Search

Background: The number of elderly patients with asthma has been increasing in Japan. Treatment for these patients should be provided based on the condition of individual patients. This study was performed to clarify the relationship between inhalation procedure and sex difference in elderly patients with asthma., Methods: The inhalation procedure was examined in 155 elderly patients with asthma (male: n=66, average age ± standard deviation: 75.5±5.65 years old; female: n=89, average age ± standard deviation: 78.7±6.87 years old) during a medical examination., Results: For the three items that were common to all devices, the percentages of the 155 patients who could/could not perform the actions were examined by separate Fisher's exact tests for males and females. A statistically significant difference (P=0.007) was observed for "breath holding", and more females than males were not able to hold their breath. Although no significant difference was seen in the "accurate number of times of inhalation", females tended to not be able to inhale accurately compared to males (P=0.072)., Conclusion: Our results suggest that elderly female patients with asthma have less understanding of inhaled steroid therapy, compared to elderly male patients. Therefore, it is particularly important to confirm that the correct inhalation procedure is used by elderly female patients with asthma.

Background and Objective: Suplatast tosilate is a Th2 cytokine inhibitor that is effective for controlling persistent asthma. However, the long-term efficacy of suplatast is unknown. We compared the clinical efficacy of long-term monotherapy with suplatast tosilate with a low dose of inhaled steroids in patients with mild atopic asthma., Methods: A total of 32 patients with mild atopic asthma were randomly assigned to receive suplatast (n=15) or fluticasone (n=17). In the suplatast group, 100 mg of suplatast was given orally 3 times a day (total daily dose = 300 mg) for 2 years. In the fluticasone group, 100 pg of fluticasone was inhaled twice a day (total daily dose = 200 tg) for 2 years., Results: In the suplatast group, the improvements in peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the changes in the symptom diary scale and frequency of beta2 stimulant inhalation were generally similar to those in the fluticasone group, and efficacy was maintained for 2 years. Improvements in inflammatory indices, such as the sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) level and exhaled nitric oxide concentration, were comparable in the suplatast and fluticasone groups. The improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness was also similar in the 2 groups. The peripheral blood eosinophil percent change, serum ECP level, and total IgE antibody titer improved only in the suplatast group., Conclusions: Long-term treatment with suplatast significantly improved symptoms and inflammatory indices in patients with mild atopic asthma. Along with fluticasone, suplatast is considered a useful drug for the management of mild atopic asthma.

A comparative study was conducted in elderly subjects with mild bronchial asthma to investigate the clinical usefulness of monotherapy with a leukotriene receptor antagonist in comparison to an inhaled corticosteroid. A total of 41 elderly patients aged 65 years or older with mild bronchial asthma, classified as being in severity step 1 and 2, were randomly assigned to the following two treatment groups: a pranlukast (CAS 103177-37-3, Onon) treatment group of 21 patients and an inhaled corticosteroid treatment group of 20 patients. Patients of the former group received pranlukast 450 mg daily and those of the latter group received fluticasone (CAS 90566-53-3) 200 microg daily for eight weeks. In the reference group, one patient was found to suffer from oral candidiasis 4 weeks after the start of the study. Therefore the evaluation was conducted on the remaining 19 participants. The evaluation parameters examined were obtained by keeping an asthma diary, determinations of PEF (peek expiratory flow), use frequency of beta2 stimulants, changes in symptom scores, and medication compliance. Further, measured before and after therapy were the ratio of peripheral blood eosinophils counts, serum ECP (eosinophils cationic protein), ECP levels induced sputum, and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0). As a result, in the time-course changes of symptoms scores and morning PEF, swift improvement was noted in the pranlukast group. Further, in the variables such as use frequency of beta2 stimulants, serum ECP levels, ECP levels induced sputum, and FEV1.0, an almost comparable level of improvement to the fluticasone group was demonstrated. From the above results, it was deemed that in elderly patients with mild bronchial asthma classified as steps 1 and 2, the pranlukast monotherapy, with superior medication compliance to inhaled therapy, would produce an equivalent level of clinical efficacy to the monotherapy with inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone 200 microg daily).

