Search

Purpose: Many adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) who are recommended to take a statin, ezetimibe and/or a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) by the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guideline do not receive these medications. We estimated the percentage of recurrent ASCVD events potentially prevented with guideline-recommended cholesterol-lowering therapy following a myocardial infarction (MI) hospitalization., Methods: We conducted simulations using data from US adults with government health insurance through Medicare or commercial health insurance in the MarketScan database. We used data from patients with an MI hospitalization in 2018-2019 to estimate the percentage receiving guideline-recommended therapy. We used data from patients with an MI hospitalization in 2013-2016 to estimate the 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrent ASCVD events (i.e., MI, coronary revascularization or ischemic stroke). The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction with guideline-recommended therapy was derived from trials of statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9i, and the associated ASCVD risk reduction was estimated from a meta-analysis by the Cholesterol-Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration., Results: Among 279,395 patients with an MI hospitalization in 2018-2019 (mean age 75 years, mean LDL-C 92 mg/dL), 27.3% were receiving guideline-recommended cholesterol-lowering therapy. With current cholesterol-lowering therapy use, 25.3% (95%CI: 25.2%-25.4%) of patients had an ASCVD event over 3 years. If all patients were to receive guideline-recommended therapy, 19.8% (95%CI: 19.5%-19.9%) were estimated to have an ASCVD event over 3 years, representing a 21.6% (95%CI: 20.5%-23.6%) relative risk reduction., Conclusion: Implementation of guideline-recommended cholesterol-lowering therapy could prevent a substantial percentage of recurrent ASCVD events., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Aim: Statin therapy is considered the gold standard for treating hypercholesterolemia. This updated meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a low/moderate-intensity statin in combination with ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)., Methods: A systematic search of two databases (PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL) was conducted from inception to January 2023 and a total of 21 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified and included in the analysis. Data were pooled using Hedges's g and a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model to derive standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cis). The primary outcome studied was the effect of these treatments on lipid parameters and safety events., Results: The results revealed that combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (SMD= - 0.41; CI - 0.63 to - 0.19; P = 0.0002). There was no significant change in the levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), Apo A1, or Apo B. The safety of these treatments was assessed by the following markers alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatine phosphokinase (CK), and a significant difference was only observed in CK (SMD: - 0.81; CI - 1.52 to - 0.10; P = 0.02)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of low/moderate-intensity statin combination therapy significantly reduced LDL-C levels compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy, making it preferable for patients with related risks. However, further trials are encouraged to evaluate potential adverse effects associated with combined therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Aim: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease., Materials and Methods: In this post-hoc subgroup analysis of the RACING trial, patients were analysed based on the presence of MetS. MetS was defined as meeting at least three of the five following criteria: (a) elevated waist circumference; (b) elevated triglycerides; (c) reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; (d) elevated blood pressure; and (e) elevated fasting glucose. The primary outcome was a 3-year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or non-fatal stroke., Results: Of the 3780 patients enrolled in the RACING trial, 1703 (45.1%) had MetS at baseline. The primary outcome rate was 10.1% and 10.3% in patients with MetS receiving ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval = 0.72-1.32; p = .868). Lower rates of intolerance-related drug discontinuation or dose reduction (3.9% vs. 8.0%; p < .001) and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (57 vs. 65 mg/dl; p < .001) were observed with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy. Furthermore, the rate of new-onset diabetes was 18.5% and 19.1% in each group (p = .822). There were no significant interactions between MetS and therapy regarding study outcomes in the total population., Conclusions: In patients with MetS and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, a moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy had comparable cardiovascular benefits with those of high-intensity statin monotherapy. Meanwhile, ezetimibe combination therapy was associated with lower drug intolerance and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, but there was no apparent between-group difference in new-onset diabetes., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Achieving target low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels remains challenging when treating homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are prescribed in addition to statins and ezetimibe, but patients' response varies and depends on residual low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) function., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective observational analysis evaluated LDL-C target achievement in response to PCSK9i treatment in 28 patients with HoFH from the Middle East/North Africa region. Effect of genotype was investigated. Demographic and clinical information was retrospectively obtained from medical records. Patient response to PCSK9i treatment was assessed by calculating percentage changes in lipid levels from pre-PCSK9i treatment baseline to most recent follow-up visit where patients were recorded as receiving PCSK9i on top of standard of care lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs; i.e., statins/ezetimibe) and assessing European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) target achievement up to January 31, 2022. Lowest LDL-C level while receiving PCSK9i was identified., Results: The cohort (n = 28) had a mean age (standard deviation; SD) of 22.8 (9.8) years (n = 28) and was 51% female (n = 27). Baseline LDL-C data were available in 24/28 (85.7%) patients (mean [SD] 14.0 [3.0] mmol/L). Median (interquartile range) duration of PCSK9i treatment was 12.0 months (4.0-19.1) months and mean (SD) % change in LDL-C after PCSK9i treatment was - 8.6% (12.1). LDL-C reduction from baseline was below 15% in 17/24 patients (70.8%). In the full cohort, mean (SD) minimum LDL-C during PCSK9i treatment was 11.9 (2.8; n = 28) mmol/L. No patient achieved EAS target LDL-C while receiving PCSK9i; genotype analysis suggested LDLR-null/null patients were most refractory to PCSK9i., Conclusion: Response to PCSK9i was minimal in this cohort of patients with HoFH. No patients achieved EAS LDL-C targets, and most failed to reach the EAS-recommended 15% LDL-C reduction for PCSK9i therapy continuation. These results suggest additional LLTs are necessary to achieve LDL-C targets in HoFH., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Aim: To assess the implementation of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies among more than 30 000 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a German and Austrian registry from 2020 to 2022., Materials and Methods: Registry data from 2020 and 2021 of 32 170 adult patients (8314 patients with T1D and 23 856 with T2D) were stratified according to the 2019 ESC/EAS risk categories, and guideline-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goal attainment was analysed., Results: In patients with T1D (median age 38.35 [20.51-57.13] years), overall statin use was 19.3%, ezetimibe use was 2.2% and the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors or fibrates was less than 1%. In patients with T2D (median age 68.76 [58.86-78.39] years), 45.7% received statins, 3.4% received ezetimibe, and fibrates and PCSK9 inhibitors were used by 1% and 0.1%, respectively. Among patients with T1D, 6.16% reached their risk-based recommended LDL-C goal of less than 55 mg/dL (very high risk), 10.97% of less than 70 mg/dL (high risk), and 69.50% of less than 100 mg/dL (moderate risk), respectively. In patients with T2D, 11.81% reached their risk-based goal of LDL-C less than 55 mg/dL, 16.25% of less than 70 mg/dL, and 51.33% of less than 100 mg/dL. Non-HDL-C goals were reached more often, with 15.3%, 25.52% and 91.61% in patients with T1D and 18.56%, 17.96% and 82.30% in patients with T2D for very high, high and moderate risk, respectively., Conclusion: Approximately 2 years after publication of the guidelines, LDL-C and non-HDL-C goal attainment was rarely achieved in patients with T1D and T2D with a high or very high cardiovascular risk., (© 2023 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Whether the effect of a combination strategy rather than increasing doses of one drug to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is consistent across baseline LDL-C levels remains uncertain., Methods: In the RACING trial, which showed a non-inferiority of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (rosuvastatin 10 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg) to high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 20 mg) for the primary outcome (3-year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular event, or stroke), the heterogeneity in treatment effect according to baseline LDL-C levels was assessed for the primary and secondary outcomes (clinical efficacy and safety)., Results: Of 3780 participants, 2817 participants (74.5%) had LDL-C <100 mg/dL, and 963 participants (25.5%) had LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL. The treatment effect of combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy was similar among the lower LDL-C subset (8.8% vs. 10.2%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.08, p = 0.19) and the higher LDL-C subset (10.8% vs. 9.6 %; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.7, p = 0.53) without a significant interaction (interaction p = 0.22). Of the secondary outcomes, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year achievement of LDL-C <70 mg/dL was greater in the combination therapy group regardless of baseline LDL-C levels., Conclusions: Among ASCVD patients, there was no heterogeneity in the effect of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy in the higher and lower baseline LDL-C levels for the 3-year composite of cardiovascular outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Byeong-Keuk Kim has received speaker's fees from Medtronic and Abbott Vascular, Myeong-Ki Hong has received speaker's fees from Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Pfizer, Yangsoo Jang has received institutional research grants from Biotronik and Hanmi, and Jung-Sun Kim has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to evaluate sex differences in the effects of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy (rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe) versus high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 20 mg) monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This was a sex-specific subgroup analysis of the RACING trial that evaluated the interaction between sex and treatment strategies for the primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or nonfatal stroke at 3 years). Of 3780 patients in the RACING trial, 954 (25.2%) were women. Regardless of sex, the effect of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy on primary outcome compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy was similar (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98 [0.63-1.52] in women; HR 0.90 [0.71-1.14] in men). The rate of discontinuation or dose reduction of study drugs due to intolerance was lower in the ezetimibe combination group than in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group in both women (4.5% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.014) and men (4.8% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001). LDL cholesterol levels of < 70 mg/dL at 1, 2, and 3 years were more frequently achieved in the ezetimibe combination group than in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group (all P < 0.001) in both sexes. There were no significant interactions between sex and treatment groups regarding the primary outcome, discontinuation, or dose reduction of study drugs, or the proportion of achievement of LDL cholesterol levels < 70 mg/dL. The effect of ezetimibe combination therapy for the 3-year composite outcomes was not different in both men and women. The benefits of ezetimibe combination therapy on LDL cholesterol lowering and drug tolerance were similarly observed regardless of sex.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03044665., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Aims: The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017)., Methods: Patients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal ＜120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal ＜100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal ＜70 mg/dL)., Results: The mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%)., Conclusions: The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.

