Search

This case is fictitious but draws upon facts from actual occurrences. It requires students to apply auditing concepts and professional standards in an international setting. An affiliate of a U.S. accounting firm, Loxon Shanghai CPA Ltd., has received a request from the SEC for the audit workpapers of one of their Chinese clients, Great Lead Software. If Loxon complies with the SEC, it may violate Chinese State Secrecy Laws. After revelations of fraud by Great Lead Software surface, Loxon's decision regarding the workpapers becomes more perilous. The case provides an opportunity for students to achieve multiple learning objectives, including identify audit deficiencies in a globalized setting, identify auditor's responsibility in the United States versus China, describe the benefits of International Standards on Auditing, describe how culture may affect financial reporting systems including transparency and regulatory issues, and identify potential conflicts between U.S. regulatory requirements and the Chinese state secrets laws. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to develop a research agenda on internal controls for offshored accounting processes. It further develops a linkage between internal controls of offshored accounting processes and auditing of the organization. Offshoring of accounting processes has become a common business practice, pursued by firms to reduce costs and focus on core competencies. However, our understanding about internal controls of these offshored processes is limited. Design/methodology/approach – Grounded in theory that is supported by prior literature and interviews with practitioners, this paper attempts to develop a research agenda on internal controls for offshored accounting processes. Findings – The main findings of our study suggest that while offshoring saves costs and allows the clients to focus on their core competencies, it also poses risks to the clients’ organizations. To mitigate these risks and comply with the regulatory requirements of the countries where the clients are located, clients and their offshore vendors need to effectively establish adequate internal controls for offshored business processes. Clients should seek those vendors who have appropriate processes in place and are willing to provide Service Organization Control (SOC) reports (or at least are capable of getting a SOC report in the near future). Moreover, clients should avoid offshoring the processes that would exist in defective internal control systems. Similarly, vendors should avoid undertaking those processes for which they are incapable of maintaining efficient internal controls. Practical implications – Our study has implications for academicians as well as practitioners on understanding the determinants and consequences of internal control for offshored processes. Originality/value – While internal controls for offshored accounting process and related regulatory changes have been increasingly important topics, little research has been devoted to explore their implications on accounting and auditing literature. We attempt to bridge this gap by synthesizing prior research on internal controls and auditing, and further developing a set of research questions for academic research. Our hope is to spur a new area of research that has not been explored before. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]