Search

Objectives: The study aimed at prospectively evaluating the evolution of asthma control in Italy, to evaluate the reasons for lack of asthma control, perceived quality of life (QoL) and association with level of asthma control, the impact of pharmacological treatment, the number of exacerbations and the healthcare resource consumption., Methods: PRISMA (PRospectIve Study on asthMA control) was an observational study performed in asthmatic patients including a cross-sectional phase and a 12-month prospective phase. Asthma control was assessed with the Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) and QoL was evaluated with EuroQoL-5D questionnaire filled in and collected during 5 clinic visits together with all the other data., Results: The prospective phase included 1017 patients with uncontrolled (55.7%) or partly controlled asthma (44.3%). Out of the 739 patients evaluable after 12 months, 22.2% achieved full asthma control (ACT score = 25) and 58.7% reached a good control (ACT score: 20-24). The improvement in asthma control was associated with improved QoL and reduced hospital visits. The main reasons for lack of asthma control were comorbidities, continued exposure to irritants/triggers and poor adherence to therapy. The frequency of exacerbations was lower in patients with controlled asthma.A fixed combination therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting β2 agonist was reported by 77.0% of patients. A better asthma control and improved QoL were achieved with extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol compared to either budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol., Conclusions: An improvement in asthma control and QoL can be achieved during a 1-year monitoring in a real life setting. Extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol was associated with significant benefit in terms of asthma control and QoL compared to large-particles combinations.ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01110460.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of partly controlled and uncontrolled asthmatic patients, to evaluate quality of life and healthcare resource consumption., Methods: Cross-sectional phase followed by a 12-month prospective phase. Asthma Control Test and the EQ-5D were used., Results: 2853 adult patients recruited in 56 Hospital Respiratory Units in Italy were evaluated: 64.4% had controlled asthma, 15.8% partly controlled asthma and 19.8% were uncontrolled. The mean (SD) EQ-5D score was 0.86 (0.17) in controlled, 0.75 (0.20) in partly controlled and 0.69 (0.23) in uncontrolled patients (p<0.001 between groups). The number of patients requiring hospitalization or emergency room visits was lower in controlled (1.8% and 1.6%, respectively) than in partly controlled (5.1% and 11.5%) and uncontrolled (6.4% and 18.6%). A combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-2 agonist was the reported therapy by 56.0% of patients, with the rate of controlled asthma and improved quality of life being higher in patients on extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol compared to budesonide/formoterol (p<0.05) and fluticasone/salmeterol (p<0.05 for quality of life)., Conclusions: Asthma control is achieved in a good proportion of Italian patients. Differences may be detected in a real-life setting in favor of extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol combination., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody approved in 2005 by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma, which remains inadequately controlled despite optimal therapy with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β₂-adrenergic agonists. Within this context, the present observational study refers to 16 patients currently treated with omalizumab at the Respiratory Unit of "Magna Græcia" University Hospital located in Catanzaro, Italy, whose anti- IgE therapy was started in the period included between March 2007 and February 2010, thus lasting at least 10 months. After 40 weeks of add-on treatment with omalizumab, very relevant decreases were detected, in comparison with pre-treatment mean (± standard deviation) values, in monthly exacerbation numbers (from 1.1 ± 0.6 to 0.2 ± 0.4; p < 0.01) and oral corticosteroid consumption (from 22.6 ± 5.0 to 1.2 ± 2.9 mg/day of prednisone; p < 0.01). These changes were associated with stable improvements in lung function, expressed as increases of both FEV1 (from 53.6 ± 14.6% to 77.0 ± 14.9% of predicted values; p < 0.01) and FEV1/FVC ratio (from 56.3 ± 9.5% to 65.8 ± 9.2%; p < 0.01). Moreover, in 5 patients who persistently had increased numbers of eosinophils (mean ± SD: 15.9 ± 8.0% of total WBC count; absolute number: 1,588.0 ± 956.9/μl) despite a long-lasting therapy with inhaled and systemic corticosteroids, the peripheral counts of these cells decreased down to near normal levels (mean ± SD: 6.3 ± 2.3% of total WBC count; absolute number: 462.0 ± 262.3/μl) after 16 weeks of treatment with omalizumab. Therefore, this descriptive evaluation confirms the efficacy of add-on omalizumab therapy in selected patients with exacerbation-prone, chronic allergic uncontrolled asthma, requiring a continuous intake of oral corticosteroids.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway infiltration with eosinophils and T lymphocytes are key features of asthma. In particular, CD4+ T cells are currently believed to play a pivotal role as initiators and coordinators of the asthmatic inflammatory response and, therefore, they represent a crucial target of corticosteroid treatment. The aim of the present investigation is thus to evaluate, in patients with mild asthma, the effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy on the following parameters: (i) functional state of CD4+ T cells; (ii) airway eosinophilia; (iii) bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. The study was completed by twenty asthmatic, atopic subjects, subdivided into two groups of ten and treated for 12 weeks with either inhaled budesonide (200 microg twice daily) or terbutaline alone (500 microg twice daily), respectively. Expression of CD4+ T cell activation markers was measured in induced sputum at baseline and after 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment by flow cytometry, which showed a down-regulation of HLA-DR and CD25 surface proteins in the budesonide group, compared with the control group; these differences resulted as being statistically significant through weeks 4-12. Budesonide also induced a quick, sharp reduction in the percentage of eosinophils detectable in induced sputum, as well as a more gradual progressive improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Therefore, in addition to assessing various indices of bronchial inflammation, flow cytometry can be reliably applied to induced sputum in order to monitor, even in mildly symptomatic patients, the effects of anti-asthma treatments on T cell activation.

