Search

Purpose: Few studies have explored choroidal changes after cessation of myopia control. This study evaluated the choroidal thickness (ChT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) during and after discontinuing long-term low-concentration atropine eye drops use for myopia control., Methods: Children with progressive myopia (6-16 years; n = 153) were randomized to receive 0.01% atropine eye drops or a placebo (2:1 ratio) instilled daily over 2 years, followed by a 1-year washout (no eye drop use). Optical coherence tomography imaging of the choroid was conducted at the baseline, 2-year (end of treatment phase), and 3-year (end of washout phase) visits. The main outcome measure was the subfoveal ChT. Secondary measures include the CVI., Results: During the treatment phase, the subfoveal choroids in both treatment and control groups thickened by 12-14 µm (group difference P = 0.56). During the washout phase, the subfoveal choroids in the placebo group continued to thicken by 6.6 µm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7 to 11.6), but those in the atropine group did not change (estimate = -0.04 µm; 95% CI = -3.2 to 3.1). Participants with good axial eye growth control had greater choroidal thickening than the fast-progressors during the treatment phase regardless of the treatment group (P < 0.001), but choroidal thickening in the atropine group's fast-progressors was not sustained after stopping eye drops. CVI decreased in both groups during the treatment phase, but increased in the placebo group after treatment cessation., Conclusions: On average, compared to placebo, 0.01% atropine eye drop treatment did not cause a differential rate of change in ChT during treatment, but abrupt cessation of long-term 0.01% atropine eye drops may disrupt normal choroidal thickening in children.

Background: A rebound in myopia progression following cessation of atropine eyedrops has been reported, yet there is limited data on the effects of stopping 0.01% atropine compared to placebo control. This study tested the hypothesis that there is minimal rebound myopia progression after cessation of 0.01% atropine eyedrops, compared to a placebo., Methods: Children with myopia (n = 153) were randomised to receive 0.01% atropine eyedrops or a placebo (2:1 ratio) daily at bedtime during the 2-year treatment phase of the study. In the third year (wash-out phase), all participants ceased eyedrop instillation. Participants underwent an eye examination every 6 months, including measurements of spherical equivalent (SphE) after cycloplegia and axial length (AL). Changes in the SphE and AL during the wash-out phase and throughout the 3 years of the study (treatment + wash-out phase) were compared between the treatment and control groups., Results: During the 1-year wash-out phase, SphE and AL progressed by -0.41D (95% CI = -0.33 to -0.22) and +0.20 mm (95% CI = -0.46 to -0.36) in the treatment group compared to -0.28D (95% CI = 0.11 to 0.16) and +0.13 mm (95% CI = 0.18 to 0.21) in the control group. Progression in the treatment group was significantly faster than in the control group (p = 0.016 for SphE and <0.001 for AL). Over the 3-year study period, the cumulative myopia progression was similar between the atropine and the control groups., Conclusions: These findings showed evidence of rapid myopia progression following cessation of 0.01% atropine. Further investigations are warranted to ascertain the long-term effects of atropine eyedrops., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Background: To test the hypothesis that 0.01% atropine eyedrops are a safe and effective myopia-control approach in Australian children., Methods: Children (6-16 years; 49% Europeans, 18% East Asian, 22% South Asian, and 12% other/mixed ancestry) with documented myopia progression were enrolled into this single-centre randomised, parallel, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial and randomised to receive 0.01% atropine (n = 104) or placebo (n = 49) eyedrops (2:1 ratio) instilled nightly over 24 months (mean index age = 12.2 ± 2.5 and 11.2 ± 2.8 years, respectively). Outcome measures were the changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL) from baseline., Results: At 12 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline were -0.31D (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.39 to -0.22) and 0.16 mm (95%CI = 0.13-0.20) in the atropine group and -0.53D (95%CI = -0.66 to -0.40) and 0.25 mm (95%CI = 0.20-0.30) in the placebo group (group difference p ≤ 0.01). At 24 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline was -0.64D (95%CI = -0.73 to -0.56) and 0.34 mm (95%CI = 0.30-0.37) in the atropine group, and -0.78D (95%CI = -0.91 to -0.65) and 0.38 mm (95%CI = 0.33-0.43) in the placebo group. Group difference at 24 months was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). At 24 months, the atropine group had reduced accommodative amplitude and pupillary light response compared to the placebo group., Conclusions: In Australian children, 0.01% atropine eyedrops were safe, well-tolerated, and had a modest myopia-control effect, although there was an apparent decrease in efficacy between 18 and 24 months, which is likely driven by a higher dropout rate in the placebo group., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Importance: Atropine eyedrops are a promising treatment for slowing myopia progression in East Asian children. However, its effects on children in Australia, including those of non-Asian background, have not been well-studied., Background: The Western Australia Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia (WA-ATOM) study aims to determine the efficacy and long-term effects of low-dose atropine eyedrops in myopia control. This paper describes the study rationale, methodology and participant baseline characteristics., Design: Single-centre, double-masked, randomized controlled trial., Participants: Children (6-16 years) with spherical equivalent ≤-1.50 D in each eye, astigmatism ≤1.50 D and myopia progression by ≥0.50 D/year., Methods: Enrolled children were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 0.01% atropine or placebo eyedrops. Participants are examined every 6 months during first 3 years of the study (2-year treatment phase followed by a 1-year washout phase), and then at a 5-year follow-up (2 years after the end of the washout phase)., Main Outcome Measures: Annual progression