Aims: In 2019, the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society updated the 2016 guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias recommending more stringent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). Based on a real-world patient population, this study aimed to determine the feasibility and cost of attaining guideline-recommended LDL-C targets, and assess cardiovascular benefit., Methods and Results: The Swiss Diabetes Registry is a multicentre longitudinal observational study of outpatients in tertiary diabetes care. Patients with DM2 and a visit between 1 January 2018 and 31 August 2019 that failed the 2016 LDL-C target were identified. The theoretical intensification of current lipid-lowering medication needed to reach the 2016 and 2019 LDL-C target was determined and the cost thereof extrapolated. The expected number of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) prevented by treatment intensification was estimated. Two hundred and ninety-four patients (74.8%) failed the 2016 LDL-C target. The percentage of patients that theoretically achieved the 2016 and 2019 target with the indicated treatment modifications were high-intensity statin, 21.4% and 13.3%; ezetimibe, 46.6% and 27.9%; proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i), 30.6% and 53.7%; ezetimibe and PCSK9i, 1.0% and 3.1%; whereas one (0.3%) and five patients (1.7%) failed to reach target, respectively. Achieving the 2016 vs. 2019 target would reduce the estimated 4-year MACE from 24.9 to 18.6 vs. 17.4 events, at an additional annual cost of medication of 2140 Swiss francs (CHF) vs. 3681 CHF per patient, respectively., Conclusions: For 68% of the patients, intensifying statin treatment and/or adding ezetimibe would be sufficient to reach the 2016 target, whereas 57% would require cost-intensive PCSK9i therapy to reach the 2019 target, with limited additional medium-term cardiovascular benefit., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests: H.S. has received honoraria for attending an Advisory Board Meeting for AstraZeneca. R.L. has received honoraria for talks and attended invited Advisory Board Meetings for Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sanofi. S.B. has received honoraria for talks and attended invited Advisory Board Meetings for Amgen, Bayer, Daichii-Sankyo, Novartis, NovoNordisk, and Sanofi. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Purpose of Review: It is clear from epidemiological studies that patients at high and very-high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) risk do not reach lipid guideline-recommended targets. Thus, fixed-dose combinations of statins/ezetimibe, bempedoic acid/ezetimibe and statins/fibrates may represent a further armamentarium in the field of lipid-lowering approaches in these individuals., Recent Findings: The combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe is not inferior to high-intensity statin monotherapy in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. Drug discontinuation or dose reduction is inferior with fixed-dose combination. The fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe is superior to bempedoic acid in monotherapy in lowering LDL-C and in reducing high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. The combination fenofibrate with atorvastatin is superior to monotherapies in lowering triglycerides. Lipid-lowering fixed-dose combinations may guarantee a higher therapy adherence, representing a better approach to control plasma lipids and thus ameliorate ASCVD burden. Additional studies will define the advantages on cardiovascular outcomes in high and very high-risk patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab, a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor, compared with ezetimibe, both added to background statin therapy in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events (in the past 12 months) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥ 100 mg/dL in China., Methods: A health economic evaluation was performed from a Chinese healthcare perspective, using a Markov model over a lifetime horizon based on a baseline cardiovascular (CV) event rate from claims database data and efficacy from the FOURIER trial. The health benefit was reflected in the decrease of LDL-C level, which led to a decrease of cardiovascular events. The costs of cardiovascular events and the utility value of each health state were derived from the published literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of uncertainty in parameters and the robustness of the model. The cost-effectiveness of evolocumab was also explored in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI), at very high risk (VHR) of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and homozygous familiar hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)., Results: In patients with recent ACS, evolocumab was associated with incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 1.33 and incremental costs of 115,782 yuan versus ezetimibe, both with background statin therapy, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 87,050 yuan per QALY gained. The probability of evolocumab + statins being cost-effective at a threshold of 217,341 yuan (three times per capita GDP, 2020), compared with ezetimibe + statins, was 100% in patients with recent ACS, recent MI, VHR ASCVD, and HoFH., Conclusion: Compared with ezetimibe + statins, the combination of evolocumab + statins was found to be cost-effective at a threshold of 217,341 yuan (three times per capita GDP, 2020) in patients with recent ACS events in China., (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Dyslipidemia has been widely recognized as a significant risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis disease (CAD). In fact, lipid variability has emerged as a more reliable predictor of cardiovascular events. In this study, we aimed to examine the variability in plasma lipids under two different lipid-lowering regimens (intensive statin therapy versus the combination of conventional-dose statins with ezetimibe). In total, we have retrospectively examined 1275 patients with CAD from January 2009 to April 2019 and divided them into two groups: intensive statin group and conventional-dose statins combined with ezetimibe group. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Lipid variability was verified by standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and variability independent of mean (VIM) triple methods. Multiple linear regression and subgroup analyses were performed. In the overall participants, the mean age was 62.3 ± 10.4 years old, and 72.8% were male. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that the intensive statin group had lower variability in terms of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in all SD, CV, and VIM triple methods than statins combined with ezetimibe group (P for all <0.05). Similar results were established in the subgroup analyses based on atorvastatin or rosuvastatin, diabetes mellitus or not, and hypertension or not (P for all < 0.05). Thus, we can conclude that intensive statin therapy could contribute in lowering lipid variability than conventional-dose statins combined with ezetimibe therapy among patients with CAD.

