Search

Previous electroencephalographic (EEG) evidence has shown event-related desynchronization (ERD) of alpha rhythms before predictable painful stimuli, as a possible neural concomitant of attentional preparatory processes (Babiloni, C., Brancucci, A., Babiloni, F., Capotosto, P., Carducci, F., Cincotti, F., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Chen, A.C., Rossini, P.M., 2003. Anticipatory cortical responses during the expectancy of a predictable painful stimulation. A high-resolution electroencephalography study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 (6) 1692-700). This study tested the hypothesis that alpha ERD before predictable painful stimuli is reduced as an effect of distraction. A visual warning stimulus preceded a laser painful stimulation, which was strictly followed by visual imperative stimuli. In the Pain (control) condition, no task was required after the imperative stimuli. In the Pain + Movement condition, subjects had to perform a movement of the right index finger. In the Pain + Cognition condition, they had to mentally perform an arithmetical task. EEG data were recorded in 10 subjects from 30 electrodes. Artifact-free recordings were spatially enhanced by surface Laplacian transformation. Alpha ERD was computed at three alpha sub-bands according to subjects' individual alpha frequency peak (i.e., about 6-8 Hz, 8-10 Hz, 10-12 Hz). Compared to the control condition, the subjects reported a significantly lower stimulus intensity perception and unpleasantness in the Pain + Movement and Pain + Cognition conditions. In addition, there was a cancellation of the alpha 3 ERD (i.e., about 10-12 Hz) in Pain + Cognition condition and even a generation of a statistically significant alpha 3 ERS in Pain + Movement condition. These effects were maximum over fronto-central midline. These results suggest that distraction during the expectancy of pain is related to a reduced neural desynchronization of fronto-central midline alpha rhythms (i.e., reduced cortical activation) towards an overt hyper-synchronization (cortical idling).

Objectives: Our study aimed at investigating the effect of repetitive recordings on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) related to spatial attention in a population of healthy elderly subjects., Methods: Fifteen healthy elderly subjects were tested for six consecutive days using a somatosensory oddball paradigm, in which target stimuli were applied above the elbow and the non-target stimuli on the ipsilateral shoulder. Brain electrical activity was recorded from six scalp electrodes (Fz, Cz, F3, F4, T3 and T4)., Results: The N140 response to target stimuli showed a significantly decreased amplitude across the sessions with the lowest value during the fourth day of recording and with a partial recovery at the sixth day. On the contrary, the amplitude of the N140 response to non-target stimuli and that of the P300 potential to target stimuli were not significantly modified., Conclusions: The significant amplitude reduction of the N140 potential in target, but not in non-target recordings across sessions, suggests that the voluntarily oriented attention is reduced by stimulus repetition, while the automatic attention is not.

The study aim was to evaluate the effect of different attentional tasks on the amplitudes and latencies of painful and non-painful contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs). CHEPs were recorded in 12 healthy subjects during two experimental conditions, in which attention was oriented towards the intensity and the distress caused by the stimuli and were compared with CHEPs recorded during a neutral condition. The painful heat stimulation produced a negative potential at Cz vertex with a latency around 540 ms (Cz/N540), a positive peak at Cz electrode around 730 ms (Cz/P730) and, lastly, a positive peak around 1000 ms (Pz/P1000) in the Pz traces. The Cz/P730 wave was significantly higher in amplitude only during the painful stimulation and is probably related to coding the nociceptive activity. Varying the attentional target towards different properties of the stimulus did not cause any significant change in CHEP responses amplitude and latencies compared with the neutral condition. Our results suggest that CHEPs represent a reliable functional measure of the nociceptive pathways and that they are generated by the activation of different cerebral areas involved in pain processing. The high activation level of each of these area or their spatial neighbouring might explain the strong similarity of CHEP components recorded during different attentional manipulations.

Our study aimed at investigating the scalp topography of ultra-late CO(2) laser evoked potentials (LEPs), which are related to C fiber activation, and at exploring the effect of attention deviation on ultra-late LEPs. Brain responses to non-painful CO(2) laser stimuli were recorded in ten healthy subjects in three different conditions: (i) neutral condition in which subjects did not have any task; (ii) distraction condition in which subjects were asked to perform a mathematical task; and (iii) attention condition in which subjects had to count the number of stimuli. In all subjects, also A fiber-related late LEPs were recorded after painful CO(2) laser stimulation. The ultra-late LEPs in attention condition included an earlier negative potential (ultra-late N1) in the contralateral temporal region and a simultaneous frontal positive response (ultra-late P1). Later, a vertex biphasic component (ultra-late N2a and ultra-late P2) was identifiable. The vertex ultra-late LEP amplitude was significantly decreased in both neutral and distraction condition. Ultra-late LEPs showed a longer latency than late LEPs, but the scalp distributions of both ultra-late and late LEPs were very similar, thus suggesting that the same cerebral areas may be involved in their generation. Since attention deviations have a strong effect on ultra-late LEP amplitude, the subject's attention should be addressed to CO(2) laser stimuli when ultra-late LEPs are used for clinical purposes.

Our study aimed at investigating the scalp topography of ultra-late CO2 laser evoked potentials (LEPs), which are related to C fiber activation, and at exploring the effect of attention deviation on ultra-late LEPs. Brain responses to non-painful CO2 laser stimuli were recorded in ten healthy subjects in three different conditions: (i) neutral condition in which subjects did not have any task; (ii) distraction condition in which subjects were asked to perform a mathematical task; and (iii) attention condition in which subjects had to count the number of stimuli. In all subjects, also Að fiber-related late LEPs were recorded after painful CO2 laser stimulation. The ultra-late LEPs in attention condition included an earlier negative potential (ultra-late N1) in the contralateral temporal region and a simultaneous frontal positive response (ultra-late P1). Later, a vertex biphasic component (ultra-late N2a and ultra-late P2) was identifiable. The vertex ultra-late LEP amplitude was significantly decreased in both neutral and distraction condition. Ultra-late LEPs showed a longer latency than late LEPs, but the scalp distributions of both ultra-late and late LEPs were very similar, thus suggesting that the same cerebral areas may be involved in their generation. Since attention deviations have a strong effect on ultra-late LEP amplitude, the subject''s attention should be addressed to CO2 laser stimuli when ultra-late LEPs are used for clinical purposes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Our study aimed at investigating the nociceptive contribution to the somatosensory evoked potentials after electrical intramuscular stimulation (mSEPs) at painful intensity. Scalp mSEPs were recorded in 10 healthy subjects after electrical stimulation of the left brachioradialis muscle at three intensities: non-painful (I2), slightly painful (I4) and moderately painful (I6). For each intensity, mSEPs were recorded in a neutral condition (NC) in which subjects did not have any task, and in an attention condition (AC) in which subjects were asked to count the number of stimuli. In both NC and AC, the N120 and P220 amplitudes were significantly higher at I6 than at I2. While the N120 amplitude did not vary between NC and AC, the P220 amplitude was significantly higher in AC than in NC at all stimulus intensities. Our results suggest that nociceptive inputs contribute to the N120 amplitude increase at painful stimulus intensity, while the P220 amplitude is more sensitive to changes of subjects’ attention level. Therefore, the N120 amplitude increase to moderately painful stimuli, as compared to non-painful stimuli, may represent a marker of the activation of the muscular thin myelinated afferents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]