Although corticosteroids have been used for a long time as a very effective therapy of airway inflammatory diseases such as asthma, only recently the molecular basis of their mechanism of action has begun to be elucidated. These hormones exert their biological and pharmacological actions by binding to cytoplasmic receptors that, upon activation, translocate to the nucleus where they interact with specific genomic sequences thus modulating gene expression. However, many glucocorticoid effects responsible for their anti-inflammatory and anti-asthmatic activity take place irrespectively of receptor binding to DNA. In particular, ligand-bound glucocorticoid receptors can repress several different pro-inflammatory genes by physically associating, via protein-protein interactions, with various transcription factors and with the macromolecular complexes implicated in regulation of chromatin structure and function. In this regard, an important role is played by the influences of corticosteroids on the intrinsic histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase functions of coactivators and corepressors, respectively. Furthermore, the signal transduction pathways mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinases are newly recognized, key targets of glucocorticoids. Indeed, these enzymatic cascades are crucially involved in the regulation of gene expression in that they are essential for the activity of a high number of transcription factors. Therefore, the recent advances made in such a rapidly growing research field are providing new insights into the mode of action of corticosteroids, thereby also unveiling novel promising therapeutic strategies directly targeted to the molecular events underlying the inflammatory, immune, and apoptotic processes implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma and other airway diseases.

Airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells express various types of potassium (K+) channels which play a key role in determining the resting membrane potential, a relative electrical stability and the responsiveness to both contractile and relaxant agents. In addition, K+ channels are also involved in modulation of neurotransmitter release from airway nerves. The most important K+ channels identified in airways include large and small Ca2+-activated, delayed-rectifier, and ATP-sensitive channels. These K+ channels are structurally and functionally different, thus playing distinct roles in airway electrophysiology and pharmacology. Many in vitro and in vivo studies, performed in both animals and humans, have shown that K+ channel openers are able to induce hyperpolarization of ASM cells, bronchodilation, suppression of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and inhibition of neural reflexes. Therefore, airway K+ channels represent a suitable pharmacological target for the development of new effective therapeutic options in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Short-acting beta(2)-agonists are currently recommended for symptom relief in asthma and the treatment of mild, acute exacerbations in COPD. However, formoterol has as fast an onset of action as salbutamol with the additional benefit of longer-lasting bronchodilation (approximately 12 h). Furthermore, systemic side effects observed with formoterol are of a similar duration but less pronounced than with short-acting beta(2)-agonists. In this double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, 20 adult patients with reversible chronic airway obstruction (intrinsic asthma or COPD) inhaled single doses of formoterol 9 microg or salbutamol 100 microg (group A) or formoterol 18 microg or salbutamol 200 microg (group B). FEV(1) was measured prior to and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min following inhalation of study drug. No significant differences in FEV(1) values were observed between group A (P=0.704) or group B (P=0.270) at baseline, or at 5 (Group A: P=0.340; Group B: P=0.559) and 15 min (Group A: P=0.526; Group B: P=0.818) post dose. No adverse events were reported during the study. Formoterol Turbuhaler has as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol pMDI when given at the recommended doses., (Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of inhaled heparin on bronchoconstriction induced by ultrasonically nebulised distilled water (UNDW) in allergic asthmatics., Methods: Eight atopic asthmatics, hyperresponsive to UNDW, were selected for this randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover double-blind study. On two consecutive days, these subjects underwent a UNDW challenge 45 min after inhaling aerosolised heparin (1000 U/kg) or placebo., Results: Neither heparin nor placebo had a significant effect on base-line forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), but heparin significantly attenuated UNDW-induced bronchoconstriction, as shown by its efficacy in preventing the decreases in FEV1 produced by all doses of water (in comparison with placebo: P < 0.05 after 2 ml water; P < 0.01 after 4, 8 and 16 ml water)., Conclusion: Inhaled heparin is able to exert a protective effect against the bronchoconstrictive response to UNDW in allergic asthmatics, and this action is likely due to inhibition of mast cell degranulation.

Allergic rhinitis can be associated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and carries an increased risk for the development of asthma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of specific immunotherapy (SIT) to reduce the progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma and prevent the associated increase in BHR. Forty-four subjects monosensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, with perennial rhinitis and BHR to methacholine, were randomly assigned to receive SIT or placebo in a double-blind study conducted over a period of 2 yr. After 1 yr of treatment, a 2.88-fold increase in the provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% decrease in FEV(1) (PD(20)FEV(1)) was recorded in the SIT-treated group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.98- to 2.09-fold; p < 0.001), with a further increase to fourfold at the end of Year 2 (95% CI: 2.9- to 5.7-fold; p < 0.001). At the end of the study, the methacholine PD(20)FEV(1) was within the normal range in 50% of treated subjects (p < 0.0001), and was significantly higher in this group than in the group receiving placebo (p < 0.0001). In contrast, no changes in methacholine PD(20)FEV(1) were found in the placebo group throughout the study. Although 9% of subjects given placebo developed asthma, none of those treated with SIT did. This study suggests that SIT, when administered to carefully selected, monosensitized patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, reduces airway responsiveness in subjects with rhinitis, and may be an appropriate prophylactic treatment for rhinitic patients with hyperreactive airways.

The recent advances in the knowledge of the basic mechanisms underlying asthmatic inflammation have significantly contributed to the delineation of new therapeutic perspectives for asthma. There are currently three main approaches to the development of novel antiasthma treatments: 1) improvement in existing classes of drugs 2) identification of new compounds able to interfere with the complex network of proinflammatory mediators, cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules involved in the pathogenesis of asthma 3) utilization of new forms of immunotherapy aimed at blocking the unbalanced Th2 response which characterizes the pathophysiology of asthma. Such a remarkable expansion in available therapeutic options will probably allow us, over the next decade, to treat asthma by more selectively targeting the pathogenetic events responsible for this widespread airway disease.

Since it is now recognized that asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways, the powerful antiasthmatic effects of corticosteroids are believed to be largely dependent on their broad anti-inflammatory activity. These drugs are the most effective asthma treatment currently available but, although they have been used for a long time, only recently the molecular mechanisms underlying their pharmacological actions are becoming clear. Corticosteroids bind to intracellular receptors which, upon ligand-dependent activation, interact with specific genomic DNA sequences thus leading to an increase or a decrease in the transcription rate of several target genes. Modulation of gene transcription by glucocorticoids underlies complex interactions involving their receptors, genomic DNA, nuclear chromatin, and other transcription factors. Furthermore, steroid hormones can also modulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. The anti-inflammatory and antiasthmatic effects of corticosteroids are mediated by down- or up-regulation of specific target genes. Down-regulation of gene expression leads to a reduced synthesis of several cytokines and adhesion molecules. Up-regulation results in increased production of lipocortins and beta 2-adrenergic receptors. A small minority of asthmatic patients do not respond to corticosteroids, and the mechanism underlying this steroid resistance is still under investigation.