Importance: High-intensity statin is strongly recommended in patients at very high risk (VHR) of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, concerns about statin-associated adverse effects result in underuse of this strategy in practice., Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of a moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination in VHR and non-VHR patients with ASCVD., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc analysis of the Randomized Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lipid Lowering With Statin Monotherapy vs Statin/Ezetimibe Combination for High-Risk Cardiovascular Disease (RACING) open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted from February 2017 to December 2018 at 26 centers in Korea. Study participants included patients with documented ASCVD. Data were analyzed from April to June 2022., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (rosuvastatin, 10 mg, with ezetimibe, 10 mg) or high-intensity statin monotherapy (rosuvastatin, 20 mg). Patients at VHR for ASCVD were defined according to the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the 3-year outcome of cardiovascular death, coronary or peripheral revascularization, hospitalization of cardiovascular events, or nonfatal stroke., Results: A total of 3780 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [10] years; 2826 male [75%]) in the RACING trial, 1511 (40.0%) were categorized as VHR, which was associated with a greater occurrence of the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.75). There was no significant difference in the primary end point between those who received combination therapy and high-intensity statin monotherapy among patients with VHR disease (11.2% vs 11.7%; HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71-1.30) and non-VHR disease (7.7% vs 8.7%; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66-1.18). The median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level was significantly lower in the combination therapy group than in the high-intensity statin group (VHR, 1 year: 57 [47-71] mg/dL vs 65 [53-78] mg/dL; non-VHR, 1 year: 58 mg/dL vs 68 mg/dL; P < .001). Furthermore, in both the VHR and non-VHR groups, combination therapy was associated with a significantly greater mean change in LDL-C level (VHR, 1 year: -19.1 mg/dL vs -10.1 mg/dL; 2 years: -22.3 mg/dL vs -13.0 mg/dL; 3 years: -18.8 mg/dL vs -9.7 mg/dL; non-VHR, 1 year: -23.7 mg/dL vs -12.5 mg/dL; 2 years: -25.2 mg/dL vs -15.1 mg/dL; 3 years: -23.5 mg/dL vs -12.6 mg/dL; all P < .001) and proportion of patients with LDL-C level less than 70 mg/dL (VHR, 1 year: 73% vs 58%; non-VHR, 1 year: 72% vs 53%; P < .001). Discontinuation or dose reduction of the lipid-lowering drug due to intolerance occurred less frequently in the combination therapy group (VHR, 4.6% vs 7.7%; P = .02; non-VHR, 5.0% vs 8.7%; P = .001)., Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that the outcomes of ezetimibe combination observed in the RACING trial were consistent among patients at VHR of ASCVD., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03044665.

Pharmacological reduction of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major treatment strategy in limiting atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) risk. Statins remain the primary therapeutic cornerstone in ASCVD prevention. Furthermore, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and PCSK9 inhibition have recently also shown to reduce cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, a treatment gap remains between guideline-recommended LDL-C goals and what is achieved in real-world practice. An important reason for this is the limited use of novel and effective non-statin lipid-lowering therapies. In order to achieve LDL-C treatment goals and, ultimately, reduction of cardiovascular events, a combination lipid-lowering therapy needs to be considered as the standard of care for patients at very high cardiovascular risk., Competing Interests: D. Sinning hat Vortrags- bzw. Beratungshonorare von Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis und Berlin-Chemie Menarini erhalten. U. Landmesser hat Vortrags- bzw. Beratungshonorare von Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Medicines Company, Bayer, NovoNordisc und Berlin-Chemie Menarini erhalten., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a likely causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve disease, confirmed by Mendelian randomization. With reliable assays, it has been established that Lp(a) is linearly associated with ASCVD. Current low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapies do not or minimally lower Lp(a). This review focuses on the clinical importance and therapeutic consequences of Lp(a) measurement., Recent Findings: Development of RNA-based Lp(a) lowering therapeutics has positioned Lp(a) as one of the principal residual risk factors to target in the battle against lipid-driven ASCVD risk. Pelacarsen, which is a liver-specific antisense oligonucleotide, has shown Lp(a) reductions up to 90% and its phase 3 trial is currently underway. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA targeting LPA messenger RNA, which is being investigated in phase 2 and has already shown dose-dependent Lp(a) reductions up to 90%., Summary: Lp(a) should be measured in every patient at least once to identify patients with very high Lp(a) levels. These patients could benefit from Lp(a) lowering therapies when approved. In the meantime, therapy in high Lp(a) patients should focus on further reducing LDL-C and other ASCVD risk factors., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

This review aims to examine the complex interaction between dyslipidemia, platelet function, and related drug treatments. In particular, the manuscript provides an overview of the effects of major hypolipidemic drugs on platelet function. Indeed, growing evidence supports the view that statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran, and icosapent ethyl also act as antithrombotics. It is known that platelets play a key role not only in the acute phase of coronary syndromes but also in the early phase of atherosclerotic plaque formation. The goal of cholesterol-lowering therapy is to reduce cardiovascular events. The direct effects of cholesterol-lowering drugs are widely described in the literature. Lowering LDL-c (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) by 1 mmol/L results in a 22-23% reduction in cardiovascular risk. Numerous studies have examined the direct antithrombotic effects of these drugs on platelets, endothelium, monocytes, and smooth muscle cells, and thus, potentially independent of blood LDL-cholesterol reduction. We reviewed in vitro and in vivo studies evaluating the complex interaction between hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, platelet function, and related drug treatments. First, we discussed the role of statins in modulating platelet activation. Discontinuation of statin therapy was associated with increased cardiovascular events with increased ox-LDL, P-selectin, and platelet aggregation. The effect of PCSK9-I (inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, PCSK9 involved in the degradation of LDL receptors in the liver) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in platelet reactivity, calculated in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), in the first 14 days and no difference at 30 days compared to placebo. Finally, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, the REDUCE-IT study showed that icosapent ethyl (an ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid that reduces triglyceride synthesis and improves triglyceride clearance) resulted in a 25% reduction in ischemic events and cardiovascular death. However, to date, there is not yet clear clinical evidence that the direct antithrombotic effects of the drugs may have a beneficial impact on outcomes independently from the reduction in LDL-C or triglycerides.

