Search

It was observed early on in the Chandra X-ray Observatory mission that the background rates of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) were highly variable on both short and long timescales. We present analysis of lightcurves of the high energy (> 15 keV) ACIS background spanning most of the mission lifetime. These high energy events are not produced by astrophysical X-rays, but by the particle background, primarily energetic protons. Temporal characteristics of both the quiescent background and background flares will be discussed as well as correlations with Chandra's orbital position and the solar activity cycle. The strength and frequency of background flares appear cyclic with a quasi-annual period, most likely from the motion of Chandra's orbit through the geomagnetic environment., 7 pages, 5 figures. To appear in ``The High Energy Universe at Sharp Focus'' (St. Paul, Minnesota 2001), eds Schlegel and Vrtilek (ASP Conference Series)

The Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO) was launched on July 23, 1999 and reached its final orbit on August 7, 1999. The CXO is in a highly elliptical orbit, approximately 140,000 km x 10,000 km, and has a period of approximately 63.5 hours (~ 2.65 days). It transits the Earth's Van Allen belts once per orbit during which no science observations can be performed due to the high radiation environment. The Chandra X-ray Observatory Center (CXC) currently uses the National Space Science Data Center's ``near Earth'' AP-8/AE-8 radiation belt model to predict the start and end times of passage through the radiation belts. However, our scheduling software uses only a simple dipole model of the Earth's magnetic field. The resulting B, L magnetic coordinates, do not always give sufficiently accurate predictions of the start and end times of transit of the Van Allen belts. We show this by comparing to the data from Chandra's on-board radiation monitor, the EPHIN (Electron, Proton, Helium Instrument particle detector) instrument. We present evidence that demonstrates this mis-timing of the outer electron radiation belt as well as data that also demonstrate the significant variablity of one radiation belt transit to the next as experienced by the CXO. We also present an explanation for why the dipole implementation of the AP-8/AE-8 model is not ideally suited for the CXO. Lastly, we provide a brief discussion of our on-going efforts to identify a model that accounts for radiation belt variability, geometry, and one that can be used for observation scheduling purposes., 12 pgs, 6 figs, for SPIE 4012 (Paper 76)