In this randomized crossover study, 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent bronchial asthma were assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) for 8 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period, then hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) for 8 weeks. After a further 2-week washout, they were again administered fluticasone DPI for 8 weeks. Patients in group 2 were assigned HFA-BDP followed by fluticasone PII and finally HFA-BDP over the same time periods. In both groups, no significant difference was observed in use of beta2-agonists and symptom score between the treatment periods; however, markers of pulmonary function were significantly higher when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. Significant increases of morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (p < 0.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1.0) (p < 0.01), V50 (p < 0.05), and V25 (p < 0.01) were observed at 18 weeks in group 1, whereas there were significant decreases of V50 (p < 0.05) at 18 weeks in group 2. No significant difference was noted in circulating eosinophil count and serum ECP between the 2 treatments; however, ECP in induced sputum and nitric oxide in expired gas were significantly lower (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively) when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. HFA-BDP might be delivered to small airways more effectively than fluticasone DPI.

The efficacy of sparfloxacin (SPFX) for the control of bronchial asthma was evaluated in 26 patients with suspected Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Patients were randomly allocated to receive SPFX 200 mg/day (n = 14) or control treatment (n = 12) for 21 days. Significant improvements in serum C-reactive protein levels, and significant decreases in peripheral eosinophil counts, serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and sputum ECP were observed in the SPFX-treated group at day 21. SPFX-treated patients also had a significantly reduced frequency of asthma symptoms, reduced inhalant beta2-stimulant use, and significant increases in morning peak expiratory flow. At the end of the study, C. pneumoniae was undetectable in two SPFX-treated patients who underwent polymerase chain reaction testing, but one control patient who was tested still had detectable levels of C. pneumoniae. These results suggest that SPFX could be used to control bronchial asthma in patients with suspected persistent C. pneumoniae infection.

Eighty-one adult patients with bronchial asthma who suffered asthmatic episodes in spite of treatment with 400 mg/day of BDP were placed on pranlukast therapy for 4 weeks. Group I, which showed a 5% or greater increase in PEFR, continued oral pranlukast medication for an additional two years. Those patients who did not show an increase of 5% or greater in PEFR after 4 weeks of pranlukast therapy were instructed to continue the medication for another year. Group II, which exhibited a 5% or greater increase in PEFR after a one-year period continued medication for one more year. Medication was suspended for Group III, which failed to show improvement in PEFR after one year, and the group was placed under observation for the following year. Group I improved significantly in PEFR and exhibited a reduction in the frequency of b2 inhalation, the number of night visits to a medical facility, the amount of steroids inhaled, and the quantity of oral steroids given at regular intervals; and the Group I peripheral eosinophil count, serum ECP level, and FEV1.0 ameliorated. After one year, Group II also showed significant improvement in PEFR and a reduction in both the peripheral eosinophil count and the serum ECP level. This group's PEFR continued to improve after two years. One year after medication was suspended, Group III showed a significant increase in the number of night visits to a medical facility and a rise in the serum ECP level. These findings indicated the efficacy of pranlukast.

Bronchial asthma induced by contact with hamsters and other small rodents is receiving higher attention from the medical profession not only because of the problem of laboratory animal allergies (LAA), but also because of increasing household allergens for asthma, since keeping these pets has become more common in Japanese homes. The present report describes our studies on the backgrounds of nine patients with asthma who kept Dzungarian Dwarf hamsters as household pets. The following features were recognized among patients with bronchial asthma induced by contact with hamsters: 1) earlier onset of symptoms than for keeping other household pets, at an average of 14.7 months or within 12 months in 78% of the cases following the start of pet keeping; 2) adults ranging from their late 30s to 40s who have children of primary school age; 3) dwelling in apartments; 4) relatively high level of serum IgE and ECP; 5) positive for both immediate and late type asthmatic responses on an inhaling induction test; and 6) rapid remission after the cessation of pet keeping.

