Search

Background: Calcified right atrial thrombus is rare and commonly occurs secondary to atrial fibrillation and long-term central venous catheterization which present risk for embolization. Treatment typically involves anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy but rarely surgical excision can be performed, especially in patients with venous obstruction or concomitant valvular dysfunction., Case Presentation: We present the case of a 69 year old symptomatic female with a history of atrial fibrillation and long-term venous catheterization found to have a large calcified right atrial thrombus causing inferior vena cava obstruction and severe tricuspid regurgitation. Patient underwent full median sternotomy with ascending arterial cannulation with superior vena cava and femoral venous cannulation. Intraoperatively, extensive right atrial calcified thrombus was found extending into the inferior vena cava and involving the septal portion of the tricuspid valve annulus causing regurgitation. The calcified thrombus was removed which resolved the inferior vena cava obstruction and the tricuspid valve was repaired by transecting septal leaflet chordae, commissuroplasty, and ring annuloplasty. Postoperative course was uncomplicated and pathology confirmed a calcified right atrial thrombus. At 6 month follow up, the patient was asymptomatic with echocardiogram showing no inferior vena cava stenosis and trivial tricuspid regurgitation., Conclusions: Surgical excision of calcified right atrial thrombus is rare and is often indicated for symptomatic patients with extensive involvement causing venous inflow obstruction or valvular dysfunction. Sufficient preoperative imaging and a multi-disciplinary approach are essential for accurate diagnosis to guide targeted treatment. When the tricuspid valve is involved, repair is preferred over replacement in this patient population given their propensity for calcification and thrombus formation which may result in an increased risk of early bioprosthetic valve degeneration or mechanical valve thrombosis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The implantation of left atrial appendage closure device (WATCHMAN, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) is an alternative option to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Patients require short-term OAC after implantation to avoid device thrombosis. The 2 clinical trials that assessed this device excluded patients thought not to be candidates for OAC. As such, little is known about the safety of this strategy in patients with previous major bleeding events., Methods and Results: All 20 consecutive patients with history of spontaneous major bleeding while on OAC who had subsequently undergone WATCHMAN device implantation at our institution were included. A newly conceived multidisciplinary Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Prevention Center evaluated patients for candidacy for device implantation and subsequent antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome was spontaneous major bleeding while receiving short-term postprocedural OAC. Median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 5 (quartiles 5-6) and 5 (quartiles 4-5), respectively. Previous major bleeding events were major gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, spontaneous hemopericardium with cardiac tamponade, and hemarthrosis in 11, 7, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. None of the patients had spontaneous major bleeding during the course of OAC after device implantation. In 1 patient, OAC was discontinued after 40 days because of mechanical fall with head trauma resulting in subdural hematoma with no associated neurological deficits; this was managed conservatively., Conclusions: With careful multidisciplinary evaluation, a short course of OAC after WATCHMAN device implantation in patients with previous spontaneous major bleeding events is associated with low risk of recurrent spontaneous major bleeding., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Introduction: Measurements of pulmonary vein (PV) flow with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) immediately before and after PV isolation may be a useful method for predicting which patients will develop chronic PV stenosis., Methods and Results: We assessed preablation and postablation flows in each of the four PVs using a phase-array ICE catheter in 95 patients (mean age 52 +/- 13) undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. The ostium of each of the PVs was defined using angiography, electrical mapping, and ICE imaging. Ostial electrical isolation of all PVs was achieved using a 4-mm cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter. Change in PV flow, when present, was examined as both an absolute value and as a percentage of the baseline flow. All patients underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) scans of the PVs 3 months after the procedure for detection of stenosis. The average preablation diastolic flows for the left superior, left inferior, right superior, and right inferior veins were 0.56, 0.54, 0.47, and 0.45 m/sec, respectively. These values increased to 0.74, 0.67, 0.58, and 0.59 m/sec postablation (P < 0.001). Of 380 PVs ablated, the CT scans revealed 2 (1%) with severe (>70%) stenosis, 13 (3%) with moderate (51%-70%) stenosis, and 62 (16%) with mild (< or = 50%) stenosis. The r value between flow and stenosis was only 0.09 (P = NS)., Conclusion: Acute changes in PV flow immediately after ostial PV isolation do not appear to be a strong predictor of chronic PV stenosis.

