Search

Anticoagulation therapy is essential to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Traditionally, clinical trials have focused only on determining the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation but not on quality of life. In the last few years there has been a growing interest in determining the quality of life of patients treated with oral anticoagulation. In fact, specific tools that can evaluate quality of life related to atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation have been developed. Vitamin K antagonists have been shown to be effective in the prevention of thromboembolic complications. However, the use of vitamin K antagonists implies changes in behavior and lifestyle modifications that may have a negative impact on the quality of life. It has been suggested that self-monitoring of international normalized ratio could improve this impact. On the other hand, as new oral anticoagulants overcome these limitations, they may improve quality of life related with anticoagulant therapy. Unfortunately, although encouraging, the clinical experience with them is still quite limited.

Aims Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) offers similar efficacy to point-by-point radiofrequency PVI for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but generally with higher X-ray exposure. Strategies aimed at reducing fluoroscopy mostly rely on other costly imaging techniques, limiting their applicability. We designed a Systematic Workflow and Electrogram guidance to reduce X-ray Exposure Time during CB-PVI (SWEET-Cryo) strategy and analysed its impact on fluoroscopy use and acute procedural and clinical outcomes. Methods and results We enrolled 100 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing CB-PVI by two operators with different levels of expertise. Patients treated with the SWEET-Cryo strategy (prospective cohort; n = 50) or conventional fluoroscopy (retrospective control cohort; n = 50) were compared. When applied by the senior operator, the SWEET-Cryo strategy significantly reduced the mean fluoroscopy time (FT) (2.6 ± 1.25 vs. 20.3 ± 10.8 min) and mean dose area product (DAP) (5.1 ± 3.8 vs. 35.3 ± 22.3 Gy cm2) compared with those of the control group, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant reductions in FT (6.4 ± 2.5 min vs. 32.5 ± 10.05) and DAP (13.9 ± 7.7 vs. 92.3 ± 63.8) were also achieved by the less experienced operator (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in acute and long-term complications or freedom from AF between fluoroscopy strategies during a 33-month median follow-up. Mean FT was maintained below 3 min in randomly selected cases performed during the follow-up period. Conclusion In contrast to conventional protocols and regardless of the operator's experience, the optimized SWEET-Cryo strategy dramatically reduced fluoroscopy exposure during CB-PVI. The efficacy, safety, or added costs of the ablation procedure were not compromised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]