Search

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a highly prevalent arrhythmia with significant burden on morbidity and mortality. The impact of AF in the revascularised population remains incompletely described. Given the high prevalence of AF in the revascularised population, we sought to evaluate the incidence and prognosis in patients with pre-existing and new-onset AF following revascularisation., Methods: We used the University of Ottawa Heart Institute Revascularisation Registry to identify patients who underwent revascularisation between August 2015 and March 2020, who were prospectively followed for an average of one year. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysing the association between AF and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation and cerebrovascular accidents. Moreover, secondary outcomes include the individual components of MACE and bleeding., Results: A total of 6704 patients underwent revascularisation and completed 1-year clinical follow-up. Median time to follow-up was 12.8 (IQR 11.2-15.9) months. One-year MACE occurred in 166 (21.8%) and 683 (11.5%) patients in AF and non-AF groups, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.61; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.01; p<0.0001). AF was independently predictive of 1-year mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation, cerebrovascular accident and bleeding. Within 1 year, 299 (4.5%) episodes of new-onset AF was observed. New-onset AF following revascularisation was also associated with 1-year MACE, mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident and unplanned revascularisation., Conclusions: Preprocedural and new-onset AF following revascularisation remains highly predictive 1-year MACE. AF should be considered in addition to traditional risk factors for adverse outcomes following revascularisation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aims: Obesity is associated with higher electrical cardioversion (ECV) failure in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). For ease-of-use, many centers prefer patches over paddles. We assessed the optimum modality and shock vector, as well as the safety and efficacy of the Manual Pressure Augmentation (MPA) technique., Methods: Patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and PeAF undergoing ECV using a biphasic defibrillator were randomized into one of four arms by modality (adhesive patches or handheld paddles) and shock vector (anteroposterior [AP] or anteroapical [AA]). If the first two shocks (100 and 200 J) failed, then patients received a 200-J shock using the alternative modality (patch or paddle). Shock vector remained unchanged. In an observational substudy, 20 patients with BMI of 35 or more, and who failed ECV at 200 J using both patches/paddles underwent a trial of MPA., Results: In total, 125 patients were randomized between July 2016 and March 2018. First or second shock success was 43 of 63 (68.2%) for patches and 56 of 62 (90.3%) for paddles (P = 0.002). There were 20 crossovers from patches to paddles (12 of 20 third shock success with paddles) and six crossovers from paddles to patches (three of six third shock success with patches). Paddles successfully cardioverted 68 of 82 patients compared with 46 of 69 using patches (82.9% vs 66.7%; P = 0.02). Shock vector did not influence first or second shock success rates (82.0% AP vs 76.6% AA; P = 0.46). MPA was successful in 16 of 20 (80%) who failed in both (patches/paddles), with 360 J required in six of seven cases., Conclusion: Routine use of adhesive patches at 200 J is inadequate in obesity. Strategies that improve success include the use of paddles, MPA, and escalation to 360 J., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)