Nearly two-thirds of individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) do not reach target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol despite statin therapy. Three novel lipid-lowering therapies have proven to further reduce ASCVD beyond statins, including: ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), and icosapent ethyl. This study evaluated the use of these three agents in 728,423 individuals with ASCVD from 89 US health systems from 01/2018 through 03/2021 using the electronic health record. As of 2021, only 6.0% of ASCVD patients were on ezetimibe, 1.6% were on a PCSK9i, and 1.3% on icosapent ethyl, with utilization only marginally increasing over the study period. Addressing the underutilization of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention is a critical step in improving the treatment gap of patients with residual risk of ASCVD., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Almost one third of U.S. adults have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increasing their risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Multisociety Cholesterol Management Guideline recommends maximally tolerated statin for those at increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk and add-on therapies (ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors) in those at very high risk and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥70 mg/dL. Prescription fill trends are unknown., Methods: Using national outpatient retail prescription data from the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2022, authors determined counts of patients who filled low-, moderate-, or high-intensity statins alone and with add-on therapies. The overall percentage change and joinpoint regression were used to assess trends. Analyses were conducted in March 2022-May 2022., Results: During the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2022, patients filling a statin increased by 25.0%, with the greatest increase in high-intensity statins (64.1%, range=6.6-10.9 million). Low-intensity statins decreased by 29.2% (range=3.3-2.4 million). Concurrent fills of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe rose by 210% to 579,012 patients by the first quarter of 2022, with an increase in slope by the first quarter of 2019 for all statin intensities (p<0.01). Concurrent fills of a statin and PCSK9 inhibitor increased to 2,629, 16,169, and 28,651 by the first quarter of 2022 for low-, moderate-, and high-intensity statins, respectively. For patients on all statin intensities and PCSK9 inhibitor, there were statistically significant increases in slope in the second quarter of 2019 and decreases in the first quarter of 2020., Conclusions: Patients filling moderate- and high-intensity statins and add-on ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors have increased, indicating uptake of guideline-concordant lipid-lowering therapies. Improvements in the initiation and continuity of these therapies are important for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aims: This study evaluated the effect of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy vs. high-intensity statin monotherapy among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)., Methods and Results: This was a pre-specified, stratified subgroup analysis of the DM cohort in the RACING trial. The primary outcome was a 3-year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or non-fatal stroke. Among total patients, 1398 (37.0%) had DM at baseline. The incidence of the primary outcome was 10.0% and 11.3% among patients with DM randomized to ezetimibe combination therapy vs. high-intensity statin monotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.89; 95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.22; P = 0.460). Intolerance-related discontinuation or dose reduction of the study drug was observed in 5.2% and 8.7% of patients in each group, respectively (P = 0.014). LDL cholesterol levels <70 mg/dL at 1, 2, and 3 years were observed in 81.0%, 83.1%, and 79.9% of patients in the ezetimibe combination therapy group, and 64.1%, 70.2%, and 66.8% of patients in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group (all P < 0.001). In the total population, no significant interactions were found between DM status and therapy regarding primary outcome, intolerance-related discontinuation or dose reduction, and the proportion of patients with LDL cholesterol levels <70 mg/dL., Conclusion: Ezetimibe combination therapy effects observed in the RACING trial population are preserved among patients with DM. This study supports moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy as a suitable alternative to high-intensity statins if the latter cannot be tolerated, or further reduction in LDL cholesterol is required among patients with DM and ASCVD., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier:NCT03044665., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.C.Y. is a chief technical officer of PHI Digital Healthcare and has received consulting fee from IQVIA; B.-K.K. has received speaker’s fees from Medtronic and Abbott Vascular; M.-K.H. has received speaker’s fees from Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Pfizer, Y.J. has received institutional research grants from Biotronik and Hanmi, and J.-S.K. has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events can be prevented, or treated, using statin therapy, either alone or in combination with ezetimibe. Chronic inflammation, vascular proliferation, and the development of atherosclerosis are also influenced by 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-OHC). The aim of the study was to compare the direct pleiotropic effects of two commonly-used statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin), ezetimibe, and their combinations, on the mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory IL1β, IL-18 and IL-23 and anti-inflammatory TGFβ, IL-35 (EBI3, IL-12 subunits), IL-10 and IL-37, in endothelial cells damaged by 25-OHC. It also analyzed IL-35 expression at the protein level. HUVECs were stimulated with atorvastatin (5 μM), rosuvastatin (10 μM), ezetimibe (1.22 μM), atorvastatin-ezetimibe (5 μM + 1.22 μM) or rosuvastatin-ezetimibe (10 μM + 1.22 μM), with or without pre-incubation with 10 μg/mL 25-OHC. mRNA expression was analyzed by real-time PCR. The protein level of IL-35 was analyzed by ELISA. In the pre-stimulated HUVECs, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin decreased mRNA expression of IL1β, IL-18, IL-23, TGFβ, IL35 and increased mRNA expression of IL-10 and IL-37 compared to 25-OHC. Furthermore, only incubation with rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin-ezetimibe decreased IL-35 mRNA and protein levels. Ezetimibe down-regulated only IL1β. Treatment with rosuvastatin-ezetimibe and atorvastatin-ezetimibe reversed the effect of 25-OHC in IL1β, IL-18 and IL-35 mRNA expression. In conclusion, rosuvastatin has the strongest anti-inflammatory effects and is the best at reducing the effect of oxysterols. Both statins exert a greater anti-inflammatory effect than ezetimibe. The anti-inflammatory effect of the combination therapies appears to be based on the effects of the statins alone and not their combination with ezetimibe., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Woźniak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Purpose: Adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are recommended high-intensity statins, with those at very high risk for recurrent events recommended adding ezetimibe and/or a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor if their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is ≥70 mg/dL. We estimated the number of recurrent ASCVD events potentially averted if all adults in the United States (US) ≥45 years of age with ASCVD achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL., Methods: The number of US adults with ASCVD and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL was estimated from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2016 (n = 596). The 10-year cumulative incidence of recurrent ASCVD events was estimated from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study (n = 5390), weighted to the US population by age, race, and sex. The ASCVD risk reduction by achieving an LDL-C <70 mg/dL was estimated from meta-analyses of lipid-lowering treatment trials., Results: Overall, 14.7 (95% CI, 13.7-15.8) million US adults had ASCVD, of whom 11.6 (95% CI, 10.6-12.5) million had LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL. The 10-year cumulative incidence of ASCVD events was 24.3% (95% CI, 23.2-25.6%). We projected that 2.823 (95% CI, 2.543-3.091) million ASCVD events would occur over 10 years among US adults with ASCVD and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL. Overall, 0.634 (95% CI, 0.542-0.737) million ASCVD events could potentially be averted if all US adults with ASCVD achieved and maintained LDL-C <70 mg/dL., Conclusion: A substantial number of recurrent ASCVD events could be averted over 10 years if all US adults with ASCVD achieved, and maintained, an LDL-C <70 mg/dL., (© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Atherosclerotic heart disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the USA. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) has been the target for many hypolipidemic agents to modify atherosclerotic risk. Bempedoic acid is a novel hypolipidemic drug that inhibits the enzymatic activity of ATP citrate lyase in the cholesterol synthesis pathway. CLEAR Harmony, CLEAR Wisdom, CLEAR Tranquillity and CLEAR Serenity have shown safety and efficacy associated with long term administration of this drug. Studies have shown effectiveness in reducing LDL-C in both statin intolerant patients and in patients on maximally tolerated doses of statin. The fixed drug combination of bempedoic acid and ezetimibe in a recent phase III showed significant reduction in LDL compared with placebo, which might be a promising future for LDL reduction among statin intolerant patients. Bempedoic acid also reduced inflammatory markers like hs-CRP. Given these results, bempedoic acid alone and in combination with ezetimibe received the USA FDA approval for adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We present a comprehensive review exploring the underlying mechanism, pre-clinical studies, and clinical trials of bempedoic acid and discuss the potential future role of the drug in treating hyperlipidaemia.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a known risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Per the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guidelines, high-risk ASCVD patients with CKD and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels  ≥ $\ge $  70 mg/dL should take a high-intensity statin with ezetimibe and/or a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i)., Objective/methods: We examined the changes in use of lipid lowering therapies (LLT) over two years in 3304 patients with ASCVD and CKD in the Getting to an imprOved Understanding of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Dyslipidemia Management (GOULD) observational cohort study., Results: Of those with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , 21.6% (171/791) had intensification of LLT while 10.4% (82/791) had de-escalation of LLT. Notably, 61.6% (487/791) had no change in LLT regimen over 2 years. Statin use was 83.2% (785/944) at baseline and 80.1% (634/791) at 2 years. Statin/ezetimibe use increased from 2.9% (27/944) to 4.9% (39/791). Statin discontinuation at 2 years was greater with lower eGFR levels across all cohorts., Conclusion: Despite the recommendations of multiscociety guidelines, statin use, while high, is not ubiquitous and rates of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe use remain low in patients with CKD. There remains a significant opportunity to optimize LLT and achieve atheroprotective cholesterol levels in the CKD population., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Background: Lipoprotein(a) is a presumed risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA that reduces lipoprotein(a) synthesis in the liver., Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial involving patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a lipoprotein(a) concentration of more than 150 nmol per liter. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four doses of olpasiran (10 mg every 12 weeks, 75 mg every 12 weeks, 225 mg every 12 weeks, or 225 mg every 24 weeks) or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously. The primary end point was the percent change in the lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 (reported as the placebo-adjusted mean percent change). Safety was also assessed., Results: Among the 281 enrolled patients, the median concentration of lipoprotein(a) at baseline was 260.3 nmol per liter, and the median concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 67.5 mg per deciliter. At baseline, 88% of the patients were taking statin therapy, 52% were taking ezetimibe, and 23% were taking a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. At 36 weeks, the lipoprotein(a) concentration had increased by a mean of 3.6% in the placebo group, whereas olpasiran therapy had significantly and substantially reduced the lipoprotein(a) concentration in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in placebo-adjusted mean percent changes of -70.5% with the 10-mg dose, -97.4% with the 75-mg dose, -101.1% with the 225-mg dose administered every 12 weeks, and -100.5% with the 225-mg dose administered every 24 weeks (P&lt;0.001 for all comparisons with baseline). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across the trial groups. The most common olpasiran-related adverse events were injection-site reactions, primarily pain., Conclusions: Olpasiran therapy significantly reduced lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Longer and larger trials will be necessary to determine the effect of olpasiran therapy on cardiovascular disease. (Funded by Amgen; OCEAN[a]-DOSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04270760.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: D.P. received speaker’s fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work. M.V. reports personal fees for speaker bureau and/or consulting in Advisory Board from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Menarini Int, MSD, Novartis Pharma, and Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work.