rate of myopia and axial length, tolerability to eyedrops and incidence and severity of unwanted effects., Results: Out of 311 children who were referred, 242 were suitable for study participation, and 153 were subsequently enrolled. The baseline characteristics of enrolled participants are presented., Conclusions and Relevance: Outcomes of the WA-ATOM study will inform on the efficacy, tolerability, safety and long-term effects of low-dose atropine eyedrops in myopia control in Australian children. The impact of ocular sun exposure, iris colour and parental myopia on the efficacy of low-dose atropine will also be assessed., (© 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Background/aims: To report the protocol of a trial designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and mechanism of action of low-dose atropine (0.01%) eye-drops for reducing progression of myopia in UK children., Methods: Multicentre, double-masked, superiority, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. We will enrol children aged 6-12 years with myopia of -0.50 dioptres or worse in both eyes.We will recruit 289 participants with an allocation ratio of 2:1 (193 atropine; 96 placebo) from five centres. Participants will instil one drop in each eye every day for 2 years and attend a research centre every 6 months. The vehicle and preservative will be the same in both study arms.The primary outcome is SER of both eyes measured by autorefractor under cycloplegia at 2 years (adjusted for baseline). Secondary outcomes include axial length, best corrected distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, reading speed, pupil diameter, accommodation, adverse event rates and allergic reactions, quality of life (EQ-5D-Y) and tolerability at 2 years. Mechanistic evaluations will include: peripheral axial length, peripheral retinal defocus, anterior chamber depth, iris colour, height and weight, activities questionnaire, ciliary body biometry and chorioretinal thickness. Endpoints from both eyes will be pooled in combined analysis using generalised estimating equations to allow for the correlation between eyes within participant. Three years after cessation of treatment, we will also evaluate refractive error and adverse events., Conclusions: The Childhood Atropine for Myopia Progression in the UK study will be the first randomised trial reporting outcomes of low-dose atropine eye-drops for children with myopia in a UK population., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN99883695, NCT03690089., Competing Interests: Competing interests: NL: research funding from CooperVision, Essilor and Zeiss., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: The Myopia Outcome Study of Atropine in Children (MOSAIC) is an investigator‐led, double‐masked, randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine eye drops for managing myopia progression in a predominantly White, European population. Methods: Children aged 6–16 years with myopia were randomly allocated 2:1 to nightly 0.01% atropine or placebo eye drops in both eyes for 2 years. The primary outcome was cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) progression at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included axial length (AL) change, safety and acceptability. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were used for statistical analyses. Results: Of 250 participants enrolled, 204 (81.6%) completed the 24‐month visit (136 (81.4%) treatment, 68 (81.9%) placebo). Baseline characteristics, drop‐out and adverse event rates were similar between treatment and control groups. At 24 months, SE change was not significantly different between 0.01% atropine and placebo groups (effect = 0.10 D, p = 0.07), but AL growth was lower in the 0.01% atropine group, compared to the placebo group (−0.07 mm, p = 0.007). Significant treatment effects on SE (0.14 D, p = 0.049) and AL (−0.11 mm, p = 0.002) were observed in children of White, but not non‐White (SE = 0.05 D, p = 0.89; AL = 0.008 mm, p = 0.93), ethnicity at 24 months. A larger treatment effect was observed in subjects least affected by COVID‐19 restrictions (SE difference = 0.37 D, p = 0.005; AL difference = −0.17 mm, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Atropine 0.01% was safe, well‐tolerated and effective in slowing axial elongation in this European population. Treatment efficacy varied by ethnicity and eye colour, and potentially by degree of COVID‐19 public health restriction exposure during trial participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explored the impact of short‑term coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) restrictions on the efficacy of atropine 0.01% eyedrops on myopia control in a multiethnic cohort of Australian children. In the Western Australia Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia study, 104 and 49 children were randomized to receive atropine 0.01% eyedrops and a placebo, respectively. We compared the 1‑year myopia progression and axial elongation following the 2‑month lockdown in 2020 to the same months in 2019 and 2021, i.e., the 1‑year myopia progression up to May 2019–October 2019 (non‑COVID‑19) versus the 1‑year progression up to May 2020–October 2020 (COVID‑19 period), and the 1‑year progression up to May 2021–October 2021 (non‑COVID‑19) versus the 1‑year progression up to the same months in 2020. After excluding participants who withdrew, completed their treatment phase prior May 2020, or those whose study visits did not fall between May 2020 and October 2020, 65 participants (mean age at baseline = 11.8 ± 2.5 years) were included in the final analysis (49 in the treatment group; 16 in the placebo group). After correcting for age, sex, and ethnicity, there was no significant main effect of the short‑term lockdown on the rate of spherical equivalent or axial length change. However, there was a lockdown × treatment interaction effect on the rate of axial elongation (P = 0.007). This was such that in the treatment group, the 1‑year axial elongation was faster during lockdown by 0.056 mm compared to the nonlockdown periods (P = 0.009), while the rate of axial elongation in those on the placebo eye drops was similar during lockdown and nonlockdown. Our findings suggest that there is a decreased efficacy of low‑concentration atropine even with relatively lenient restrictions lasting for a few months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]