Search

Background: Scarce data exist on the evolution of device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)., Objectives: This study sought to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of persistent and recurrent DRT in LAAC recipients., Methods: Data were obtained from an international multicenter registry including 237 patients diagnosed with DRT after LAAC. Of these, 214 patients with a subsequent imaging examination after the initial diagnosis of DRT were included. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was defined as either persisting or recurrent DRT., Results: DRT resolved in 153 (71.5%) cases and persisted in 61 (28.5%) cases. Larger DRT size (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.15; P = 0.009) and female (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.12-5.26; P = 0.02) were independently associated with persistent DRT. After DRT resolution, 82 (53.6%) of 153 patients had repeated device imaging, with 14 (17.1%) cases diagnosed with recurrent DRT. Overall, 75 (35.0%) patients had unfavorable evolution of DRT, and the sole predictor was average thrombus size at initial diagnosis (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; P = 0.003), with an optimal cutoff size of 7 mm (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.39-4.52; P = 0.002). Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a higher rate of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT (26.7% vs 15.1%; HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.15-3.94; P = 0.02)., Conclusions: About one-third of DRT events had an unfavorable evolution (either persisting or recurring), with a larger initial thrombus size (particularly >7 mm) portending an increased risk. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a 2-fold higher risk of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Rodés-Cabau holds the Research Chair “Fondation Famille Jacques Larivière” for the Development of Structural Heart Disease Interventions (Laval University, Quebec City, Canada). He also has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific. Dr Maarse has received an unrestricted grant from Boston Scientific. Dr Pérez de Prado has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific. Dr Gupta has served as a proctor for Abbott. Dr Sanchez has served as a speaker and proctor for Boston Scientific. Dr Wang has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Neochord; and received research grant support from Boston Scientific assigned to his employer, the Henry Ford Health System. Dr Demkow has served as a proctor for Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Alkhouli has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Device-related thrombus (DRT) has been considered an Achilles' heel of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, data on DRT prediction remain limited., Objectives: This study constructed a DRT registry via a multicenter collaboration aimed to assess outcomes and predictors of DRT., Methods: Thirty-seven international centers contributed LAAO cases with and without DRT (device-matched and temporally related to the DRT cases). This study described the management patterns and mid-term outcomes of DRT and assessed patient and procedural predictors of DRT., Results: A total of 711 patients (237 with and 474 without DRT) were included. Follow-up duration was similar in the DRT and no-DRT groups, median 1.8 years (interquartile range: 0.9-3.0 years) versus 1.6 years (interquartile range: 1.0-2.9 years), respectively (P = 0.76). DRTs were detected between days 0 to 45, 45 to 180, 180 to 365, and >365 in 24.9%, 38.8%, 16.0%, and 20.3% of patients. DRT presence was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint of death, ischemic stroke, or systemic embolization (HR: 2.37; 95% CI, 1.58-3.56; P < 0.001) driven by ischemic stroke (HR: 3.49; 95% CI: 1.35-9.00; P = 0.01). At last known follow-up, 25.3% of patients had DRT. Discharge medications after LAAO did not have an impact on DRT. Multivariable analysis identified 5 DRT risk factors: hypercoagulability disorder (odds ratio [OR]: 17.50; 95% CI: 3.39-90.45), pericardial effusion (OR: 13.45; 95% CI: 1.46-123.52), renal insufficiency (OR: 4.02; 95% CI: 1.22-13.25), implantation depth >10 mm from the pulmonary vein limbus (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.57-3.69), and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.22-2.97). Following conversion to risk factor points, patients with ≥2 risk points for DRT had a 2.1-fold increased risk of DRT compared with those without any risk factors., Conclusions: DRT after LAAO is associated with ischemic events. Patient- and procedure-specific factors are associated with the risk of DRT and may aid in risk stratification of patients referred for LAAO., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Maarse has received an unrestricted grant from Boston Scientific. Dr Pérez de Prado has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific. Dr Gupta has served as a proctor for Abbott. Dr Sanchez has served as a speaker and proctor for Boston Scientific. Dr Demkow has served as a proctor for Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Alkhouli has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Wang has been a consultant for Edwards LifeSciences, Boston Scientific, and Neochord; and has received research grant support from Boston Scientific assigned to employer Henry Ford health system. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion for stroke and thromboembolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a significant advancement in the field of cardiovascular disease. Prevention and avoidance of the devastating consequences of thromboembolic complications from AF continues to be central in the management of these patients. The role of LAA as a nidus for thrombus formation is well documented. Multiple approaches to exclude the LAA from the circulation either percutaneously or surgically have been described and are undergoing testing. Although pharmacological therapy for stroke prevention remains the cornerstone of treatment, device and surgical exclusion of the LAA have proven to be viable alternatives in carefully selected patients. Even though current evidence show that LAA occlusion is safe and effective, approval and adoption of this strategy has been quite difficult due to paucity of randomised clinical trial data on the risk and benefit ratio, cost effectiveness and the issues of procedural risk as well as longer-term outcome. This review aims to provide an update on the current status of LAA occlusion, specifically looking at interpretation of current clinical data, available techniques and devices, issues with current devices and future direction., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Left atrial appendage device occlusion for the preventions of systemic thromboembolism and stroke represents a major breakthrough in the field of cardiovascular disease. The wide prevalence of atrial fibrillation with devastating consequences of thromboembolic stroke as a result of thrombus arising from the left atrial appendage has led to the development of transcatheter and surgical based occlusion devices. Though this device is yet to be formally approved for a clinical indication in the USA, the WATCHMAN appendage occlusion device remains the most rigorously examined and studied of all transcatheter-based devices in this space. This review will focus on the needs assessment in this space, the technology of the current WATCHMAN device, trials and studies looking at safety and efficacy, specific patient populations who might benefit as well as future perspectives.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. One of its most devastating complication is the development of thromboembolism leading to stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has been shown to be the site of thrombus formation in the majority of strokes associated with AF. Anticoagulation with warfarin has been the treatment of choice for prevention of embolic events in these patients, but it does have significant limitations including bleeding, need for continued follow-up blood tests, and drug-drug interactions. Although newer anticoagulants have been developed, they still have the potential side effect of causing significant bleeding. Closure or exclusion of the LAA has emerged as an alternative therapeutic approach to medical therapy. The aim of this article is to review the anatomy and physiology of the LAA, discuss the various treatment strategies for stroke prevention, review the current devices and technologies available for LAA occlusion, and discuss some of the more recent data available on these technologies., (Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)