1. A cost-effectiveness analysis of remote monitoring after pacemaker implantation for bradycardia in Japan.
- Author
-
Kawakami H, Saito M, Fujisawa T, Nagai T, Nishimura K, Akazawa Y, Miyoshi T, Higaki A, Seike F, Higashi H, Inoue K, Ikeda S, and Yamaguchi O
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Bradycardia etiology, Bradycardia therapy, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Japan, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Pacemaker, Artificial, Atrial Fibrillation epidemiology, Stroke
- Abstract
Background: Although remote monitoring (RM) after pacemaker implantation is common, its cost-effectiveness has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of RM compared with conventional follow-up (CFU) in Japanese patients with pacemakers., Methods: A Markov model was constructed to analyze costs and quality-adjusted life years after pacemaker implantation. The target population was Japanese patients implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker for bradycardia. Transition probabilities (e.g. atrial fibrillation, stroke, and device trouble) were obtained from literature and expert sources. Additionally, stroke risk was determined according to anticoagulation and CHADS
2 scores. We used a 10-year horizon with sensitivity analyses for significant variables., Results: Compared to CFU, RM was more effective; however, it was also more expensive. When the range of the Japanese willingness-to-pay threshold was considered to be ¥5,000,000, RM was at least cost-neutral relative to the CFU in all elderly patients with pacemakers for bradycardia. The cost-effectiveness of RM relative to CFU could be higher for patients with high CHADS2 scores, especially in patients with a CHADS2 score ≥ 3. Scenario analyses changing the interval between visits to an in-office evaluation in the CFU also demonstrated the same conclusions. In particular, when the interval between office visits was 1 year for the CFU, the RM could be more cost-effective., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that RM can be a cost-effective option for Japanese patients, especially those with high CHADS2 scores and long-term intervals between office visits., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF