Search

Objectives: This study sought to determine the long-term right atrial (RA) electrical and structural changes in a subgroup from the CAMERA-MRI (Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction-Magnetic Resonance Imaging) study., Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is successful in restoring ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and otherwise unexplained cardiomyopathy, as demonstrated in the randomized study of CA versus rate control (CAMERA-MRI). It is unknown if this is associated with atrial remodeling., Methods: Detailed electroanatomical (EA) mapping of the RA using CARTO3 and a force sensing catheter was performed at initial CA and electively at least 12 months after CA in patients with >90% reduction in AF burden following ablation. Bipolar voltage, fractionation, and conduction velocity were collected in 4 segments together with echo and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging., Results: Fifteen patients (mean age 59.1 ± 6.8 years) underwent repeat RA EA mapping. At a mean follow-up of 23.4 ± 11.9 months, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction improved from 33.6 ± 3.2% to 54.1 ± 3.2% (p = 0.001), RA area decreased from 28.4 ± 2.0 cm 2 to 20.8 ± 1.2 cm 2 (p < 0.001), and left atrial area decreased from 32.9 ± 2.3 cm 2 to 26.8 ± 1.4 cm 2 (p = 0.007). On EA mapping, RA bipolar voltage increased from 1.6 ± 0.1 mV to 1.9 ± 0.1 mV (p = 0.04). Tissue voltage increased across all regions, which achieved statistical significance at the posterior (p = 0.002) and septal (p = 0.01) segments. There was a significant decrease in complex fractionated electrograms from 21.7 ± 3.5% to 8.3 ± 1.8% (p = 0.002); however, no significant change occurred in global or regional conduction velocities (p = 0.5)., Conclusions: Recovery of atrial electrical and structural changes was observed following restoration of sinus rhythm and recovery of LV function in patients who underwent CA for persistent AF and LV systolic dysfunction. The randomized CAMERA MRI study demonstrated significant improvement in LV systolic function with AF ablation compared with rate control. The present study demonstrated reverse electrical and structural atrial recovery in concert with recovery of LV systolic function at 2 years post-AF ablation. This may partially explain the long-term success of CA in patients with AF and otherwise unexplained cardiomyopathy., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to determine if diffuse ventricular fibrosis improves in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)-mediated cardiomyopathy following the restoration of sinus rhythm., Background: AF coexists in 30% of heart failure (HF) patients and may be an underrecognized reversible cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Myocardial fibrosis is the hallmark of adverse cardiac remodeling in HF, yet its reversibility is unclear., Methods: Patients with persistent AF and an idiopathic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤45%) were randomized to catheter ablation (CA) or ongoing medical rate control as a pre-specified substudy of the CAMERA-MRI (Catheter Ablation versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction-an MRI-Guided Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial) trial. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans (including myocardial T1 time), serum B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-min walk tests, and Short Form-36 questionnaires performed at baseline and 6 months. Sixteen patients with no history of AF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction were enrolled as normal controls for T1 time., Results: Thirty-six patients (18 in each treatment arm) were included in this substudy. Demographics, comorbidities, and myocardial T1 times were well matched at baseline. At 6 months, patients in the CA group had a significant reduction in myocardial T1 time from baseline compared with the medical rate control group (-124 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -23 to -225 ms; p = 0.0176), although it remained higher than that of normal controls at 6 months (p = 0.0017). Improvements in myocardial T1 time with CA were associated with significant improvements in absolute LVEF (+12.5%; 95% CI: 5.9% to 19.0%; p = 0.0004), left ventricular end-systolic volume (p = 0.0019), and serum B-type natriuretic peptide (-216 ng/l; 95% CI: -23 to -225 ng/l; p = 0.0125)., Conclusions: The improvement in LVEF and reverse ventricular remodeling following successful CA of AF-mediated cardiomyopathy is accompanied by a regression of diffuse fibrosis. This suggests timely treatment of arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy may minimize irreversible ventricular remodeling., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) frequently co-exist despite adequate rate control. Existing randomized studies of AF and LVSD of varying etiologies have reported modest benefits with a rhythm control strategy., Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine whether catheter ablation (CA) for AF could improve LVSD compared with medical rate control (MRC) where the etiology of the LVSD was unexplained, apart from the presence of AF., Methods: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with persistent AF and idiopathic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤45%). After optimization of rate control, patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement, indicative of ventricular fibrosis, before randomization to either CA or ongoing MRC. CA included pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall isolation. AF burden post-CA was assessed by using an implanted loop recorder, and adequacy of MRC was assessed by using serial Holter monitoring. The primary endpoint was change in LVEF on repeat CMR at 6 months., Results: A total of 301 patients were screened; 68 patients were enrolled between November 2013 and October 2016 and randomized with 33 in each arm (accounting for 2 dropouts). The average AF burden post-CA was 1.6 ± 5.0% at 6 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis, absolute LVEF improved by 18 ± 13% in the CA group compared with 4.4 ± 13% in the MRC group (p < 0.0001) and normalized (LVEF ≥50%) in 58% versus 9% (p = 0.0002). In those undergoing CA, the absence of late gadolinium enhancement predicted greater improvements in absolute LVEF (10.7%; p = 0.0069) and normalization at 6 months (73% vs. 29%; p = 0.0093)., Conclusions: AF is an underappreciated reversible cause of LVSD in this population despite adequate rate control. The restoration of sinus rhythm with CA results in significant improvements in ventricular function, particularly in the absence of ventricular fibrosis on CMR. This outcome challenges the current treatment paradigm that rate control is the appropriate strategy in patients with AF and LVSD. (Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction [CAMERA-MRI]; ACTRN12613000880741)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)