Source Citation: Kim BK, Hong SJ, Lee YJ, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (RACING): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 202;400:380-90. 35863366.

We aim to estimate the number and proportion of very-high risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) who would be able to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL with various lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), including statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and evinacumab, using a Monte Carlo simulation model described previously. With current treatment options for LDL-C lowering, including statin, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and PCSK9 inhibitors, it was estimated that most very-high risk patients with ASCVD (99.1%) were able to achieve the LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL. Nevertheless, approximately 88,715 patients in the USA were estimated to not be able to achieve the LDL-C goal after current available LLTs, thus remaining at elevated risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. Evinacumab may be useful to address such unmet needs effectively, as the majority of those not at goal after PCSK9 inhibitors could achieve the goal of <70 mg/dL after taking evinacumab., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest J.G., R.J.S., and S.F. are employees of and stockholders in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. A.C. is an employee of Axtria. R.S.R. reports grants and/or personal fees for scientific advisory board participation from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen, Arrowhead, CRISPER Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, and Precision BioSciences; honoraria for non-promotional speaking from Amgen and Kowa; royalties from UpToDate; and stock holdings in MediMergent, LLC., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Aims: The LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals recommended by the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines are only achieved in a minority of patients. The study objective was to estimate the impact of bempedoic acid treatment on LDL-C target attainment, drug costs, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. The simulation used a Monte Carlo approach in a representative cohort of German outpatients at high or very-high cardiovascular risk. Additionally to statins, consecutive treatment with ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and a PCSK9 inhibitor was simulated in patients not achieving their LDL-C goal. Considered were scenarios without and with bempedoic acid (where bempedoic acid was replaced by a PCSK9 inhibitor when LDL-C was not controlled)., Results: The simulation cohort consisted of 105,577 patients, of whom 76,900 had very-high and 28,677 high cardiovascular risk. At baseline, 11.2% of patients achieved their risk-based LDL-C target. Sequential addition of ezetimibe and bempedoic acid resulted in target LDL-C in 33.1% and 61.9%, respectively. Treatment with bempedoic acid reduced the need for a PCSK9 inhibitor from 66.6% to 37.8% and reduced drug costs by 35.9% per year on stable lipid-lowering medication. Compared to using only statins and ezetimibe, this approach is projected to prevent additional 6,148 ASCVD events annually per 1 million patients, whereas PCSK9 inhibition alone would prevent 7,939 additional ASCVD events annually., Conclusions: A considerably larger proportion of cardiovascular high- and very-high-risk patients can achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals with escalated lipid-lowering medication. Bempedoic acid is projected to substantially decrease the need for PCSK9 inhibitor treatment to achieve LDL-C targets, associated with reduced drug costs albeit with fewer prevented events., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: JLK has received consulting fees and travel grants from Daiichi Sankyo. CB and AB are employees of Daiichi Sankyo. UL has received speaker honoraria from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Sanofi. The company Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH is marketing authorisation holder of Nilemdo® and Nustendi® in the UK, European Economic Area, and Switzerland. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The company IQVIA Germany (https://www.iqvia.com/de-de/locations/germany) provided and analysed the data which are presented in this analysis. The data can be obtained from IQVIA on request.

The last 50 years have experienced a rapid evolution in the development of lipid-lowering agents to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. This significant advance in medicine has not occurred without debate. Whether lowering blood cholesterol levels was beneficial has remained one of the most controversial issues during the past 50 years. The discovery of statins was the revolution that made it possible to delay and stop the progression of the atherosclerotic process resulting in improved health and longevity for millions of people. To date, statins remain the drugs of choice for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Despite their use, the risk of cardiovascular events persists. Therefore, the use of non-statin drugs, such as ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors, in combination with statins has been shown to further reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. This review aims to summarize the advances in the field of lipid-lowering therapies over the past 50 years, focusing on advances in the development of drug therapies up to and including gene silencing or gene editing treatments that are expected in the near future.

Aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by high serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C), tendon and skin xanthomas, and premature coronary artery disease (CAD). In Japan, detailed information on the current status of drug therapies for patients with FH has not been reported so far, and their efficacy and safety have not been clarified. After the introduction of ezetimibe, which can further reduce serum LDL-C levels on top of statins, the changes of management for FH patients with these drugs are of particular interest. The current study aimed to evaluate the clinical status of FH heterozygotes and homozygotes, especially focusing on the real-world lipid-lowering drug therapy, attained serum LDL-C levels, and cardiovascular events at registration and during the follow-up., Methods: The FAME Study enrolled 762 heterozygous (including 17 newly diagnosed cases) and 7 homozygous FH patients from hospitals and clinics nationwide. Diagnosis of FH was based upon the criteria defined in the Study Report in 2008 of the Research Committee on Primary Hyperlipidemia supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Data analysis was primarily carried on heterozygous FH patients., Results: Xanthoma or thickening of the Achilles tendon was observed in more than 80% of the patients. CAD was recorded in 23% of patients. Patients with parental and sibling CAD accounted for 47% and 24%, respectively. At baseline, patients without CAD who had LDL-C ＜100 mg/dL accounted for 12.3% and those with CAD who had attained the target (LDL-C ＜70 mg/dL) in the secondary prevention accounted for only 1.8%. In the multiple logistic analysis, male sex, age ＞40, heterozygous FH score ＞20, hypertension, and sibling CAD were significantly and positively associated with prevalent CAD, whereas serum HDL-cholesterol levels showed a significant inverse association with CAD. Patients treated with statin alone, statin＋ezetimibe, statin＋resin, or statin＋probucol accounted for 31.1%, 26.3%, 4.0%, and 3.7%, respectively. Patients treated with three-drug combination (statin＋ezetimibe＋resin or statin＋ezetimibe＋probucol) accounted for 7.5%. Statins and ezetimibe were used in 88.0% and 48.0% at the baseline, respectively. Although high-intensity statins were mainly prescribed, statin doses were much lower than those reported in Western countries. The addition of ezetimibe resulted in ~20% reduction in serum LDL-C. CAD was diagnosed in 17 patients with 21 episodes during follow-up. The Cox hazard model analysis demonstrated that male sex, CAD at the baseline, and parental CAD were related to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Furthermore, an increase in serum HDL-C was associated with a significant reduction of ASCVD events, while serum LDL-C and triglyceride levels were not related to ASCVD events., Conclusion: The prevalence of CAD in Japanese patients with heterozygous FH is still very high. In most of the cases, the target level of serum LDL-C was not achieved for primary and secondary prevention of CAD, suggesting that a more aggressive LDL-C lowering and appropriate management of residual risks are necessary.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most frequent cause of death in Austria. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines recommend intensive lipid lowering therapy (LLT) in patients at high or very high CV risk. Lipid management and achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in Austria have not recently been assessed., Methods: Subgroup analysis for Austria of a European 18 country, cross-sectional, observational study. Patients received LLT for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP). Data including LLT in the preceding 12 months and most recent LDL‑C were collected during a single visit between June 2017 and November 2018. Achievement of the risk-based 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL‑C goal while receiving stabilized LLT was assessed., Results: A total of 293 patients were enrolled from 8 Austrian sites, of which 200 (PP = 104, SP = 96) received stabilized LLT at the LDL‑C measurement date. Overall, 58% (71% PP, 43% SP) and 38% (52% PP, 23% SP) achieved the risk-based 2016 and 2019 goals, respectively. Most patients received moderate-intensity statin monotherapy (46%), while 34% used high-intensity statin monotherapy. Combination therapy of moderate/high-intensity statin with ezetimibe (12%), or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors with statin ± ezetimibe (1%), was used infrequently., Conclusion: The current Austrian routine lipid management using mainly moderate-intensity or high-intensity statin monotherapy is insufficient to attain ESC/EAS guideline goals, in particular the more stringent 2019 recommendations, a situation comparable to other participating European countries. In addition to switching to and optimizing doses of high-intensity statins, a combination with ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors will be needed in many cases., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Several randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering by using statins, including high-doses of strong statins, reduced the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, among the eight RCTs which investigated the effect of statins vs. placebos on the development of CVD, 56-79% of patients had the residual CVD risk after the trials. In three RCTs which investigated the effect of a high dose vs. a usual dose of statins on the development of CVD, 78-87% of patients in the high-dose statin arms still had the CVD residual risk after the trials. An analysis of the characteristics of patients in the RCTs suggests that elevated triglyceride (TG) and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), the existence of obesity/insulin resistance, and diabetes may be important metabolic factors which determine the statin residual CVD risk. To understand the association between lipid abnormalities and the development of atherosclerosis, we show the profile of lipoproteins and their normal metabolism, and the molecular and biological mechanisms for the development of atherosclerosis by high TG and/or low HDL-C in insulin resistance. The molecular biological mechanisms for the statin residual CVD risk include an increase of atherogenic lipoproteins such as small dense LDL and remnants, vascular injury and remodeling by inflammatory cytokines, and disturbed reverse cholesterol transport. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) agonists improve atherogenic lipoproteins, reverse the cholesterol transport system, and also have vascular protective effects, such as an anti-inflammatory effect and the reduction of the oxidative state. Ezetimibe, an inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol absorption, also improves TG and HDL-C, and reduces intestinal cholesterol absorption and serum plant sterols, which are increased by statins and are atherogenic, possibly contributing to reduce the statin residual CVD risk.

Atherosclerotic disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Much of atherosclerotic disease initiation and progression is driven by dyslipidemia. With the advent of statins, ezetimibe, and more recently the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, physicians across all specialties have access to an armamentarium to address this major pathophysiological driver. Nevertheless, there is still a large unmet need in terms of optimizing pharmacotherapeutic lipid lowering strategies. This article will review the evidence pertaining to the major lipid-lowering agents that have been introduced lately, or still are under development, after the advent of statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors. There is cumulating evidence suggesting that there soon will be a broad specter of differential therapies across a variety of mechanistic pathways that will enter clinical medicine. Knowledge about these potential recent advances and various upcoming therapeutic options will make choice easier for physicians, and will lead to more personalized selections of available treatments.

Purpose: Interest in improving residual cardiovascular (CV) risk by targeting multiple causative pathways has been growing. Several medications including icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe have been shown to individually improve outcomes in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond conventional therapy consisting of aspirin and statins. While each drug has been shown to individually improve outcomes, the expected treatment benefit of the combined use of these drugs for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD is not known., Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated the aggregate treatment effect of comprehensive medical therapy consisting of icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe added to background aspirin and statin therapy through established methods of indirect comparisons of the results of three key clinical trials (REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179], COMPASS [n = 27,395], and IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144]). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included each individual component of the primary endpoint., Results: The hazard ratio (HR) of the imputed aggregate treatment effects for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD with comprehensive disease modifying therapy compared to aspirin and statin alone for the primary endpoint was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61). The HR for CV death was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), non-fatal MI was 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69), and non-fatal stroke was 0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses., Conclusion: The estimated aggregate treatment effect of enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD through comprehensive medical therapy is substantial. This exploratory analysis supports further study of comprehensive therapy to reduce residual CV risk for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.

Background: Sitosterolemia is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by phytosterol accumulation in the blood and tissues. However, the detailed clinical and genetic spectra are lacking., Objective: To describe and compare the clinical, biochemical, genetic, therapeutic, and follow-up characteristics of 55 pediatric and five adult sitosterolemia patients., Methods: Clinical, genetic and therapeutic data from 60 patients at Xinhua Hospital from January 2016 to June 2021 were retrospectively collected., Results: Pediatric patients' manifestations included xanthomas(93%), hematological disorders(30%), arthralgia(24%), splenomegaly(11%), atherosclerosis(10%). Adult patients had symptoms such as atherosclerosis(5/5), xanthomas(4/5), hematological disorders(3/5), arthralgia(3/5), splenomegaly(3/5). Elevated total cholesterol(TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) were observed in 96% patients (pediatric 98%, adult 3/4), and phytosterol levels in 100% patients. The age of onset was also negatively correlated with blood TC (P < 0.0001, r = -0.5548) and LDL-C (P = 0.0001, r = -0.4859) levels. Targeted treatments resulted in symptomatic remission(pediatric 96%, adult 4/5), and significantly decreased lipid and phytosterol levels(all P<0.05). In the dietary-therapy cohort(n=34), blood lipid levels decreased(all P<0.05). In the 13 pediatric patients from the dietary-therapy cohort who switched from dietary to combination therapy with ezetimibe, dietary therapy decreased TC and LDL-C levels by 54% and 52%, and ezetimibe further decreased them by 18% and 20%, respectively. Further, we identified 15 novel ABCG5/ABCG8 variants., Conclusions: This study expands the clinical and genetic spectra of sitosterolemia. The low-phytosterol diet is the cornerstone of sitosterolemia treatment. Ezetimibe can further decrease blood lipid levels and increase daily dietary phytosterol tolerance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains an important contributor of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD is recognized as an important risk enhancer that identifies patients as candidates for more intensive low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering. However, there is controversy regarding the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapy, especially in patients on dialysis. Among patients with CKD, not yet on dialysis, there is clinical trial evidence for the use of statins with or without ezetimibe to reduce ASCVD events. Newer cholesterol lowering agents have been introduced for the management of hyperlipidemia to reduce ASCVD, but these therapies have not been tested in the CKD population except in secondary analyses of patients with primarily CKD stage 3. This review summarizes the role of hyperlipidemia in ASCVD and treatment strategies for hyperlipidemia in the CKD population.

