1. Vertical Versus Horizontal Training for Improving the Change of Direction Speed in Adult Basketball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Barrera-Domínguez, Francisco J., Martínez-García, Dario, Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel, Chirosa-Ríos, Luís Javier, Almagro, Bartolome J., and Molina-Lopez, Jorge
- Subjects
- *
PSYCHOLOGY of athletes , *MOTOR ability , *BIOMECHANICS , *EXERCISE physiology , *PLYOMETRICS , *STATISTICAL significance , *PHYSICAL training & conditioning , *META-analysis , *MUSCLE strength , *SYSTEMATIC reviews , *MEDLINE , *ATHLETIC ability , *BASKETBALL , *ONLINE information services , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *DATA analysis software , *ADULTS - Abstract
The ability to perform changes of direction (COD) is a complex skill that involves the application of multiple force-orientations, and its execution at maximum speed is crucial in basketball players. The present study aimed to synthesize findings from previous interventions classified according to force-orientation (vertical, horizontal, or mixed) and determine their magnitude of the effect on COD performance in basketball players. A systematic review of the literature was performed in several databases (Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed) following the PRISMA statement and reviewed the quality of the included papers according to the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines Assessment. Sixteen articles with a total of 21 reports were included to analyze the role of force-orientations in COD performance. For the metaanalysis, the standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the chronic changes induced by training and performed an effect size (ES) analysis with a random-effects model. The results showed that all force-orientations generated improvements in COD performance (ES = -0.47 [95% CI -0.57, -0.36], Z = 8.74 [p < 0.01]). It was a mixed force-orientation that produced the greatest changes (ES = -0.91 [95% CI -1.27, -0.55], Z = 4.96 [p < 0.01]), followed by vertical training (ES = -0.45 [95% CI -0.70, -0.20], Z = 3.51 [p < 0.01]). Horizontal training was the least studied and showed the smallest change (ES = -0.10 [95% CI -0.14, -0.07], Z = 5,71 [p < 0.01]). This meta-analysis demonstrates that mixed vertical and horizontally oriented training may be the most optimal because it offers a greater variety of multidirectional stimuli that better prepares the athlete to deal with complex COD in real-game situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF