Search

Background and Objectives: Mitral isthmus (MI) ablation for mitral flutter is technically difficult, and incomplete block line is not uncommon. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the ridge line of left pulmonary vein isolation (LPVI) from left atrial appendage (LAA) on completion rate of mitral isthmus (MI) block line and recurrence rate of atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial flutter (AFL) after the first MI ablation., Methods: We identified 611 patients who underwent first MI ablation for mitral flutter during the study period. Finally, 559 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the method of ridge line ablation of LPVI (LAA group, n = 467, conventional group, n = 92). Outcome measures were the completion of MI block line by first MI ablation, the recurrence of AT/AFL, and repeat MI ablation after the first MI ablation., Results: The first MI block line completion rate was significantly higher in the LAA group than the conventional group (95% vs. 85%, p < 0.001). The recurrence rate of AT/AFL after 3 months from first MI ablation was significantly lower in the LAA group. The requirement of additional MI ablation tended to be lower in the LAA group., Conclusions: Our novel approach of ablating LPV-LAA ridge from the LAA side during PVI can increase the success rate of MI block line completion, and reduce the recurrence rate of AT/AFL and the need for additional MI block line ablation. Graphical abstract Ablation of the left pulmonary vein-left atrial appendage ridge from the left atrial appendage side during PVI increased the success rate of mitral isthmus block line completion., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is not guaranteed for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and it is unclear which type of ablation approach should be applied in addition to PVI. This study aimed to compare outcomes and prognosis between empirical linear ablation and low-voltage area (LVA) ablation after PVI for PeAF.Methods: We enrolled 128 patients with PeAF who were assigned to the linear ablation group (n = 64) and the LVA ablation group (n = 64) using a propensity score-matched model. After PVI and cardioversion, the patients underwent either empirical linear ablation or LVA ablation during sinus rhythm. All patients in the linear ablation group underwent both roof line and mitral valve isthmus (MVI) ablations. An electrical-guided ablation targeting LVA (< 0.5 mV) was performed in the LVA group. When there was no LVA in the LVA group, only PVI was applied. We compared the procedural outcomes and recurrence after ablation between the two groups.Results: The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Fifty patients had LVA (22 and 28 patients in the linear and LVA groups). The roof and MVI lines were completed in 100% and 96.9% of the patients. During the mean follow-up of 279.5 ± 161.3 days, the LVA group had significantly lower recurrence than the linear group (15 patients [23%] vs. 29 patients [45%], p = 0.014). Thirty-five patients were prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs during the follow-up period (linear group, n = 17; LVA group, n = 18); amiodarone and bepridil were administered to most of the patients (15 and 17 patients, respectively). The difference in the prognosis was relevant among the patients with LVA, while this trend was not observed in those without LVA. The LVA ablation group demonstrated significantly lower radiofrequency energy and shorter procedural time compared to the linear ablation group. The recurrence of atrial flutter was more likely to occur in the linear group than in the LVA group (14 [22%] vs. 6 [9.4%], p = 0.052).Conclusion: The electrophysiological-guided LVA ablation is more effective than empirical linear ablation in PeAF patients with LVA. Unnecessary empirical linear ablation might have a risk of iatrogenic gap and atrial flutter recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]