Background Statin-mediated efficacy of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol varies in each individual, and its diminished response is associated with worse outcomes. However, there is no established approach to predict hyporesponse to statins. PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subxilisin/kexin type 9) is a serine-protease associated with LDL metabolism, which circulates as mature and furin-cleaved PCSK9. Since mature PCSK9 more potently degrades the LDL receptor, its evaluation may enable the identification of statin hyporesponders. Methods and Results We analyzed 101 statin-naive patients with coronary artery disease who commenced a statin. PCSK9 subtypes at baseline and 1 month after statin use were measured by ELISA. Hyporesponse to statins was defined as a percent reduction in LDL cholesterol <15%. The relationship between each PCSK9 subtype level and hyporesponse to statins was investigated. Statins significantly lowered LDL cholesterol level (percent reduction, 40%±21%), whereas 11% of study participants exhibited a hyporeseponse to statins. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that baseline mature PCSK9 level was an independent predictor for hyporesponse to statins even after adjusting clinical characteristics (mature PCSK9 per 10-ng/mL increase: odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24 [ P =0.03]), whereas furin-cleaved level was not (per 10-ng/mL increase: OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.73-2.58 [ P =0.33]). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified mature PCSK9 level of 228 ng/mL as an optimal cutoff to predict hyporesponse to statins (area under the curve, 0.73 [sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.56]). Conclusions Baseline mature PCSK9 level >228 ng/mL is associated with hyporesponse to statins. This finding suggests that mature PCSK9 might be a potential determinant of hyporesponse to statins.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and consequent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality across Europe. Much of these diseases burden is modifiable, in particular by lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Current guidelines are based on the sound premise that with respect to low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "lower is better for longer", and the recent data have strongly emphasized the need of also "the earlier the better". In addition to statins, which have been available for several decades, the availability of ezetimibe and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) are additional very effective approach to LLT, especially for those at very high and extremely high cardiovascular risk. LLT is initiated as a response to an individual's calculated risk of future ASCVD and is intensified over time in order to meet treatment goals. However, in real-life clinical practice goals are not met in a substantial proportion of patients. This Position Paper complements existing guidelines on the management of lipids in patients following ACS. Bearing in mind the very high risk of further events in ACS, we propose practical solutions focusing on immediate combination therapy in strict clinical scenarios, to improve access and adherence to LLT in these patients. We also define an 'Extremely High Risk' group of individuals following ACS, completing the attempt made in the recent European guidelines, and suggest mechanisms to urgently address lipid-medicated cardiovascular risk in these patients., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This article discusses the pharmacology of bempedoic acid, the trials that led to United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of its use, and the overall safety and efficacy of this therapy in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and hyperlipidemia., Methods: A database search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for articles published between January 2012 to September 2020 and containing the key words bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, Nexletol and Nexlizet. Trials from the CLEAR series were selected, as they played a pivotal role in the establishment of FDA approval, along with additional trials published after FDA approval, which provided novel evidence on the use of bempedoic acid in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Publications that were not randomized, controlled trials were not included in this review. Only randomized controlled trials in which ezetimibe was used in conjunction with bempedoic acid were included in this review as they were relevant to the new FDA approval of bempedoic acid., Findings: The findings of the present review show that bempedoic acid is both an effective and well-tolerated option for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia when used without ezetimibe in addition to standard therapy. It also appears that the combination with ezetimibe increases the cholesterol-lowering effect more than either agent alone when added to standard therapy., Implications: Hypercholesteremia continues to be a major contributing factor leading to ASCVD. Bempedoic acid is an additional treatment option, along with both statins and diet and exercise, for reducing cholesterol levels and ASCVD events. With the new FDA approval, bempedoic acid may offer an effective therapy for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events due to established ASCVD or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

A functional lymphatic vasculature is essential for tissue fluid homeostasis, immunity, and lipid clearance. Although atherosclerosis has been linked to adventitial lymphangiogenesis, the functionality of aortic lymphatic vessels draining the diseased aorta has never been assessed and the role of lymphatic drainage in atherogenesis is not well understood. We develop a method to measure aortic lymphatic transport of macromolecules and show that it is impaired during atherosclerosis progression, whereas it is ameliorated during lesion regression induced by ezetimibe. Disruption of aortic lymph flow by lymphatic ligation promotes adventitial inflammation and development of atherosclerotic plaque in hypercholesterolemic mice and inhibits ezetimibe-induced atherosclerosis regression. Thus, progression of atherosclerotic plaques may result not only from increased entry of atherogenic factors into the arterial wall but also from reduced lymphatic clearance of these factors as a result of aortic lymph stasis. Our findings suggest that promoting lymphatic drainage might be effective for treating atherosclerosis., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).)

Background: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9-I) have been reported to cause a moderate increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in human studies. We thus evaluated the effect of two approved PCSK9-I on the concentration and lipid composition of HDL particle subclasses., Subjects and Methods: 95 patients (62.8 ± 10.3 years old, 58% men), with or without statin and/or ezetimibe treatment and eligible for PCSK9-I therapy, received either evolocumab (140 mg) or alirocumab (75 or 150 mg). Their HDL particle profiles were measured by NMR spectroscopy at baseline and after 4 weeks of PCSK9-I treatment., Results: PCSK9-I treatment increased the level of HDL-C by 7%. The level of medium-sized HDL particles (M-HDL-P) increased (+8%) while the level of XL-HDL-P decreased (-19%). The lipid core composition was altered in the smaller S- and M-HDL-P, with a reduction in triglycerides (TG) and an enrichment in cholesterol esters (CE), whereas the for the larger XL- and L-HDL-P the relative CE content decreased and the TG content increased. Ezetimibe therapy differentially impacted the HDL particle distribution, independently of statin use, with an increase in S-HDL-P in patients not receiving ezetimibe., Conclusions: As S- and M-HDL-P levels are inversely related to cardiovascular risk, PCSK9-I treatment may result in a more atheroprotective HDL particle profile, particularly in patients not concomitantly treated with ezetimibe., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To estimate the proportion of patients with a recent myocardial infarction (MI) who would be eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapy according to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, and to simulate the effects of expanded lipid-lowering therapy on attainment of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target as recommended by the guidelines., Methods and Results: Using the nationwide SWEDEHEART register, we included 25 466 patients who had attended a follow-up visit 6-10 weeks after an MI event, 2013-17. While most patients (86.6%) were receiving high-intensity statins, 82.9% of the patients would be eligible for expanded lipid-lowering therapy, as they had not attained the target of an LDL-C level of <1.4 mmol and a ≥50% LDL-C level reduction. When maximized use of high-intensity statins followed by add-on therapy with ezetimibe was simulated using a Monte Carlo model, the LDL-C target was reached in 19.9% using high-intensity statin monotherapy and in another 28.5% with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, while 50.7% would still be eligible for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. When use of alirocumab or evolocumab was simulated in those who were eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors, around 90% of all patients attained the LDL-C target., Conclusion: Our study suggests that, even with maximized use of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, around half of patients with MI would be eligible for treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Considering the current cost of PCSK9 inhibitors, the financial implications of the new guidelines may be substantial., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Statin therapy is the gold standard in the treatment of dyslipidemia. Understanding the mechanisms of action of these drugs provides an opportunity to define new therapeutic goals for pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic lesions. The present review indicates the existence of previously unknown therapeutic targets for statins, such as Krüppel-like Factor 2 (KLF-2), Cystathionine γ lyase (CSE) and the microRNA regulating eNOS activity and synthesis; nuclear PXR receptor and EB transcription factor regulating Inflammasome NLRP3 activity; the Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1), which inhibits the WNT signalling pathway; the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-γ) in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which regulates the cell cycle, and the ERK5-Nrf2 pathway, which reduces the level of harmful advanced glycation end-products (AGE) in VSMCs during diabetic vasculopathy. Importantly, our review includes a number of promising discoveries, specifically those related to the effects of miR-221, miR-222 and miR-27b on the structure, synthesis and activity of eNOS, such as microRNA-based therapies, which offer promise in future targeted therapies. In contrast to numerous experiments confirming the pleiotropic effect of statins, there is still insufficient evidence on the pleiotropic effect of ezetimibe, which goes beyond its basic inhibitory effect on intestinal cholesterol absorption. However, recent studies indicate that this effect is limited to inhibiting macrophage migration, decreasing VCAM-1 expression and reducing the levels of reactive oxygen species. Defining new therapeutic goals for pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic lesions and ensuring effective treatment of dyslipidemia and its associated cardiovascular complications requires a thorough understanding of both the mechanisms of action of these drugs and of atherosclerosis itself., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several clinical trials have investigated the effect of statin/ezetimibe combination therapy on secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the Asian population., Objective: This study aimed to summarize study results regarding the effect of statin/ezetimibe combination therapy on lipid parameters and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (HsCRP) biomarkers in ASCVD patients from Asian countries., Methods: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for relevant papers published from 2008 to June 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that (1) were conducted in ASCVD patients in Asian countries; (2) examined the effects of statin/ezetimibe combination therapies compared with a control group; and (3) reported sufficient data on lipid parameters and HsCRP biomarkers. The results were reported as weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test were used to assess publication bias., Results: Twenty-four RCTs were reviewed and 20 were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 4344 participants were included (n = 2197 in the intervention group and n = 2147 in the control group), and the intervention durations ranged from 6 weeks to 3.6 years. Ezetimibe coadministered with statin therapy, compared with control treatment, significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; n = 20 studies) [WMD  - 0.39 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.73 to - 0.05; p < 0.001], triglycerides (TG; n = 18 studies) [WMD - 0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.33 to - 0.13; p < 0.001], and total cholesterol (TC; n = 17 studies) [WMD - 0.31 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.45 to - 0.17; p < 0.001). Although the effect of statin/ezetimibe combinations on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; n = 17 studies) [WMD 0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.05 to 0.09; p < 0.001) was very minimal and no effect was observed on HsCRP levels (n = 11 studies)., Conclusions: Our study found that statin/ezetimibe combinations reduced LDL-C, TC, and TG levels but had minimal effects on HDL-C and no effect HsCRP biomarkers in ASCVD patients. The statin/ezetimibe therapy enabled a more effective reduction in LDL-C levels; however, the duration of the treatment was suboptimal.

