Search

Background: With the exponential growth of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), there is increasing interest in associated health care costs. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a single-shot pentaspline multielectrode catheter has been shown to be safe and effective for AF ablation, but its cost efficiency compared to conventional thermal ablation modalities (cryoballoon [CB] or radiofrequency [RF]) has not been evaluated., Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare cost, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety between PFA, CB, and RF for AF ablation., Methods: We studied 707 consecutive patients (PFA: 208 [46.0%]; CB: 325 [29.4%]; RF: 174 [24.6%]) undergoing first-time AF ablation. Individual procedural costs were calculated, including equipment, laboratory use, and hospital stay, and compared between ablation modalities, as were effectiveness and safety., Results: Skin-to-skin times and catheter laboratory times were significantly shorter with PFA (68 and 102 minutes, respectively) than with CB (91 and 122 minutes) and RF (89 and 123 minutes) (P < .001). General anesthesia use differed across modalities (PFA 100%; CB 10.2%; RF 61.5%) (P < .001). Major complications occurred in 1% of cases, with no significant differences between modalities. Shorter procedural times resulted in lower staffing and laboratory costs with PFA, but these savings were offset by substantially higher equipment costs, resulting in higher overall median costs with PFA (£10,010) than with CB (£8106) and RF (£8949) (P < .001)., Conclusion: In this contemporary real-world study of the 3 major AF ablation modalities used concurrently, PFA had shorter skin-to-skin and catheter laboratory times than did CB and RF, with similarly low rates of complications. However, PFA procedures were considerably more expensive, largely because of higher equipment cost., Competing Interests: Disclosures Prof Gupta reports institutional research grants from Boston Scientific and Medtronic and speaker fees from Boston Scientific. Dr Todd reports speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr Luther reports support from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research scholarship award, being a speaker for Biosense Webster, and research grants from Biosense Webster. The other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Despite promising success rates, redo ablation is sometimes required. At redo, PVs may be found to be isolated (silent) or reconnected. We studied patients with silent vs reconnected PVs at redo and analysed associations with adverse outcomes., Methods: Patients undergoing redo AF ablations between 2013 and 2019 at our institution were included and stratified into silent PVs or reconnected PVs. The primary outcome was a composite of further redo ablation, non-AF ablation, atrioventricular nodal ablation, and death. Secondary outcomes included arrhythmia recurrence., Results: A total of 467 patients were included with mean 4.6 ± 1.7 years follow-up, of whom 48 (10.3%) had silent PVs. The silent PV group had had more often undergone >1 prior ablation (45.8% vs 9.8%; p<0.001), had more persistent AF (62.5% vs 41.1%; p=0.005) and had more non-PV ablation performed both at prior ablation procedures and at the analysed redo ablation. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in those with silent PVs (25% vs 13.8%; p=0.053). Arrhythmia recurrence was also more common in the silent PV group (66.7% vs 50.6%; p=0.047). After multivariable adjustment, female sex (aHR 2.35 [95% CI 2.35-3.96]; p=0.001) and ischaemic heart disease (aHR 3.21 [95% CI 1.56-6.62]; p=0.002) were independently associated with the primary outcome, and left atrial enlargement (aHR 1.58 [95% CI 1.20-2.08]; p=0.001) and >1 prior ablation (aHR 1.88 [95% CI 1.30-2.72]; p<0.001) were independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence. Whilst a finding of silent PVs was not itself significant after multivariable adjustment, this provides an easily assessable parameter at clinically indicated redo ablation which informs the clinician of the likelihood of a worse future prognosis., Conclusions: Patients with silent PVs at redo AF ablation have worse clinical outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often performed under general anaesthesia (GA) or deep sedation. Anaesthetic availability is limited in many centers, and deep sedation is prohibited in some countries without anaesthetic support. Very high-power short duration (vHPSD-90W/4 s) PVI using the Q-Dot catheter is generally well tolerated under mild conscious sedation (MCS) though an understanding of catheter stability and long-term effectiveness is lacking. We analyzed lesion metrics and 12-month freedom from atrial arrythmia with this approach., Methods: Our approach to radiofrequency (RF) PVI under MCS is standardized and includes a single catheter approach with a steerable sheath. We identified patients undergoing Q-Dot RF PVI between March 2021 and December 2022 in our center, comparing those undergoing vHPSD ablation under MCS (90W/MCS) against those undergoing 50 W ablation under GA (50 W/GA) up to 12 months of follow-up. Data were extracted from clinical records and the CARTO system., Results: Eighty-three patients met our inclusion criteria (51 90W/MCS; 32 50 W/GA). Despite shorter ablation times (353 vs. 886 s; p < .001), the 90 W/MCS group received more lesions (median 87 vs. 58, p < .001), resulting in similar procedure times (149.3 vs. 149.1 min; p = .981). PVI was achieved in all cases, and first pass isolation rates were