Search

Objective: To compare postoperative astigmatism induced by two different suturing techniques in penetrating keratoplasty (PKP)., Design: A monocenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial with a longitudinal 1-year follow-up., Participants: A total of 95 eyes undergoing PKP were randomized into 2 groups. Of these, 51 eyes were allocated to the combined interrupted and continuous suturing group (ICS) and 44 eyes to the single continuous adjustable suturing (SCAS) group., Intervention: In the ICS group, suturing was with a combination of 12 interrupted 10-0 nylon and 1 continuous 11-0 nylon sutures. Eyes in the SCAS group had been sutured with a single running 24-bite 10-0 nylon. Selective suture removal started no earlier than 10 weeks after surgery; suture adjustment could start as soon as possible after surgery., Main Outcome Measures: Astigmatism was measured by topography, keratometry, and refraction at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month postoperative intervals., Results: The difference in mean time of suture manipulation between groups was significant (P = 0.0001), with the SCAS starting earlier. A significant decrease in astigmatism occurred by either interrupted suture removal (6.69 +/- 3.11 diopter [D] before to 4.76 +/- 2.99 D after, P = 0.0002) or suture adjustment (7.18 +/- 3.12 D before to 4.46 +/- 3.24 D after, P = 0.0001). However, the net astigmatic reduction in the SCAS group was not significantly greater (P = 0.250) than in the ICS group. Vector change was 7.40 +/- 4.17 D and 6.28 +/- 4.14 D for SCAS and ICS, respectively (P = 0.13). At no interval (3, 6, 9, or 12 months) was there significant difference in astigmatism between the two groups. Refractive astigmatism (cyl, D) at 1 year was 2.66 +/- 1.70 for the ICS and 3.12 +/- 2.62 for the SCAS, but there was no significant treatment effect (P = 0.945). Furthermore, 66% of the ICS eyes and 58% of the SCAS eyes (P = 0.295) were within the astigmatic target of the study (<3.5 D)., Conclusions: Postkeratoplasty astigmatism can be decreased similarly with either adjustment of a single running suture or selective removal of interrupted sutures. No advantage of the SCAS over ICS in terms of fewer manipulations or less astigmatism was seen as suggested previously.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of computerized videokeratography (CVK) in refining the surgical design and in improving predictability of surgical correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism., Design: A prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical trial., Participants: A total of 31 postkeratoplasty eyes, divided into 2 groups (group A, 16 eyes; group B, 15 eyes), with more than 4 diopters (D) of disabling astigmatism were studied., Intervention: All eyes were treated with a combination of arcuate relaxing incisions and compression sutures. The surgical plan in group A was based on topographic information, whereas in the control group B, the surgical plan was based on information obtained by refraction and keratometry alone., Main Outcome Measures: Change in the surgical plan induced by the CVK information, astigmatism, topographic patterns, and factors associated with outcome were measured., Results: In all 16 cases of group A, the use of CVK changed some aspect of the surgical plan. At 12 months after surgery, both groups showed a significant net reduction (P = 0.001) of baseline astigmatism. However, the reduction (47% and 41 % for groups A and B, respectively) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The topographic astigmatism at 12 months measured 4.24 +/- 0.71 D in group A and 5.60 +/- 0.51 D in group B (P = 0.139). Significant differences between the two groups at 12 months were seen only for keratometric astigmatism (3.60 +/- 0.81 D in group A vs. 5.77 +/- 0.52 D in group B, P = 0.035) and refractive astigmatism (2.34 +/- 0.37 D in group A vs. 4.88 +/- 0.52 D in group B, P = 0.000). The mean vector surgical effect was 91 % for group A and 70% for group B. Regular astigmatism patterns had a greater benefit from surgery than irregular patterns (P = 0.008). Previous refractive surgery was associated with less-favorable outcome (P = 0.045)., Conclusions: The current study indicates that the use of CVK provides a benefit compared to keratometry and refraction alone in the planning and outcome of surgical treatment for high postgraft astigmatism.