Search

The treatment of patients with chronic heart failure and those with asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction has focused primarily on patients with LV enlargement and a low ejection fraction (EF). Little attention has been paid to those with a normal chamber size and a low EF. We sought to examine the LV geometry and clinical characteristics in such patients with nondilated cardiomyopathy. Of 3,350 transthoracic echocardiograms performed during a 6-month period, 696 showed an EF of < or =0.45. The patients with an end-diastolic diameter of >56 mm, regional wall motion abnormalities, or valvular disease were excluded. Of the 696 patients, 98 met these criteria, and their medical records were reviewed. The average age was 71 +/- 14 years, and 56% were men. Common co-morbidities included hypertension in 52% and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 43%. Only 22% had disabling cardiac symptoms (functional class III or greater). The average end-diastolic dimension was 49 +/- 5 mm, and the EF was 34 +/- 8%. LV hypertrophic remodeling was present in 53%. A second echocardiogram (422 +/- 177 days after the baseline study) was available for 54 patients. The chamber size was unchanged, but the EF had increased from 33 +/- 8% to 40 +/- 14% (p <0.01). The improvement in EF was seen in the group with AF (33 +/- 6% to 44 +/- 15%, p <0.01) but not in those with normal sinus rhythm (33 +/- 9% to 37 +/- 12%, p = NS). In conclusion, 14% of patients with an EF of < or =0.45 had nondilated cardiomyopathy, often with LV hypertrophic remodeling and/or AF. An improvement in LV function can be expected in many patients with nondilated cardiomyopathy, particularly those with AF., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Echocardiographic techniques were used to measure left ventricular isovolumic and ejection phase indexes of contractility in 54 patients with atrial fibrillation, and the relations between cycle lengths and contractility were compared in patients with normal and depressed ejection fractions. Data indicate that variations in contractility occur in a pattern that is consistent with postextrasystolic potentiation and that such interval-dependent potentiation is preserved in patients with atrial fibrillation and depressed ejection fraction.

In 10 patients with atrial fibrillation, echocardiographic measures of left ventricular function-interval relations were used to assess contractility and to test the hypothesis that rhythm regularization produces a higher contractile state than is seen when the rhythm is irregular. Regularization, following direct-current cardioversion, did not augment ventricular contractility above that seen during atrial fibrillation.

In atrial fibrillation (AF), beat-to-beat changes in left ventricular (LV) systolic performance are caused by variations in filling (preload), aortic pressure (afterload), and ventricular inotropic or contractile state. These factors are known to be influenced by the preceding diastolic or RR interval (RR1), but the independent impact of variations in the pre-preceding RR interval (RR2) on contractile state is not well defined. This aspect was studied in 10 patients with lone AF and 8 with coronary artery disease by measuring LV peak ejection velocity (V[pe] Doppler echocardiography) in 80 to 100 consecutive cardiac cycles. V(pe) was plotted against RR1 for beats with a short RR2 and for beats with a long RR2. Such function-interval plots indicate a direct relation between V(pe) and RR1 (for RR1 = 500 to 1,000 ms). In lone AF, the slope (linear fit) of V(pe) versus RR1 was similar for short and long RR2 (slopes = 46 and 50 s[-1]). V(pe), calculated from best linear fit and a common RR1, was consistently higher when RR2 was short than when it was long. At an RR1 = 750 ms, V(pe) (% of max) was 87 +/- 6% when RR2 was short versus 76 +/- 6% when RR2 was long, p <0.05. Results were similar in patients with coronary artery disease and the observed interval-dependent potentiation of contractile state was preserved in patients with a low ejection fraction. By comparing V(pe) at a common RR1, the effects of time-dependent changes in LV preload and afterload are minimized if not abolished. Thus, differences in V(pe) reflect differences in contractile state caused by variations in RR2. Data confirm interval-dependent alterations in contractile state that are likely an expression of the force-frequency relation. Studies of LV function in AF should incorporate a consideration of cycle length-dependent changes in LV contractile state.