Search

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer often co-exist. Each has been associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize available data regarding the incidence of arterial thromboembolism (TE), bleeding, and all-cause mortality in patients with AF with or without cancer., Methods: Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, WebOfScience, Scopus, CENTRAL, OpenGrey, and EThOS databases to identify studies that included patients with AF and accounted for cancer status with the incidence of TE (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or arterial thrombosis), major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. A random-effects meta-analysis was used., Results: Overall, 17 studies were included (3,149,547 patients). The risk of TE was similar in patients with AF with comorbid cancer compared with that in AF alone (pooled odds ratio [pOR] 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.85-1.11, I 2  = 87%). Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (pOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.02, I 2  = 98%) and all-cause death (pOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.83-2.56, I 2  = 98%) were significantly higher in patients with AF with cancer than in patients with AF only. The history of TE and hypertension and mean age were significant moderators of TE risk., Conclusion: In patients with AF, the presence of cancer is associated with a similar risk of TE as well as an increased risk of bleeding and all-cause death compared with the absence of cancer., (Copyright © 2023 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist in real-life clinical practice. Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), guidelines call for evidence-based target doses of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers. However, target doses of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) are often underused in real-world conditions, including HF-AF comorbidity. This retrospective cohort study of a randomized trial (Motivational Interviewing to Support Oral AntiCoagulation adherence in patients with nonvalvular AF) included hospitalized patients with AF and HFrEF or HFmrEF. Optimally targeted GDMT was defined as intake of evidence-based target doses of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and beta-blockers at 3 months after discharge. Rates of optimally targeted GDMT achievement across the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were assessed. Independent predictors of nontargeted GDMT and its association with all-cause mortality and the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization were assessed by regression analyses. In total, 374 patients with AF and HFrEF or HFmrEF were studied. At 3 months after discharge, 30.7% received target doses of GDMT medications. The rate of optimally targeted GDMT was reduced by 11% for every 10 mg/min/1.73 m 2 decrease in baseline eGFR [adjusted β = 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-0.99] levels. After a median 31-month follow-up period, 37.8% patients in the optimally targeted GDMT group died, as compared with 67.8% (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.13) in the nontargeted GDMT group. The risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was also higher in these patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.60; 95% CI, 1.17-2.20). Target doses of all HF drugs were reached in roughly one-third of patients with AF and HFrEF or HFmrEF 3 months after hospital discharge. Nontargeted GDMT was more frequent across lower eGFR levels and was associated with worse outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often receive multiple medications daily. The purpose of this study was to examine the prognostic implications of polypharmacy in patients with AF. This is a retrospective post hoc analysis of 1113 AF patients, enrolled in a randomized trial during an acute hospitalization (MISOAC-AF, NCT02941978). The presence of polypharmacy (use of >4 drugs daily) was assessed at hospital discharge. Regression analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors of polypharmacy and compare the outcomes of patients with or without confirmed polypharmacy. The coprimary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Among patients with polypharmacy, the difference in the risk of mortality was also assessed per each added drug as a numeric variable. Polypharmacy was found in 36.9% of participants. Dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and higher glomerular filtration rates were independent predictors of polypharmacy. Polypharmacy was an independent predictor for all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.64) and CV death (aHR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.05-1.84). Among patients with polypharmacy, each additional concomitant medication was independently associated with a 4% increased risk of all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.08) and a 5% increased risk of CV mortality (aHR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.10). Polypharmacy was common among patients with AF hospitalized in a tertiary hospital and was incrementally associated with higher rates of mortality., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rhythm control and rate control are both employed commonly in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), but limited real-world data exist on them. We aimed to compare outcomes between these two strategies across the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) spectrum., Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the randomized MISOAC-AF trial, including from patients with AF and coexistent HF who were hospitalized and followed up after discharge. At baseline, the patients were classified into pharmaceutical (or electrical cardioversion) rhythm control strategy or rate control treatment (b-blocker, digoxin, calcium channel blockers) groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable-adjusted Cox regression were utilized to compare the two strategies. Spline curve models were used to demonstrate the results across the LVEF stratified spectrum., Results: In total, 199 AF patients with HF were studied (mean age, 77 years). At discharge, 73 (36.7%) patients received rhythm control and 126 (63.3%) rate control treatment. After a median follow-up period of 31 months, 26 (35.6%) patients in the rhythm-control group died, as compared to 43 (33.3%) in the rate-control group (aHR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.78-2.14; p = 0.31). The spline curves also revealed no difference in all-cause mortality favoring either strategy in any HF subtype across the nominally classified LVEF., Conclusion: The use of a pharmacological rhythm-control strategy was not associated with a survival advantage compared to the rate control strategy in recently hospitalized patients with AF and comorbid HF. More randomized trials and large studies are needed in the future to explore these results in each subgroup of HF patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Education level has been long considered a life-quality modifier, but little is known about its relation to life expectancy in patients with cardiovascular disease. This study aims to assess possible correlations between education level and survival in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from a randomised trial of 1082 hospitalised patients with AF (mean age of 75 ± 11 years) who were followed up after discharge. Patients were divided into three groups based on their education level: i) none or primary (NPEL), ii) secondary (SEL), and iii) tertiary education level (TEL). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were used to compare survival rates between groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The composite secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality or any hospitalisation., Results: After a median 31-month follow-up period, 289 (41.9%) patients died in the NPEL group, 75 (31.1%) in the SEL group, and 29 (19.1%) in the TEL group. The aHRs for all-cause mortality were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66; p < 0.001) for the TEL group compared with the NPEL group, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.93; p = 0.02) for the TEL group compared with the SEL group, and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93; p = 0.01) for the SEL group compared with the NPEL group. The corresponding aHRs for the composite secondary outcome were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.52; p < 0.001), 0.49 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.80; p < 0.001), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50 to 9.91; p = 0.01)., Conclusion: Higher education levels were independently associated with fewer fatal and non-fatal outcomes in recently hospitalised patients with AF., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None declared., (Copyright © 2022 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) constitute two major closely inter-related chronic cardiovascular disorders whose concurrent prevalence rates are steadily increasing. Although, the pathogenic mechanisms behind the AF and DM comorbidity are still vague, it is now clear that DM precipitates AF occurrence. DM also affects the clinical course of established AF; it is associated with significant increase in the incidence of stroke, AF recurrence, and cardiovascular mortality. The impact of DM on AF management and prognosis has been adequately investigated. However, evidence on the relative impact of glycemic control using glycated hemoglobin levels is scarce. This review assesses up-to-date literature on the association between DM and AF. It also highlights the usefulness of glycated hemoglobin measurement for the prediction of AF and AF-related adverse events. Additionally, this review evaluates current anti-hyperglycemic treatment in the context of AF, and discusses AF-related decision-making in comorbid DM. Finally, it quotes significant remaining questions and sets some future strategies with the potential to effectively deal with this prevalent comorbidity., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered the most common sustained arrhythmia. Major cardiovascular risk factors that have been identified to initiate and perpetuate AF include age, sex, arterial hypertension, heart failure, valvular heart disease and diabetes mellitus. In the literature, several studies aimed to formulate easily - applied and accurate risk stratification scores, based on antecedent cardiovascular events, comorbidities and biomarkers for the prediction of new-onset AF. The present narrative review addresses the most universally accepted and efficient clinical scores, with an extended applicability in different populations and ages, particularly scores derived from the Framingham Heart Study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, as well as the CHARGE-AF, the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HATCH and CH2EST scores. Identification of incident AF can be challenging, thus dictating for utilization of validated clinical instruments in everyday clinical practice., (© 2021 Anna Maria Louka et al., published by Sciendo.)