Although the atrioventricular node (AVN) plays a vital role in blocking many of the atrial impulses from reaching the ventricles during atrial fibrillation (AF), a rapid irregular ventricular rate nevertheless persists. The goals of the present study were to explore the feasibility of novel epicardial selective vagal nerve stimulation for slowing of the ventricular rate during AF and to characterize the hemodynamic benefits in vivo. Electrophysiological-echocardiographic experiments were performed on 11 anesthetized open-chest dogs. Hemodynamic measurements were performed during three distinct periods: 1) sinus rate, 2) AF, and 3) AF with vagal nerve stimulation. AF was associated with significant deterioration of all measured parameters (P < 0.025). The vagal nerve stimulation produced slowing of the ventricular rate, significant reversal of the pressure and contractile indexes (P < 0.025), and a sharp reduction in one-half of the abortive ventricular contractions. The present study provides comprehensive evidence that slowing of the ventricular rate during AF by selective ganglionic stimulation of the vagal nerves that innervate the AVN successfully improved the hemodynamic responses.

The clinical assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function during atrial fibrillation (AF) is unreliable and difficult because of beat-to-beat variability. We evaluated an index for the estimation of LV systolic function in AF that is based on the relationship between the preceding (R-R1) and prepreceding (R-R2) R-R intervals. LV Doppler stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), peak aortic flow rate (AoF) and the maximum value of the first derivative of the LV pressure curve (dP/dt(max)) were evaluated in 13 healthy open-chest dogs during triggered AF. All parameters showed a significantly strong positive linear relationship with the ratio of R-R1/R-R2 (r = 0.65, 0.74, 0.75, and 0.70 for SV, EF, AoF, and dP/dt(max), respectively). The calculated value of LV systolic parameters at R-R1/R-R2 = 1 in the linear regression line showed a good relationship and an agreement with the measured average value of the parameter over all cardiac cycles (SV, 12.1 vs. 12.8 ml; EF, 49.6 vs. 51.2%; AoF, 1.37 vs. 1.48 l/min; and dP/dt(max), 2,323 vs. 2,454 mmHg/s). Using the LV systolic parameters estimated at R-R1/R-R2 = 1 in the linear regression line allows the LV contractile function to be accurately and reproducibly evaluated during AF and obviates the less-reliable process of averaging multiple cardiac cycles.

Background: The conventional treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation who are to undergo electrical cardioversion is to prescribe warfarin for anticoagulation for three weeks before cardioversion. It has been proposed that if transesophageal echocardiography reveals no atrial thrombus, cardioversion may be performed safely after only a short period of anticoagulant therapy., Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, prospective clinical trial, we enrolled 1222 patients with atrial fibrillation of more than two days' duration and assigned them to either treatment guided by the findings on transesophageal echocardiography or conventional treatment. The composite primary end point was cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral embolism within eight weeks. Secondary end points were functional status, successful restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm, hemorrhage, and death., Results: There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the rate of embolic events (five embolic events among 619 patients in the transesophageal-echocardiography group [0.8 percent]) vs. three among 603 patients in the conventional-treatment group [0.5 percent], P=0.50). However, the rate of hemorrhagic events was significantly lower in the transesophageal-echocardiography group (18 events [2.9 percent] vs. 33 events [5.5 percent], P=0.03). Patients in the transesophageal-echocardiography group also had a shorter time to cardioversion (mean [+/-SD], 3.0+/-5.6 vs. 30.6+/-10.6 days, P<0.001) and a greater rate of successful restoration of sinus rhythm (440 patients [71.1 percent] vs. 393 patients [65.2 percent], P=0.03). At eight weeks, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of death or maintenance of sinus rhythm or in functional status., Conclusions: The use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide the management of atrial fibrillation may be considered a clinically effective alternative strategy to conventional therapy for patients in whom elective cardioversion is planned.

Electrical cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently performed to relieve symptoms and improve cardiac performance. Patients undergoing cardioversion are treated conventionally with therapeutic anticoagulation for three weeks before and four weeks after cardioversion to decrease the risk of thromboembolism. A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy has been proposed as an alternative that may lower stroke and bleeding events. Patients without atrial cavity thrombus or atrial appendage thrombus by TEE are cardioverted on achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation, whereas cardioversion is delayed in higher risk patients with thrombus. The aim of this review is to discuss the issues and controversies associated with the management of patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. We provide an overview of the TEE-guided and conventional anticoagulation strategies in light of the recently completed Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) clinical trial. The two management strategies comparably lower the patient's embolic risk when the guidelines are properly followed. The TEE-guided strategy with shorter term anticoagulation may lower the incidence of bleeding complications and safely expedite early cardioversion. The inherent advantages and disadvantages of both strategies are presented. The TEE-guided approach with short-term anticoagulation is considered to be a safe and clinically effective alternative to the conventional approach, and it is advocated in patients in whom earlier cardioversion would be clinically beneficial.

