Search

Neurophysiological studies in non-human primates have provided evidence for simultaneous activation of competing responses in the (pre)motor cortex. Human evidence, however, is limited, partly because experimental approaches have often mapped competing responses to paired effectors represented in opposite hemispheres, which restricts the analysis to between-hemisphere comparisons and allows simultaneous execution. A demonstration of competition between different movement plans in the motor cortex is more compelling when simultaneous execution of the alternative responses is ruled out and they are represented in one motor cortex. Therefore, in the current MEG study we have used a unimanual Eriksen flanker paradigm with alternative responses assigned to flexion and extension of the right index finger, activating different direction-sensitive neurons within the finger representation area of the same motor cortex. Results showed that for stimuli eliciting response competition the pre-response motor cortex beta-band (17-29 Hz) power decreased stronger than for stimuli that did not induce response competition. Furthermore, response competition elicited an additional pre-response mid-frontal high-gamma band (60-90 Hz) power increase. Finally, larger gamma-band effect sizes correlated with greater behavioral response delay induced by response competition. Taken together, our results provide evidence for co-activation of competing responses in the human brain, consistent with evidence from non-human primates., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Markers of preparatory visual-spatial attention in sensory cortex have been described both as lateralized, slow-wave event-related potential (ERP) components and as lateralized changes in oscillatory-electroencephalography alpha power, but the roles of these markers and their functional relationship are still unclear. Here, 3 versions of a visual-spatial cueing paradigm, differing in perceptual task difficulty and/or response instructions, were used to investigate the functional relationships between posterior oscillatory-alpha changes and our previously reported posterior, slow-wave biasing-related negativity (swBRN) ERP activity. The results indicate that the swBRN reflects spatially specific, pretarget preparatory activity sensitive to the expected perceptual difficulty of the target detection task, correlating in both location and strength with the early sensory-processing N1 ERP to the target, consistent with reflecting a preparatory baseline-shift mechanism. In contrast, contralateral event-related decreases in alpha-band power were relatively insensitive to perceptual difficulty and differed topographically from both the swBRN and target N1. Moreover, when response instructions emphasized making immediate responses to targets, compared with prescribing delayed responses, contralateral alpha-event-related desynchronization activity was particularly strong and correlated with the longer latency target-P3b activity. Thus, in contrast to the apparent perceptual-biasing role of swBRN activity, contralateral posterior alpha activity may represent an attentionally maintained task set linking stimulus-specific information and task-specific response requirements.

The integration of multisensory information has been shown to be guided by spatial and temporal proximity, as well as to be influenced by attention. Here we used neural measures of the multisensory spread of attention to investigate the spatial and temporal linking of synchronous versus near-synchronous auditory and visual events. Human participants attended selectively to one of two lateralized visual-stimulus streams while task-irrelevant tones were presented centrally. Electrophysiological measures of brain activity showed that tones occurring simultaneously or delayed by 100 ms were temporally linked to an attended visual stimulus, as reflected by robust cross-modal spreading-of-attention activity, but not when delayed by 300 ms. The neural data also indicated a ventriloquist-like spatial linking of the auditory to the attended visual stimuli, but only when occurring simultaneously. These neurophysiological results thus provide unique insight into the temporal and spatial principles of multisensory feature integration and the fundamental role attention plays in such integration.

Recent brain imaging studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have implicated a frontal-parietal network in the top-down control of attention. However, little is known about the timing and sequence of activations within this network. To investigate these timing questions, we used event-related electrical brain potentials (ERPs) and a specially designed visual-spatial attentional-cueing paradigm, which were applied as part of a multi-methodological approach that included a closely corresponding event-related fMRI study using an identical paradigm. In the first 400 ms post cue, attention-directing and control cues elicited similar general cue-processing activity, corresponding to the more lateral subregions of the frontal-parietal network identified with the fMRI. Following this, the attention-directing cues elicited a sustained negative-polarity brain wave that was absent for control cues. This activity could be linked to the more medial frontal-parietal subregions similarly identified in the fMRI as specifically involved in attentional orienting. Critically, both the scalp ERPs and the fMRI-seeded source modeling for this orienting-related activity indicated an earlier onset of frontal versus parietal contribution ( approximately 400 versus approximately 700 ms). This was then followed ( approximately 800-900 ms) by pretarget biasing activity in the region-specific visual-sensory occipital cortex. These results indicate an activation sequence of key components of the attentional-control brain network, providing insight into their functional roles. More specifically, these results suggest that voluntary attentional orienting is initiated by medial portions of frontal cortex, which then recruit medial parietal areas. Together, these areas then implement biasing of region-specific visual-sensory cortex to facilitate the processing of upcoming visual stimuli., Competing Interests: Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

In the present study, we investigated control of selective attention to spatial frequency patterns, using a cueing paradigm. Subjects either used the instruction embedded in a word cue to prepare for the upcoming test stimulus (transient attention condition) or used the instruction they received before a block of trials (sustained reference condition), under completely similar stimulus conditions. The pattern of differential cue responses between these two conditions, reflecting top-down attentional control processes, was different between two groups of subjects, effectively canceling each other out. Despite comparable behavioral performance on both cues and targets, one group (n = 4) elicited a fronto-central-parietal positivity, starting 500 ms postcue over frontal and prefrontal areas, later including more central and posterior scalp sites, whereas another group (n = 8) started 400 ms postcue over central sites with a negativity, growing in strength over time and stabilizing over fronto-central sites. Only the group of eight subjects showed some evidence of occipital pretarget biasing activity. Independent of group, source modeling of the attentional control activity showed that attentional control was initiated in anterior, not posterior, parts of the brain. Furthermore, different underlying sources were found for both groups, in addition to signs of differential processing of target stimuli. Possible individual differences in attentional control ability and its relation to usage of different brain areas to deal with the task demands are discussed in more detail.

The effects of selective attention on the neural response to the violation of musical syntax were investigated in the present study. Musical chord progressions were played to nonmusicians while Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were recorded. The five-chord progressions included 61% harmonically expected cadences (I-I(6)-IV-V-I), 26% harmonically unexpected cadences (I-I(6)-IV-V-N(6)), and 13% with one of the five chords having an intensity fadeout across its duration. During the attended condition, subjects responded by pressing a button upon detecting a fadeout in volume; during the unattended condition, subjects were given reading comprehension materials and instructed to ignore all auditory stimuli. In response to the harmonic deviant, an Early Anterior Negativity (EAN) was observed at 150-300 ms in both attention conditions, but it was much larger in amplitude in the attended condition. A second scalp-negative deflection was also identified at 380-600 ms following the harmonic deviants; this Late Negativity onset earlier during the attended condition. These results suggest strong effects of attention on the neural processing of harmonic syntax.