Cloning and characterization of the gene encoding the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2-AR) have opened new insights into the structure, function and regulation of beta 2-AR. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing and site-directed mutagenesis have made it possible to localize the receptor regions, which are essential for beta 2-AR phosphorylation, sequestration, and downregulation. Furthermore, identification of specific regulatory sites within the nucleotide sequence of the beta 2-AR gene is contributing to a better understanding of the control of beta 2-AR gene transcription. All these mechanisms are involved in homologous and heterologous regulation of beta 2-AR, which accounts for the modulation of beta 2-AR synthesis and responsiveness mediated by catecholamines, steroid hormones, inflammatory mediators and other agents. Homologous and heterologous regulation of beta 2-AR, along with modulation of expression and turnover of the G proteins coupled to adenylyl cyclase, may play an important role in the pathogenesis, evolution, and management of bronchial asthma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate by cytofluorimetry, the phenotype and the activation of alveolar macrophages (CD14; CD33; CD44; CD54; CD23; HLA-DR) and, by radioimmunoassay, the "in vivo and in vitro" macrophage secretory pattern (IL-1 alpha; IL-1 beta; IL6; IL8; PGE2; PGD-1 alpha; TXB2; LTB4) in atopic patients with mild asthma in intercritical phase and with bronchial hyperreactivity (PD20 FEV1 = 377 +/- 262.8 micrograms). In asthmatic patients we have demonstrated that the number of cells recovered in BALF expressing the phenotypic features (CD14; CD33; HLA-DR; CD23; CD44; CD54) was larger than in control subjects. By analysing the culture medium of unstimulated and LPS-stimulated alveolar macrophages from asthmatic and normals we have demonstrated a greater production of IL-1 beta (p = 0.005) and IL-8 (p = 0.005) in the first group than in one second, as confirmed by a Wilcoxon test. Concerning the secretory pattern in BALF of asthmatic patients we obtained similar results, showing a significant IL-1 beta (p = 0.005) and IL-8 (p = 0.002) increase suggesting a persistent cellular activation. On the contrary we could not show any significant increase of IL-1 alpha (p = 0.31) and IL-6 (p = 0.22). The cellular activation was confirmed by increased levels of different chemical mediators such as TXB2 (p = 0.005); LTB4 (p = 0.004); PGE2 (p = 0.007); PGF-1 alpha (p = 0.008) which were recovered from BALF of asthmatic patients compared to normal subjects. In conclusion alveolar macrophages play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma because of the presence of cytokines and mediators in BALF and in the supernatant of alveolar macrophage cultures.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of non-bronchoconstrictive doses of propranolol on airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Methods: Double increasing concentrations (from 0.03 to 64 µg/ml) of inhaled propranolol were administered to a study population which included ten patients with mild asthma, ten rhinitics, and ten healthy control subjects. After the baseline bronchial responses to propranolol and methacholine, expressed as the cumulative provocative dose producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PD20FEV1), were assessed, methacholine challenge was repeated after pretreatment with non-bronchoconstrictive doses of propranolol. Results: The pharmacologically induced β-blockade did not cause any effect in normal individuals, but it worsened airway responsiveness to methacholine in all asthmatics (geometric mean PD20 FEV1: 257 and 87 µg, respectively) and some rhinitics (geometric mean PD20 FEV1: 724 and 446 µg, respectively). Conclusion: Asthmatic patients were extremely sensitive to β-blockers, whereas we observed a variable response to propranolol within the group of rhinitic subjects. This variability in the latter group is possibly because these individuals had different degrees of airway inflammation, increased parasympathetic activity, and β-adrenoceptor dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]