An alternative clinical management strategy and cost analysis model is presented for patients with atrial fibrillation of >2 days' duration who may benefit from immediate cardioversion with self-administered low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as a bridge antithrombotic therapy to warfarin, after a negative transesophageal echo-cardiography (TEE) screening for thrombus. Assuming no difference in stroke or bleeding rates, our cost minimization model shows that the TEE-guided enoxaparin treatment costs are $1353 lower per patient than an intravenous unfractionated heparin approach. Sensitivity analyses for stroke and bleeding reveal that the treatment-cost economic dominance of the TEE-guided enoxaparin approach may be enhanced by an expected improvement in clinical outcome.

Background: Previous studies have reported the clinical and echocardiographic findings of patients with left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) and thrombi. We sought to study these characteristics in patients with right atrial SEC and thrombi., Methods: We reviewed 580 consecutive patients from the ACUTE (Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography) Registry and found 79 patients (14%, aged 67 +/-13 years, 67 male) with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings of right atrial SEC or thrombi (group 1). This group was compared with a control group of 75 consecutive patients (group 2) (aged 68 +/- 13 years, P = not significant; 49 male, P <.005) from the registry with no TEE findings of SEC or thrombi in the left or right atrium., Results: Atrial fibrillation was present in 60 of 79 group 1 patients (76%). Five right atrial (6%) and 11 left atrial (14%) thrombi were identified. Both left ventricular ejection fraction (39% +/- 16% versus 47% +/- 14%; P =.0005) and presence of right ventricular dysfunction (n = 44 versus 18; P =.0001) differed significantly between groups 1 and 2, respectively. Right atrial area (24 +/- 6 cm(2) versus 22 +/- 6 cm(2); P = .02) was larger in patients in group 1. Left atrial SEC was present in 68 of 79 group 1 patients (86%). Patients with right atrial thrombi and right atrial SEC had a longer duration of arrhythmia (524 +/-812 days versus 147 +/-368 days, P <.05) than patients with right atrial SEC only., Conclusions: Right atrial SEC has a prevalence of 14% in patients with atrial arrhythmia who undergo TEE-guided cardioversion. Right atrial thrombi are a rare finding and were seen in fewer than 1% (5/580) of patients with atrial arrhythmia. Right atrial thrombi among patients on anticoagulation therapy were not associated with clinically significant pulmonary embolism.

In this study, we sought evidence for an underlying atrial or ventricular myopathy in patients with paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation using standard echocardiographic parameters in addition to Doppler tissue imaging of mitral annular motion. No impairment in atrial contractile function was found, but there was evidence for impaired diastolic function in these patients.

Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for evaluation of the left atrium and the left atrial appendage (LAA) for the presence of thrombi. Anticoagulation is conventionally used for patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent embolization of atrial thrombi. The mechanism of benefit and effectiveness of thrombi resolution with anticoagulation is not well defined., Methods and Results: We used a TEE database of 9058 consecutive studies performed between January 1996 and November 1998 to identify all patients with thrombi reported in the left atrium and/or LAA. One hundred seventy-four patients with thrombi in the left atrial cavity (LAC) and LAA were identified (1.9% of transesophageal studies performed). The incidence of LAA thrombi was 6.6 times higher than LAC thrombi (151 vs 23, respectively). Almost all LAC thrombi were visualized on transthoracic echocardiography (90.5%). Mitral valve pathology was associated with LAC location of thrombi (P <.0001), whereas atrial fibrillation or flutter was present in most patients with LAA location of thrombi. Anticoagulation of 47 +/- 18 days was associated with thrombus resolution in 80.1% of the patients on follow-up TEE. Further anticoagulation resulted in limited additional benefit., Conclusions: LAC thrombi are rare and are usually associated with mitral valve pathology. Transthoracic echocardiography is effective in identifying these thrombi. LAA thrombi occur predominantly in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Short-term anticoagulation achieves a high rate of resolution of LAA and LAC thrombi but does not obviate the need for follow-up TEE.