Background: Chronic continuous airway inflammation caused by eosinophils has been noted to play critical roles in the pathophysiology of bronchial asthma, in addition to reversible obstruction and hypersensitivity of the respiratory tract. Therefore, suppression of chronic airway inflammation has become more important in asthma treatment. Although theophylline has been a conventionally used bronchodilator, it has been recently reported to have concurrent anti-inflammatory effects., Objective: Accordingly, we studied the effects of a slow-release theophylline preparation, Theolong, on airway inflammation., Methods: Administration of Theolong 400 mg/day to 24 patients with mild or moderate asthma and measuring eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), a marker of airway inflammation, and eosinophils in sputum and peripheral blood at 4 and 8 weeks., Results: As a result, sputum ECP, serum ECP and sputum eosinophil count (%) were significantly lowered after 4 and 8 weeks., Conclusion: Thus, in the theophylline-administered group, slow-release theophylline, Theolong, was effective in treating asthma, with anti-inflammatory effects on inflammatory cells besides its bronchodilator action.

Pranlukast hydrate (CAS 103177-37-3, ONO-1078) was administered to 20 patients with bronchial asthma, and examined the effects of this agent on serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels and peripheral blood eosinophil counts. The mean serum ECP level in the group comprised of patients with bronchial asthma was significantly higher than that in the control group comprised of healthy adults. In responders in whom improvement in asthmatic symptoms was observed, serum ECP levels were significantly decreased compared to the pretreatment values 4 weeks after commencement of pranlukast hydrate administration. However, there were no changes in non-responders. There was no correlation between serum ECP level and peripheral blood eosinophil count before administration of pranlukast hydrate. However, there was a correlation 4 weeks after administration was started. It is suggested that pranlukast hydrate inhibits eosinophilic activity in patients with bronchial asthma.

We often see severe asthma attacks occur in patients taking high doses of theophylline and disappear soon after intravenous injection of aminophylline. Theophylline concentration in the serum was investigated in those cases. Twenty five asthmatic patients, 14 males and 11 females, 16-17 years of age, visited our out-patient clinic 41 times in total over a period of 9 months suffering from dyspneic attacks of such severity that they had difficulty in speaking and walking although they had taken at least 200 mg theophylline within 6 hours and 400 mg within 12 hours. All cases were treated with iv infusion of 2.8-14 ml of 2.5% aminophylline for 5-15 minutes until the dyspneic symptoms disappeared. Theophylline levels in the serum (micrograms/ml) before the treatment were 2.0 in 1 case, 6.0-9.8 in 8, 10-20 in 23, and over 20 in 9 cases. Levels after the treatment were 5.8 in 1 case, 10-20 in 15, and over 20 in 25 cases. In one patient, a 27-year-old female, 300-400 mg of theophylline, aminophylline, or choline theophyllinate tablets could increase theophylline concentration in the serum only 4.8 micrograms/ml or less, while her theophylline clearance was normal. The present study revealed that there are asthmatic patients requiring unusually high doses of theophylline, partly because some of them have problems in absorption of theophylline, and partly because many of them need higher levels of blood theophylline than those usually thought of as standard therapeutic concentrations.

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of ebastine on serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in patients with bronchial asthma. Patients: Twenty patients with bronchial asthma (11 patients with atopic disease and nine with non-atopic disease) were enrolled in the study. Methods: In an open-label design, all patients received ebastine 10 mg/day for 4 weeks and serum ECP levels, peripheral blood eosinophil counts, morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and thresholds for airway hyper-responsiveness (Din asthgraphy) were determined before and after treatment. Results: Serum ECP levels and peripheral blood eosinophil counts were significantly decreased. By disease type, no significant change was found in the non-atopic patients, while the serum ECP level was significantly (p < 0.001) decreased in the atopic patients. Furthermore, no significant change in D was found, but PEFR was significantly (p < 0.019) increased in the atopic type. Conclusion: Ebastine not only inhibits type I allergic reactions, but may also inhibit airway inflammation by reducing serum ECP levels, particularly in patients with atopic bronchial asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]