similar (left wide antral circumferential ablation [WACA] 82.4% vs. 87.5%, p = .758; right WACA 74.5% vs. 78.1%, p = .796; 90 W/MCS vs. 50 W/GA respectively). Analysis of 6647 ablation lesions found similar mean impedance drops (10.0 ± 1.9 Ω vs. 10.0 ± 2.2 Ω; p = .989) and mean contact force (14.6 ± 2.0 g vs. 15.1 ± 1.6 g; p = .248). Only median 2.5% of lesions in the 90 W/MCS cohort failed to achieve ≥ 5 Ω drop. In the 90 W/MCS group, there were no procedural related complications, and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was observed in 78.4%., Conclusion: vHPSD PVI is feasible under MCS, with encouraging acute and long-term procedural outcomes. This provides a compelling option for centers with limited anaesthetic support., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation services were significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate a symptom-based clinician prioritisation scheme for waiting list management compared with patient-completed quality of life (QoL) scores. We also sought to understand factors influencing QoL, particularly the impact of COVID-19, on patients awaiting AF ablation, via a bespoke questionnaire., Methods: Patients awaiting AF ablation were sent two QoL questionnaires (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of Life (AFEQT) and EuroQol 5D (EQ5D-5L)) and the bespoke questionnaire. At a separate time point, patients were categorised as C1-urgent, C2-priority or C3-routine by their cardiologist based on review of clinic letters., Results: There were 118 patients included with priority categorisation available for 86 patients. Median AFEQT scores were lower in C2 (30.4; 17.2-51.9) vs C3 patients (56.5; 32.1-74.1; p<0.01). Unplanned admission occurred in 3 patients in C3 with AFEQT scores of <40. Although 65 patients had AF symptoms during the pandemic, 43.1% did not seek help where they ordinarily would have. An exercise frequency of ≥3-4 times a week was associated with higher AFEQT (56.5; 41.2-74.1; p<0.001) and EQ5D (0.84; 0.74-0.88; p<0.0001) scores., Conclusion: The QoL of patients awaiting AF ablation is impaired and AFEQT helps to identify patients at risk of admission, over and above physician assessment. COVID-19 influenced patients seeking medical attention with symptomatic AF when they normally would. Regular exercise is associated with better QoL in patients awaiting AF ablation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: This work set out to comprehensively characterize patients admitted to hospital with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) and to compare this cohort of patients to the global hospital population of patients with only one of these diagnoses., Methods and Results: This was a retrospective analysis of all in-patients with HF and AF admitted to a large urban hospital over a 3-month period. Patients with AF were identified by both discharge codes and electrocardiograms. HF patients were identified by means of discharge codes for HF and by screening all patients with AF, a common comorbidity of HF. Evidence for left ventricular (LV) dysfunction was sought. Of patients with AF (n = 453), 43% had symptoms of HF and LV dysfunction. Of patients with a discharge code and confirmed HF (n = 286), 34% had AF, 60% of whom were in chronic AF. Compared to HF patients in sinus rhythm those in AF were older (70 +/- 10 y vs 67 +/- 12 y, P < 0.02), had a higher prevalence of valvular heart disease (25% vs 7%, P < 0.0001) and a lower prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (17% vs 40%, P < 0.0001). HF patients identified by discharge codes in AF were more likely to have QRS > or = 120 msec (18% vs 12% in sinus rhythm; P= ns). Patients with AF and deemed to suffer concomitant HF, as opposed to AF alone, were significantly more likely to have QRS prolongation (QRS > or = 120 msec 27% vs 8%, P < 0.05). 8% of patients with AF and HF had a QRS > 150 msec., Conclusions: AF and HF are frequent, concomitant pathologies in a hospitalised population. AF complicates HF assessment and treatment. Greater dyssynchrony, as denoted by ECG, in the AF and HF population suggests opportunities for treatment of HF by cardiac resynchronization therapy and ablative therapies.

Background: Patients who have recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following redo catheter ablation may eventually be managed with a pace-and-ablate approach, involving pacemaker implant followed by atrioventricular nodal ablation (AVNA). We sought to determine which factors would predict subsequent AVNA in patients undergoing redo AF ablation. Methods: We analyzed patients undergoing redo AF ablations between 2013 and 2019 at our institution. Follow-up was censored on December 31, 2021. Patients with no available follow- up data were excluded. Time-to-event analysis with Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare those who underwent AVNA to those who did not. Results: A total of 467 patients were included, of whom 39 (8.4%) underwent AVNA. After multivariable adjustment, female sex (aHR 4.68 [95% CI 2.30-9.50]; p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (aHR 2.99 [95% CI 1.25-7.16]; p = 0.014), presence of a preexisting pacemaker (aHR 3.25 [95% CI 1.10-9.60]; p = 0.033), and persistent AF (aHR 2.22 [95% CI 1.07-4.59]; p = 0.032) were associated with increased risk of subsequent AVNA requirement. Conclusion: Female sex, ischemic heart disease, and persistent AF may be useful clinical predictors of the requirement for subsequent AVNA and may be considered as part of shared clinical decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]