Search

Background Atezolizumab (anti–programmed death-ligand 1) was approved in the USA, Europe, and elsewhere for treatment-naive and platinum-treated locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Objective To report efficacy and safety from an atezolizumab expanded access study. Design, setting, and participants This single-arm, open-label study enrolled 218 patients at 36 US sites. Key eligibility criteria included progression during/following ≥1 platinum-based chemotherapy for mUC or in perioperative setting (progression within 12 mo) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–2. Intervention Patients received atezolizumab1200 mg intravenously every 3 wk until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, decision to discontinue, death, atezolizumab commercial availability, or study closure. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Key end points reported herein included Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 objective response rate and duration, disease control rate (DCR; response or stable disease), and safety. Results and limitations All patients received prior systemic therapy (68% mUC; 27% adjuvant; and 26% neoadjuvant). At baseline, 57% of 214 treated patients had ECOG PS ≥1, 19% had hemoglobin <10 g/dl, and 25% had liver metastases. Median treatment duration was 9 wk (interquartile range [IQR], 6–12 wk). Median follow-up duration was 2.3 mo (IQR, 1.6–3.4 mo) overall and 2.7 mo (IQR, 2.0–3.5 mo) in patients not known to have died. Seventeen of 114 evaluable patients (15%) had objective responses (16 ongoing at study termination). DCR was 49%. Treatment-related adverse events (mostly fatigue) occurred in 98 of 214 treated patients. Conclusions The benefit/risk profile of atezolizumab was consistent with that observed in previous studies, despite pretreatment and poor prognostic factors. These results suggest a potential role for atezolizumab in a broader patient range than typically eligible for phase 1–3 studies. Patient summary In this expanded access study, atezolizumab was active and tolerable in a range of patients with platinum-treated metastatic urothelial carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Integrated multi-omics evaluation of 823 tumors from advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients identifies molecular subsets associated with differential clinical outcomes to angiogenesis blockade alone or with a checkpoint inhibitor. Unsupervised transcriptomic analysis reveals seven molecular subsets with distinct angiogenesis, immune, cell-cycle, metabolism, and stromal programs. While sunitinib and atezolizumab + bevacizumab are effective in subsets with high angiogenesis, atezolizumab + bevacizumab improves clinical benefit in tumors with high T-effector and/or cell-cycle transcription. Somatic mutations in PBRM1 and KDM5C associate with high angiogenesis and AMPK/fatty acid oxidation gene expression, while CDKN2A/B and TP53 alterations associate with increased cell-cycle and anabolic metabolism. Sarcomatoid tumors exhibit lower prevalence of PBRM1 mutations and angiogenesis markers, frequent CDKN2A/B alterations, and increased PD-L1 expression. These findings can be applied to molecularly stratify patients, explain improved outcomes of sarcomatoid tumors to checkpoint blockade versus antiangiogenics alone, and develop personalized therapies in RCC and other indications. • Genomics of 823 RCC tumors, including 134 sarcomatoid tumors, reveals 7 subtypes • Subtype specific angiogenesis, immune, metabolic, stromal, and cell-cycle profiles • Differential prevalence of PBRM1 , KDM5C , CDKN2A/2B , and TP53 alterations in subsets • Differential outcomes to VEGF blockade alone or in combination with anti-PD-L1 Motzer et al. perform integrative multi-omics analyses of 823 renal cancer tumors from a randomized clinical trial. A robust molecular classification scheme, based on transcriptional and gene alteration profiles and differential clinical outcomes to VEGF blockade alone or in combination with anti-PD-L1, informs personalized treatment strategies and future therapeutic development in RCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]