Purpose of Review: Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is a key modifiable cause of ASCVD and lowering LDL-C with statins reduces the risk of ASCVD events in a wide range of populations, including those with CKD. This review considers the utility of recently developed nonstatin LDL-C-lowering therapies in CKD., Recent Findings: The cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, reduces LDL-C by 15-20% and is well tolerated in CKD. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) reduce LDL-C by 50-60% and reduce the risk of ASCVD events. However, these agents require self-administration by subcutaneous injection every 2-4 weeks. The PCSK9 synthesis inhibitor, inclisiran, is administered approximately 6 monthly and may be more suitable for widespread use, although outcome trials are awaited. These PCSK9 targeting therapies require no dose adjustment in CKD and have no drug interactions., Summary: Statins and ezetimibe are safe and reduce ASCVD risk in CKD populations. PCSK9 targeting agents may be useful in high-risk CKD patients, including those with prior ASCVD.

Purpose of Review: The causal association of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has been demonstrated in robust experimental, epidemiological, genetic, and interventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The goal of this review is to show how the knowledge acquired from statin RCTs influenced and was recommended on guidelines for prevention of ASCVD during the last three decades., Recent Findings: Guideline recommendations have evolved with accruing information derived mostly from statin RCTs, and as decades passed, more intensive LDL-C lowering was recommended according to a given ASCVD risk. Recent guidelines are unanimous in recommending intensive LDL-C lowering for the highest-risk individuals; however, they differ regarding risk stratification tools, use of specific LDL-C targets, management of primary prevention individuals, and thresholds to start non-statin lipid-lowering therapies. Even considering the advent of non-statin therapies like ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors, due to their efficacy, safety, and low cost, guidelines state that statins persist as the main component of ASCVD preventive strategies and should be prescribed in adequate doses to attain evidence-based LDL-C lowering.

Purpose of Review: Statins represent the cornerstone for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, although muscle-related side effects and dysregulation of glucose metabolism have strongly limited their adherence and compliance especially in primary prevention therapy. The purpose of the present review is to provide the most recent evidence of the efficacy and safety of statins in monotherapy or combination with new lipid-lowering drugs., Recent Findings: Recent "life-long" analysis conducted on young familial hypercholesterolemia patients, elderly hypocholesterolemic subjects, and from a 20-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial (RCT) have been published confirming that the cardiovascular benefits of statin therapy, in patients for whom it is recommended by current guidelines, greatly outweigh the risks of side effects. In addition, recent therapies to be used in combination with statins have shown to increase the percentage of patients at goal for low-density lipoprotein - cholesterol (LDL-C) with a good safety profile. The cardiovascular (CV) benefits of monoclonal antibodies anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and ezetimibe, in patients under statin therapy, have been proven by specific RCT, while we are still waiting for the results of bempedoic acid and the small-interfering RNA (si-RNA) anti-PCSK9 inclisiran. Taken together, the approval of new pharmacological agents to be used in combination with statins represents the future for a tailored therapy of cardiovascular disease patients.

In the last 50 years, several clinical and epidemiological studies during have shown that increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) are associated with the development and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. The discovery of β-Hydroxy β-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), that possess LDLc-lowering effects, lead to a true revolution in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Statins remain the cornerstone of LDLc-lowering therapy. Lipid-lowering drugs, such as ezetimibe and bile acid sequestrants, are prescribed either in combination with statins or in monotherapy (in the setting of statin intolerance or contraindications to statins). Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitors and protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are other drug classes which have been investigated for their potential to decrease LDLc. PCSK9 have been approved for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. The present narrative review discusses the latest (2019) guidelines of the European Atherosclerosis Society/European Society of Cardiology for the management of dyslipidemia, focusing on LDLc-lowering drugs that are either already available on the market or under development. We also consider "whom, when and how" do we treat in terms of LDLc reduction in the daily clinical practice.

Lifestyle factors remain the bedrock of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention. Statins remain the first-line therapy for primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD. Physicians are encouraged to discuss the risks and benefits of statins with patients before beginning therapy. Nonstatins and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors are recommended for secondary prevention in patients with clinical ASCVD. For patients at intermediate risk of ASCVD, new risk-enhancing factors, including chronic inflammatory conditions and ethnicity, should be considered to better risk stratify these patients., (Copyright © 2020 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.)

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Most guidelines recommend treating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to ≤70 mg/dL (1.8 mM) for patients with T2D and established atherosclerotic CV disease, and some a more aggressive target of ≤55 mg/dL (1.4 mM). Our objective was to assess the degree to which these LDL-C targets are achieved in routine practice., Methods: Using data from TECOS, an international pragmatic CV outcomes trial of sitagliptin vs placebo, we assessed lipid-lowering treatment among patients with T2D and CV disease, baseline lipid values, and the association between baseline LDL-C and 5-year risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE; ie, CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke)., Results: Overall, 11,066 of 14,671 TECOS participants (75.4%) had LDL-C measured at baseline. Median age was 65 years, 72% were male, and median T2D duration was 10 years. Overall, 82.5% of patients were on statins; only 5.8% were on ezetimibe. At baseline, 14.3% had LDL-C ≤55 mg/dL, 18.4% between 55.1 and 70 mg/dL, 35% between 70.1 and 100 mg/dL, and 32.3% >100 mg/dL. Each 10 mg/dL higher LDL-C value was associated with a higher risk of MACE (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07) or CV death (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09)., Conclusions: Although most high-risk patients with T2D and CV disease were on lipid-lowering therapy, only 1:3 had LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 1:6 had LDL-C <55 mg/dL. Each 10 mg/dL higher LDL-C value was associated with a 5% and 6% higher 5-year incidence of MACE and CV death, respectively. (TECOS, NCT00790205)., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)