistance items, but lower for parasomnia and sleep-disordered breathing items. A PCA suggested that a five-component solution best fits the data. Internal consistency of the newly extracted five components ranged α = .87-.50.Conclusions: Item endorsement frequencies were highest for bedtime resistance items. A PCA suggested a five-component solution. Three of the five components (Sleep Routine Problems, Insufficient Sleep, and Sleep-onset Association Problems) were types of sleep disturbances commonly reported in ASD, but the other two components (Parasomnia/Sleep-disordered Breathing and Sleep Anxiety) were less clear. Internal consistencies ranged from mediocre to good. Further development of this measure for use in children with ASD is encouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background and purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare two parent completed questionnaires, the Modified Simonds & Parraga Sleep Questionnaire (MSPSQ) and the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ), used to characterize sleep disturbances in young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Both questionnaires have been used in previous work in the assessment and treatment of children with ASD and sleep disturbance. Participants and methods: Parents/caregivers of a sample of 124 children diagnosed with ASD with an average age of six years completed both sleep questionnaires regarding children’s sleep behaviors. Internal consistency of the items for both measures was evaluated as well as the correlation between the two sleep measures. A Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was also conducted to examine the predictive power of the MSPSQ. Results: More than three quarters of the sample (78%) were identified as poor sleepers on the CSHQ. Cronbach’s alpha for the items on the CSHQ was 0.68 and Cronbach’s alpha for items on the MSPSQ was 0.67. The total scores for MSPSQ and CSHQ were significantly correlated (r =.70, p <.01). After first identifying the poor sleepers based on the CSHQ, an area under the curve was 0.89 for the MSPSQ. Using a cut off score of 56 on the MSPSQ, sensitivity was .86 and specificity was .70. Conclusions: In this sample of children with ASD, sleep disturbances were common across all cognitive levels. Preliminary findings suggest that, similar to the CSHQ, the MSPSQ has adequate internal consistency. The two measures were also highly correlated. A preliminary cut off of 56 on the MSPSQ offers high sensitivity and specificity commensurate with the widely used CSHQ. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: This study examined the impact of parent training on adaptive behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and disruptive behavior.Methods: This was a 24-week, 6-site, randomized trial of parent training versus parent education in 180 children with ASD (aged 3-7 years; 158 boys and 22 girls) and moderate or greater behavioral problems. Parent training included specific strategies to manage disruptive behavior over 11 to 13 sessions, 2 telephone boosters, and 2 home visits. Parent education provided useful information about autism but no behavior management strategies over 12 core sessions and 1 home visit. In a previous report, we showed that parent training was superior to parent education in reducing disruptive behavior in young children with ASD. Here, we test whether parent training is superior to parent education in improving daily living skills as measured by the parent-rated Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales II. The long-term impact of parent training on adaptive functioning is also presented.Results: At week 24, the parent training group showed a 5.7-point improvement from baseline on the Daily Living domain compared to no change in parent education (p = .004; effect size = 0.36). On the Socialization domain, there was a 5.9-point improvement in parent training versus a 3.1-point improvement in parent education (p = .11; effect size = 0.29). Gains in the Communication domain were similar across treatment groups. The gain in Daily Living was greater in children with IQ of >70. However, the interaction of treatment-by-IQ was not significant. Gains in Daily Living at week 24 were maintained upon re-evaluation at 24 weeks posttreatment.Conclusion: These results support the model that reduction in disruptive behavior can lead to improvement in activities of daily living. By contrast, the expected trajectory for adaptive behavior in children with ASD is often flat and predictably declines in children with intellectual disability. In the parent training group, higher-functioning children achieved significant gains in daily living skills. Children with intellectual disability kept pace with time. Clinical trial registration information-Randomized Trial of Parent Training for Young Children With Autism (RUBI); http://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT01233414. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]