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation >2 days' duration for whom immediate cardioversion is desired or required are commonly hospitalized for 4 or more days of antithrombotic therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin and commencement of oral warfarin. For these early cardioversion patients, self-administered low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin sodium) as "bridge" therapy to warfarin may obviate the need for hospitalization and activated partial thromboplastin time monitoring and thus potentially lower costs and enhance utility., Objective: To compare feasibility and safety of a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided enoxaparin strategy with those of a TEE-guided unfractionated heparin strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation of >2 days' duration undergoing early electrical or chemical cardioversion., Design and Setting: This is a randomized, multicenter clinical trial at 11 hospitals in the United States., Patients and Intervention: Two hundred patients with atrial fibrillation >2 days' duration requiring early chemical or electric cardioversion will be enrolled. TEE-guided intravenous unfractionated heparin bridge therapy will be compared with TEE-guided subcutaneous enoxaparin bridge therapy., Outcome Measures: Feasibility outcomes are time to hospital discharge, patient quality of life/utility, treatment costs, and sinus rhythm. Safety outcomes are ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolization, major and minor bleeding, clinical hemodynamic instability, and cardiac and cardioversion-related death for a 5-week period from enrollment., Clinical Implications: The results of this pilot study will have important clinical and economic implications for the antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing TEE-guided cardioversion.

Transesophageal echocardiography-guided anticoagulation management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion has evolved over the past decade as a viable alternative to conventional anticoagulation management. Its use grew out of a need for a more predictable, dependable, and convenient approach to this difficult management dilemma, which has become increasingly prevalent in practice as an increasing number of patients present to clinics and hospitals with atrial fibrillation. In addition to its use in risk stratification of patients scheduled to undergo cardioversion, this management strategy allows for early cardioversion, which enables a minimal delay in proceeding from the diagnosis to the institution of therapy (electrical cardioversion). This review explores the evolution of the transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy, the advantages and disadvantages of its use, and possible modifications to the strategy that would allow for a more convenient, practical, and more widely acceptable approach in the near future.

Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE)-guided cardioversion of patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) of >2 days' duration is used as an alternative to conventional therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate practice patterns employed for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF who underwent cardioversion, and to determine the relative use of conventional and TEE-guided management strategies. We forwarded regionally stratified survey questionnaires to 947 clinical practices within the United States. The 10-question questionnaire queried demographic and clinical practice volumes and practices for managing patients with AF who underwent cardioversion. In addition, we used historical data to determine longitudinal use patterns of the TEE-guided approach for a large institution over 7 years. The 197 completed and returned surveys yielded a return rate of 20.8%. The TEE-guided approach was employed in approximately 12% of total cardioversions, but 75% of practices indicated that they employed transesophageal echocardiography only occasionally. The TEE-guided approach was associated with community size (r = 0.19; p<0.008), type of practice (r = 0.26; p = 0.001), total use of transesophageal echocardiography (r = 0.48; p<0.001), and volume of cardioversions (r = 0.28; p<0.001). Importantly, there was little consensus on the most appropriate clinical indications for TEE-guided cardioversions, and the proportions of TEE-guided cardioversion to total number of electrical cardioversions remained stable over 7 years. Practice volume and physician training may be the most important variables in the adoption of the TEE approach.

We report a cohort of our first 100 minimally invasive cardiac valvular operations matched 1:1 by age and valvular surgery type with patients undergoing a traditional midline sternotomy approach. The prevalence of postoperative atrial fibrillation among patients with minimally invasive procedures versus traditional midline sternotomy was 26.3% versus 38.0%, respectively (p = 0.08). Neither multiple logistic regression nor Kaplan-Meier distribution analysis identified differences in postoperative atrial fibrillation between the 2 surgical techniques.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly develops after cardiac valvular surgery. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative AF following valvular surgery. A cohort of 915 consecutive adult patients undergoing isolated valvular surgery with preoperative sinus rhythm was analyzed. Univariate and independent multivariate risk factors for postoperative AF were determined. A second cohort of 305 patients with the same inclusion criteria was used to validate the multivariate predictors. Patients studied had a mean age of 56.1 +/- 14.7 years, 57.9% were men, 79.6% had a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, and their mean left atrial size was 46.2 +/- 9.3 mm. The incidence of postoperative AF was 36.7%. Independent predictors of postoperative AF included: advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.506 per decade, 95% confidence interval, [CI] 1.35 to 1.68, p = 0.0001); mitral stenosis (OR 2.066, CI 1.21 to 3.52, p = 0.0077); left atrial enlargement (OR 1.468, CI 1.07 to 2.01, p = 0.0165); use of systemic hypothermia (OR 0.572, CI 0.422 to 0.776, p = 0.0003); and a history of cardiac surgery (OR 0.676, CI 0.465 to 0.981, p = 0.0393). Among these variables, advanced age, mitral stenosis, and left atrial enlargement were confirmed as independent risk factors in the validation cohort.

