Search

Background: To study the association between timing and success of electrical cardioversion (ECV) for the treatment of early recurrences (ERs) of atrial fibrillation post pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on long-term rhythm outcome., Methods: Data of 133 patients ablated for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation receiving ECV for ERs, i.e., atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences within 90 days post ablation were analyzed. During 1-year follow-up, patients were screened for late recurrences (LRs), i.e., recurrences after the blanking period., Results: In 114 patients (85.7%), ECV was successful compared to 19 patients (14.3%) with failed ECV. A higher body mass index (odds ratio (OR) 1.19 (95% CI 1.02-1.39), p = 0.029), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 1.07 (95% CI 0.99-1.15), p = 0.079), and performance of ECV > 7 days from ER onset (OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.01-8.87), p = 0.048) remained independently associated with ECV failure. During 1-year follow-up, the rate of LR was significantly higher among patients with failed ECV as compared to patients with successful ECV (hazard ratio (HR) 3.00 (95% CI, 1.79-5.03), p < 0.001). Patients with ECV performed > 7 days from ER onset had a significantly higher risk of developing LR as compared to patients with ECV performed within ≤ 7 days from ER onset (HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.15-2.62), p = 0.009). Performance of ECV > 7 days from ER onset (HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.16-2.67), p = 0.008) and failed ECV (HR 3.32 (95% CI 1.96-5.64), p < 0.001) remained independently associated with LR., Conclusions: A failed ECV and performance of ECV > 7 days from ER onset were independently associated with LR., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Aims: To investigate the association between catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and mortality as well as hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with HF across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum., Methods and Results: Patients with first-time catheter ablation for AF (ablation group) compared to only medical treated AF patients (no ablation group) were identified from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2005 and 2019. The primary outcome (all-cause mortality/first HF hospitalization) was assessed by Cox regression models in a 1:2 propensity score (PS) matched cohort and pre-specified EF subgroups (preserved EF [≥50%], mildly reduced EF [40-49%], reduced EF [&lt;40%]) of this cohort. A total of 452 patients in the ablation group and 43 766 patients in the no ablation group were identified. After PS matching, 434 patients in the ablation group were compared to 868 patients in the no ablation group. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years (0.0-14.1 years), catheter ablation was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (all-cause mortality/first HF hospitalization) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.94). Results were consistent across all EF subgroups. In HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), catheter ablation was also associated with a lower risk of recurrent HF hospitalization (incidence rate ratio 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.42)., Conclusion: In HF patients across the EF spectrum, catheter ablation for AF was associated with lower risk of the primary outcome (all-cause mortality/first HF hospitalization). This study supports catheter ablation as a treatment option for AF in HF patients, including those with HFpEF., (© 2022 European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: This study evaluates the incidence of procedural complications related to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) to assess the potential feasibility and safety of same-day discharge in a large cohort., Methods: We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data of complications of all patients staying overnight after undergoing AF ablation between 2001 and 2020 at a tertiary center. Using medical records, we analyzed complications occurring intraprocedurally until 6 h postablation and between 6 h postablation and discharge the day after the ablation procedure., Results: In 5414 AF ablations, we identified a total of 108 (2.0%) major complications occurring intraprocedural or before discharge. Most major complications occurred intraprocedurally or within 6 h after the procedure (n = 96, 1.8%). Twelve (0.2%) major complications occurred between 6 h Postablation and discharge. The most common of these major complications were congestive heart failure (n = 6) and transient ischemic attack (TIA, n = 4). During this time span, 61 (1.1%) minor complications occurred. Factors independently associated with major complications intraprocedurally and until discharge were body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m 2 (p = .009), significant valvular disease (p = .001), cardiomyopathy (p < .001), prior stroke or TIA (p = .014), first-time procedure versus repeat procedure (p = .013), cryoablation versus radiofrequency (p < .001), and procedure duration (p < .001)., Conclusion: After AF ablation, very few complications occurred between 6 h postprocedure and discharge the next day. Therefore, same-day discharge is a safe option for a majority of patients., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Cather ablation is known to influence the autonomic nervous system. This study sought to investigate the association of sinus heart rate pre-/post-ablation and recurrences in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)., Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2017, data of 482 patients undergoing their first PVI were included. Sinus heart rate was recorded before (PRE), directly post-ablation (POST) and 3 months post-ablation (3 M). All patients were screened for atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences during the one-year follow-up., Results: In the total study cohort, the mean resting sinus heart rate at PRE [mean 57.9 bpm (95% CI 57.1-58.7 bpm)] increased by over 10 bpm to POST [mean 69.4 bpm (95% CI 68.5-70.3 bpm); p < 0.001] followed by a slight decrease at 3 M [mean 67.3 bpm (95% CI 66.4-68.2 bpm)] but still remaining higher compared to PRE (p < 0.001). This pattern was observed in patients with and without recurrences at POST and 3 M (both p < 0.001 compared to PRE). However, at 3 M the mean sinus heart rate was significantly lower in patients with compared to patients without recurrences (p = 0.031). In this regard, patients with a heart rate change < 11 bpm (PRE to 3 M) or, as an alternative parameter, patients with a heart rate < 60 bpm at 3 M had a significantly higher risk of recurrences compared to the remaining patients (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.82 (95% CI 1.32-2.49), p < 0.001 and HR 1.64 (95% CI 1.20-2.25), p = 0.002, respectively)., Conclusion: Our study confirms the impact of PVI on cardiac autonomic function with a significant sinus heart rate increase post-ablation. Patients with a sinus heart rate change < 11 bpm (PRE to 3 M) are at higher risk for recurrences during one-year post-PVI.

Aims: To investigate the significance of early recurrence (ER) of atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on the development of late recurrence (LR) and to redefine the blanking period during which an ER is considered nonspecific., Methods: Data of 713 patients undergoing their first PVI for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation between January 2012 and December 2017 were included. All patients were followed-up for 12 months according to clinical and outpatient routine and were screened for any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 seconds occurring during the first 3 months postablation (ER) and after the 3 months blanking period (LR)., Results: Patients with ER compared to those without ER had significantly more LR (74.5% vs 16.5% vs, P < .001). The occurrence of ER during the first, second and third months showed increasing LR rates of 35.2%, 67.9%, and 94.8%, respectively (P < .001). Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed a blanking period of 46 days with the highest sensitivity (68.1%) and specificity (96.5%). Later timing and longer time span of ER were independent predictors for LR in multivariable analysis., Conclusion: ER is a strong predictor for LR. Our study advocates a shortening of the post-PVI blanking period followed by a "gray zone" up to 3 months where individualized therapeutic decisions based on additional risk factors should be considered. We suggest that the ER time span might serve as such a predictor identifying patients at the highest risk for LR., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). In this setting, cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as alternative therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF remain a matter of debate., Methods and Results: We searched electronic scientific databases for studies of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Aggregate data were pooled to perform a meta-analysis. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia and procedure-related complications, respectively. A total of 6473 participants from 10 studies (CB, n = 2232 vs. RF, n = 4241) were studied. After a median follow-up of 16 months, the risk of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio, RR 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.90-1.14], P = 0.83) and procedure-related complications (RR [95% CI] = 0.92 [0.66-1.28], P = 0.61) were comparable between CB vs. RF ablation. Cryoballoon ablation led to a higher risk of persistent phrenic nerve palsy (RR [95% CI] = 13.60 [3.87-47.81], P < 0.01) and a lower risk of cardiac tamponade (RR [95% CI] = 0.48 [0.25-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with RF ablation. There was a trend of statistically significant interaction between the type of CB and the duration of ablation (P for interaction = 0.09)., Conclusion: In patients with paroxysmal AF, ablation therapy with CB is associated with efficacy and safety comparable to that of RF. Second-generation CB catheters seem to reduce procedure duration. Further studies are warranted to disclose the impact of second-generation CB catheters compared with RF for ablation of paroxysmal AF., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background The incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) as complication after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has decreased in the last decade. However, as PVI for AF is becoming more prevalent, the incidence remains considerable in absolute terms. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the optimal approach for management of PVS after PVI for AF. Methods and results We searched electronic scientific databases for studies comparing plain balloon angioplasty (BA) versus stenting for PVS after PVI for AF. Aggregate data were pooled to perform a meta-analysis. The primary and secondary outcomes were restenosis requiring repeated intervention and procedure-related complications, respectively. A total of 4 studies, treating 315 PVS in 188 patients (BA, n = 171 versus stent, n = 144 PVS) were considered. After a median follow-up of 32 months, the overall incidence of restenosis was 46%. A percutaneous therapy with BA was associated with a higher risk for restenosis requiring repeat intervention compared to stent (risk ratio — RR, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 2.18 [1.64–2.89], p < 0.001). Procedure-related complications were comparable between BA and stent (RR [95% CI] = 0.96 [0.19–4.96], p = 0.96). The time to diagnosis of PVS after PVI for AF did not modify the treatment effect for the primary outcome with BA versus stent ( p for interaction = 0.16). Conclusions In patients presenting PVS after PVI for AF, a percutaneous therapy with BA is associated with higher risk for restenosis requiring repeat intervention as compared to stent. These percutaneous therapies display comparable safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). In this setting, cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as alternative therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF remain a matter of debate.Methods and Results: We searched electronic scientific databases for studies of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Aggregate data were pooled to perform a meta-analysis. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia and procedure-related complications, respectively. A total of 6473 participants from 10 studies (CB, n = 2232 vs. RF, n = 4241) were studied. After a median follow-up of 16 months, the risk of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio, RR 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.90-1.14], P = 0.83) and procedure-related complications (RR [95% CI] = 0.92 [0.66-1.28], P = 0.61) were comparable between CB vs. RF ablation. Cryoballoon ablation led to a higher risk of persistent phrenic nerve palsy (RR [95% CI] = 13.60 [3.87-47.81], P < 0.01) and a lower risk of cardiac tamponade (RR [95% CI] = 0.48 [0.25-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with RF ablation. There was a trend of statistically significant interaction between the type of CB and the duration of ablation (P for interaction = 0.09).Conclusion: In patients with paroxysmal AF, ablation therapy with CB is associated with efficacy and safety comparable to that of RF. Second-generation CB catheters seem to reduce procedure duration. Further studies are warranted to disclose the impact of second-generation CB catheters compared with RF for ablation of paroxysmal AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]