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether left atrial appendage stunning occurs in patients with atrial flutter and to compare left atrial appendage function in the pericardioversion period with that in patients with atrial fibrillation., Background: Left atrial appendage stunning has recently been proposed as a key mechanistic phenomenon in the etiology of postcardioversion thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. Atrial flutter is thought to be associated with a negligible risk of thromboembolic events; therefore, anticoagulation is commonly withheld before and after cardioversion in these patients., Methods: Sixty-three patients with atrial flutter (n = 19) or atrial fibrillation (n = 44) underwent transesophageal echocardiography immediately before and after electrical cardioversion. In addition to assessing the presence of thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast, we measured left atrial appendage emptying velocity and calculated shear rates by pulsed wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography., Results: Patients with atrial flutter exhibited greater left atrial appendage flow velocities before cardioversion than those with atrial fibrillation (42 +/- 19 vs. 28 +/- 15 cm/s [mean +/- SD], p < 0.001). Left atrial appendage shear rates were also higher in patients with atrial flutter (103 +/- 82 vs. 59 +/- 37 s-1, p < 0.001). After cardioversion, left atrial appendage flow velocities decreased compared with precardioversion values in patients with atrial fibrillation (28 +/- 15 before to 15 +/- 14 cm/s after cardioversion, p < 0.001) and atrial flutter (42 +/- 19 to 27 +/- 18 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.001). Shear rates decreased from 59 +/- 37 before cardioversion to 30 +/- 31 s-1 after cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), and from 103 +/- 82 s to 65 +/- 52 s-1, respectively (p < 0.001), in atrial flutter. This decrease in flow velocity from before to after cardioversion occurred in 36 (82%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation and 14 (74%) of 19 with atrial flutter. The impaired left atrial appendage function after cardioversion was less pronounced in the group with atrial flutter (27 +/- 18 cm/s for atrial flutter vs. 15 +/- 14 cm/s for atrial fibrillation, p < 0.001). New or increased spontaneous echo contrast occurred in 22 (50%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation versus 4 (21%) of 19 with atrial flutter (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Left atrial appendage stunning also occurs in patients with atrial flutter, although to a lesser degree than in those with atrial fibrillation. These data suggest that patients with atrial flutter are at risk for thromboembolic events after cardioversion, although this risk is most likely lower than that in patients with atrial fibrillation because of better preserved left atrial appendage function.

Background: Electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for embolic stroke. Screening for atrial thrombi with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before cardioversion should, in many patients, safely permit cardioversion to be done earlier than would be possible with prolonged conventional, anticoagulation therapy., Objective: To compare the feasibility and safety of TEE-guided early cardioversion with those of conventional management of cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation., Design: Randomized, multicenter clinical trial., Setting: 10 hospitals in the United States, Europe, and Australia., Patients: 126 patients who had atrial fibrillation lasting longer than 2 days and were having electrical cardioversion., Intervention: Conventional therapy or early, TEE-guided cardioversion with short-term anticoagulation therapy., Outcome Measures: Feasibility outcome variables were frequency of cardioversion and times to cardioversion and sinus rhythm. Safety outcomes were ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolization, bleeding, and detected episodes of clinical hemodynamic instability occurring as long as 4 weeks after cardioversion., Results: 62 patients were randomly assigned to receive TEE-guided cardioversion; TEE was done in 56 (90%) of these patients. Atrial thrombi were detected in 7 patients (13%) and led to the postponement of cardioversion. Cardioversion was successful in 38 of 45 patients (84%) who had early cardioversion. No embolization occurred with this strategy. Of the 64 patients receiving conventional therapy, 37 (58%) had cardioversion, which was successful in 28 patients (76%). One patient had a peripheral embolic event. The time to cardioversion was shorter in the TEE group (0.6 weeks [95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9 weeks] compared with 4.8 weeks [CI, 3.8 to 5.7 weeks]; P < 0.01). The incidence of clinical hemodynamic instability and bleeding complications tended to be greater in the conventional therapy group., Conclusions: These results suggest that TEE-guided cardioversion with short-term anticoagulation therapy is feasible and safe. The use of TEE may allow cardioversion to be done earlier, may decrease the risk for embolism associated with cardioversion, and may be associated with less clinical instability than conventional therapy. A large, multicenter study to confirm these findings is currently under way.

The aim of this study was to characterize left atrial appendage mechanical function in atrial fibrillation and flutter by Fourier analysis to analyze frequency and regularity of flow. Left atrial appendage function is central to a patient's risk for thromboembolism. Although the function of the appendage can be analyzed by Doppler echocardiography in sinus rhythm, its mechanical function in atrial fibrillation and flutter has not been well characterized. This lack of adequate definition is caused by the complexity and temporal variability of the Doppler flow profiles. We assessed left atrial appendage function in 21 cases of atrial fibrillation (n - 11) and flutter (n = 10) and five in sinus rhythm with transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Doppler profiles were examined by Fourier analysis, and the power spectra compared and analyzed between patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter. Left atrial appendage Doppler flow in atrial fibrillation produced Fourier spectra over a narrow band of frequencies with a peak frequency of 6.2 +/- 1.0 Hz, significantly higher than in atrial flutter (3.9 +/- 0.6 Hz, p < 0.00001). Additionally, a significant difference in subharmonic modulation (spectral power below the peak frequency) was observed between atrial appendage flow in atrial fibrillation and flutter, because 37% +/- 16% of the total spectral power was achieved before the dominant frequency in atrial fibrillation compared with 20% +/- 14% in atrial flutter (p = 0.02). Conversely, patients in sinus rhythm exhibited broad-banded Fourier spectra with most of the power in discrete frequency spikes at harmonics above the fundamental frequency with very little subharmonic modulation (1% +/- 0.05%). Left atrial appendage function in atrial fibrillation and flutter can be well characterized by Fourier analysis of Doppler flow. Atrial fibrillation has higher dominant frequencies and greater subharmonic modulation compared with flutter. Moreover, atrial fibrillation demonstrated quasiperiodic contraction patterns typically found in chaotic systems. Fourier analysis of left atrial appendage contraction patterns may therefore have significant promise in providing insights into mechanisms of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism.

In patients with atrial fibrillation, electrical cardioversion is often performed to relieve symptoms, to improve left ventricular function, and to decrease thromboembolic risks. However, cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias is associated with an increased embolic risk, with an event rate of up to 5.6%. The American College of Chest Physicians recommend 3 weeks of systemic anticoagulation before elective cardioversion and 4 weeks of systemic anticoagulation afterwards. Expulsion of preexisting left atrial (LA) thrombi with resumption of sinus rhythm has traditionally been considered the mechanism for this increased embolic risk associated with cardioversion. The advent of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has allowed accurate detection of LA thrombus. Moreover, recent studies using TEE have identified a state of atrial "stunning" immediately after cardioversion, which is considered a thrombogenic milieu in which new thrombus formation and increased or de novo appearance of LA spontaneous echocardiographic contrast have been observed. Furthermore, embolic events have been reported after cardioversion despite exclusion of preexisting LA thrombus by TEE. These studies strongly suggest an alternative mechanism for embolism after cardioversion, ie, atrial stunning with worsened atrial appendage function and enhanced thrombogenesis. Recent studies have shown the safety of a TEE-guided anticoagulation approach in which exclusion of preexisting LA thrombus by TEE enables early cardioversion without the need for the standard 3 weeks of systemic anticoagulation. The importance of maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation has been further emphasized. Although preliminary observational studies of TEE-guided cardioversion are encouraging, there has been no prospective, randomized trial comparing the two strategies of anticoagulation management. The Assessement of Cardioversion Utilizing Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) pilot study randomized 126 patients from 10 sites and showed the feasibility and safety of the larger scale study. A larger multicenter, prospective randomized trial is now underway and is expected to randomize a total of 3,000 patients. The results of the ACUTE study will definitively establish the safest and the most cost-effective way to manage anticoagulation for elective cardioversion.

Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been used recently to detect atrial thrombi before cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. It has been assumed that embolic events after cardioversion result from embolism of preexisting atrial thrombi that are accurately detected by TEE. This study examined the clinical and echocardiographic findings in patients with embolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation despite exclusion of atrial thrombi by TEE., Methods and Results: Clinical and echocardiographic data in 17 patients with embolic events after TEE-guided electrical (n = 16) or pharmacological (n = 1) cardioversion were analyzed. All 17 patients had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, including four patients with lone atrial fibrillation. TEE before cardioversion showed left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in five patients and did not show atrial thrombus in any patient. Cardioversion resulted in return to sinus rhythm without immediate complication in all patients. Thirteen patients had cerebral embolic events and four patients had peripheral embolism occurring 2 hours to 7 days after cardioversion. None of the patients were therapeutically anticoagulated at the time of embolism. New or increased left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was detected in four of the five patients undergoing repeat TEE after cardioversion including one patient with a new left atrial appendage thrombus., Conclusions: Embolism may occur after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in inadequately anticoagulated patients despite apparent exclusion of preexisting atrial thrombus by TEE. These findings suggest de novo atrial thrombosis after cardioversion or imperfect sensitivity of TEE for atrial thrombi and suggest that screening by TEE does not obviate the requirement for anticoagulant therapy at the time of and after cardioversion. A randomized clinical trial is needed to compare conventional anticoagulant management with a TEE-guided strategy including anticoagulation after cardioversion.

The management of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion remains controversial, largely because of inadequate studies demonstrating risk or benefit, a relatively inconvenient anticoagulation management strategy and the increasing use of transesophageal echocardiography. Recent investigations into the potential mechanisms involved in the development of thrombus and systemic embolism in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may provide insight into underlying predisposing factors, with subsequent modification of management strategies. Conventional wisdom suggests that preexisting thrombus is responsible for thromboembolic events after cardioversion. However, development of a thrombogenic milieu after cardioversion, particularly in the left atrial appendage, may also be an important predisposing factor. To protect against both potential mechanisms of embolization, these data support therapeutic anticoagulation for all patients with atrial fibrillation of > 2 days in duration from the time of, as well as after cardioversion for a total of 4 weeks, undergoing cardioversion, even in the absence of thrombus on echocardiography. Therefore, the role of transesophageal echocardiography in this setting should be to enable early cardioversion if atrial thrombus is excluded and to identify high risk patients with atrial thrombi so as to postpone cardioversion and avoid the risk of embolization. Ultimately, however, a controlled, randomized and prospective clinical trial will be required to compare conventional management with a transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy.

Objectives: This study assessed the function of the left atrial appendage in the pericardioversion period to gain insights into mechanisms involved in thromboembolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation., Background: Systemic embolization associated with electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is thought to originate from the left atrium or left atrial appendage, or both. However, the mechanism involved is poorly understood., Methods: We studied left atrial appendage function with transesophageal echocardiography in 20 patients with atrial fibrillation before and after successful electrical cardioversion. We measured left atrial appendage emptying and filling velocities by pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography, characterized Doppler emptying patterns, measured atrial appendage areas and assessed the presence or absence of spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus., Results: Organized left atrial appendage function returned in 16 (80%) of 20 patients immediately after cardioversion. Atrial appendage emptying velocities before cardioversion were greater in patients without (0.39 +/- 0.02 m/s) than in those with (0.25 +/- 0.12 m/s) spontaneous echo contrast (p = 0.045). Furthermore, emptying velocities before cardioversion were significantly greater than late diastolic emptying velocities after cardioversion (0.31 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.12 m/s, p = 0.0001), as well as in both the group with (0.25 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.13 m/s, p = 0.001) and the group without (0.39 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.12 m/s, p = 0.01) spontaneous echo contrast. In addition, left atrial and atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast developed in 4 of 20 patients and increased in intensity in 3 of 20 patients in the immediate postcardioversion period., Conclusions: Organized left atrial appendage function returns in most patients immediately after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. However, its function is impaired compared with that before cardioversion. Furthermore, spontaneous echo contrast increased in 7 (35%) of 20 patients after cardioversion. These observations suggest that stunned left atrial appendage function after cardioversion may predispose the chamber to thrombus formation, which may play a role in the mechanism involved in the occurrence of embolization after cardioversion.